The Great ERA of Sedition the accepted ICC criminal case includes the death penalty & 300+ trillion in civil penalties

#NationalSecurityViolations #InternationalNationalSecurityViolations #IntentionallyCreatedDomesticTerrorism #IntentionallyCreatedNarcoTerrorism                                                                                        International Criminal Court Oude Waalsdorperweg 10, 2597 AK The Hague, The Netherlands Post Office Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int

Willard Max “name it” Imamoto Relator/Witness/Pro Se                                                                   1070 Kinau Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96814                                                        willardimamoto@gmail.com

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
THE HAGUE NETHERLANDS

The International Criminal Court CR No. _______________________________

Vs.

The States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Community Empowerment Resources, Dr. Benjamin Young, Aliman Sears, Cindy Lee, Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, NARPA (National Association For Rights Protection and Advocacy), NAMI (National Alliance On Mental Illness) The Church of Scientology And its Human Rights Organization The CCHR (citizen commission on human rights and it’s 100’s of offices throughout the world), SAMSHA, WHO (world health organization), Mind Freedom International And David Oaks, PsychRights and James Gottstein esq, Monica Suematsu esq, John Nishimoto esq, Stanley Chow esq, Bruce Voss esq, Alexa Zen esq, Ira Burnim, John E. B. Jones, Paul Alston esq, Kenneth Robbins esq, John-Anderson Meyer esq, John Molay esq, Dudley Akama esq, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Guangzhou pharmaceutical Co Limited, Beijing Yunbang Biosciences Co. Limited, India has 10 Companies INDO GULF Company, Swapnroop Drugs & Pharmaceuticals (produces 5 different antipsychotics), SALIUS PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED, Prans Life Science, OPTIMUS PHARMA PVT LTD, alchem international, Turkey AKTurk and All Its Conduits With the American Psychology Psychiatric Association, Dr. Peter Breggin, University of Pittsburgh and the Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Statistics, McLean Hospital Belmont MA, Dr. Glenn T. Konopaske, Dr. Karl-Anton Dorph-Peterson, Dr. Joseph N. Pierri, Dr. Qiang Wu, Dr. Allan R. Sampson, Dr. David A. Lewis, Dr. Robert A. Sweet, Harvard Medical School and the Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Wei Zhang, the University of Iowa and Neuroscience, Dr. Nancy C. Andreasen, Dr.Zoric, Dr.Kim, Dr. Rad, Dr. Tsuang, and University of UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior Judges Rhonda Nishimura and Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald, Judge Paula A. Nakayama, Judge Simeon R. Acoba Jr., Judge Sabrina S. McKenna, and Judge Derrick H.M.Chan,, Judge Bert I. Ayabe, Judge Kenneth K. Sakamoto, Chief Judge Craig Nakamura, Judges in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Leavy and Judge McKeown, Judge David Alan Ezra, Judge Kevin S. Chang, Judge Alan C. Kay, Judge Richard L. Puglisi, Office of Disciplinary Counsel Mark Bradbury, and Janet Hunt, Commission on Judicial Conduct and Gerald Sekiya and, the United States of America, Germany, Italy, France, Belgium, Netherland’s, Columbia, Japan, China, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Ukraine, Spain, Britain, the United Nations Turkey, India, Pakistan, and Ban Ki Moon. Food and Drug Administration, Hawaii State Hospital, Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutler, Dr. Julie Trihn, Jamie Roman, April Luria Esq., Kahi Mohala Hospital, Naomi Morgan, Helping Hands Of Hawaii, Jan Harada (Director of Helping Hands Of Hawaii), Dr. Alan Buffenstein, Dr. Kenneth Luke, Dr. Loretta J. Fuddy (Director Of Health), Dr. Lynn Fallin (Deputy Director Of Behavior Health). Wayne Morin Jr., James Raymond, Executive Director of Napa Valley TV, Craig Newmark CEO of Craigslist, and Senators Diane Feinstein, Harry Reid, Patty Murray, Jeb Hensarling. Patrick Leahy, Daniel Inouye, Colleen Hanabusa, Mazie Hirono, Ed Case, Charles Djou, Brian Schatz, EPA, FCC, the Attorney General’s Office in Washington D.C. Obama, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Cruz, Kasick, Bernie Sanders, FOX News, Barbara Walters, Megyn Kelly, Krauthammer, O’Reilly, Deepak Chopra, Anant ???, Ian Bremmer, Amnesty International, Article 19, Breakthrough (human rights), Carter Center, Center for Economic and Social Rights, Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian law, Committee of Concerned Scientists, Committee to Protect Journalists, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, Cultural Survival, Disabled Peoples’ International, Enough Project, Equality Now, Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, Every Human Has Rights, Freedom from Torture, Freedom House, Front Line Defenders, Society for Threatened Peoples, GIRCA, Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, Global Rights, Habitat International Coalition, Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, Helsinki Watch, Hindu American Foundation, Hindu Human Rights, Human Life International, Human Rights Internet, Human Rights First, Human Rights Foundation, Human Rights Internet, Human Rights Watch, Human Rights Without Frontiers, Institute for War and Peace Reporting, International Alliance of Women, International Center for Transitional Justice, International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, International Centre for Human Rights Research, International Disability Alliance, International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, International Committee of the Red Cross (private, sovereign organization), International Federation for Human Rights, International Foundation for Human Rights and Tolerance, International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (federation of 15 other human rights organizations not included in this list; now bankrupt due to fraud), International Humanist and Ethical Union, International Human Rights Commission-IHRC, http://www.ihrchq.org, International Institute of Human Rights, International League for Human Rights, International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR), International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims, International Service for Human Rights, International Society for Human Rights, Islamic Human Rights Commission, JUSTICE, Mind Freedom International, Minority Rights Group International, National Labor Committee in Support of Human and Worker Rights, International Organization of Human Rights IOHR (OIDO), No Peace Without Justice, Peace Brigades International, Physicians for Human Rights, Point of Peace Foundation, Peace University, Protection International, Reporters Without Borders, Redress Trust, Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, Society for Threatened Peoples, Survival International, Tahirih Justice Center, The Advocacy Project, The Sentinel Project for Genocide Prevention, Transparency International, UN Watch, World Council of Churches, World Organization Against Torture, Witness (human rights group), Womankind Worldwide, Women’s Learning Partnership for Rights, Development, and Peace, World Future Council, World Organization Against Torture, Youth for Human Rights International, Regional non-governmental organizations, Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (Arab world), Arab Commission for Human Rights (Arab world), Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (Asia), Asian Human Rights Commission (Asia), Asian Centre for Human Rights (Asia), Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (Commonwealth nations), Ecumenical Center for Human Rights (Americas), Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (Euro-Mediterranean region), European Roma Rights Centre (Europe), Federal Union of European Nationalities (Europe), Helsinki Citizens Assembly (Europe), Human Rights Foundation (Americas), Human Rights Trust of Southern Africa (Southern Africa), International Association of Independent Journalists Inc. (Canada, England & elsewhere), Journalists for Human Rights (Africa), Kurdish Human Rights Project (Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Iran & elsewhere), UNESCO): SAMSHA, Active Minds, Amen Clinics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, American Association for the Abolition of Involuntary Mental Hospitalization, American Association of Community Psychiatrists, American Board of Professional Psychology, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, American College Counseling Association, American College of Psychiatrists, American Counseling Association, American Group Psychotherapy Association, American Mental Health Foundation, American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry, American Psychiatric Association, Association of LGBTQ Psychiatrists, Association of Medical Superintendents of American Institutions for the Insane, Aurora Mental Health Center, Berkeley Free Clinic, Biofeedback Certification International Alliance, Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, Center for the Prevention of Suicide, Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis, Cole Resource Center, Compeer, CONREP, Consumer Action Network, Copeland Center for Wellness and Recovery, CrisisLink, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (Greater Houston), Fountain House (self-help program), Freedom Center (mental health organization), Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, Independence Center (St. Louis), International OCD Foundation, International Society for Bipolar Disorders, International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, Jennifer Mudd Houghtaling Postpartum Depression Foundation, Justice Resource Institute, Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Mental Health Association of Portland, Mental Health Association of San Francisco, Mental Research Institute, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, National Alliance on Mental Illness and the Stanley Foundation, National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, National Child Traumatic Stress Network, National Empowerment Center, National Institute of Mental Health, National Mental Health Anti-Stigma Campaign, National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, Naval Center for Combat and Operational Stress Control, New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, New Jersey Association for Infant Mental Health, North American Society of Adlerian Psychology, Palladia (social services organization), Recovery International, Samaritan Institute, Sensory Processing Disorder Foundation, Service Program for Older People, Suicide Prevention Action Network USA, Aristides Hatzis Associate Professor of Law & Economics and Legal Theory at the University of Athens, Genocide scholars, educators, and activists Aleksandar Veljic, Claudia Moscovici, Summer Programmes Office University of Amsterdam Graduate School of Social Sciences, Beverley Chalmers, Anthonie Holslag Teacher at University of Amsterdam, Goran Basic Postdoctoral Researcher in Sociology, Department of Sociology, Lund University, and the other 679 members and Doctors, Re: Newly Unlocked UN Archive Confirms Horrors First Exposed in “Genocide Revealed” genocide revealed.com• A UN archive sealed for 70 years confirms Holocaust atrocities first exposed in detail in Aleksandar Veljic’s “Genocide Re: from Willard Max Imamoto What’s with the Holocaust in this age in time?
The Holocaust is History and I have presented to you a “new form” of Genocide that has already exceeded the Holocaust (10X) and all World Wars and the War on Terrorism. Ladies and Gentlemen I have received No input or response in your discussion topics from such Notable as yourselves. Only the Great Genocide Scholar Gregory Stanton had some balls as to approach Genocide in a slightly different way. It seems Genocide Scholars are stuck with the same routine with Genocide and war and/or Malfeasant Dictators and if you review my blogs (which you already did) you will see that 99.9% of what your basing your narrow minded affixation(s) upon are now known as Smoke Screens to the Bigger picture of what is happening here in the United States of America and abroad where there is a huge Intentional Eradication Extermination process by our Health and Mental Health system and the Court(s) both State & Federal & has reached both Supreme Courts that’s being Shrouded, Cloaked, and Avoided by the USA, and the United Nations (in which I already set up Ban Ki Moon & Zapaday about 3-4 years ago and documented), and now by Genocide Scholars. Hey anyway you’ve just been set up, because this now goes ballistic publically, and this just a small sample as to the Governmental Agencies and NGO’s that I contact dealing in economy, cultural and social, activists that could have about 5 more pages of Defendants…so when I say to the ICC when the 2500 Governmental and/or NGO’s have NO SAY in this Instant Criminal Case.

Defendant’s.

Certificate of Service

International Criminal Court and President Mr. Sediki Kaba Oude Waalsdorperweg 10, 2597 AK The Hague, The Netherlands Post Office Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int

Relator Willard Max Imamoto upon the penalty of perjury of law has sent Mr. Sediki Kaba the complete Hard Copy Complaint with Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I via United States Postal Service certified return mail with receipt that is published as a Public Document via social media.

COMPLAINT

Now comes Relator Willard Max Imamoto with causes of Actions and Inactions in accordance with Articles of the Rome Statutes via references as cited in this Complaint, and cited in the United Nations Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 18, 19, 26, 27, 28, and 29, and with the International Criminal Court’s Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and introducing the Crime of Aggression in purple, and cited in National Security law and International Security law violation are in blue, and cited in red are Federal Codes as applied to the United States of America cited in 31 U.S.C §§ 3729 et seq., of the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §3729(b), 31 U.S.C.3730, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), 31 U.S.C. §3730 (e), 28 U.S.C §1331, and 31 U.S.C. §3732, 31 U.S.C. §3732(a), 42 U.S.C. §1396b(i)(10), 1396r-8(k)(2), (3), 31 U.S.C. 729(a)(1)&(2, Title 16 to 28 U.S.C, and §3730(d), and cited in violations of Actions and Inactions to the Intentionally Created “domestic terrorism” and “international domestic terrorism and in accordance with 18 U.S.C. VIOLATIONS: CHAPTER 5 – ARSON (§ 81) CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293) CHAPTER 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 to 373) CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 31 – EMBEZZLEMENT AND THEFT (§§ 641 to 670) CHAPTER 37 – ESPIONAGE AND CENSORSHIP (§§ 791 to 799) CHAPTER 40 – IMPORTATION, MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTION AND STORAGE OF EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS (§§ 841 to 848) CHAPTER 41 – EXTORTION AND THREATS (§§ 871 to 880) CHAPTER 44 – FIREARMS (§§ 921 to 931) CHAPTER 45 – FOREIGN RELATIONS (§§ 951 to 970) CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 55 – KIDNAPPING (§§ 1201 to 1204) CHAPTER 63 – MAIL FRAUD AND OTHER FRAUD OFFENSES (§§ 1341 to 1351) CHAPTER 65 – MALICIOUS MISCHIEF (§§ 1361 to 1369) CHAPTER 67 – MILITARY AND NAVY (§§ 1381 to 1389) CHAPTER 68 – REPEALED] (§ 1401..) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 87 – PRISONS (§§ 1791 to 1793) CHAPTER 88 – PRIVACY (§ 1801) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 90A – PROTECTION OF UNBORN CHILDREN (§ 1841) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960) CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968) CHAPTER 97 – RAILROAD CARRIERS AND MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ON LAND, ON WATER, OR THROUGH THE AIR (§§ 1991 to 1993) CHAPTER 102 – RIOTS (§§ 2101 to 2102) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 109A – SEXUAL ABUSE (§§ 2241 to 2248) CHAPTER 110A – DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND STALKING (§§ 2261 to 2266) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM Domestic, National and International (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391) CHAPTER 118 – WAR CRIMES (§§ 2441 to 2442) CHAPTER 119 – WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (§§ 2510 to 2522) CHAPTER 121 – STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS ACCESS (§§ 2701 to 2712), and cited in Constitutional Amendments violations 1st, 5th, 8th, 14th and 11th respectively and equal protections of the law, equal protection clause, due process, substantive and procedural due process, stigmata plus (stigma with a constitutional deprivation 1st Amendment), product liability for the Intentional use/misuse, product defective design, and Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intentional Failures to Inform or Warn, Conspiracy, the RICO Act, Plagiarism, assault and battery ie., trespass to a person, and Off Label Usage, 1st Murder, 2nd Murder

(Para 1) The legal question of Product Liability and “tangible personal property” (defined as owner of BODY) that qualifies the Antipsychotic Pharmaceutical Companies and all its Conduits for murder in the 1st degree and 2nd degree, and for Civil Rights and Constitutional violations.

(Para 2) These claims in product liability (product defect and design) has also created an extension to an unjustified psychiatric commitment in outpatient care and in long term treatment goals/plans, and is medical malpractice/gross negligence, Res ipsa loquitur, actual malice and constitutes CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119), assault and battery, and cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with

(Para 3) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293) CHAPTER 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 to 373) CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), and

(Para 4) CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), and
(Para 5) CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391) and civil and constitutional rights violations, and punitive damage claims assault and battery Murder in the 1st, and Murder in the 2nd.

(Para 6) In most states, the manufacturer and all the “conduits” by which the defective product reaches the victim may be held liable on contract theory for breach of implied warranty of fitness for intended use. Warranties are statements by a manufacturer or seller concerning a product during a commercial transaction. Warranty claims commonly require privity between the injured party and the manufacturer or seller; in plain English, this means they must be dealing with each other directly.

Under the RICO Act for Criminal Charges is where this collaborative effort(s) begins and is cited in Conspiracy charges as well.
(Para 7) Under the RICO Act Title 18 U.S.C. the progression of all Defendants constitutes a Grand Scale Conspiracy with Defendants operation of management of the enterprise, and the pattern. Then the relatedness, and then continuity, and then multiple schemes and the pattern, and then racketeering activity, and then the issue of consent,

(Para 8) and then extortion under Color of Official Right, and then extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Governmental Power(s) that are Defendants ranging from the State Court(s), Federal Supreme Court(s), Legislature, Senators, Presidential administration(s) and candidates, Private Companies,

(Para 9) and then other predicate acts related to extortion, and then extraterritorial acts of racketeering, and then Civil Remedies under section 1964 from proximate cause to intervening factors to non-predicate acts to independent contributing factors to directly injured third-party victims to injury to business or property to equitable relief to securities fraud,

(Para 10) and then section 1962 (a) and (b) claims association–in-fact enterprise under section 1962(a) and (b), and then injury “ by reason of” a section 1962 (a) violation, and then injury “by reason of” section (b) violation, and then Conspiracies to violate RICO-section 1962(d), and the RICO statute of limitations, and then limitation period, and then accrual of a Civil RICO claim, and then early conflicting accrual Rules,

(Para 11) and the Supreme Courts (are Defendants with Criminal charges against them thereby eliminating their immunity) effort to resolve the conflict, and then tolling doctrines, and then new and independent injuries.

Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1963 – Criminal penalties (Para 12) § 1963. Criminal penalties
(a) Whoever violates any provision of section 1962 of this chapter shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years (or for life if the violation is based on a racketeering activity for which the maximum penalty includes life imprisonment), or both, and shall forfeit to the United States, irrespective of any provision of State law—

(Para 13) (1) any interest the person has acquired or maintained in violation of section 1962; (2) any— (A) interest in; (B) security of; (C) claim against; or (D) property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over; any enterprise which the person has established, operated, controlled, conducted,

(Para 14) or participated in the conduct of, in violation of section 1962; and (3) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds which the person obtained, directly or indirectly, from racketeering activity or unlawful debt collection in violation of section 1962.

(Para 15) The court, in imposing sentence on such person shall order, in addition to any other sentence imposed pursuant to this section, that the person forfeit to the United States all property described in this subsection. In lieu of a fine otherwise authorized by this section, a defendant who derives profits or other proceeds from an offense may be fined not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.

(Para 16) (b) Property subject to criminal forfeiture under this section includes— (1) real property, including things growing on, affixed to, and found in land; and (2) tangible and intangible personal property, including rights, privileges, interests, claims, and securities.

(Para 17) (c) All right, title, and interest in property described in subsection (a) vests in the United States upon the commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture under this section. Any such property that is subsequently transferred to a person other than the defendant may be the subject of a special verdict of forfeiture

(Para 18) and thereafter shall be ordered forfeited to the United States, unless the transferee establishes in a hearing pursuant to subsection (l) that he is a bona fide purchaser for value of such property who at the time of purchase was reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section.

(Para 19) (d) (1) Upon application of the United States, the court may enter a restraining order or injunction, require the execution of a satisfactory performance bond, or take any other action to preserve the availability of property described in subsection (a) for forfeiture under this section—

(Para 20) (A) upon the filing of an indictment or information charging a violation of section 1962 of this chapter and alleging that the property with respect to which the order is sought would, in the event of conviction, be subject to forfeiture under this section; or (B) prior to the filing of such an indictment or information, if, after notice to persons appearing to have an interest in the property and opportunity for a hearing, the court determines that—

(Para 21) (i) there is a substantial probability that the United States will prevail on the issue of forfeiture and that failure to enter the order will result in the property being destroyed, removed from the jurisdiction of the court, or otherwise made unavailable for forfeiture; and

(Para 22) (ii) the need to preserve the availability of the property through the entry of the requested order outweighs the hardship on any party against whom the order is to be entered:
Provided, however, That an order entered pursuant to subparagraph

(Para 23) (B) shall be effective for not more than ninety days, unless extended by the court for good cause shown or unless an indictment or information described in subparagraph (A) has been filed.
(2) A temporary restraining order under this subsection may be entered upon application of the United States without notice or opportunity for a hearing when an information or indictment has not yet been filed with respect to the property,

(Para 24) if the United States demonstrates that there is probable cause to believe that the property with respect to which the order is sought would, in the event of conviction, be subject to forfeiture under this section and that provision of notice will jeopardize the availability of the property for forfeiture.

(Para 25) Such a temporary order shall expire not more than fourteen days after the date on which it is entered, unless extended for good cause shown or unless the party against whom it is entered consents to an extension for a longer period. A hearing requested concerning an order entered under this paragraph shall be held at the earliest possible time, and prior to the expiration of the temporary order.

(Para 26) (3) The court may receive and consider, at a hearing held pursuant to this subsection, evidence and information that would be inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
(e) Upon conviction of a person under this section, the court shall enter a judgment of forfeiture of the property to the United States and shall also authorize the Attorney General to seize all property ordered forfeited upon such terms and conditions as the court shall deem proper.

(Para 27) Following the entry of an order declaring the property forfeited, the court may, upon application of the United States, enter such appropriate restraining orders or injunctions, require the execution of satisfactory performance bonds, appoint receivers, conservators, appraisers, accountants, or trustees, or take any other action to protect the interest of the United States in the property ordered forfeited.

(Para 28) Any income accruing to, or derived from, an enterprise or an interest in an enterprise which has been ordered forfeited under this section may be used to offset ordinary and necessary expenses to the enterprise which are required by law, or which are necessary to protect the interests of the United States or third parties.

(Para 29) (f) Following the seizure of property ordered forfeited under this section, the Attorney General shall direct the disposition of the property by sale or any other commercially feasible means, making due provision for the rights of any innocent persons.

(Para 30) Any property right or interest not exercisable by, or transferable for value to, the United States shall expire and shall not revert to the defendant, nor shall the defendant or any person acting in concert with or on behalf of the defendant be eligible to purchase forfeited property at any sale held by the United States.

(Para 31) Upon application of a person, other than the defendant or a person acting in concert with or on behalf of the defendant, the court may restrain or stay the sale or disposition of the property pending the conclusion of any appeal of the criminal case giving rise to the forfeiture, if the applicant demonstrates that proceeding with the sale or disposition of the property will result in irreparable injury, harm or loss to him.

(Para 32) Notwithstanding 31 U.S.C. 3302(b), the proceeds of any sale or other disposition of property forfeited under this section and any moneys forfeited shall be used to pay all proper expenses for the forfeiture and the sale, including expenses of seizure,

(Para 33) maintenance and custody of the property pending its disposition, advertising and court costs. The Attorney General shall deposit in the Treasury any amounts of such proceeds or moneys remaining after the payment of such expenses.

(Para 34) (g) With respect to property ordered forfeited under this section, the Attorney General is authorized to— (1) grant petitions for mitigation or remission of forfeiture, restore forfeited property to victims of a violation of this chapter, or take any other action to protect the rights of innocent persons which is in the interest of justice and which is not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter;

(Para 35) (2) compromise claims arising under this section;
(3) award compensation to persons providing information resulting in a forfeiture under this section; (4) direct the disposition by the United States of all property ordered forfeited under this section by public sale or any other commercially feasible means, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons; and

(Para 36) (5) take appropriate measures necessary to safeguard and maintain property ordered forfeited under this section pending its disposition.
(h) The Attorney General may promulgate regulations with respect to—
(1) making reasonable efforts to provide notice to persons who may have an interest in property ordered forfeited under this section;
(2) granting petitions for remission or mitigation of forfeiture;

(Para 37) (3) the restitution of property to victims of an offense petitioning for remission or mitigation of forfeiture under this chapter;
(4) the disposition by the United States of forfeited property by public sale or other commercially feasible means;
(5) the maintenance and safekeeping of any property forfeited under this section pending its disposition; and

(Para 38) (6) the compromise of claims arising under this chapter.
Pending the promulgation of such regulations, all provisions of law relating to the disposition of property, or the proceeds from the sale thereof, or the remission or mitigation of forfeitures for violation of the customs laws, and the compromise of claims and the award of compensation to informers in respect of such forfeitures shall apply to forfeitures incurred,

(Para 39) or alleged to have been incurred, under the provisions of this section, insofar as applicable and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof. Such duties as are imposed upon the Customs Service or any person with respect to the disposition of property under the customs law shall be performed under this chapter by the Attorney General.

(Para 40) (i) Except as provided in subsection (l), no party claiming an interest in property subject to forfeiture under this section may— (1) intervene in a trial or appeal of a criminal case involving the forfeiture of such property under this section; or

(Para 41) (2) commence an action at law or equity against the United States concerning the validity of his alleged interest in the property subsequent to the filing of an indictment or information alleging that the property is subject to forfeiture under this section.

(Para 42) (j) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to enter orders as provided in this section without regard to the location of any property which may be subject to forfeiture under this section or which has been ordered forfeited under this section.

(Para 43) (k) In order to facilitate the identification or location of property declared forfeited and to facilitate the disposition of petitions for remission or mitigation of forfeiture, after the entry of an order declaring property forfeited to the United States the court may, upon application of the United States, order that the testimony of any witness relating to the property forfeited be taken by deposition

(Para 44) and that any designated book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material not privileged be produced at the same time and place, in the same manner as provided for the taking of depositions under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(Para 45) (l) (1) Following the entry of an order of forfeiture under this section, the United States shall publish notice of the order and of its intent to dispose of the property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct (THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN A DEFENDANT).

(Para 46) The Government may also, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have alleged an interest in the property that is the subject of the order of forfeiture as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified.

(Para 47) (2) Any person, other than the defendant, asserting a legal interest in property which has been ordered forfeited to the United States pursuant to this section may, within thirty days of the final publication of notice or his receipt of notice under paragraph (1), whichever is earlier, petition the court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of his alleged interest in the property. The hearing shall be held before the court alone, without a jury.

(Para 48) (3) The petition shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner’s right, title, or interest in the property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner’s acquisition of the right, title, or interest in the property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner’s claim, and the relief sought.

(Para 49) (4) The hearing on the petition shall, to the extent practicable and consistent with the interests of justice, be held within thirty days of the filing of the petition. The court may consolidate the hearing on the petition with a hearing on any other petition filed by a person other than the defendant under this subsection.

(Para 50) (5) At the hearing, the petitioner may testify and present evidence and witnesses on his own behalf, and cross-examine witnesses who appear at the hearing. The United States may present evidence and witnesses in rebuttal and in defense of its claim to the

(Para 51) property and cross-examine witnesses who appear at the hearing. In addition to testimony and evidence presented at the hearing, the court shall consider the relevant portions of the record of the criminal case which resulted in the order of forfeiture.

(Para 52) (6) If, after the hearing, the court determines that the petitioner has established by a preponderance of the evidence that— (A) the petitioner has a legal right, title, or interest in the property, and such right, title, or interest renders the order of forfeiture invalid in whole or in part because the right, title, or interest was vested in the petitioner rather than the defendant or was superior to any right,

(Para 53) title, or interest of the defendant at the time of the commission of the acts which gave rise to the forfeiture of the property under this section; or (B) the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser for value of the right, title, or interest in the property

(Para 54) and was at the time of purchase reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section; the court shall amend the order of forfeiture in accordance with its determination.

(Para 55) (7) Following the court’s disposition of all petitions filed under this subsection, or if no such petitions are filed following the expiration of the period provided in paragraph (2) for the filing of such petitions, the United States shall have clear title to property that is the subject of the order of forfeiture and may warrant good title to any subsequent purchaser or transferee.

(Para 56) (m) If any of the property described in subsection (a), as a result of any act or omission of the defendant— (1) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (2) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (3) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; (4) has been substantially diminished in value; or (5) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty;

Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1964 – Civil remedies

(Para 57) § 1964. Civil remedies (a) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of section 1962 of this chapter by issuing appropriate orders, including, but not limited to: ordering any person to divest himself of any interest, direct or indirect, in any enterprise;

(Para 58) imposing reasonable restrictions on the future activities or investments of any person, including, but not limited to, any person from engaging in the same type of endeavor as the enterprise engaged in, the activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or ordering dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons.

(Para 59) (b) The Attorney General may institute proceedings under this section. Pending final determination thereof, the court may at any time enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other actions, including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as it shall deem proper.

(Para 60) (c) Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, except that no person may rely upon any conduct that

(Para 61) would have been actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities to establish a violation of section 1962. The exception contained in the preceding sentence does not apply to an action against any person that is criminally convicted in connection with the fraud, in which case the statute of limitations shall start to run on the date on which the conviction becomes final.

(Para 62) (d) A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding brought by the United States under this chapter shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding brought by the United States.

(Para 63) Although Government entities cannot be Defendants from civil claims they are liable under Criminal activity Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business.

(Para 64) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725)
Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373)
Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
CONSPIRACY – 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

(Para 65) If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 66) To reflect the construction placed upon said section 88 by the courts the words “or any agency thereof” were inserted. (See Haas v. Henkel, 1909, 30 S. Ct. 249, 216 U. S. 462, 54 L. Ed. 569, 17 Ann. Cas. 1112, where court said:

(Para 67) “The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful functions of any department of government.” Also, see United States v. Walter, 1923, 44 S. Ct. 10, 263 U. S. 15, 68 L. Ed. 137, and definitions of department and agency in section 6 of this title.)

(Para 67) The punishment provision is completely rewritten to increase the penalty from 2 years to 5 years. Since consolidation was highly desirable and because of the strong objections of prosecutors to the general application of the punishment provision of said section 294, the revised section represents the best compromise that could be devised between sharply conflicting views.

(Para 68) A number of special conspiracy provisions, relating to specific offenses, which were contained in various sections incorporated in this title, were omitted because adequately covered by this section.

Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725) Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373)
Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence
CONSPIRACY – 18 U.S.C. § 373 (2012)

(Para 69) a) §373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States,

(Para 70) and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited,

(Para 71) or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years.

(Para 72) (b) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal intent, the defendant prevented the commission of the crime solicited.

(Para 73) A renunciation is not “voluntary and complete” if it is motivated in whole or in part by a decision to postpone the commission of the crime until another time or to substitute another victim or another but similar objective. If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.

(Para 74) (c) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime because he lacked the state of mind required for its commission, because he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution.

(Para 75) Breach of warranty-based product liability claims usually focus on one of three types: (1) breach of an express warranty, (2) breach of an implied warranty of merchant-ability, and (3) breach of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and I have meet the three criteria’s of this claim.

(Para 76) I am claiming Product Liability from all Defendants including pharmaceutical companies (example) Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., now of Johnson and Johnson, and Johnson and Johnson.

(Para 77) Under Product Liability Law of products in the form of “Tangible Personal Property” and when referencing this subject it refers to “Body” specifically as “Ownership of Body”, and is further supported by HRS (Hawaii Revised Statutes, and/or Revised Statutes with every other State),

(Para 78) and that the validity of property does depend on
Whether the “property right” requires enforcement by the state, and that Different forms of “property” require different amounts of enforcement, and the Pharmaceutical Companies “purported Product” (and the Only Product enforced in HRS) due to the insistence of its purported product by its conduits and ultimately in State Court citing’s

(Para 79) that influenced State Legislators into enacting a stringent amount of enforcement that has enable a “Special Relationship” that was Created or Assumed by the State and the Antipsychotic Pharmaceutical Companies who never Objected to this “Special Relationship” of Tangible Personal Property Rights of our Body and/or Ownership or Co-Ownership of our Body.

(Para 80) Product liability is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause.

(Para 81) Although the word “product” has broad connotations, product liability as an area of law is traditionally limited to products in the form of “Tangible Personal “Property” (review this reference material under Product Liability), and they also became or having joint OWNERSHIP OF OUR BODY,

(Para 82) and IS THREEFOLD and shared by the State and Pharmaceutical Company (example Defendants Janssen Pharmaceutical s Inc., now of Johnson and Johnson, and Johnson and Johnson) and the Federal Government in their mutual responsibility in ownership of our body,

(Para 83) by the enactment of law in Revised Statutes and Federal Codes in commanding us to the administration of their product (antipsychotic) in Involuntary Treatment Orders and in outpatient care from CR (conditional release terms), and are BIG ISSUES dealing with drugs.

(Para 84) As Stated in Law and in the form of tangible personal property in Product Liability is “Physical property” “Intangible asset” “Entity” “Ownership” “Person” or jointly by a group of people (namely the State Federal Government and Pharmaceutical Companies). Depending on the nature of the property (WHICH IS OUR BODY, as Defined in the 5th and 14th Amendments, and in the form of Tangible Personal Property in Product Liability and Revised Statutes), and,

(Para 85) the owner of said property has the right to SELL its Property (the Pharmaceutical Companies Purported Product) that heavily established the Legislative Enactment in Revised Statutes, or to destroy it, or to exclude others from doing these things (the State and Federal Government),

(Para 86) because the Pharmaceutical Companies Purported Product has enable the State and Federal Government and Consumers, as their Property, “Title (property)” “Right” (ownership) establishes the relation between the property and other persons (the State and its employees as well as the Federal Government)

(Para 87) who are now commanded by the Owners and Law through the States and Federal Government mutual agreement to be co-owners, and who are subjected to Civil Rights and Constitutional Torts, assuring the owner the right to dispose of the property it OWNS (its Product, and Our Body),

(Para 88) as the owner sees fit, and therefore the “Owners” should be subjected to the Law(s) it implemented, and is a Direct Link and prime example as to what it subjects its other property (the State and its employees, and Federal Government and employees, and US) to, and should not be privy as a private entity to its Direct link of Ownership.

(Para 89) Some philosophers assert that property rights arise from convention (norm) social convention.
Other’s find origins for them in “Morality” morality “Natural law” natural law.

(Para 90) The validity of property depends on whether the “property right” requires enforcement by the State and this is Obviously Black Letter Law in HRS or Revised Statutes as applies to the 5th and 14th Amendments.

(Para 91) Different forms of “property” require different amounts of enforcement.
I am not challenging the intent of Law or the Sociology of Law just the nature of the property (which is OUR BODY), as defined and in the form of “tangible personal property” in Product Liability law and Ownership of our Body as Property

(Para 92) and is supported by Revised Statutes as well as Federal Codes) and that the validity of property has been properly established, and that the “property right” did require enforcement by the State(s) and Federal Government that created this special relationship and having exclusive PROPERTY RIGHTS All To Themselves that has infringing and violated our Civil and Constitutional Rights.

(Para 93) The State created the validity of “property right” exclusively to Antipsychotic Pharmaceutical Companies that did require enforcement by the State in Hawaii Revised Statutes, and Federal Codes. The enforced owners (antipsychotic pharmaceutical companies) liability due to having the exclusive Totalitarian Control as Owners of the States and Federal Government cited in and attached as EXHIBIT B purports this and supports my stance.

(Para 94) and the many sub-contracted Expert Witnesses, Expert Witnesses in Employment, and the Director of the Dept. of Health and Deputy Director of Behavioral Health, and through the States enforcement of Necessitating the Need of a Legally Legitimate Product who’s exclusive ownership was derived through the older conventional neuroleptics that targeted only Dopamine D receptor sites

(Para 95) and the State and everyone else employed by the State was boasting of the significant improvement to the response and efficacy of the older conventional neuroleptics which was just predominately a major tranquilizer (and still is), and the older conventional neuroleptic that they were treating for drug psychosis’s way back then to more people than for a true schizophrenic (by what a 100 to 1 throughout the world)

(Para 96) wasn’t designed PERIOD for a Drug Psychosis’s (it’s impossible because it only targeted Dopamine (D) Receptor Sites), but was a wonder drug (can you believe that with its already established notoriety), and now comparing this to the new evidence that now targets the multiple symptom dimensions of a True Schizophrenic

(Para 97) such as Monoamines, Glutamate, GABA, Serotonin, and other 5-HT receptor sites (the mesolimbic or rewards pathways), but look what the intent of the enforced ownership and necessitating the need of Legally legitimizing a Product has created in Fallacy derived from Proof through the newer atypical agents (another experimental blinding).

(Para 98) Proving time and time again were human guinea pigs, and even in Fallacy with the creation of new evidence of the multiple symptom dimensions of a true schizophrenic and still not knowing the cause of the disease, but incorporating a wider range of receptor sites making each and every newer agent an Off Label Usage

(Para 99) Here’s what happened back in 1995 in CR No. 95-0990 State of Hawaii vs. Willard M. Imamoto Attached as Exhibit I as Did Hawaii’s Protection and Advocacy Center with Michael Rabinal attributed to below and I requested HRS dealing with Fitness and Unfit to proceed and they brought me the American Standard and didn’t help me with my Criminal case below. They too are Buffers.

(Para 100) A Prime time example of “everyone” who had a Drug Psychosis and was given the older Conventional Neuroleptics and the Efficacy and Response was Tremendous that’s how Full of Shit Psychiatry was back then, and how Full of Shit Centers for Mental Health Law and Advocates were.

(Para 101) ESPECIALLY with The New Evidence and the NEW AGENTS “ATYPICALS” and the Interaction between Monoamines, Glutamate, GABA, Serotonin, Serotonin-Dopamine’s and other 5-HT Receptors as a contributory factor to the Multi Symptom Dimensions of a True Schizophrenic/Bipolar,

(Para 102) and I am an excellent example of this (in CR. 950990) being three years as unfit to proceed and while at OCCC for two weeks in Module 4, which is the psychiatric Module where I was transferred to general population prior to being transferred to Hawaii State Hospital (now referred to as HSH), and every time I was transferred back from HSH to OCCC.

(Para 103) I was always placed in general population and classified as un-fit to proceed, anyway, because I was involuntarily treated at the State hospital, sent back to OCCC (jail) and refused to take my medication,

(Para 104) and I was offered supervised release (SR) in a year, but my aunty who accompanied my grandmother who was going to assume the responsibility of me in SR, opposed my grandmother, and I was denied SR, and then was sent back to the State hospital for involuntary treatment again, then sent back to OCCC, and refused medications again, and Judge Francis Q.F. Wong then wanted to have me forced medicated at OCCC,

(Para 105) but couldn’t because of my treating physician at OCCC who testified that I was not a threat to myself or others and that my psychosis was not distressful, and that I was fully aware of the basics in Courtroom procedures (because for three years Unfit –To- Proceed was the main issue of my involuntary treatment, and my insistence in challenging this), thereby aggravating and forced Judge Francis Q.F. Wong into making an erroneous decision that was above her head and beyond the ordinary norms/ standards towards involuntary treatment procedures,

(Para 106) and informed the prosecutor to “let’s make an example of him (me)”, and is in Court Record. So she informed the prosecutor (who probably got his small-rocks-off) to organize the Director of Health, the State Attorney General’s Office,

(Para 107) and my past treating physician at Hawaii State Hospital on the legalities of having me transferred permanently to Hawaii State Hospital where I’ll remain under treatment until the Donkey Court went through the motions of trial, after three and a half years of being “classified” as unfit to proceed, mentally ill, paranoid, delusional, and suffering from chronic paranoid schizophrenia,

(Para 108) Just to get the acquit and commit over with, and for my first offense “EVER” of terroristic threatening, and of not being able to control a situation that warranted the necessity of further treatment, but became an abomination/travesty of unjustified Courtroom flexing of power that did violate my civil and constitutional rights and the cannons of judicial conduct.

(Para 109) Which at that time did quiescent/stop me from challenging this through the frustration that I created, that outraged a Power Trip Judge to the point of extreme and outrageousness which she instructed the Prosecution to engage in governmental misconduct,

(Para 110) and ultimately became vindictive prosecution and not for the acquit and commit (which was a give-me). Like I said from day one classified as unfit to proceed and for three years shifting back and forth from OCCC to Hawaii State Hospital (HSH) and refusing medication I was always deemed unfit to proceed by HSH and the Court,

(Para 111) and in the first two times that I was transferred back to HSH while waiting for the Court Order to Involuntarily Treat me again, it so happens that it was Christmas time. I was the MC (master of ceremony 2X) for the hospital play’s while I was classified as unfit to proceed and un-medicated for three years,

(Para 112) and I asked for these video tapes because this will prove my point that I was competent, and HSH told me it was missing and there went my evidence, but was witnessed by several hundred people whom at that time I didn’t know how to use them as witnesses, (subpoenas, affidavits, oral depositions, and/or written interrogatories), and then I was transferred back to OCCC my final time and you know what happened there I’ve been on CR for 17 years.

(Para 113) We’re Always Guinea Pigs!!! Starting in the earlier day’s with the older conventional neuroleptics and this notorious drug (in so many ways) only could target dopamine D receptor sites and they were obviously ineffective in treating a DRUG PSYCHOSIS based on 1) the new evidence of the multi symptom dimensions of a True Schizophrenic and 2) the birth of the new Agents the Atypical Anti Psychotics, and you can see how full of shit All Psychiatrist, Psychologist and the Courts Are.

(Para 114) WHICH IN reality made the Older Conventional Neuroleptics an Ineffective “Off Label Usage” in Treating Any Drug Psychosis that was approved by the FDA. These genuine materials of facts that I am presenting is Not New Information/Evidence that should Have Been Addressed/refuted Long Ago by ALL DEFENDANTS,

(Para 115) But Intentionally refused to, and back in 1995 in CR No. 95-0990 with a methamphetamine drug psychosis for Three Years being classified as Un-Fit To Proceed is impossible because of my Absolute Drug Psychosis Dissipation of MAX 6 months WHAT’S GOING ON HUH.

(Para 116) and to be a complete polypharmacy per atypical antipsychotic (risperidone is an excellent example in over targeting and is made for people with chronic usage of psychedelic’s hallucinogens, and entactogens), and is truly more substantiated with the Many Critical Issues of Genuine Materials of Facts that I’ve presented, and one of them is (the owners) Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intentional Failure to Inform or Warn by the owner and all its conduits and even the Court.

(Para 117) It is not always possible to be certain of the diagnosis in a psychotic individual. Organic psychoses (including substance induced psychoses), Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizophreniform Disorder Schizoaffective Disorder, Delusional Disorder and Brief Psychotic Disorder all can mimic one another.

(Para 118) If uncertain of the diagnosis, either from history or from clinical presentation or both, it is wisest to use a working diagnosis and to refer to a differential diagnosis list.
In addition, it is then necessary to refer to this and to attempt to reach a more definitive diagnosis over time.

(Para 119) I’ve placed the State “In a State Created Danger” that usually applies to Municipalities, but in my Prima Facie State Created Danger I’ve linked a multitude of Civil and Constitutional Rights Violations due to the ENFORCED ENACTMENT of Antipsychotics by the States in HRS (or Revised Statutes) that all State actors and Contracted Private actors as an agent of the State,

(Para 120) because Private Actors (and many of them are in outpatient care that’s contracted by the State with many non-profit organizations and in receiving Federal Grants, and of coarse including the Pharmaceutical companies) usually causes the ultimate injury in State Created Danger Claims,

(Para 121) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees § 1505.
Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act,

(Para 122) willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

(Para 123) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States,

(Para 124) or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

(Para 125) the Courts (Federal) have struggled with imposing liability on the State actor who played an indirect role, but in this case the State actor(s) created the position of danger, and placed Plaintiff in a greater danger by their contracted private actors and pharmaceutical companies, and caused the Ultimate injury, and in the process has created a Moral Hazard, and a very serious Risk Regulation and Consumer Welfare interest from a Federal standpoint.

(Para 126) The violation of federal law must be ongoing to warrant injunctive or declaratory relief. The Court explained that remedies designed to end a continuing violation of federal law are necessary to vindicate the federal interest in assuring the supremacy of that law.
Through Defendants Inactions and Actions and Continued Inactions and Actions.

(Para 127) as applied to this Honorable Courts Ruling on the Issues of Laws in that I presented what Qualifies above Defendants to the responsibility of Civil Rights and Constitutional violations in an attempt to aid those who can’t afford Expert Witnesses and/or are Pro Se litigant similarly situated to be able to redress the Government against these Defendants in a way to discourage these Defendants with Civil Rights and Constitutional claims and much like Punitive Damage claims once was as in to discourage.

(Para 128) What I am proving through Product design and Defect is the Intentional, Conscious, Callous, Deliberate Indifference that’s wanton, reckless, and malicious for my punitive claims and to the Scientific Knowledge that I’ve presented versus Defendants Plagiarism(s), and the continuance of the Fraudulent Concealment and/or Non-Disclosure “Lulling” that amounts to Fraudulent Concealment is very wanton, reckless, and malicious.

(Para 129) According to section 2307.73 or 2307.78 of the Revised Code was the result of misconduct of the manufacturer or supplier in question that manifested a flagrant disregard of the safety of persons who might be harmed by the product in question.

(Para 130) The fact by itself that a product is defective does not establish a flagrant disregard of the safety of persons who might be harmed by the product, but your Honor after reviewing my Complaint the word “flagrant” is NOW INTENTIONAL MALFEASANCE.

(Para 131) In determining the amount of punitive or exemplary damages, the Court shall consider factors including, but not limited to, the following. 1) The likelihood that serious harm would arise from the
misconduct of the manufacturer or supplier in question.
2) The degree of the awareness of the manufacturer or supplier in question of that likelihood.

(Para 132) 3) The profitability of the misconduct to the manufacturer or supplier in question, and your Honor, as you well know, with “JUST” the Atypical Anti Psychotic’s first appearance on the market back in 1995/1996 the Federal Government has been spending Trillions of dollars a year and not Only for the Off label prescription costs.

(Para 133) 4) The Duration of the Misconduct and any CONCEALMENT of it by the Manufacturer or supplier in question and just for the Atypical Antipsychotic since 1995.

(Para 134) 5) The Attitude and Conduct of the manufacturer or supplier in question upon the discovery of the misconduct and whether the misconduct has terminated, and in the past your Honor, the Antipsychotic Pharmaceutical Companies Attitude and Conduct with Off Label Usage for Children with ADD, ADHD, RAD, Behaviors, and the Elderly with Dementia

(Para 135) has been uncontrollable and Even by the States and Federal Government with civil suits against the Pharmaceutical Companies Constant Misconduct and Disregard of the Governments “flagrant” attitude in trying to deter the Pharmaceutical Giants didn’t even dent their wallets.

(Para 136) On the other hand government agents have No immunity from Civil existence of Criminal activity listed in section 1961 (1).
claims, but construing the facts as applied to RICO claims with the
To have standing under section 1962(a) and (b) the plaintiff must allege more than injury flowing from the racketeering activity.

(Para 137) Under section 1962 (a) a civil plaintiff has standing only if injured by reason of the Defendants investment of the proceeds of racketeering activity. Under section 1962(b) a civil plaintiff has standing only if he has been injured by reason of the Defendants acquisition or maintenance of an interest in or control over an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity (IN THIS CASE EXPERIEMENTAL BLINDING’S).

(Para 138) The law seeks to punish conspiracy as a substantive crime separate from the intended crime because when two or more persons agree to commit a crime, the potential for criminal activity increases, and as a result, the danger to the public increases.

(Para 139) Therefore, the very act of an agreement with criminal intent (along with an overt act, where required) is considered sufficiently dangerous to warrant charging conspiracy as an offense separate from the intended crime.

(Para 140) Once an agreement with criminal intent is made, the conspiracy is complete, unless the applicable statute requires the additional element of an overt act. The agreement need not be written or formal, and it may be proved by Circumstantial Evidence.

(Para 141) Intent Criminal intent is also necessary to create a conspiracy. This means that the parties must intend both to agree on and to engage in the unlawful act. Ignorance of the law is not usually a defense to a crime, but an unwitting conspirator may defend against conspiracy charges on grounds of ignorance. Ignorance will not be a defense if the person continues to participate in the common plan after learning of its illegality.

(Para 142) Either the purpose of the agreement or the means by which it is accomplished must be illegal to support criminal prosecution on conspiracy charges. If the purpose is unlawful, the offense is committed even if the means used to achieve the purpose are lawful.

(Para 143) The overt act must follow the agreement and must be executed with an “Intent” to carry out the purpose of the conspiracy. An overt act need not be committed by each and every conspirator; an overt act by one conspirator solidifies the offense for all coconspirators. Thus, a conspirator who does not participate in the overt act can be charged with conspiracy.

(Para 144) If a conspirator completely and voluntarily renounces the criminal purpose to all conspirators, that person may withdraw from the conspiracy before the overt act is committed. Many jurisdictions require that the withdrawing conspirator also inform law enforcement officials or take measures to thwart the crime, in order to avoid criminal liability for the conspiracy.

Other Considerations
(Para 145) A conspiracy exists as long as measures are taken to conceal evidence of the crime. A person who did not participate in the original agreement can become a coconspirator after the actual criminal act if the person joins in the concealment of the conspiracy. Whether a coconspirator received personal benefit or profit is of no importance.

(Para 146) Generally, conspirators are liable for all crimes committed within the course or scope of the conspiracy. In some jurisdictions, a person may be guilty of conspiracy even if a coconspirator is immune from prosecution. There must be a willful participation in the conspiracy, as well as an “Intent” to further the common purpose or design for conspiratorial liability.

(Para 147) Generally, if a number of conspirators agree to carry out different functions in furtherance of the conspiracy, the agreement constitutes a single conspiracy. This is so even if the different functions amount to more than one unlawful purpose. In some states, however, the different functions may constitute multiple conspiracies if there is an agreement to commit more than one crime.

(Para 148) These Defendants have join forces with, join together with, joint effort, joint planning, maneuvering, plan, plot, plot together, proposal, scheme, scheme together, take part in a crime together, take part with another in crime, treasonable alliance, underplot, unlawful combination, unlawful contrivance, unlawful plan, unlawful scheme.

(Para 149) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with Associated concepts: conspiracy charges, conspiracy in restraint of interstate trade, conspiracy in restraint of trade, conspiracy to commit felony, conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy within, continuing conspiracy, criminal conspiracy, entered into a conspiracy, felony murder, furtherance of the conspiracy, overt act

(Para 150) The FDA and the Department of Justice are currently trying a NEW STRATEGY by making the CEO of the pharmaceutical companies liable but haven’t been successful in its first attempt in Federal Court, and have also stipulated that they will ultimately stop Medicare and Medicaid coverage for this Off Label Usage because their the biggest purchasers of antipsychotics.

(Para 151) What I have proven is that the children and elderly with Off Label Usage is small potatoes, and it’s not only the Pharmaceutical Companies fault, but ALL its Conduits the Federal Government, State(s), and all its Agents) that has created our current 19-20 Trillion Federal deficit.

(Para 152) The total effect of other punishment imposed or likely to be imposed upon the manufacturer or supplier in question as a result of the misconduct, including awards of punitive or exemplary damages to persons similarly situated to the claimant and the severity of criminal penalties to which the manufacturer or supplier in question has been or is likely to be subjected.

(Para 153) The growing power of transnational corporations and their extension of power through privatization, deregulation and the rolling back of the State also mean that it is now time to develop binding legal norms that hold corporations to human rights standards and circumscribe potential abuses of their position of power.

(Para 154) I am asking this Court and the State of Hawaii to waive its Sovereign Immunity of the 11th Amendment. Your Honor the State(s) (all Defendants) has manipulated their immunity in a systematic fashion to discriminate against Federal Causes of Action cited in Alden, Supra, 527 US at 758.

(Para 155) This is most frequently done pursuant to Section 5 of the “Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution” which explicitly allows the Congress to enforce its guarantees on the states and thus overrides states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity.

(Para 156) In dissent, Justice Harlan criticized the “ratchet theory” and the idea of multiple interpreters of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Harlan relied on the separation of powers doctrine to argue that allowing Congress to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment undercut the power of the judiciary.

(Para 157) Justice Harlan objected to Congress having the power to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment substantively (that is, to create new rights). Harlan argued that the appropriate use of Section 5 power was the enforcement of judicially recognized 14th Amendment rights.
The “good Faith” of the States that they will not refuse to Honor “obligations imposed by the Constitution and by Federal Statutes that comport with the Constitutional design” Id at 755

(Para 158) 4) The States WILL waive their sovereign immunity as a condition of receiving federal funds. Laws that waive sovereign immunity based on the acceptance of federal funds have a wide applicability. Because most state agencies receive some federal funds, it is generally not difficult to establish the state’s acceptance of federal assistance especially for the Title I and the ADA, and funding for Title II, Title VI, Title IX, Rehabilitation Act etc,. which are small potatoes.

(Para 159) The Supreme Court held some time ago, in South Dakota v. Dole, that Congress may impose conditions on states in exchange for the provision of federal funds. Citing Dole, the Court recently stated that “Congress has broad power to set the terms on which it disburses Federal money to the States.

(Para 160) Congress may require that the states waive their sovereign immunity as a condition of receiving federal funds. In Dole, the Supreme Court suggested that in some unspecified circumstances, financial inducement might be coercive, thereby exceeding congressional power.

(Para 161) In response to challenges brought by states to Medicaid requirements, courts have rejected the argument that the threat of the loss of federal Medicaid funds is coercive, even when such funds exceed a billion dollars per year, and your Honor the State is accepting Federal Funding for the State Hospital, General Assistance (cash), State Contracts with other outpatient treatment and in Federal Grants as an another source, etc.

(Para 162) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States
§ 1031. Major fraud against the United States
(a) Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, any scheme or artifice with the intent— (1) to defraud the United States; or

(Para 163) (2) to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, in any grant, contract, subcontract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance, including through the Troubled Asset Relief Program, an economic stimulus, recovery or rescue plan provided by the Government,

(Para 164) or the Government’s purchase of any troubled asset as defined in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or in any procurement of property or services as a prime contractor with the United States or as a subcontractor or supplier on a contract in which there is a prime contract with the United States,

(Para 165) if the value of such grant, contract, subcontract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance, or any constituent part thereof, is $1,000,000 or more shall, subject to the applicability of subsection (c) of this section, be fined not more than $1,000,000, or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(Para 166) (b) The fine imposed for an offense under this section may exceed the maximum otherwise provided by law, if such fine does not exceed $5,000,000 and— (1) the gross loss to the Government or the gross gain to a defendant is $500,000 or greater; or (2) the offense involves a conscious or reckless risk of serious personal injury.

(Para 167) (c) The maximum fine imposed upon a defendant for a prosecution including a prosecution with multiple counts under this section shall not exceed $10,000,000.

(Para 168) (d) Nothing in this section shall preclude a court from imposing any other sentences available under this title, including without limitation a fine up to twice the amount of the gross loss or gross gain involved in the offense pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3571(d).

(Para 169) (e) In determining the amount of the fine, the court shall consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. sections 3553 and 3572 the factors set forth in the guidelines and policy statements of the United States Sentencing Commission, including— (1) the need to reflect the seriousness of the offense, including the harm or loss to the victim and the gain to the defendant;

(Para 170) (2) whether the defendant previously has been fined for a similar offense; and (3) any other pertinent equitable considerations.
(f) A prosecution of an offense under this section may be commenced any time not later than 7 years after the offense is committed, plus any additional time otherwise allowed by law.

(Para 171) (g) (1) In special circumstances and in his or her sole discretion, the Attorney General is authorized to make payments from funds appropriated to the Department of Justice to persons who furnish information relating to a possible prosecution under this section.

(Para 172) The amount of such payment shall not exceed $250,000. Upon application by the Attorney General, the court may order that the Department shall be reimbursed for a payment from a criminal fine imposed under this section.

(Para 173) (2) An individual is not eligible for such a payment if—
(A) that individual is an officer or employee of a Government agency who furnishes information or renders service in the performance of official duties;

(Para 174) (B) that individual failed to furnish the information to the individual’s employer prior to furnishing it to law enforcement authorities, unless the court determines the individual has justifiable reasons for that failure;

(Para 175) (C) the furnished information is based upon public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a congressional, administrative, or GAO report, hearing, audit or investigation, or from the news media unless the person is the original source of the information.

(Para 176) For the purposes of this subsection, “original source” means an individual who has direct and independent knowledge of the information on which the allegations are based and has voluntarily provided the information to the Government; or (D) that individual participated in the violation of this section with respect to which such payment would be made.

(Para 177) (3) The failure of the Attorney General to authorize a payment shall not be subject to judicial review.
(h) Any individual who— (1) is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions

(Para 178) of employment by an employer because of lawful acts done by the employee on behalf of the employee or others in furtherance of a prosecution under this section (including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in such prosecution), and

(Para 179) (2) was not a participant in the unlawful activity that is the subject of said prosecution, may, in a civil action, obtain all relief necessary to make such individual whole. Such relief shall include reinstatement with the same seniority status such individual would have had but for the discrimination,

(Para 180) 2 times the amount of back pay, interest on the back pay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, including litigation costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.

(Para 181) 5) In Ex Parte Young Defendants in this Criminal Case warrants a relief of the States Sovereign Immunity waiver of the States (Defendants)i, and .I’ll be challenging whether the States Statutes dealing with anti psychotics from involuntary treatment and in Cr (conditional release terms), and benefits, programs, outpatient care, contracted outpatient care, etc., and that their policies, customs, and improper training violates the

(Para 182) Commerce Clause (here’s a little bit of a rattle snake to regulating commerce) by interfering this with the ECONOMICS (a False Claims Act of 300 Trillion and more as will be cited further down in this complaint) between the Federal Government (Defendants) Illegal allocation of funds to the State (Defendants) and fraud-ing taxpayers,

(Para 183) and is explained through the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities on the STATES Budget Cuts, they have imposed cuts that hurt vulnerable residents and is REGULATING the ECONOMY based on unacceptable policy priorities

(Para 184) If you review the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities on the STATES Budget Cuts, they have imposed cuts that hurt vulnerable residents and the Economy, and have made major cuts in K-12 and Early Education, Higher Education, and in the State Workforce, and have made these Major Cutbacks and Prioritized Public Health

(Para 185) and the Elderly (which is good) and Disabled but what I have already proven through the Intentional Avoidance of Liability created the Intentional Failures to Warn or Inform, and is an atrocity to the States Policy Priorities, and the Federal government Personal knowledge of this continuing Human Rights Genocide violations.

(Para 186) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters
§ 1035. False statements relating to health care matters
(a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or

(Para 187) (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Para 188) (b) As used in this section, the term “health care benefit program” has the meaning given such term in section 24(b) of this title.

(Para 189) The states are responsible for the administration of these programs and are required to operate them in compliance with Federal law, and they Have Not, and the Federal Government could have been trimmed down considerably, and could have Prioritize the States irresponsibility in how it stimulates its Economy, but the Federal government are the biggest Conspirators with our economies downfall.

(Para 190) The Federal Government could have pursued multi Civil Action against all Anti Psychotics Pharmaceutical Companies for 100+ Trillion dollars because of the length and time with this intentional misconduct, easily.
In review of the Commerce Clause Limitations on State Regulation,

(Para 191) and in accordance with cited; Ex Parte Young Claim of waiver of the States Sovereign Immunity the States regulation of Commerce/Economy is invalid only when it is preempted by Federal Law, based on the Intentional, Conscious, Callous, Deliberate Indifference, that’s wanton, reckless and malicious as I have proven.

(Para 192) Because Hawaii has enacted by enforcement in HRS establishing Pharmaceutical Companies and the States interest as being Owners of our Body (and look under ownership), and Hawaii has whole heartedly disguised/manipulated its ownership risks,

(Para 193) and in the loosest sense of group ownership due to the lack of a Substantiated Legal framework derived from Rules and Regulations that is insubordinate to the Absolute Supremacy of Federal Laws and that this Structured Group that is Duly Constituted as an Entity under Law

(Para 194) is still protecting members from being personally liable for each other’s actions, and in Law, a legal Entity is an Entity that is capable of bearing legal rights and obligations, and the States of America and all other Defendants has established itself as a “Market Participant” with the enforced enactment in Revised Statutes as the
Only Product and in Product Liability with the Law Defining Tangible Property Rights of Antipsychotics, and

(Para 195) According to section 2307.73 or 2307.78 of the Revised Code was the result of misconduct of the manufacturer or supplier (State and Federal government(s) in question that manifested a flagrant disregard of the safety of persons who might be harmed by the product in question.

(Para 196) The fact by itself that a product is defective does not establish a flagrant disregard of the safety of persons who might be harmed by the product, but your Honor after reviewing my Complaint the word “flagrant” is NOW AN INTENTIONAL MALFEASANCE.

(Para 197) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518.
Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses
(a) Whoever willfully prevents, obstructs, misleads, delays or attempts to prevent, obstruct, mislead, or delay the communication of information or records relating to a violation of a Federal health care offense to a criminal investigator shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Para 198) (b) As used in this section the term “criminal investigator” means any individual duly authorized by a department, agency, or armed force of the United States to conduct or engage in investigations for prosecutions for violations of health care offenses.

(Para 199) The likelihood that serious harm would arise from the misconduct of the manufacturer or supplier (State) in question.
The degree of the awareness of the manufacturer or supplier (State) in question of that likelihood.
The profitability of the misconduct to the manufacturer or supplier in question.
The Duration of the Misconduct and any CONCEALMENT of it by the Manufacturer or supplier (State) in question.

(Para 200) The Attitude and Conduct of the manufacturer or supplier (State) in question upon the discovery of the misconduct and whether the misconduct has terminated,
The total effect of other punishment imposed or likely to be imposed upon the manufacturer or supplier (State) in question as a result of the misconduct, including the severity of criminal penalties to which the manufacturer or supplier (State) in question has been or is likely to be subjected, and will create a huge Federal Deficit if this continues.

(Para 201) 6) Cases seeking to apply Ex parte Young may be brought in several different way’s.
First, suits may be brought directly under a federal statute containing an explicit or implicit private cause of action.

(Para 202) Second, suits may be brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 WHICH I am ALSO CLAIMING, which creates a federal cause of action for violation of “rights” secured by the federal laws and the Constitution.
Third, in some cases such as those involving claims of federal preemption, a suit is simply brought under the federal question jurisdiction of the federal courts.

(Para 203) There is No Case Law supporting my stance for I am the only person to have challenged both State and Federal Courts, and I am relying on constitutional provisions, statute, administrative provision or Court Rule (includes rules of evidence) and I am arguing that the drafters (Legislative Intent although Impetuous in making arbitrary decisions,

(Para 204) especially in an impulsive and forceful manner) of the Rules, Statutes, and Expounding on Constitutional Provisions intended to include my situation.
My argument will show that the language, spirit and purpose of the Rules, Statutes, and Constitutional Provisions support’s my Stance.

(Para 205) I’ll be Asserting THAT I BELIEVE PUBLIC POLICY will be GREATLY INFLUENCED. WHEREAS the Court should rule in my favor for the public benefit, and THE GOOD moral wellbeing of all people’s, and to ride the crest of public opinion to victory.
THIS IS A NATIONAL CONCERN FINANCIALLY, TAXPAYERS CONCERNS, AND THE FUTURE OF HEALTH CARE BENEFITS.

(Para 206) RISK REGULATION AND CONSUMER WELFARE: AND I CAN ASSURE YOU ALL OTHERS SEEKING TO FILE THIS SAME SUIT CAN, AND PROBABLY WILL DO IT UNDER THE JURISDICTION IN FEDERAL COURT(S):
Health and safety have become major consumer concerns in the 1980s. Major issues focus on who should decide for whom what level of safety and health is appropriate.

(Para 207) This paper examines the role of consumers and government in reducing risk. Consideration is given to consumer risk perception and risk response, the need for government intervention, and the various risk evaluation procedures that might be used by government agencies to develop appropriate risk management strategies,

(Para 208) and due to the Pharmaceutical Companies Experimental Blinding’s of the Evidence I presented Which I am using Against them in admitters, and ALL other Defendant’s, and There Denials such as Referenced in MY FUTURE BUSINESSES cited further down in this Complaint, and dealing with Extensive Structural Brain Damage.

(Para 209) It has been said that these studies require serious attention and that such effects were not clearly tested for by pharmaceutical companies prior to obtaining approval for placing the drugs on the market.

(Para 210) The Pharmaceutical Companies Have Not Submitted Any Data to the FDA on these topic’s prior to the Antipsychotics going on the market per my conversation with FDA and Med Watch and in FDA’s research database.

(Para 211) Therefore any Scientific Data that I submitted will be impossible to refute based ONLY on challenges to my supportive evidence to which they can only challenge the length or completeness of the Multiple research abstracts that “regardless indicates substantive injury” caused by the product,

(Para 212) and they shouldn’t try to support any stance to their non-disclosure with the FDA, Courts and everyone else, and these genuine materials of facts that I am presenting is Not New Information/Evidence that All Defendants should Have Addressed/Refuted Long Ago.

(Para 213) My other scientific data also typifies the obvious differences with a person who has a Drug Psychosis versus the Psychosis of a True Schizophrenic, and again differentiated the multiple symptom dimensions of a True Schizophrenic, Dual Diagnosis, and someone only having a Drug Psychosis,

(Para 214) and all Drugs and the Regions and pathways of the Dopaminergic over activity in ligands agonists and antagonists, and the pharmacological reports of all the Atypical antipsychotic’s in ligands, agonists, and antagonist’s, and that Every Atypical Antipsychotic is a Complete Polypharmacy in itself,

(Para 215) and The Absolute Time Frame of My Drug Psychosis Dissipation which is from methamphetamine, and this affects a CR (conditional release terms) AND THE LENGTH OF OUTPATIENT TREATMENT CARE that is an extension to an Unjustified Psychiatric Commitment, and ALL Defendants can’t refute in what they Intentionally avoided in disclosure to anyone. All the evidence that I entered THAT IS OVERLY SUPPORTED, and they may try to enter any scientific evidence to support their stance,

(Para 216) but there is NONE, and they shouldn’t try to support any stance to their non-disclosure with the FDA, Courts and everyone else, and these genuine materials of facts that I am presenting is Not New Information/Evidence that should Have Been Addressed/refuted Long Ago, and back in the earlier day’s with the older conventional neuroleptic,

(Para 217) and this notorious drug (in so many ways) only could target dopamine D receptor sites and they were obviously ineffective in treating a drug psychosis’s based on the new evidence of the
multi symptom dimensions of a True Schizophrenic and the birth of the new Agents

(Para 218) (we were Always Guinea pigs, and still are), and back in 1995 when the first Atypical Anti Psychotics came out on the market All Defendants are doing the very same thing with experimental blinding’s that was funded by pharmaceutical companies, and supported by all its Conduits (as Exhibit B) Are Genuine Issues of Material Facts for Response, Polypharmacy, Randomized Controlled Trial, Placebo, Experimental blinding’s, and the Myth of the Antipsychotic.

(Para 219) A review of the methods used in trials of antipsychotics, despite stating that the overall quality is “rather good,” reported issues with the selection of participants (including that in schizophrenia trials up to 90% of people who are generally suitable do not meet the elaborate inclusion and exclusion criteria, and that negative symptoms have not been properly assessed despite companies marketing the newer antipsychotics for these);

(Para 220) issues with the design of trials (including pharmaceutical company funding of most of them, and inadequate experimental “blinding” so that trial participants could sometimes tell whether they were on placebo or not);

(Para 221) and issues with the assessment of outcomes (including the use of a minimal reduction in scores to show “response,” lack of assessment of quality of life or recovery, a high rate of discontinuation, selective highlighting of favorable results in the abstracts of publications, and poor reporting of side-effects), and Intentionally chose this RICO Act and Conspiracy path.

(Para 222) This Off Label Usage bring in charges of assault and battery ie., trespass to a person, and plagiarism constitutes $250,,000 fine 10 years in jail and/or both when Conspirators of the RICO Act profits over $2500.00, as cited in paragraphs ???????product liability, as cited in and attached as Exhibit B in CV No. 1100551 ACK RLP, and CV No. 11-00781 DAE KSC.

(Para 223) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government
§ 954. False statements influencing foreign government
Whoever, in relation to any dispute or controversy between a foreign government and the United States, willfully and knowingly makes any untrue statement, either orally or in writing, under oath before any person authorized and empowered to administer oaths, which the affiant has knowledge or reason to believe will,

(Para 224) or may be used to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government, or of any officer or agent of any foreign government, to the injury of the United States, or with a view or intent to influence any measure of or action by the United States or any department or agency thereof, to the injury of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(Para 225) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States
§ 914. These Defendants are Creditors of the United States who are creditors of other Defendants in this Criminal Case.
Whoever falsely personates any true and lawful holder of any share or sum in the public stocks or debt of the United States, or any person entitled to any annuity, dividend, pension, wages,

(Para 226) or other debt due from the United States, and, under color of such false personation, transfers or endeavors to transfer such public stock or any part thereof, or receives or endeavors to receive the money of such true and lawful holder thereof, or the money of any person really entitled to receive such annuity, dividend, pension, wages, or other debt, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 227) I’ll be entering in this instant Criminal (not civil) Action as applied From Paragraphs 207 to 416 with the RICO Act under Title 18 U.S.C. sections 1961-1968, and Conspiracy as cited in paragraphs 1 to 122, and Under 18 U.S.C. violations in assault and battery, and the Progression of the Crime of Aggression

(Para 228) Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), and

(Para 229) CHAPTER 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 to 373) CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), and

(Para 230) CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391) As the most common civil RICO claim of present day are CEO’s of Corporations, the controlling share-holder of these Corporations, or the leaders of Political protest groups.

(Para 231) Here are the two Civil Suits in Federal Court (Defendants and their roles in Conspiracy and under the RICO Act:
Defendants Helping Hands Of Hawaii, Jan Harada, (Director of Helping Hands Of Hawaii), Dr. Alan Buffenstein, Dr. Kenneth Luke, Dr. Loretta J. Fuddy (Director Of Health in which she is dead wasn’t me), Dr. Lynn Fallin (Deputy Director Of Behavior Health) INACTIONS in CV No. 1100551 ACK RLP

(Para 232) where created by the Actions of Defendants Whom by the way are the Expert Witnesses from all the Antipsychiatry Antipsychotic and Mental Health Law Centers and Advocate Buffers, and is supported with Certified Court Documents, Depositions upon oral examinations and by a certified court reporter, written interrogatories, and Bates Certified Hospital Records.

(Para 233) with Defendants Dr. Peter Breggin, University of Pittsburgh and the Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Statistics, and Dr. Glenn T. Konopaske, Dr. Karl-Anton Dorph-Peterson, Dr. Joseph N. Pierri, Dr. Qiang Wu, Dr. Allan R. Sampson, Dr. David A. Lewis, Dr. Robert A. Sweet, Harvard Medical School and the Department of Psychiatry,

(Para 234) and Dr. Wei Zhang, and the University of Iowa and Neuroscience and Dr. Nancy C. Andreasen, and Dr.Zoric, Dr. Kim, Dr. Rad, and Dr. Tsuang of the University of UCLA Semel Institute for Neurosciences and Human Behavior, and District Judge David Allan Erza, Magistrate Judge Kevin S. Chang and the Intermediate Court of Appeals in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Leavy and Judge McKeown IN CV No. 11-00781 DAE KSC

(Para 235) and attached as Exhibit B of Favorable Abstract of Scientific Publications entered in my Complaints and Declarations, and these Defendants Actions has ultimately became Inactions to my claims for relief in CV No. 11-00781 DAE KSC with new claims for relief, and I Boldly told the Court of DAE KSC I am in a “Can’t Lose Situation” Created by the Federal Court in this Civil Suit, and that is why I Honestly stated to the Federal Court In Hawaii YOU HAVE ENTERED DANGEROUS WATERS.

(Para 236) LIBEL AND SLANDER occur when a person or entity communicates false information that damages the reputation of another person or entity. Slander occurs when the false and defamatory communication is spoken and heard. Libel occurs when the false and defamatory communication is written and seen.
The laws governing libel and slander, which are collectively known as DEFAMATION, are identical.

(Para 237) Finally, the statements of CERTAIN DEFENDANTS in certain circumstances, such as lawyers, “JUDGES”, jurors, and WITNESSES are protected from defamation for PUBLIC POLICY reasons. This type of protection is known as PRIVILEGE, and Intentionally gave Defendants a PROTECTED PRIVILEGE.

(Para 238) Judges Allan C. Kay, Richard L. Puglusi, David Alan Ezra, and Kevin S. Chang have libel/slandered/Defamation Defendants Intentionally, and this is Plagiarism by the Federal Judges who have a political agenda as is Supported by their paychecks, and carries Criminal charges as well a fine and/or both.

(Para 239) through what all Judges believe is Privilege that isn’t, and Plaintiff has been subjected by all Judges to Libel, Slander, and Defamation as well, (although all Judges have absolute immunity). THEY PROTECTED THE DEFENDANTS FROM BEING DEFENDANTS in accordance with Privilege: under Rule 501 (FRE) Federal Rules of Evidence (Privileges).

(Para 240) Judges Alan C. Kay, Richard L. Puglisi, David Alan Ezra, and Kevin S. Chang FURTHERMORE prevented DEFENDANTS FROM ALSO BEING WITNESSES or disclosing any matter or producing any object or writing IN WHICH THEY ALREADY HAVE PUBLICALLY, and Rule 512 (FRE) thereby eliminating privileged matters disclosed under compulsion or without opportunity to claim privilege that COULD NOT BE PRESERVED

(Para 241) evidence of a statement or other disclosure of privileged matter is not admissible against the holder of the privilege if the disclosure was (1) COMPELLED ERRONEOUSLY, BUT WAS INTENTIONALLY DESIGNED TO COMPELLED ME ERRONEOUSLY FROM ENTERING EVIDENCE or (2) made Without Opportunity to Claim the Privilege,

(Para 242) and Rule 513 (a) (Comment Upon Or Interference From Claim Of Privilege) Comment or interference Not Permitted the claim of a privilege, whether in the present proceeding or upon a prior occasion is not a proper subject of comment by Judge or Counsel. No interference may be drawn there from, and that is why I have two dismissed Complaints, and two dismissed first Amended Complaints.

(Para 243) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally
§ 1621. Perjury generally
Whoever—(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or

(Para 244) (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;

(Para 245) is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.

(Para 246) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury
§ 1622. Subornation of perjury
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 247) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court
§ 1623. False declarations before grand jury or court
(a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration

(Para 248) or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 249) (b) This section is applicable whether the conduct occurred within or without the United States.
(c) An indictment or information for violation of this section alleging that, in any proceedings before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States,

(Para 250) the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations, which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if—
(1) each declaration was material to the point in question, and

(Para 251) (2) each declaration was made within the period of the statute of limitations for the offense charged under this section.
In any prosecution under this section, the falsity of a declaration set forth in the indictment or information shall be established sufficient for conviction by proof that the defendant while under oath made irreconcilably contradictory declarations material to the point in

(Para 252) question in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury. It shall be a defense to an indictment or information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was true.

(Para 253) (d) Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration to be false, such admission shall bar prosecution under this section if, at the time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be exposed.

(Para 254) (e) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt under this section is sufficient for conviction. It shall not be necessary that such proof be made by any particular number of witnesses or by documentary or other type of evidence.

Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings
(Para 255) § 1018. Official certificates or writings
Whoever, being a public officer or other person authorized by any law of the United States to make or give a certificate or other writing, knowingly makes and delivers as true such a certificate or writing, containing any statement which he knows to be false, in a case where the punishment thereof is not elsewhere expressly provided by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Para 256) These Defendants Helping Hands Of Hawaii, Jan Harada, (Director of Helping Hands Of Hawaii), Dr. Alan Buffenstein, Dr. Kenneth Luke, Loretta J. Fuddy (Director Of Health in which she is dead wasn’t me), Dr. Lynn Fallin (Deputy Director Of Behavior Health) INACTIONS in CV No. 1100551 ACK RLP

(Para 257) and Dr. Peter Breggin, University of Pittsburgh and the Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Statistics, and Dr. Glenn T. Konopaske, Dr. Karl-Anton Dorph-Peterson, Dr. Joseph N. Pierri, Dr. Qiang Wu, Dr. Allan R. Sampson, Dr. David A. Lewis, Dr. Robert A. Sweet, Harvard Medical School and the Department of Psychiatry, and Dr. Wei Zhang,

(Para 258) and the University of Iowa and Neuroscience and Dr. Nancy C. Andreasen, and Dr.Zoric, Dr. Kim, Dr. Rad, and Dr. Tsuang of the University of UCLA Semel Institute for Neurosciences and Human Behavior, and District Judge David Allan Ezra, Magistrate Judge Kevin S. Chang and the Intermediate Court of Appeals in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Leavy and Judge McKeown IN CV No. 11-00781 DAE KSC

(Para 259) Have violated the RICO Act Title 18 U.S.C. sections 1961-1968, and under section 1962(a)(b) ( c ) and (d), and cited in paragraphs 81 to 90 in this Complaint under the RICO Act as Criminal Charges and not civil liability, and Under 18 U.S.C ————, and cited in paragraphs 91 to 102 of this Complaint as applies to the Criminal offenses of Conspiracy

(Para 260) especially in paragraph 99 a conspiracy exists as long as measures are taken to conceal evidence of the crime. A person who did not participate in the original agreement can become a coconspirator after the actual criminal act if the person joins in the concealment of the conspiracy.

(Para 261) Whether a coconspirator received personal benefit or profit is of no importance, and in paragraph 100 Generally conspirators are liable for all crimes committed within the course or scope of the conspiracy. In some jurisdictions, a person may be guilty of conspiracy even if a coconspirator is immune from prosecution.

(Para 262) There must be a willful participation in the conspiracy, as well as an-intent to further the common purpose or design for conspiratorial liability, and in paragraph 101 Generally if a number of conspirators agree to carry out different functions in furtherance of the conspiracy, the agreement constitutes a single conspiracy.

(Para 263) This is so even if the different functions amount to more than one unlawful purpose. In some states, however, and in paragraph 102 the different functions may constitute multiple conspiracies if there is an agreement to commit more than one crime.
Punishment for the crime of conspiracy is ordinarily defined by statute and varies in accordance with the conspiracy’s objective.

Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1963 – Criminal penalties

(Para 264) § 1963. Criminal penalties
(a) Whoever violates any provision of section 1962 of this chapter shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years (or for life if the violation is based on a racketeering activity for which the maximum penalty includes life imprisonment), or both, and shall forfeit to the United States, irrespective of any provision of State law—

(Para 265) (1) any interest the person has acquired or maintained in violation of section 1962; (2) any— (A) interest in; (B) security of; (C) claim against; or (D) property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over; any enterprise which the person has established, operated, controlled, conducted, or participated in the conduct of, in violation of section 1962; and

(Para 266) (3) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds which the person obtained, directly or indirectly, from racketeering activity or unlawful debt collection in violation of section 1962.
The court, in imposing sentence on such person shall order, in addition to any other sentence imposed pursuant to this section, that the person forfeit to the United States all property described in this subsection.

(Para 267) In lieu of a fine otherwise authorized by this section, a defendant who derives profits or other proceeds from an offense may be fined not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.
(b) Property subject to criminal forfeiture under this section includes—
(1) real property, including things growing on, affixed to, and found in land; and

(Para 268) (2) tangible and intangible personal property, including rights, privileges, interests, claims, and securities. All right, title, and interest in property described in subsection (a) vests in the United States upon the commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture under this section.

(Para 269) Any such property that is subsequently transferred to a person other than the defendant may be the subject of a special verdict of forfeiture and thereafter shall be ordered forfeited to the United States, unless the transferee establishes in a hearing pursuant to subsection (l) that he is a bona fide purchaser for value of such property who at the time of purchase was reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section.

(Para 270) (d) (1) Upon application of the United States, the court may enter a restraining order or injunction, require the execution of a satisfactory performance bond, or take any other action to preserve the availability of property described in subsection (a) for forfeiture under this section—

(Para 271) (A) upon the filing of an indictment or information charging a violation of section 1962 of this chapter and alleging that the property with respect to which the order is sought would, in the event of conviction, be subject to forfeiture under this section; or
(B) prior to the filing of such an indictment or information, if, after notice to persons appearing to have an interest in the property and opportunity for a hearing, the court determines that—

(Para 272) (i) there is a substantial probability that the United States will prevail on the issue of forfeiture and that failure to enter the order will result in the property being destroyed, removed from the jurisdiction of the court, or otherwise made unavailable for forfeiture; and

(Para 273) (ii) the need to preserve the availability of the property through the entry of the requested order outweighs the hardship on any party against whom the order is to be entered:
Provided, however, that an order entered pursuant to subparagraph (B) shall be effective for not more than ninety days, unless extended by the court for good cause shown or unless an indictment or information described in subparagraph (A) has been filed.

(Para 274) (2) A temporary restraining order under this subsection may be entered upon application of the United States without notice or opportunity for a hearing when an information or indictment has not yet been filed with respect to the property, if the United States demonstrates that there is probable cause to believe that the property with respect to which the order is sought would,

(Para 275) in the event of conviction, be subject to forfeiture under this section and that provision of notice will jeopardize the availability of the property for forfeiture. Such a temporary order shall expire not more than fourteen days after the date on which it is entered,

(Para 276) unless extended for good cause shown or unless the party against whom it is entered consents to an extension for a longer period. A hearing requested concerning an order entered under this paragraph shall be held at the earliest possible time, and prior to the expiration of the temporary order.

(Para 277) (3) The court may receive and consider, at a hearing held pursuant to this subsection, evidence and information that would be inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence.

(Para 278) (e) Upon conviction of a person under this section, the court shall enter a judgment of forfeiture of the property to the United States and shall also authorize the Attorney General to seize all property ordered forfeited upon such terms and conditions as the court shall deem proper.

(Para 279) Following the entry of an order declaring the property forfeited, the court may, upon application of the United States, enter such appropriate restraining orders or injunctions, require the execution of satisfactory performance bonds, appoint receivers, conservators, appraisers, accountants, or trustees, or take any other action to protect the interest of the United States in the property ordered forfeited.

(Para 280) Any income accruing to, or derived from, an enterprise or an interest in an enterprise which has been ordered forfeited under this section may be used to offset ordinary and necessary expenses to the enterprise which are required by law, or which are necessary to protect the interests of the United States or third parties.

(Para 281) (f) Following the seizure of property ordered forfeited under this section, the Attorney General shall direct the disposition of the property by sale or any other commercially feasible means, making due provision for the rights of any innocent persons. Any property right or interest not exercisable by, or transferable for value to, the United States shall expire and shall not revert to the defendant,

(Para 282) nor shall the defendant or any person acting in concert with or on behalf of the defendant be eligible to purchase forfeited property at any sale held by the United States. Upon application of a person, other than the defendant or a person acting in concert with or on behalf of the defendant,

(Para 283) the court may restrain or stay the sale or disposition of the property pending the conclusion of any appeal of the criminal case giving rise to the forfeiture, if the applicant demonstrates that proceeding with the sale or disposition of the property will result in irreparable injury, harm or loss to him.

(Para 284) Notwithstanding 31 U.S.C. 3302(b), the proceeds of any sale or other disposition of property forfeited under this section and any moneys forfeited shall be used to pay all proper expenses for the forfeiture and the sale, including expenses of seizure, maintenance and custody of the property pending its disposition, advertising and court costs.

(Para 285) The Attorney General (is a Defendant) shall deposit in the Treasury any amounts of such proceeds or moneys remaining after the payment of such expenses.
(g) With respect to property ordered forfeited under this section, the Attorney General is authorized to—

(Para 286) (1) grant petitions for mitigation or remission of forfeiture, restore forfeited property to victims of a violation of this chapter, or take any other action to protect the rights of innocent persons which is in the interest of justice and which is not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter;

(Para 287) (2) compromise claims arising under this section;
(3) award compensation to persons providing information resulting in a forfeiture under this section; (4) direct the disposition by the United States of all property ordered forfeited under this section by public sale or any other commercially feasible means, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons; and

(Para 288) (5) take appropriate measures necessary to safeguard and maintain property ordered forfeited under this section pending its disposition.
(h) The Attorney General may promulgate regulations with respect to—
(1) making reasonable efforts to provide notice to persons who may have an interest in property ordered forfeited under this section;
(2) granting petitions for remission or mitigation of forfeiture;

(Para 289) (3) the restitution of property to victims of an offense petitioning for remission or mitigation of forfeiture under this chapter;
(4) the disposition by the United States of forfeited property by public sale or other commercially feasible means;
(5) the maintenance and safekeeping of any property forfeited under this section pending its disposition; and

(Para 290) (6) the compromise of claims arising under this chapter.
Pending the promulgation of such regulations, all provisions of law relating to the disposition of property, or the proceeds from the sale thereof, or the remission or mitigation of forfeitures for violation of the customs laws,

(Para 291) and the compromise of claims and the award of compensation to informers in respect of such forfeitures shall apply to forfeitures incurred, or alleged to have been incurred, under the provisions of this section, insofar as applicable and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.

(Para 292) Such duties as are imposed upon the Customs Service or any person with respect to the disposition of property under the customs law shall be performed under this chapter by the Attorney General.

(Para 293) (i) Except as provided in subsection (l), no party claiming an interest in property subject to forfeiture under this section may—
(1) intervene in a trial or appeal of a criminal case involving the forfeiture of such property under this section; or

(Para 294) (2) commence an action at law or equity against the United States concerning the validity of his alleged interest in the property subsequent to the filing of an indictment or information alleging that the property is subject to forfeiture under this section.

(Para 295) (j) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to enter orders as provided in this section without regard to the location of any property which may be subject to forfeiture under this section or which has been ordered forfeited under this section.

(Para 296) (k) In order to facilitate the identification or location of property declared forfeited and to facilitate the disposition of petitions for remission or mitigation of forfeiture, after the entry of an order declaring property forfeited to the United States the court may, upon application of the United States,

(Para 297) order that the testimony of any witness relating to the property forfeited be taken by deposition and that any designated book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material not privileged be produced at the same time and place, in the same manner as provided for the taking of depositions under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(Para 298) (l) (1) Following the entry of an order of forfeiture under this section, the United States shall publish notice of the order and of its intent to dispose of the property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct.

(Para 299) The Government may also, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have alleged an interest in the property that is the subject of the order of forfeiture as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified.

(Para 300) (2) Any person, other than the defendant, asserting a legal interest in property which has been ordered forfeited to the United States pursuant to this section may, within thirty days of the final publication of notice or his receipt of notice under paragraph (1),

(Para 301) whichever is earlier, petition the court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of his alleged interest in the property. The hearing shall be held before the court alone, without a jury.
(Para 302) (3) The petition shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner’s right, title, or interest in the property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner’s acquisition of the right, title, or interest in the property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner’s claim, and the relief sought.

(Para 303) (4) The hearing on the petition shall, to the extent practicable and consistent with the interests of justice, be held within thirty days of the filing of the petition. The court may consolidate the hearing on the petition with a hearing on any other petition filed by a person other than the defendant under this subsection.

(Para 304) (5) At the hearing, the petitioner may testify and present evidence and witnesses on his own behalf, and cross-examine witnesses who appear at the hearing. The United States may present evidence and witnesses in rebuttal and in defense of its claim to the property and cross-examine witnesses who appear at the hearing.

(Para 305) In addition to testimony and evidence presented at the hearing, the court shall consider the relevant portions of the record of the criminal case which resulted in the order of forfeiture.
(6) If, after the hearing, the court determines that the petitioner has established by a preponderance of the evidence that—

(Para 306) (A) the petitioner has a legal right, title, or interest in the property, and such right, title, or interest renders the order of forfeiture invalid in whole or in part because the right, title, or interest was vested in the petitioner rather than the defendant or was superior to any right, title, or interest of the defendant at the time of the commission of the acts which gave rise to the forfeiture of the property under this section; or

(Para 307) (B) the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser for value of the right, title, or interest in the property and was at the time of purchase reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section;
the court shall amend the order of forfeiture in accordance with its determination.

(Para 308) (7) Following the court’s disposition of all petitions filed under this subsection, or if no such petitions are filed following the expiration of the period provided in paragraph (2) for the filing of such petitions, the United States shall have clear title to property that is the subject of the order of forfeiture and may warrant good title to any subsequent purchaser or transferee.

(Para 309) (m) If any of the property described in subsection (a), as a result of any act or omission of the defendant— (1)
cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (2) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (3) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; (4) has been substantially diminished in value; or

(Para 310) (5) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty;

Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1964 – Civil remedies (Para 311) § 1964. Civil remedies (a) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of section 1962 of this chapter by issuing appropriate orders, including, but not limited to: ordering any person to divest himself of any interest, direct or indirect, in any enterprise; imposing reasonable restrictions on the future activities or

(Para 312) investments of any person, including, but not limited to, prohibiting any person from engaging in the same type of endeavor as the enterprise engaged in, the activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or ordering dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons.

(Para 313) (b) The Attorney General may institute proceedings under this section. Pending final determination thereof, the court may at any time enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other actions, including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as it shall deem proper.

(Para 314) (c) Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, except that no person may rely upon any conduct that

(Para 315) would have been actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities to establish a violation of section 1962. The exception contained in the preceding sentence does not apply to an action against any person that is criminally convicted in connection with the fraud, in which case the statute of limitations shall start to run on the date on which the conviction becomes final.

(Para 316) (d) A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding brought by the United States under this chapter shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding brought by the United States.

(Para 317) These are Great examples of my Civil Suits showing the obvious legal Conspiracy that is heavily into legal malfeasance Re: my first Amended Complaints, and I firmly believe Defendants Johnson and Johnson, and Janssen now Janssen of Johnson and Johnson and their Counsel was informed not to answer Plaints Complaint, because they never answered the Original Complaint,

(Para 318) and they were all served even their Legal Affairs office, and they had about four to five months before the dismissals was Ruled upon, and never responded as opposition or no opposition, or in filing Motion to dismiss as joinder with the Federal Courts dismissals or in any form of objections.

(Para 319) That is why the Statement of agreed Facts entered into the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, and its Supreme Court.
In accordance with FRAP (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure) Rule 18 Plaintiff Submitted in my Declaration to my Exhibits B in which Judge Kevin Chang Dismisses my First Amended Complaint citing in his Order for Dismissal in page 4, second paragraph that he has reviewed Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint of Rambling 30 pages “EXCLUDING EXHIBITS” (attached as Exhibit A in Objections and Application to the US Supreme Court in San Francisco)

(Para 320) is the DIRECT ADMITTER by Judge Chang and Ezra that My Facts are Genuine Materials of Facts that can support my Legal Claims for relief based on all Exhibits Judge Chang “EXCLUDED AS NOT BEING FACTUAL FRIVOLOUSNESS” that has now become admitted Facts as opposed to being Ruled as factual frivolousness and/or delusional evidence,

(Para 321) The very same Exhibits in CV No. 11-00551 AKC RLP which made my Facts supporting my legal claims in CV No. 1100551 ACK RLP legitimate Facts in which I based my numerous claims for relief upon that affirmatively establishes viable legal grounds as opposed to being meritless in CV No. 11-00781 DAE KSC.

(Para 322) THE 9th Circuit Court of Appeals or its Supreme Court should Rule in my favor.
I’ve based my claims on the Ruling of factual frivolousness and/or delusional evidence in CV No.11-00551 ACK RLP based on abstracts from scientific publications from research neurologists and psychiatrists, and my claims are based on factual frivolousness and/or delusional evidence to my other numerous claims of Actions and Inactions,

(Para 323) but is being dismissed even with Judge Chang’s and Ezra’s Admitter of Plaintiffs Exhibits, and is being Ruled that my Complaint is still frivolous.
Even Construing Plaintiffs Complaint Liberally as Cited by Judges Chang and Ezra in Bernhardt vs. Los Angeles County, Jackson vs. Carey it is unintelligible, incoherent, and has no arguable substance of law or FACT in which I STATED to both JUDGES that it should be based on Fact then Law.

(Para 324) Now how can my Complaint and First Amended Complaint be of Ramblings, Unintelligible, Vague, Ambiguous, and Incoherent BASED ON EXHIBITS Judge Chang “EXCLUDED AS NOT BEING” THAT HAS NOW BECOME ADMITTED FACTS BY JUDGE CHANG AS OPPOSED TO BEING RULED AS FACTUAL FRIVOLOUSNESS (THE VERY SAME EXHIBITS In CV No. 11-00551 ACK RLP) WHICH MADE MY FACTS IN CV No. 11-00551 ACK RLP LEGITIMATE FACTS SUPPORTING MY LEGAL CLAIMS in which I Based my Numerous Claims for Relief Upon that Supported My Stance that Now Affirmatively Establishes Viable Legal Grounds as opposed as being merit less.

(Para 325) Now Judge Kevin Chang DISMISSES both my Complaint and First Amended Complaint citing in his Order for Dismissal in Page 4, Second Paragraph that he has reviewed Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint of Rambling 30 pages and concludes that it is STILL FRIVOLOUS.
My Complaint was dismissed as being highly duplicative and that further amending is futile and cited in Willard Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohal;a Hospital (attached as Exhibit B Civil Suit using the same ploy that each Court used rendering my Complaint as still being frivolous, and attached as Exhibit B supports my stance,

(Para 326) and to FRCP Rules 8 and 10 commanding a Complaint be short, plain, simple and concise.
As my Objections reflected I stipulated that I have 20 Defendants in this Civil Action, and Just naming all 20 Defendants to the Numerous Actions and Inactions took about 5 pages already of the 30 page Complaint, and out of the 76 pages of Exhibits Which Judges Chang and Ezra Admits to being Genuine Materials of Facts

(Para 327) I USED ABOUT 20 PAGES WORD FOR WORD FROM THESE EXHIBITS (abstracts from scientific publications from research neurologists and psychiatrists from Harvard, UCLA, Universities of Pennsylvania and Iowa, are these Judges out of their F—ken minds even they didn’t go these Prestigious colleges) and calling my Complaint still frivolous is impossible in which I brought to the attention of the 9th Circuit Court and its Supreme Court in San Francisco.

(Para 328) Failure to state a claim where relief may be granted is a subject in which Higher Courts usually review with disfavor. HERE’S WHERE NONE OF THE FEDERAL JUDGES COULD PROTECT ANY OF THE DEFENDANTS IN BOTH CIVIL ACTIONS, NOR COULD THE 9 Circuit
Court of Appeals OR ITS SUPREME COURT AND THAT’S WHY THEY ALL DISMISSED my Appeals “DEALING WITH EVIDENTIARY MATTERS” how heinous.

(Para 329) Federal and State Rules of Evidence gives rise to my Claims for Relief in the Form of Scientific Misconduct of Fabrication that the Publication of Deliberately false or misleading research, and/or the actual making up of research data and the Intent of Publishing them sometimes known as “drylabbing”, and Falsification through manipulation of research data and processes in order to reflect or prevent a certain result,

(Para 330) and bare assertions making entirely unsubstantiated claims which are Intentional or gross negligence leading to this fabrication of the scientific message or a false credit or emphasis given to a scientist, or distortion of the research process in other ways,

(Para 331) and that this scientific misconduct can be severe at a personal level for these perpetrator(s), and that these References included are to give arguments the appearance of widespread acceptance, but are Fake, and/or do not support the Argument,

(Para 332) scientific misconduct may also constitute violations of the law for being accused of the activities of a practicing scientist with server consequences should it be determined that a researcher intentionally or carelessly engage in misconduct omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the

(Para 333) research record may give the appearance of deception as this claim has, and has Created FRAUD and a conflict of interest through the clear evidence of falsification of data to the Damaging Scare of Antipsychotics causing about 50 plus Side Effects including Structural Brain Damage, etc.

(Para 334) To those who have perpetrated this fraud based on Premature scientifically unjustified publication of results, which do not conform to the rigorous academic and scientific standard’s that are expected from the above notables in their respective field(s), and in cases of this type, fairness and justice require discipline be imposed “to protect members of the public, to maintain the integrity of the legal profession and to safeguard the administration of justice from reproach”.

(Para 335) As you can see the Courts and it’s Judges (Defendants) and the other Defendants collaborated in the RICO At and under Conspiracy as cited, but also committed assault and battery ie., trespass to a person from Off Label Usage, and violated PLAGIARISM to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own, and to use (another’s production) without crediting the source, and to commit literary theft.

(Para 336) In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ARE CONSIDERED PLAGIARISM: copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit, failing to put a quotation in quotation marks, giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation

(Para 337) Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source is usually enough to prevent plagiarism. The legality of these situations, and others, would be dependent upon the intent and context within which they are produced.

Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees a progression into the Crime of Aggression.

(Para 338) § 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds,

(Para 339) misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

(Para 340) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States,

(Para 341) or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—
Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

(Para 342) cited in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail § 1506. Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ, process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect; or

(Para 343) Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 344) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with of 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders § 1509. Obstruction of court orders Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States,

(Para 345) shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime.

(Para 346) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigations
(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 347) (b) (1) Whoever, being an officer of a financial institution, with the intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding, directly or indirectly notifies any other person about the existence or contents of a subpoena for records of that financial institution, or information that has been furnished in response to that subpoena, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Para 348) (2) Whoever, being an officer of a financial institution, directly or indirectly notifies— (A) a customer of that financial institution whose records are sought by a subpoena for records; or

(Para 349) (B) any other person named in that subpoena; about the existence or contents of that subpoena or information that has been furnished in response to that subpoena, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Para 350) (3) As used in this subsection— (A) the term “an officer of a financial institution” means an officer, director, partner, employee, agent, or attorney of or for a financial institution; and

(Para 351) (B) the term “subpoena for records” means a Federal grand jury subpoena or a Department of Justice subpoena (issued under section 3486 of title 18), for customer records that has been served relating to a violation of, or a conspiracy to violate— (i) section 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1344, 1956, 1957, or chapter 53 of title 31; or (ii) section 1341 or 1343 affecting a financial institution.

(Para 352) (c) As used in this section, the term “criminal investigator” means any individual duly authorized by a department, agency, or armed force of the United States to conduct or engage in investigations of or prosecutions for violations of the criminal laws of the United States.

(Para 353) (d) (1) Whoever— (A) acting as, or being, an officer, director, agent or employee of a person engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce, or

(Para 354) (B) is engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce or is involved (other than as an insured or beneficiary under a policy of insurance) in a transaction relating to the conduct of affairs of such a business,

(Para 355) with intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding, directly or indirectly notifies any other person about the existence or contents of a subpoena for records of that person engaged in such business or information that has been furnished to a Federal grand jury in response to that subpoena, shall be fined as provided by this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Para 356) (2) As used in paragraph (1), the term “subpoena for records” means a Federal grand jury subpoena for records that has been served relating to a violation of, or a conspiracy to violate, section 1033 of this title.

(Para 357) (e) Whoever, having been notified of the applicable disclosure prohibitions or confidentiality requirements of section 2709(c)(1) of this title, section 626(d)(1) or 627(c)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681u(d)(1) or 1681v(c)(1)), section 1114(a)(3)(A) or 1114(a)(5)(D)(i) of the Right to Financial Privacy Act (12 U.S.C. 3414(a)(3)(A)

(Para 358) or 3414(a)(5)(D)(i)), or section 802(b)(1) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 436(b)(1)),[2] knowingly and with the intent to obstruct an investigation or judicial proceeding violates such prohibitions or requirements applicable by law to such person shall be imprisoned for not more than five years, fined under this title, or both.

(Para 359) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters § 1035. False statements relating to health care matters (a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or

(Para 360) (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Para 361) (b) As used in this section, the term “health care benefit program” has the meaning given such term in section 24(b) of this title.

(Para 362) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518. Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses (a) Whoever willfully prevents, obstructs, misleads, delays or attempts to prevent, obstruct, mislead, or delay the communication of information or records relating to a violation of a Federal health care offense to a criminal investigator shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Para 363) (b) As used in this section the term “criminal investigator” means any individual duly authorized by a department, agency, or armed force of the United States to conduct or engage in investigations for prosecutions for violations of health care offenses.

(Para 364 ) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court § 1623. False declarations before grand jury or court a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court

(Para 365) or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 366) (b) This section is applicable whether the conduct occurred within or without the United States.
(c) An indictment or information for violation of this section alleging that, in any proceedings before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States, the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations, which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if—

(Para 367) (1) each declaration was material to the point in question, and (2) each declaration was made within the period of the statute of limitations for the offense charged under this section.
In any prosecution under this section, the falsity of a declaration set forth in the indictment or information shall be established sufficient for

(Para 368) conviction by proof that the defendant while under oath made irreconcilably contradictory declarations material to the point in question in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury. It shall be a defense to an indictment or information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was true.

(Para 369) (d) Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration to be false, such admission shall bar prosecution under this section if, at the time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be exposed.

(Para 370) (e) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt under this section is sufficient for conviction. It shall not be necessary that such proof be made by any particular number of witnesses or by documentary or other type of evidence.

(Para 371) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings § 1018. Official certificates or writings
Whoever, being a public officer or other person authorized by any law of the United States to make or give a certificate or other writing, knowingly makes and delivers as true such a certificate or writing, containing any statement which he knows to be false, in a case where the punishment thereof is not elsewhere expressly provided by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Para 372) I based my numerous claims for relief upon that supported my Stance that affirmatively establishes viable legal grounds in this case and to the infringement of my copyright interests and Future Business Ventures, etc. mentioned in Plaintiffs Complaint and First Amended Complaint.

(Para 373) In which I have Many Business Ventures that needed to be expressed for my claims for relief.
Plagiarism is generally considered a misdemeanor. Muhlenberg College reports that most plagiarism fines are between $100 and $50,000 dollars with up to one year of jail possible.

(Para 374) They also report that plagiarism is considered a felony if the plagiarist earns more than $2,500 dollars from their plagiarism. In this case, fines may be up to $250,000 and ten years of jail time is possible, and Scientific Journals explicitly ask authors not to do this,

(Para 375) because it is referred to as “salami” (i.e.Many identical slices) in the jargon of medical journal editors, and in some cases, scientific misconduct may also constitute violations of the Law for being accused of the activities of a practicing scientist with server consequences should it be determined that a researcher intentionally or carelessly engage in misconduct omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record, has an editorial crime been committed?

(Para 376) and if so, was this a felony?
It obviously is as cited in paragraphs??????????????and in Exhibit B, and, to answer this question, we turned to the Committee on Publication Ethics (and the World Association of Medical Editors among other resources, and each of these violations carries different moral weight. Their publications is a clear ethical breech and has given the appearance of deception as this claim has,

(Para 377) and has Created FRAUD and the Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intentional failures to Inform or Warn, and created a CONFLICT of INTEREST through the clear evidence of falsification of data to the extent of damage caused by the many side effects, related to Structural Brain Damage and Could have saved Millions of lives from when this Civil Suit was entered in Federal Court as Defendants,

(Para 378) and the defining of schizophrenia, bipolar diseases possessing a Degenerative Brain Process (enlarged ventricles) that creates Neurodevelopmental disorders as well with bipolar who also has enlarged amygdala’s, and the multi-symptom dimensions of schizophrenia and bipolar diseases, and the differentiating of a Dual Diagnosis,

(Para 379) and under this “Diagnosis” please read it stipulates that substance use disorders can be confused with other psychiatric disease, and Finally Substance-Related Disorder, Substance –Induced Psychosis, Stimulant Psychosis and the KEY MAJOR DISTINCTIONS

(Para 380) Differentiating a drug psychosis and the psychosis of a True Schizophrenic, and in Bipolar Diseases or the above Structural Brain Damage that differentiates a disease from a drug psychosis, and the Absolute Time Frame of Drug Psychosis(s) Dissipation especially with methamphetamine usage.

(Para 381) and Defendants communications in there abstracts from scientific publications represented in the public domain (worldwide web, anti-antipsychotic websites, and antipsychiatry websites) through false information has damaged my Reputation, others or other entities Libel occurs when the false information rendered in the Public Domain that has created a defamatory communication and is “written and seen” as in my public document in CV No. 11-00551 ACK RLP, and in my numerous websites and blogs.

(Para 382) has tarnished my reputation as a Mind Freedom International Member (now ex-member)of (anti-anti psychotics, and psychiatric oppression), Author (through copyrights that I possess in the Library of Congress), and Inventor, and businessman through mass publication of said eBooks, and my many Social networking connections,

(Para 383) and other Future Businesses as described below that will be Cited in actions by each Defendant to my claims for relief that also based on Defendants factual frivolousness and/or delusional abstracts from scientific publications of misconduct that denied me legal grounds by the dismissal of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint of a meritless legal theory.

(Para 384) My future businesses dealing with Human Rights and Genocide violations caused by Project P.E.N.I. I’VE SUBMITTED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ABSTRACTS FROM PUBLICATIONS FROM THE DEFENDANTS in my civil suits OF MACAQUE MONKEY’S WHO DON’T HAVE SCHIZOPHRENIA OR BIPOLAR DISEASES AND GIVEN ANTI PSYCHOTICS PROVING VARIOUS AREAS OF STRUCTURAL BRAIN DAMAGE,

(Para 385) and my Businesses are in the process and will be gathering THE NECESSARY EVIDENCE ONCE AND FOR ALL in entering Extensive Structural Brain Damage caused by OVER antipsychotics and anti-depressants usage through various dimensional imaging tests (like the ones done with the Macaque Monkeys) such as MRI, functional fMRI, SPECT, or PET scans,

(Para 386) but are now based on the children who are not diagnosed with having schizophrenia or bipolar diseases, but only having ADD, ADHD and behaviors and who has been on a Polypharmacy Regime for over 10 years, and many of Hawaii’s Methamphetamine users (or other locations with the Dual Diagnosis) who also doesn’t possess these Diseases or the Degenerative Brain Processes of Schizophrenia (enlarged ventricles) and Bipolar (enlarged amygdala’s),

(Para 387) but only so called possessing a temporary Stimulant Psychosis, and who’s been on a Polypharmacy Regime for 25-35 years which definitely show Extensive Structural Brain Damage and will definitely determine antipsychotic and anti-depressant usage to be too dangerous for Any Use in which None of the Defendant who are research Neurologists and Psychiatrist

(Para 388) and have wholeheartedly Intentionally avoided this Liability, and so has the FDA, and has created the Intentional Failures to Inform or Warn, and could have saved countless millions of lives by now, and this is the bottom line to affirmatively put Psycho-Endo-Neuro-Immunology (psychiatry, psychologists, neurologists, neuro-immunologists, and immunologists out of business,

(Para 389) and the Pharmaceutical Companies of antipsychotics and anti-depressants, and Without this Critical Factual Evidence ALL ATTEMPTS for asserting any legal protections will be Meritless as so many Organizations (NGO’s) are wasting your time on.

(Para 390) Antipsychotics affect’s the brain at a structural level, for example increasing the volume of the BASAL GANGLIA (especially the CAUDATE NUCLEUS, and the THALAMUS through the reduction of cortical GREY MATTER volume in different brain areas and Death of NEURONS.

(Para 391) The effects may differ for typical versus atypical anti psychotics and many say the newer atypical’s are even worst the typical’s. The usage of antipsychotics for about 18-22 Months with the Macaque Monkeys led to a significant overall SHRINKAGE IN BRAIN TISSUE about 8-11%, in both GRAY and WHITE MATTER across several brain areas, and

(Para 392) with lower GLIAL CELL COUNTS, due to a decrease in ASTROCYTES and OLIGODENDROCYTES (and this is the insulation of your neurons and it’s like an electrical cord that is frayed and shorting out), and increased NEURONAL DENSITY.

(Para 393) I’ve included other side effects (that has been Intentionally avoided) that affects so many other areas of the cranium, such as the central nervous system, endocrine, autonomous nervous system, cerebral cortex, cerebellar cortex, hypothalamus; sub-thalamus, – putamen, globus pallidus, endocrine system, all the nucleus and nuclei, anterior horn,

(Para 394) lateral horn, posterior horn, neurons are the core components of the nervous system affecting, signaling, synapses, networks, brain spinal cord, ganglia, sensory neurons, sensory organs, motor neurons, muscle contractions, glands, and so many other areas. I’ll be gathering and collecting ALL Imaging Tests and kept in a Data Base FOR EVERYONE WITH BACKUP SYSTEMS and WILL ALSO BE APPLIED TO BELOW.

(Para 395) My Businesses will also be establishing with various Neurologists and Immunologists and Especially Personal Injury Lawyers on the subject of Traumatic Brain Injury (now referred to as TBI) because this is already proven with these lawyers and expert witnesses) and the neurobiological deficits that can occur, and then the Secondary Mechanisms of injury, and Assessing TBI results in Variable Constellations of Neurobehavioral disorders

(Para 396) such as cognitive or intellectual deficits, behavioral and personality changes, and mood, etc (which Defendants Research Publications is already indicating and I’ve expounded upon), and then going beyond TBI and secondary mechanisms of injury that also goes into the Central Nervous System and Endocrine System from a Neuro-immunology to Immunology standpoint that requires careful attention,

(Para 397) and detailed monitoring of ALL DEFICITS biological, biophysiological, metabolic, hormonal, enzymes, and amino , and effects from structural brain damage that can affect the total schematics from a psycho-endo-neuro-immunological standpoint that CAUSES heart diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cancers and shortened life expectancy’s by 25-30 years.

(Para 398) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder
§ 1111. Murder (a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery;

(Para 399) or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.
Any other murder is murder in the second degree.

(Para 400) (b) Within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life;
Whoever is guilty of murder in the second degree, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

(Para 401) (c) For purposes of this section— (1) the term “assault” has the same meaning as given that term in section 113;
(2) the term “child” means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years and is— (A) under the perpetrator’s care or control; or
(B) at least six years younger than the perpetrator;

(Para 402) (3) the term “child abuse” means intentionally or knowingly causing death or serious bodily injury to a child;
(4) the term “pattern or practice of assault or torture” means assault or torture engaged in on at least two occasions;
(5) the term “serious bodily injury” has the meaning set forth in section 1365; and

(Para 403) (6) the term “torture” means conduct, whether or not committed under the color of law, that otherwise satisfies the definition set forth in section 2340(1).

(Para 404) Cited in violation of Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter
§ 1113. Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter
Except as provided in section 113 of this title, whoever, within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, attempts to commit murder or manslaughter, shall, for an attempt to commit murder be imprisoned not more than twenty years or fined under this title, or both, and for an attempt to commit manslaughter be imprisoned not more than seven years or fined under this title, or both.

(Para 405) Cited in violation of Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder
§ 1117. Conspiracy to murder
If two or more persons conspire to violate section 1111, 1114, 1116, or 1119 of this title, and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

(Para 406) attached as Exhibit H is also an excellent way to exposing this Derelict Science in their many ways dealing with efficacy, changing of, medication (antipsychotics and anti-depressant), to even a change in a Polypharmacy Regime that put all State Hospital employees into a Checkmate you’re going to Love This 1, and is cited and attached as Exhibit H.

(Para 407) THAT IS ATTRIBUTED AS BEING FATAL IATYROGENESIS. Iatrogenesis, or an iatrogenic artifact pronounced (I-AT-RO-GENESIS); “originating from a physician”) is an inadvertent adverse effect or complication resulting from medical treatment or advice, including that of psychologist, therapists, pharmacists, nurses, physicians and dentists. Iatrogenesis is not restricted to conventional medicine: Some iatrogenic artifacts are clearly defined and easily recognized, such as a complication following a surgical procedure.

(Para 408) Some less obvious ones can require significant investigation to identify, such as complex drug interactions. Causes of iatrogenesis include chance, medical error, negligence, social control, unexamined instrument design, anxiety or annoyance related to medical procedures, and the adverse effects or interactions.

(Para 409) I’ve already linked antipsychotics usage to Cancers, Brain Tumors, All Heart Diseases and Autoimmune Diseases, and presently Iatrogenesis is currently the number 3 Cause of Death it replaced Autoimmune Disease as the #3 cause of death. THIS WILL VERY WELL LEAD ONE DAY TO criminal charges not related to a monetary thing (as pharmaceutical companies pay no disregard to in Product Liability,

(Para 410) but is due to the Intentional Avoidance of Liability that created the Intentional Failures to Inform and/or Warn (this is the Critical “Intent” needed and is already established),

(Para 411) and as other conduits/Defendants who have not been subjected to YET), but now we will be able to prosecute them with a Higher Degree of “INTENT” to man-slaughter once the determination of any deadly/fatal outcomes occurs and through the causal connection of antipsychotic use and/or over-usage In which Locked these people in, and it’s impossible for them to weasel out of.

(Para 412) and that Plaintiff was not given the opportunity to expound on the “Basic” Supreme Laws of the U.S. Court system(s). The Intentional Avoidance of Liability and Intentional Failures to Warn by the State of Hawaii has manipulated their immunity in a systematic fashion to discriminate against Federal Causes of Action cited in Alden, Supra, 527 US at 758, and from State causes of action as well from pre-deprivation to post deprivation remedies under Civil Rights and Constitutional violations as well as for tort claims,

(Para 413 ) and cited in Civil Right violations 42 U.S.C. 1983 violations, the State of Hawaii Health system policy, customs and regulations in training of its employees is of a continuous violation of Civil and Constitutional Rights that also applies to the Waiver of the State of Hawaii 11th Amendment rights, fraudulent concealment and/or non-disclosure and Lulling, that amounts to fraudulent concealment, and an extension to a unjustified psychiatric commitment, and an Intentional conscious callous deliberate indifference that’s wanton, reckless, and malicious for compensatory/punitive damages.

(Para 414) This is WHERE THE JUDICIAL CONSPIRACY IN LEGAL MALFEASANCE BEGINS AND ENDED WITH THE COURTS and DEFENSE ATTORNEY’S AIDING AND ABETTING IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH REVISED STATUTES AND FEDERAL CODES CITED BELOW AND ALL SUPPLIED WITH COURT DOCUMENTS THAT WILL BE INCLUSIVE IN cited and attached to as Exhibit B..

(Para 415) Cited in violation of Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 USC CHAPTER 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 to 373), Chapter 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS, CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122), CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623), 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, and

(Para 416) 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, and

(Para 417) 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder

(Para 418) and Read how I was illegally labeled a Vexatious litigant according to Revised Statutes, that Denied me filing Motions, Reply Memorandums, Entering all Evidentiary Matters, even Objections, and threatened that I must post security or my civil suit will be dismissed as a Pro se litigant with an Informa Pauperis status, and the Courts Intentionally prevented me from filing an Appeal to the higher Court by Denying my non hearing Motion to dismiss two Defendants L. Ron Hubbard and Dr. Thomas Szasz or for filing for Final Judgment,

(Para 419) because they were dead in which I could not file for Final Judgment to Appeal. My writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not be issued unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action;

(Para 420) where a court has discretion to act, mandamus will not over rule and/or interfere with or control the exercise of that discretion, even when the judge has acted erroneously, unless the judge has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which he or she has a Legal duty to act.

(Para 421) Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Rectenwald told me so what if Judge Nishimura made Erroneous Rulings because I can appeal this, but he knew that I could not appeal this decision thereby implicating himself, and he did not Rule on their direct involvement with aiding and abetting in criminal activity or any immediate disciplinary actions, and Senators Daniel Inouye, Colleen Hanabusa, Mazie Hirono, Ed Case, Charles Djou, Brian Schatz refused to write a letter to Senator Patrick Leahy to investigate this matter of urgency that Senator Patrick Leahy requested and passed the buck to these Senators.

(Para 422) Monica Suematsu and John Nishimoto Esq., represented Defendants Community Empowerment Resources and Aliman Sears Dr. Benjamin Young here in Hawaii and Entered a Defense for Motion to dismiss that Plaintiff is a Vexatious litigant on the Grounds that my Complaints entered in Federal Court and State Courts were Frivolous.
This was denied in Judge Nishimura’s Courts, because Plaintiffs Complaint was not frivolous (another words my Complaints had genuine material facts and lays claim to viable legal merits.

(Para 423) Hawaii biggest Law Firm in Hawaii Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing represented by Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer, Kenneth Robbins thereafter file a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff as being a Vexatious Litigant in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) that plaintiff filed more than 5 Civil Suits within HRS 7 year period.
Plaintiff DEMANDED the over-turning of the Order Declaring Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant (4x) in objections through other Defendant counsel) by Judge Nishimura’s Intentional Erroneous Ruling

(Para 424) WHO CAN’T EVEN MAKE A VERY SIMPLE CALCULATION IN YEARS in accordance with HRS 634J-2, HRS 634J-6, and HRS 634J-7 in Conjunction with Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer and Kenneth Robbins of Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing for Defendant NAMI in their Very Poor Intentional Tabulation and Both John-Anderson L. Meyer and Kenneth Robbins and Judge Nishimura WAS INFORMED THEY BOTH should get a Calculator, calendar, or an abacus or something,

(Para 425) and this was brought up in the Hearing Motion for Dismissal by Defendant NAMI, and in the Hearing Motion By Plaintiff, and in Plaintiffs Objection to Defendant NAMI’s Order Granting Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant, and in Defendants Wayne Morin Jr., and James Raymond’s Hearing Motion to Dismiss cited on page 16 on May 8, 2013 Hearing by and through Defense Counsel Alexa Zen for both Defendants, and Again in Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment

(Para 426) against Defendants Morin and Raymond which INTENTIONALLY WASN’T BROUGH UP BY DEFENSE COUNSEL OR JUDGE NISHIMURA AT THAT HEARING WHICH WAS A VERY BIG CRUX OF ALEXA ZEN’S DEFENSE filed February 22, 2013, filed again March 12, 2013, filed again April 12, 2013, filed again May 20, 2013, filed again May 29, 2013, and Finally filed again on July 18, 2013.

(Para 427) Paul Alston, John –Anderson L. Meyer and Kenneth Robbins Filed this Defense in his Hearing Motion to Dismiss Three Years too Late and is Time Barred from filing this-AGAIN ATTACHED AS PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT A (cited in SOM LEK Federal Court 2003) is John-Anderson L. Meyers and Kenneth Robbins First Exhibit A showing in 2003 Plaintiff Filed his First Civil Action NOT IN 2005 IN WHICH THE ORDER WAS GRANTED,

(Para 428) and also Attached as Exhibit A is Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer and Kenneth Robbins Memorandum in Support of Motion shows Exhibit A the Civil Suit filed in SOM LEK Federal Court 2003, and the in the Order Granted by Judge Nishimura for being a Vexatious Litigant showing that Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer and Kenneth Robbins and Judge Nishimura is INTENTIONALLY NOW ONLY SHOWING Exhibits B through M,

(Para 429) and Not Paul Alston, John-Anderson Meyer and Kenneth Robbins Original Exhibit A of Plaintiffs First Civil Suit Entry in 2003, and THIS IS NOT IN THE TRANSCRIPTS of the July 24, 2013 Hearing Attached as Plaintiffs Exhibit A, Page 3 line 21-25, Page 4, lines 1-21 in which PLAINTIFF PRESENTED JOHN-ANDERSON L . MEYER and KENNTH ROBBINS Motion for Vexatious Litigant, Memorandum in Support of EXHIBITS (and Especially Exhibit A), and of coarse Exhibit A, and my Documents attached as Exhibit B has these Documents supporting my stance.

(Para 430) Plaintiff Showed this is Court to all Present including Plaintiffs Four Witnesses and Jessica Akita hasn’t transcribe this “at all” she states “some lec” No it SOM as in Judge Susan Oki Mollway and LEK is Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi dated in January of 2003, and Jessica Akita failed to Put in Transcripts that I Presented to the Court John-Anderson L. Meyer and Kenneth Robbins “MEMORANDUM

(Para 431) in Support of Exhibits to his Motion for Vexatious Litigant Showing Exhibit A is the Civil Suit in SOM LEK’s Court dated January of 2003”, But Jessica Akita did include the Order of the Hearing Granting Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant and its Missing Exhibit A in that Order it only has Exhibit B (brilliant what happened to your Exhibit A)..

(Para 432) This is Judge Nishimura, Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer, Kenneth Robbins, Alexa Zen, and Bruce Voss Illegal Entry and Submissions of Evidence Creating the Instant Dismissal of Defendants and Plaintiffs Every Submission of Court Motions to be Subjected to the Request of the Court, and when Hearing Motions are Approved then Plaintiff STILL by

(Para 433) Order of Judge Nishimura MUST have Judge Nishimura’s Approval by REVIEW of Plaintiffs Supplemental Memorandums or Reply Memorandums to the Already Approved Hearing Motion and is NOT CONSIDERED A MOTION ONLY BECAUSE JUDGE NISHIMURA DOESN’T WANT PLAINTIFF GETTING PERTINANT MEMORANDUMS, DEFENSES, DOCUMENTS ON RECORD IN CIRCUIT COURT.

(Para 434) Plaintiffs Original Intentional Order being declared a vexatious litigant by Judge Nishimura demanded that Plaintiff can’t file any hearing Motions without the Courts approval, but may file Memorandums and Reply memorandums to Defendants Hearing Motions.
This latter expanded that Plaintiff can’t file OBJECTIONS Plaintiff has TO HAVE HIS OBJECTION REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO FILING HIS OBJECTION,

(Para 435) and Plaintiff must has his REPLY MEMORANDUMS Reviewed for APPROVAL AND Even Plaintiffs SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUMS must be approved for filings, and GUESS WHAT EACH ONE OF EVERY DIFFERENT FILING WAS DENIED.
THEY DIDN’T WANT PLAINTIFF TO GET ANYTHING ON RECORD.

(Para 436) THIS IS WHERE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES HAS ENTERED THE CIRCUIT COURT AND NOW THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII AND ALSO THE FEDERAL COURT HERE AND THE 9th CIRCUIT SUPREME COURT IN SAN FRANCISCO 9th Circuit THAT HANDLES 5-6 STATES?

(Para 437) Plaintiff Objects to Defendant NARPA, Alexa Zen, Bruce Voss, Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer, Kenneth Robbins, and Judge Nishimura who is Under Investigation for Practicing Law Without a License and in aiding and abetting in Criminal activity in accordance with HRS (Hawaii Revised Statutes) HRS 605-14, and HRS 605-15

(Para 438) as is Evident by John E. B. Jones President of NARPA first Filing according to Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyers and Defendant NAMI’s Statement of No Opposition and Non-Appearance regarding Defendant NARPA’s Motion to Dismiss Filed February 20, 2013.

(Para 439) Plaintiff Informed this Court Several times before with Alexa Zen and Bruce Voss representing Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law for the March 12, 2013 Hearing Motion to Dismiss, and in my Objection and reconsideration and/or for new trial request PRIOR TO THE APRIL 2, 2013 Hearing Motion to Dismiss that John E. B. Jones Isn’t a Lawyer nor does he have a License to Practice Law in Hawaii Which ALL PARTIES HAS PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF BECAUSE I INFORMED THEM TWICE.

(Para 440) Alexa Zen and Bruce Voss defending Bazelon and through President of Bazelon Ira Burnim’s Declaration who are Very good friends with President of NARPA John E. B. Jones and Both Presidents and Governmental Entities are always Speakers at NARPA’S Annual Conferences.

(Para 441) Alexa Zens and Bruce Voss Defense for Bazelon and John E. B. Jones filed Hearing Motion to Dismiss is the VERY SAME EXACT INDENTICAL SUBSTANTIVE JOINDER DEFENSE AS ALEXA ZENS and BRUCE VOSS, but Alexa Zens and Bruce Voss Famous HRS Long Arm Statute does not apply to Defendant NARPA, because Plaintiff Super ceded the “Minimal Contact” Requirements to Defeat this Defense and the Remainder of Alexa Zen and Bruce Voss Defenses that So-Called Applied to Defendant Bazelon.

Para 442) The Rules of Professional Conduct Prohibits an Attorney (Alexa Zen and Bruce Voss) from Assisting a Non-Attorney (John E. B. Jones) from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law AS JOHN E. B. JONES EXACT SUBSTATIVE JOINDER DEFENSE AS DEFENDANT BAZELON SUPPORTS

(Para 443) and SPEAKS FOR ITSELF IN HIS UNAUTHORIZED FILING(S) THAT AUTOMATICALLY IMPLICATES ALEXA ZEN AND BRUCE VOSS CRIMINALLY Attached as Plaintiffs Exhibit B.
An Attorney therefore may not Partner with or split fees with a non-attorney in the performance of any sort of legal work,

(Para 444) and the Remaining BUFFER Defendants are Governmental Non-Profit Mental Health Law Centers and Advocates, and the Hawaii Code Comparison with regard to paragraph (a) DR 3-101 (A) of the Hawaii Code provides that (a) lawyer shall not aid a non-lawyer in the unauthorized practice of law.

(Para 445) Regulation: a process of the promulgation, monitoring and enforcement of rules, a written instrument containing rules having the force of law and in this case under Statutes HRS 605-14, and HRS 605-15, a Statute is a formal written enactment of a legislative authority that governs a State, Statutes Commands or Prohibits something, or Declares Policy, Statutes are “Black Letter Law”,

(Para 446) All Statutes Must be in Harmony with the Fundamental Law of the land according to Rule(s) 3.2 Expediting Litigation, 3.4 the Fairness to Opposing Party, 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal (a) Influencing Decision Maker (d) Communication with a Judge or Official.

(Para 447) The Hawaii Code Comparison with regard to paragraph (a) DR 3-101 (B) of the Hawaii Code provided that (a) lawyer shall not practice law in the State of Hawaii unless (the lawyer) is licensed by the Supreme Court of Hawaii in the presentation of a Specific Case at the DISCRETION of the Presiding Judge as Authorized by Rule 1 (d) of the Supreme Court of Hawaii,

(Para 448) and Judge Nishimura has Wholeheartedly Aided and Abetted a non-lawyer in the unauthorized practice of law in Conjunction with Attorney’s Alexa Zen, Bruce Voss, Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer, and Kenneth Robbins.
Judge Nishimura was Informed Twice and Yet Accepted a Pro Hac Vice Application Twice from John E. B. Jones presently of North Little Rock Arkansas,

(Para 449) because this must be Presented to Her and her Clerk and shall state under penalty of perjury, 1) the attorneys residence and office address, 2) by what Courts the attorney has been admitted to practice and the date(s) of admission, 3) that the attorney is in good standing and is eligible to practice in said Court(s), 4) that the attorney is not currently suspended or disbarred in any other court, 5) if the attorney has concurrently or within the year preceding the current application made any pro hac vice application in this Court,

(Para 450) the title and the number of each matter wherein the attorney made application, the date of application, and whether or not the application was GRANTED AND IN THIS CASE IT WAS TWICE (February 20, 2013 and April 2, 2013).

(Para 451) Defendant NARPA by and through John E. B. Jones and Judge Nishimura acceptance of John E. B. Jones Hearing Motion to Dismissed didn’t even have a Notice of Hearing, but was Granted and “Filed by Judge Nishimura’s Court” Herself filed February 20, 2013,
(Para 452) and later again for the April 2, 2013 Hearing as is Documented in the Document List/Index attached as Plaintiffs Exhibit B, and in Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer Motion of No Opposition, and in Plaintiffs Opposition Motion for SJ, Reply Memorandum, and Through Alexa Zen and Bruce Voss No Stance in the May 8, 2013 Hearing attached as Plaintiffs Exhibit B.

(Para 453) JUDGE NISHIMURA DENIED THIS OPENLY AT THE HEARING ON JULY 24, 2013 attached as Plaintiffs Exhibit B the Transcripts from the July 24, 2013 Hearing that Judge Nishimura Stated I Didn’t Sign or OK or Schedule John E. B. Jones Filing on February 20, 2013 and for the Hearing Motion for April 2, 2013, BUT ALL HEARING MOTION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE PRESIDING JUDGE,

(Para 454) AND MUST BE INITIALED BY THE PRESIDING JUDGE AND SCHEDULED BY THE JUDGES CLERK FOR A HEARING DATE IN WHICH IT WAS, YET JUDGE NISHIMURA IS DENYING THIS SHE IS GUILTY AS SIN, and who submitted this to Judge Nishimura and Filed by who down hear I Believe it was Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer and Kenneth Robbins

(Para 455) according to the April 2, 2013 Hearing the Minutes will Determine this or if Altered Judge Nishimura has a lot more Explaining to do. Plaintiff is Seeking Concurrent Criminal Charges against Alexa Zen, Bruce Voss, Paul Alston, John-Anderson L. Meyer, Kenneth Robbins,

(Para 456) John E. B. Jones and Judge Nishimura this Intentional Willful Misconduct that is related to the Judicial Duties brings the Judicial Office into Disrepute, and Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice or conduct that brings the Judicial Office into Disrepute via Violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct,

(Para 457) and the Rules of Profession Conduct upon Plaintiffs Request to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Did Judge Nishimura Initiate an Investigation of John E. B. Jones with the Attorney General’s Office Prior to this Hearing Scheduled for July 24, 2013. NO ONE Informed Plaintiff of this Hearing Motion Nor Did The Court or Defendant NARPA or John-Anderson L. Meyer Notify Plaintiff of Any Changes Prior to Defendant NARPA’s Hearing Motion to Dismiss,

(Para 458) and John E. B. Jones MUST HAVE BEEN INFORMED AS WELL AS ALL PARTIES EXCEPT PLAINTIFF to this Privy Ex Parte Communication Violation BECAUSE HE DIDN’T SHOW UP.
Judge Nishimura (filed by her Court) for the April 2, 2013 Hearing Motion to Dismiss in which John E. B. Jones President of NARPA Did Not Show up for his Own Hearing Motion to Dismiss.

(Para 459) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2332b – Acts of terrorism transcending … The term narcoterrorism has been around since the early 1980s, when it was used to refer to violence used by Latin American cocaine cartels to extract political concessions from their governments (although cocaine, pharmacologically speaking, is not a narcotic).

(Para 460) More recently, the term has been used to refer to groups who use terrorism on behalf of a political agenda (and are known as terrorist groups), who use drug trade to finance their political agenda’s and consortiums.

(Para 461) Here are Great examples NAMI’s (national alliance for mental illness) who at this time with the NAMI Institute and Stanley Foundation in conjunctions with President Obama’s Administration and the FDA and these numerous Causes of Action through their ACTIONS and Why and What they Created

(Para 462) Senator Grassley’s Senate Panel Investigation of NAMI found them guilty of receiving illegal funds from Big Pharmaceutical Companies.
Over three quarters of NAMI’s income 56 million dollars was received illegally in less than two and a half years, and NAMI Institute and the Stanley Foundation in conjunction with the Obama Administration,

(Para 463) and the FDA are using this illegal funding to create Experimental blindings, and are educating and encouraging parents from these experimental blindings to have your children medicated for ADHD (because of them theirs a 700 % increase Big Pharmaceutical companies newest markets).

(Para 464) Science News: ScienceDaily (Aug. 17, 2010 you may reference this material) nearly 1 million children in the United States are potential misdiagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder per year, simply because they “Are The Youngest And Most Immature” in their Kindergarten Class according to new research by a Michigan State University economist.

(Para 465) The Centers For Disease Control And Prevention on the subject of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD states the Morbidity in number of children 3-17 years of age ever diagnosed with ADHA is 5.2 million, and in Health Care Use, Ambulatory Care the number of these visits (to physician offices, hospital outpatient

(Para 466) and emergency departments) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as primary diagnosis is 7.3 million (average annual, 2006-2007). What I am saying is that regardless if it’s a misdiagnosis this is what will logically happen to most of the children, and they will be very susceptible of being further caught in the system that they can’t get out of.

(Para 467) There is lack of evidence of the effectiveness in the long term of beneficial effects of Methylphenidate, Ritalin, and Adderall with regard to learning and academic performance. Therapy with Methylphenidate should not be indefinite, and weaning off periods to assess symptoms is recommended. Methylphenidate is derived from the illegal drug meth-amphetamine (ice), but is FDA approved.

(Para 468) The 700% increase in psycho stimulant use that occurred in the 1990s justifies concern about potential over diagnosis and
inappropriate treatment of child behavior problems. A critical review of epidemiologic research suggests that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is not universally over diagnosed however, for some U.S. communities there is evidence of substantial ADHD over diagnosis,

(Para 469) adverse educational outcomes among children treated
for the disorder, and suboptimal management of childhood behavior problems. Evidence of ADHD over diagnosis is obscured when findings are reported without respect to geographic location, race, gender, and age. More sophisticated epidemiologic tracking of ADHD treatment trends

(Para 470) and examination of associated outcomes is needed to appreciate the scope of the problem on a national level. Meanwhile, a public health approach to ADHD that includes the development and implementation of data-driven, community-based interventions is warranted and is underway in some communities.

(Para 471) Guidelines for promoting judicious use of psychotropic drugs are suggested. Children who are forced to take
methylphenidate are more prone or have a higher affinity of becoming drug users (of all stimulants) due to the profound induced stimulant
psychological effects that was forced upon them, that will created even more drug psychosis people being classified as schizophrenic or
bipolar in the years to come,

(Para 472) and so on, and so on. There are many adverse effects to taking this stimulate drug (that I listed), and it can cause decreases in height and weight, deforming of bone structure (curvature). As well known Dr. Peter R. Breggin M.D. (psychiatrist and
anti-anti psychotic expert) from the Center for the study of Psychiatry and Psychology in Maryland and NARPA and Bazelon’s Main Man

(Para 473) quotes and has address the United States Congress that children become psychotic with long term therapy such as paranoia, schizophrenia, and behavioral sensitization, and can include hearing voices, visual hallucinations, urges to harm oneself, severe anxiety, euphoria, grandiosity, paranoid delusions, confusion, increased aggression and irritability, and is unpredictable in whom it will occur.

(Para 474) Special Precaution is recommended in individuals with Epilepsy (as both children have) with additional caution to individuals with uncontrolled epilepsy due to the Potential for Methylphenidate to Lower the Seizure Threshold. These drugs can drastically and permanently change brain chemistry, and short term doses produce brain cell death, and long-lasting and sometimes permanent changes in the biochemistry of the brain.

(Para 475) These drugs also endanger the cardiovascular system and commonly produce mental effects, including depression. Stimulants even more often become gateway drugs to additional psychiatric medications. Stimulant-induced over-stimulation, for example, is often treated with additive or dangerous sedatives (Risperidone, etc.,

(Para 476) while stimulant-induced depression is often treated with dangerous unapproved antidepressants. As the child’s emotional control breaks down due to medication effects, mood stabilizers may be added. Eventually, these children end up on four or five psychiatric drugs at once and a “DIAGNOSIS OF BIPOLAR DISORDER” by the age of eight
or ten.

(Para 477) This is an Atrocity that will become a Very Huge Human Rights, Genocide (because of the demographics, race, ethnics, poverty level of these targeted people, through educators and the State System) that Has Already IMPACTED the 10 Million Children in the USA diagnosed as having ADD, ADHD, and behaviors, Who Has a Very Great Chance of becoming Bipolar by the Age of 9-10 through Off Label Usage,

(Para 478) and our Government has CREATED THESE CHILDREN… FUTURE DRUG USERS (NARCOTERRORISM) THAT WILL BECOME LIKE THE 20-30 MILLION Dual Diagnosed due to Forced Stimulant Inducement through Methylphenidate, Ritalin, Adderall, and the Major Tranquilizers Antipsychotics and are more prone or have a higher affinity of becoming drug users that has

(Para 479) Create a HUGE TAXPAYER, PARENTS INTEREST, and ALREADY IS THE DOWNFALL OF OUR HEALTH SYSTEM.
The 700% increase in psycho stimulant (methylphenidate, Ritalin, Adderall) use that occurred in the 1990s justifies concern about potential over diagnosis and inappropriate treatment of child behavior problems.

(Para 480) A critical review of epidemiologic research suggests that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is not universally over diagnosed however, for some U.S. communities there is evidence of substantial ADHD over diagnosis, adverse educational outcomes among children treated for the disorder, and suboptimal management of childhood behavior problems. Evidence of ADHD over diagnosis is

(Para 481) obscured when findings are reported without respect to geographic location, race, gender, and age. More sophisticated epidemiologic tracking of ADHD treatment trends and examination of associated outcomes is needed to appreciate the scope of the problem on a national level.

(Para 482) Meanwhile, a public health approach to ADHD that includes the development and implementation of data-driven, community-based interventions is warranted and is underway
in some communities. Guidelines for promoting judicious use of psychotropic drugs are suggested.

(Para 483) THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT OUR STATE SYSTEM IS CREATING YOUR CHILDREN TO BE PERMANENTLY CLASSIFIED A BIPOLAR, A SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS BY THE MEDICATIONS THEY’VE BEEN PRESCRIBED, AND IS HAPPENING TO TENS OF MILLIONS OF CHILDREN IN THE USA ALONE AND THEIR CREATED DRUG USERS THROUGH NARCOTERRORISM.

(Para 484) Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing Represents Companies in Health Care, Non Profits, Governmental Contract and in Education and
Bet the Company with litigation in Health Care, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, and Probably Traumatic Brain Injury, and aids in Grow the Company in Health Care, Governmental Contracts and Federal Grant Compliance, and in Education (they sound like NAMI)

(Para 485) But Yet Big Dog Law Firm Like Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing is a Substantive Joinder a Follower to the Law Firm of Bays Lung Rose &
Holma for Defendant Bazelon who doesn’t Specialize in this type of Litigation my sounds like a Lot of Ex Parte Communication Violations
Going On Huh?.

(Fact 486) Attached as Exhibit E from NAMI’s website and Publishing is about Research Programs their involved with and Policy
Topics dealing in Juvenile Justice, Child Welfare and Custody Relinquishment, Parental Placement and Relinquishment to Juvenile Justice and Child Welfare to Access Mental Health Services sounds like NAMI is working with CWS or CPS, and Public Policy Topics on

(Para 487) State Advocacy, Health Care Reform making Anti psychotics more affordable through Obama’s Plan with Medicaid and Off Label Usage, and Advocates for Mental Health Funding for State and Federal Budget Issues CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS CRAP (Taxpayers will soon have a field day with entities like NAMI, NAMI Institute, Stanley Foundation, the Obama Administration, and Congress).

(Fact 488) Attached as Exhibit F are Many, Many ADMITTERS BY NAMI that Anti psychotics Cause Structural Brain Damage in Conjunction with the Stanley Foundation/NAMI Research Institute THAT HAS NOW CRUCIFIED NAMI citing that some of the Brain Changes appears to Be Related to the “EFFICACY” of the Antipsychotic Drugs (can you believe that Crap), while other changes are probably related to the Side Effects of the Drugs, but all in all they believe its Affects a Wide Range of Structural Brain Damage According to their Findings.

(Para 489) THESE ARE THE CIVIL SUIT NUMBERS FOR REFERENCES CV No. Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al, CV No. Willard Max Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al, CV No. 1100551 ACK RLP,CV No. 11-00781 DAE KSC, and CV No 12-1-2761-11 RAN cited in and attached as Exhibit B.

(Para 490) these civil suits has entered into the present day age of Intentionally Created “domestic terrorism” cite in violations of Actions and Inactions, and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2331 are the violations against all Defendants – Definitions the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State with 75 Million other mental health consumers;

(Para 491) (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

(Para 492) Willard Imamoto Versus Hawaii State Hospital et al KKS (Judge Kenneth S. Sakamoto) and Appeal No. 29859, and Willard Imamoto versus Kahi Mohala Hospital et al BIA (Judge Bert I. Ayabe) and Appeal No.30065 attached as Exhibit J.

(Para 493) Now one of them in Willard Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al was first submitted in the Honorable Court of Gary W. B. Chang and I had another Civil suit filed in Judge Marks Courts that Had very same Defense and Claims so that was Consolidated in Judge Chang’s Court which took a little over two years before

(Para 494) Deputy Attorney General John Molay deceitfully filed two Motions One to dismiss that this Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction and that it must go through the MCCP first (medical claims conciliation panel) and the other Motion was Summary Judgment against Plaintiff.

(Para 495) I knew after researching about Tort Claims that I would lose to the First Motion or I would have filed an Opposition Motion to John Molays Motion for Summary Judgment. John Molay Deceitfully won that this Court lacks Subject Matter
Jurisdiction that it must go to the MCCP because of its tortuous claims, but lost his Motion for Summary Judgment on the Grounds of Mootness another words it had no Probative value. Plaintiff took this to the MCCP in which John Molay Refused to show up.

(Para 496) So Plaintiff re-entered his Complaint in State Court again because John Molay deceitful tactic of waiting to file his two Motions took over two years now the Statute of Limitations play its role. Plaintiff used as a Defense Fraudulent Concealment and/or Non- Disclosure “lulling” that amounts to fraudulent Concealment which up-ed Plaintiffs claims for relief to six years.

(Para 497) John Molay who defended Dr. Chiyomi Fukino (Director of Health) and Dr. Julie Trihn when Plaintiff reenters his Civil Suit again now Hires a Private Lawyer because they didn’t trust the abilities of John Molay.

(Para 498) THESE ARE TWO GREAT EXAMPLES OF CIVIL SUITS SHOWING OBVIOUS COLLABORATIVE LEGAL CONSPIRACIES.
Dear Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Re; John F. Molay Esq., April Luria Esq., and Dudley Akama Esq. MARK L. BRADBURY LOOK AT WHAT YOU SOME HOW OVERLOOKED!!!

(Para 499) NOW I REQUEST YOUR SUPERIOR JANET S. HUNT TO REVIEW THIS MATTER. Document Matters Sent and Enclosed Again are Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al, Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al, Application to the Supreme Court in Willard Max Imamoto vs. Dr. Peter Breggin et al,

(Para 500) Correspondence to Senators Patrick Leahy, Daniel Inouye, Senator Colleen Hanabusa, Senator Mazie Hirono, Brian Schatz, State Bar Association, and the Office of Judicial Conduct Gerald Sekiya Esq. Rules of Professional Conduct Violations: Rule 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contention;

(Para 501) A Lawyer shall not bring or Defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an
extension, modification or reversal of existing law.

(Para 502) Cited in Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al and Willard Max Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al. Rule 3.3 Candor toward the Tribunal; (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly (1) make a false statement of Material Fact or Law to a Tribunal, and (2) fail to disclose a Material Fact to a Tribunal when Disclosure is necessary to AVOID assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the Client,

(Para 503) and (3) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclose by opposing counsel, or
(4) offer evidence that the lawyer known to be false.

(Para 504) If a lawyer has offered Material Evidence and Comes To Know of Its Falsity, the Lawyer shall take remedial measures to the extent reasonably necessary to rectify the consequences, and (d) In Ex Parte Proceeding except grand jury proceedings and application for search warrants a lawyer shall not inform the tribunal of all material

(Para 505) facts known to the lawyer which will enable the tribunal to make informed decisions, whether or not the facts are adverse, disclosure of which is not otherwise prohibited by law, and (d) (3) Misleading Legal Argument; Legal Argument Based On Knowingly False Representation Of Law Constitutes Dishonesty Towards The Tribunal.

(Para 506) A lawyer is not required to make a disinterested exposition of the Law, but must recognize the Existence of Pertinent Legal Authorities. Furthermore as stated in paragraph (a)(3), an advocate has a duty to disclose directly adverse authority in the controlling jurisdiction which has not been disclosed by the opposing party.

(Para 507) The underlying concept is that legal argument
is a discussion seeking to determine the legal premises properly applicable to the case, and (d) (4) False Evidence when evidence that a lawyer knows to be false is provided by a person (other lawyers) who is not the client, the lawyer must refuse to offer it regardless of the
client’s wishes.

(Para 508) Suspicions and hunches are insufficient to substantiate the degree of falsity necessary to refuse to offer evidence, and (d)
(5) when the False Evidence is offered by the client, however, a conflict may arise between the lawyer’s duty to keep the clients
revelations confidential and the duty of candor to the court.

(Para 509) Upon ascertaining that Material Evidence is False, the lawyer should seek to persuade the client that the Evidence should not be offered or, if it has been offered, that its false character should Immediately be Disclosed.

(Para 510) If the persuasion is ineffective, the lawyer must take Remedial Measures to the extent reasonably necessary to rectify the
consequence’s, and (d)(11) Remedial Measures; if Perjured Testimony or False Evidence has been offered, the advocates proper coarse
ordinarily is to remonstrate with the client confidentiality.

(Para 511) If that fails, the advocate should seek to withdrawal if that would remedy the situation. If withdrawal will not remedy the situation or is impossible, the advocate should make Disclosure to the Court. It is for the Court then to Determine what should be done.

(Para 512) If the False Testimony was that of the Client, the Client may controvert the lawyer’s version of their communication when the lawyer discloses the situation to the court. If there is an issue whether the client has committed Perjury, the
lawyer cannot represent the client in resolution of the issue and a mistrial may be unavoidable.

(Para 513) An Unscrupulous Client might in this way attempt to produce a series of mistrials and thus escape prosecution. However a second such encounter could be construed as a deliberate
abuse of the right to counsel and as such a waiver of the right to further representation (DUDLEY AKAMA TWO TIMES REPRESENTED BY JOHN F. MOLAY),

(Para 514) and (d)(12) Constitutional Requirements the general rule that an advocate must disclose the Existence of Perjury with respect to the Material Fact, even that of a client and applies to Defense Counsel in criminal cases, as well as in other instances and the Lawyers Ethical Duty in such a situation may be qualified by constitutional provisions,

(Para 515) and the Obligation of the advocate under these Rules is subordinate to such a constitutional requirement, and (d)(13) Duration of Obligation WAS MADE KNOWN BY ME PLAINTIFF IN MY SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS AND THEREAFTER IN THE HIGHER COURTS, and (d)(14) refusing to Offer Proof believed to be False, and in (d)(15) Ex Parte Proceedings in that a Tribunal Should Consider in reaching a

(Para 516) decision and that the conflicting position came from the opposing party (Plaintiff), and the Object of an Ex Parte Proceeding is nevertheless to yield a substantially Just Result, BUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS OBVIOUS WITH DEFENDANTS, DEFENSE COUNSELS AND THE COURT JUDGES OVERWHELMING EX PARTE COMMUNICATION VIOLATIONS BETWEEN ALL MENTIONED PARTIES.

(Para 517) Cited in Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al Page 8 starting at the second paragraph to Page 11. I pointed out to Both Judges Ahn and Sakamoto that Mr. Molay is no stranger to this Civil Action. Mr. Molay took over two years before I

(Para 518) entered this Civil Suit in Judge Ahn/Sakamoto’s Court because Mr. Molay with all the Bates Certified Hawaii State Hospital Records and the Complete Court Document Index in CR No. 95-0990 could not Defeat my Causes of Actions and Claims for Relief so he

(Para 519) Purposely waited to when the Applicable Statute of Limitations had expired, and then Filed his Motion that this Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction “it must first go to the MCCP” (medical claims conciliation panel). Mr. Molay’s Deceitful Tactics

(Para 520) and his filing of his two Motions, and that his Motion for Summary Judgment was DENIED on the Grounds of Mootness, as Mr. Molay is claiming that it was not. So I provided the Order from Judge Gary Won Bae Chang’s Court as an Exhibit Supporting my Honesty.

(Para 521) His Motion for Summary Judgment Obviously had No Probative Value to Defend my Causes of Actions and Claims for Relief. I also brought in the Fact that Mr. Molay represented Defendants Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutler and Dr. Julie Trihn in Judge Gary Won Bae Chang’s Court.

(Para 522) Upon my re-entering of this Civil Suit in Judge Ahn/Sakamoto’s Court both Defendants Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutler and Dr. Julie Trihn HAD NO CONFIDENCE in Mr. Molay representing
them again and hired a private law firm to represent them with Ms. April Luria formally of ROECA, LOUIE (the Present Attorney General for
the State of Hawaii) and HIRAOKA now Roeca, Luria, and Hiraoka. Mr. Molay

(Para 523) represented his Colleague and associate Defendant Deputy Attorney General Dudley Akama of the same branch with the Attorney General Office (Dept. of Health). Mr. Molay obviously attacked the Statute of Limitations, but in determining the Statute of Limitations one I am claiming Fraudulent
Concealment,

(Para 524) and/or Non-Disclosure (LULLING), that amounts to Fraudulent Concealment in which Respondent Dr. Julie Trihn did purposely LULL the Court and Everyone into believing she was my Treating Physician when she corresponded to the Court dated December 18, 2004 when she wasn’t and THAT IS WHY I RE-ENTERED THIS CIVIL SUIT IN CIRCUIT COURT.

(Para 525) THIS has never been Ruled upon it in Circuit Court, Intermediate Court of Appeals, and the Supreme and is Respondents alternative Argument. The obvious reasons to WHY Defense Attorney have not Submitted any
Exhibits in support of their Defense is because of Petitioners Exhibit Attached as Exhibit B is the Complete document list of CR No. 95-0990

(Para 526) and starting on page 10 from December 14, 2004 to February 8, 2005 are the Only Court Documents this Honorable Court can Review. This is the entry Date of I being Admitted to HSH to being Involuntarily Treated at Acute Stabilization Unit and not Unit E Dr. Julie Trihn’s unit.

(Para 527) This complete document list shows NO COURT RECORDS supporting Defendants Defense of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion that my claims for relief was ever litigated which would be from before Respondent Dr. Julie Trihn became my treating physician when she corresponded to the Court on December 18, 2004 saying I

(Para 528) was Violent and Hostile to the Patients and Staff at Unit E and wants to Force Medicate me under this Perjured Testimony and stated I am paranoid, delusional and suffering from paranoid schizophrenia to the Court when I was still in the Acute Stabilization Unit and my treating physician was Dr. Michael Chang who refuted her testimony that she wasn’t my treating physician at the time she corresponded to the Court with her Perjured Testimony and Dr. Michael Change refuted that I was not Violent and Hostile to the patients and staff at his unit, and is in Bates Certified Hawaii State Hospital records.

(Para 529) On or about January 4-10, 2005 I was transferred to Unit E Dr. Julie Trihn’s unit and Dr. Julie Trihn still used her testimony in her correspondence from December 18, 2004 to have me involuntarily treated because I was Violent and Hostile to the Patients and Staff at Unit E regardless of it not being true and as an un-medicated patient,

(Para 530) suffering from paranoia, delusional and chronic paranoid schizophrenia I was filing my own Motions for an investigation of Dr. Julie Trihn’s Perjured testimony and contacted my lawyer to investigate this as well.

(Para 531) The Judge Ordered me not to file any more Motions thru the Court Clerk to her and told me to communicate with my lawyer who didn’t investigate anything on my behalf in which I filed a Motion for ineffective assistance of Counsel which was denied…ANOTHER WORDS THESE ISSUES WERE NEVER LITIGATED in Court

(Para 532) which included violations of Gross negligence (where even a lay person can see how Dr. Julie Trihn, the Judge and my Lawyer f—k up), Res ispa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself) actual malice, medical malpractice and all the “but for’s”, but my civil suit wasn’t about these claims it was about Constitutional and Civil Rights violations, and punitive damages due to the conscious callous deliberate indifference that wanton, reckless and malicious

(Para 533) And up to the Order of Involuntary treatment (February 8, 2005) FROM THIS SHORT TIME FRAME WINDOW in my Motion for Summary Judgment I submitted Exhibits supporting my stance and Under the Rules of Evidence it was support by the admissibility of
Evidence by the different Rules governing the Rules of Evidence by submitting Bates Certified Hawaii State Hospital Records, Complete
Certified Court Documents Index, and my Sworn Declaration,

(Para 534) VERSUS ALL DEFENSE COUNSELS Hearsay Declaration ONLY supporting a CONJURED UP DEFENSE of Issue Preclusion or Collateral Estopple, and NO EXHIBITS.
Cited in HAMM Vs. GROOSE 15 F3d 110 (8 cir. 1994) and COOPER Vs.
Pate 378 US 546, 12 Led2d 1030, 84 SCt 1733 (1964) Court must accept Allegations in Pleading as True,

(Para 535) and even in my Motion for Summary Judgment based on EVERY LEGAL CRITERIA in Accordance with the HRCP (Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure) and the HRE (Hawaii Rules of Evidence)
VERSUS DEFENDANTS Cited in Johnson Vs. the Baptist Medical Center 97 F3d 1070 (8 cir. 1996) Hearsay Cannot Defeat a Motion for Summary Judgment.

(Para 536) As In Defendants Counter Motion for Summary Judgment Supported by their HEARSAY DECLARATION(s) ONLY. Which all Competent Court Judges know very well that warrants my Complaint for an investigation that heavily supports Perjury and Ex Parte communication violations that clearly exposed a huge Statewide Conspiracy.

(Para 537) Judge Sakamoto applauded John F. Molay’s Defense of Issue Preclusion and/or Collateral Estopple in Court records at the Summary Judgment Hearing and allowed John F. Molay’s to slander and persecute Plaintiff in Court that I am a Vexatious litigant and dealing with unnecessary Court expenditures and that he has more important matter to take care of, and doesn’t have time to be wasting on such frivolous matters,

(Para 538) and all Defendants have NEVER submitted any Exhibits from Circuit Court records supporting their Defense of Issue Preclusion only a Declaration and signed by John F. Molay, and my claims were that Issue Preclusion cannot apply because the Perjury Testimony was never litigated it was granted (look at CR NO. 95-0990 in the Docket Division) THERE ARE NO RECORDS OF THIS as my Exhibits of Bate Certified Hawaii State Hospital supports

(Para 539) all Court Documents and list of this Criminal Case (as a probation violation) show this Issue was Never litigated, and I’ve given Defendants Lawyers every chance to present this even after their Answering Brief in the Appeals Courts and brought this to this COURTS ATTENTION numerous times.

(Para 540) Please Review my Writ of Certiorari showing conclusively that Defendants Attorney’s Lost the First Summary Judgment against me then conjured up Issue Preclusion as a Defense. Justice requires some showing of falsity, not mere denials or assertions from all Defendants claiming Collateral estoppel and/or Issue Preclusion.

(Para 541) The Hawaii Supreme Court Justices was Boldly reminded by Respondent in his Writ of Certiorari as is apparent with Associate Justice James E. Duffy (recusal) and the Intermediate Court of Appeals, and the Circuit Court of Outrageous Court Room Biasness,

(Para 542) and of the Integrity of our State’s Highest Court to do this right if this Court make an erroneous Ruling Petitioner requests from what factual source did this Court base its Ruling, and I want this source cited in record of Findings and Conclusion, because based on Defendants only claim of Issue Preclusion was a signed Declaration saying this is Issue Preclusion, and not support by ANY EXHIBITS.

(Para 543) I told the Supreme Court that I Like them to enforce, and I challenged all the State Courts Competence dealing with Basic
Rules governing Evidentiary Matters. Petitioners Writ Of Certiorari From Appeal No. 29859 When Submitted in the State of Hawaii Supreme Court And as Exhibit B is the Recusal of Associate Justice James Duffy Jr.

(Para 544) Whom in my Correspondence to the Supreme Court of his Recusal of this Supreme Court Associate Justice extreme biasness has obviously entered the Supreme Court who is now being replaced by Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge Derrick Chan who was the presiding Judge in Appeal No. 30065 Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al and Dudley Akama that has taken slightly over Three and a half Years to be decided upon for an Appeals Court in Hawaii is already Ludicrous.

(Para 545) Dudley Akama Represented the Department of Health for my Involuntary Treatment in CR No. 95-0990 who Concealed Dr. Julie Trihn, and Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutlers Perjured testimony and is explained in my Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al from Page 3 second paragraph to Page 8.

(Para 546) False testimony by clients Dudley Akama, Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutler and Dr. Julie Trihn, but Also by Counsels Mr. John F. Molay (Deputy Attorney General for the Dept. of Health) and Ms. April Luria A lawyer is not required to make a disinterested exposition of the Law, But must recognize the existence of Pertinent Legal Authorities.

(Para 547) The underlying concept is that legal argument is a discussion seeking to determine the legal premises properly applicable to the case, and False Evidence when evidence that a lawyer knows to be false is provided by a person (other lawyers) who is not the client, the lawyer must refuse to offer it regardless of the clients wishes.

(Para 548) False Evidence is offered by the clients. upon ascertaining that Material Evidence is False, the lawyer should seek to persuade the client that the Evidence should not be offered or, if it has been offered, that its false character should Immediately be Disclosed. If the persuasion is ineffective, the lawyer must take Remedial Measures to the extent reasonably necessary to rectify the consequences,

(Para 549) and If Perjured testimony or False Evidence has been offered, the advocates proper coarse ordinarily is to remonstrate with the client confidentiality.
If that fails, the advocate should seek to withdrawal if that would remedy the situation.

(Para 550) An Unscrupulous Client might in this way attempt to produce a series of mistrials and thus escape prosecution. However a second such encounter could be construed as a deliberate abuse of the right to counsel and as such a waiver of the right to further representation as Dudley has two times cited in Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital and Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al,

(Para 551) and was represent both times by Mr. John F. Molay. Constitutional requirements the general rule that an advocate must disclose the Existence of Perjury with respect to the Material Fact, and the Lawyers Ethical Duty in such a situation may be qualified by constitutional provisions, and the Obligation of the advocate under these Rules is subordinate to such a constitutional requirement.

(Para 552) Duration of Obligation WAS MADE KNOWN BY ME PLAINTIFF IN MY SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS AND THEREAFTER IN THE HIGHER COURTS.
Refusing to offer Proof believed to be false.
Defense Counsel Mr. John F. Molay and Ms. April Luria has also violated the Rules on Professional Conduct. Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel;

(Para 553) a lawyer shall not (a) unlawfully obstruct another parties access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy or CONCEAL A Document(s) or other material having potential evidentiary value. A Lawyer shall not Counsel or Assist another person to do any such act(s), and (b) falsify evidence or counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely.

(Para 554) Rule 3.7 Lawyer as Witness (a) a lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness except where (2) the testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case.
Rule 3.8 performing the duty of Public Prosecutor or other Government Lawyer;

(Para 555) a public prosecutor or other government lawyer shall (a) not initiate or cause to be instituted criminal charges when the prosecutor or government lawyer knows or it is obvious that the charges are not supported by probable cause. Rule 4.1 Truthfulness in Statements to others; In the coarse of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly;

(Para 556) (a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or (b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person
when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client. Rule 8.1 (a) and (b) Bar Admission And
Disciplinary Matters; Rule 8.3 Reporting Professional Misconduct

(Para 557) (a) a Lawyer having Knowledge that another Lawyer has committed a Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a Substantial Question as to that Lawyers honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a Lawyer in other respects; Shall inform the appropriate Professional Authority and all Defense Counsels John F. Molay and April Luria and Defendant Dudley Akama (Deputy Attorney General with John F. Molay of the same division representing the Dept. of Health) has not.

(Para 558) This automatically supersedes and exposes an instant Violation of Rule 8.1 (a) and (b) Failure to disclose necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen in the matter. Rule 8.4 Misconduct; It Is Misconduct for a Lawyer(s) to; (a) Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct,

(Para 559) knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the act of another, and (f) Knowingly assist a Judge or judicial officer in Conduct that is a Violation of applicable Rules of Judicial Conduct or other Law(s).

(Para 560) Guidelines of Professionalism Section 5 in writings submitted to the Court ONLY A DECLARATION IN DEFENDANTS COUNTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOT SUPPORTED BY EXHIBITS THAT SUPPOSE TO SUPPORT THE DECLARATION and the Lawyers signature;

(Para 561) Written material submitted to the Court should always be FACTUAL and CONCISE and should ACCURATELY State the current Laws and fairly represent the parties position without unfairly attacking the opposing party or opposing counsel.

(Para 562) Specifically, a Lawyer(s) who manifests professional courtesy and civility (a) Does not use Facts that are not entered properly and introduced in the case and part of the record in the case written in briefs or memoranda of Points of Authorities, (b) does not degrade the intelligence , ethics, morals, integrity, or personal behavior of the opposing party unless such matters are at issue in the proceeding,

(Para 563) and let me use proceedings (all past events by all Defendants creating my History) especially in Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital KKS Plaintiffs Hearing Motion for Summary Judgment, and when UNMEDICATED I’VE ALWAYS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS BEING MENTALLY ILL, PARANOID AND DELUSIONAL, AND SUFFERING FROM PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA,

(Para 564) AND AS OF APRIL 2011 I’VE BEEN UNMEDICATED and has insulted my intelligence, integrity, and caused me a life time Stigma. Section 6; Communications with Clients and Adversaries: A lawyer should at all times be civil, courteous, and accurate in communication with clients and adversaries, whether in writing or orally.

(Para 565) Specifically, a Lawyer(s) who manifests professional courtesy and civility in (a) DOES NOT draft a letter assigning to an opposing party a position that party has not taken or TO CREATE A “RECORD” OF EVENTS THAT HAS NOT OCCURRED.

(Para 566) Section 7 Discovery: In the Efficient and Cost Effective Resolution of a Dispute COSTING OUR TAX PAYERS MONEY THAT’S PAYING FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE TO REPRESENT THERE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERALS AND THE STATES EMPLOYEES
SUPPORTING A VERY HUGE GENUINE CONSPIRACY AND THE LAWYERS COULDN’T BEAT ME. TOM, DICK, AND HARRY BEAT ME “THE CIRCUIT COURT, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS AND THE SUPREME COURT,

(Para 567) and AGAIN COSTING THE TAX PAYERS NEEDLESS COURT COSTS AND NOT TO MENTION FUTURE RAMIFICATIONS.
Section 8 (a)(8) does not direct a deponent to refuse to answer a question unless the question seeks privilege information or is calculated to harass,

(Para 568) and (a)(9) refrains from self-serving speeches during depositions, no matter which party he or she represents, and (a)(10) does not engage in any conduct during deposition that is likely to offend others necessarily present and that would violate prevalent standards of behavior in judicial proceedings,

(Para 570) and (b)(1) Document requests limiting requests of documents reasonably believed to be needed for the prosecution or DEFENSE OF AN ACTION, and (b)(2) does not draft document production and Presents Documents (but in this case does not present any documents supporting ONLY A DECLARATION BY BOTH COUNSELS John F. Molay and April Luria) clearly is not relevant to the subject matter of the case,

(Para 571) and (b)(4) Withholding Documents but in this case Not being Able To Produce Documents supporting a Counter Motion for Summary Judgment based on only a Declaration by Defendants and Counsels, and (b)(6) does not Delay Producing Documents to prevent opposing Counsel from inspecting documents prior to depositions, interrogatories

(Para 572) or MORE LIKE FOR OTHER TACTICAL REASONS CONSPIRING TO COVER UP PERJURY, and (c)(2) does not
read or respond to Interrogatories in an artificial manner designed to assure that answers are not Truly Responsive, and (c)(3) does not
object to Interrogatories except when a good faith exists in the merit of the objection for the purpose of withholding relevant information,

(Para 573) and if an interrogatory is objectionable only in part, answers the unobjectionable portion.
From candor toward the Tribunal to Misleading Legal Argument; Legal Argument based on knowingly False Representation of Law constitutes dishonesty towards the Tribunal, etc., BUT THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED THROUGH MULTIPLE OBVIOUS LEGAL FACTORS.

(Para 574) ### Section 10 EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE COURT(S); ESPECIALLY WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF A CONJURED DEFENSE WITH ISSUE PRECLUSION OR COLLATERAL ESTOPPLE SUPPORTED BY A HEARSAY DECLARATION AND NO EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF THIS DEFENSE WHICH EVERYONE KNOWS IS PURE PURJURY WHERE THE INTENTIONAL INCOMPETENCE OF ALL COURTS HAS ALLOWED THE ILLEGAL APPLICATION OF LAWS

(Para 575) OR RULES OR INCONSISTENT LAWS THAT AFFIRMLY SUPPORTS A COLLABORATIVE CONSPIRACY IN WHICH THEIR WAS AN ABUNDANCE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS GOING ON, AND FROM OTHER OUTSIDE SOURCES AS WELL THAT HAS INFLUENCED THE HIGHER COURTS.

(Para 576) Section 12 (d) Trials and Hearings: honors requests made by opposing Counsel during trial or Hearing Motions that do not Prejudice his or her clients Rights or sacrifice Tactical Advantage(s).
In the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii Willard Max Imamoto from Appeal No. 30065

(Para 577) Petitioner Willard Max Imamoto’s Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court, Summary Disposition Order from the Intermediate Court of Appeals Attached Kahi Mohala Hospital As Exhibit A, and Certificate of Service Naomi Morgan, Dudley Akama, the Department of the Attorney General Appellee’s.

(Para 578) Writ of Certiorari now comes Petitioner Willard Max Imamoto with his application for Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii in accordance with HRAP (Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure) Rule 40.1. As Cited In Civil No. 06-1-2068-11 BIA, and Appeal No. 30065 Final Judgment for Defendants Naomi Morgan of Kahi Mohala Hospital.

(Para 579) The evidence before the Circuit Court was undisputed that the item of mail at the heart of this dispute was addressed to Appellee Ms. Morgan (and not addressed to Appellant). Final Judgment for Defendant Dudley Akama was that it was perfectly legal to hold the Legal Documents (Plaintiff’s Civil Suit in Federal Court from the mail)

(Para 580) Seized or Taken from Kahi Mohala Hospital to allow the Department of the Attorney General to investigate whether I was violating or attempting to violate HRS 605-14, and HRS 60515 which
empowers the Department of the Attorney General to investigate and prosecute persons who practice law without a license.

(Para 581) The Lower Court(s) have Erred as to the above CRUX of the Circuit Court Intentional diversion of Petitioners Genuine Materials of Facts presented in the Lower Court(s) HERE’S THE BOTTOM LINE TO PETITIONERS CRUX.
AFTER PETITIONER COMPLETED HIS DEPOSITION UPON ORAL EXAMINATION WITH DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,

(Para 582) HIS LEGAL COUNSEL AND COLLEAGUE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MR. JOHN F. MOLAY PRESENTED EXHIBITS AND QUESTIONED DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA AT THAT ORAL DEPOSITION AS TO WHETHER MY CIVIL SUIT THAT DEFENDANT NAOMI MORGAN HAS IN HER POSSESSION BREACHED CONFIDENTIALITY.

(Para 583) DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA BOLDLY STATED NO IT CONTAINED “NO HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL RECORDS”, BUT HOW
COULD IT I WAS ADMITTED TO KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL HOW COULD I POSSIBLY HAVE HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL RECORDS OF PATIENT THEIR?

(Para 584) PETITIONER ALSO ASKED THIS QUESTION TO DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA NUMEROUS TIMES IN ORAL DEPOSITIONS/WRITTEN INTERRROGATORIES WHO DENIED THIS SIMPLE LEGAL QUESTION. THEREFORE DEFENDANTS DUDLEY AKAMA KNEW HE HAD NO JURISDICTION PERIOD AS A DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN SEIZING MY LEGAL MAIL/DOCUMENTS FROM KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL THAT CONTAINED NO HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL RECORDS

(Para 585) AND DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA COULD NOT TAKE IT OFF PRIVATE PROPERTY FROM A PRIVATE HOSPITAL AND NAOMI MORGAN HAD NO LEGAL GROUNDS AND JURISDICTION
TO ALLOW DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DUDLEY AKAMA TO ILLEGALLY TAKE MY LEGAL DOCUMENTS FROM KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL PROPERTY AS WELL.

(Para 586) The Summary Disposition Order of the Intermediate Court of Appeals Erred stating Appellant Imamoto’s burden required him to convince the Circuit Court with regard to his claims against Defendants did not present Genuine Issues of Material Facts, and because he did not support his assertions of Material Facts with admissible Evidence his claims was Denied.

(Para 587) Imamoto stated in his Memorandum for MSJ that he intended to depose witnesses to prove his case, but he does not appear to have submitted those Depositions nor does he explain how the Documents he did submit prove the Facts he averred.
Petitioner submitted Depositions upon Oral Examinations with Defendants Dudley Akama and Naomi Morgan via a Certified Court Reporter

(Para 588) and Petitioner submitted Written Interrogatories with both Defendants as well, and is obvious that the Intermediate Court of Appeals has erroneously erred.
Also one of Petitioners CRUX is in Deposition Upon Oral Examination with Defendants Dudley Akama and Naomi Morgan is that Both Defendants on numerous occasions Denied knowing that they Illegally Seized Petitioners “Legal Paper” work from Kahi Mohala Hospital

(Para 589) COMPOUNDING and supporting Petitioners Legal Claims, because in the Deposition upon Oral Examination with Defendant Dudley Akama Deputy Attorney General John F. Molay presented as part of Defendant Akama’s Defense the Civil Cover Sheet of the Civil Suit Attached as their Exhibit A, which supports Perjury by both Defendants Denials of Seizing Petitioners Legal Paper Work when Defendant Akama is an Attorney,

(Para 590) and Defendant Morgan is a Patient Rights Advisor at Kahi Mohala Hospital and They Don’t Know they Seized a Civil Action
Against Kahi Mohala Hospital. Petitioners Genuine Issues of Material Facts in his Deposition Upon Oral Examination(s) and Written Interrogatories supported a very obvious Conscious, Deliberate Indifference that was Wanton, Reckless, and Malicious that is
very supportive to Punitive Damage Claims.

(Para 591) Now Defendant Naomi Morgan in my Deposition upon Oral Examination of her stipulates she seized my legal papers because she believed it violated and breached confidentiality because it contained Kahi Mohala Hospital patients Names.
I asked her in this Deposition if she has any knowledge as a administrative supervisor, social worker, and Patient Right Advisor of

(Para 592) Kahi Mohala Hospital in having Knowledge of HRS (Hawaii Revised Statutes) and confidentiality and a Breach of Confidentiality. she has NONE, and in two Written Interrogatories with her she stipulated she has a General knowledge and when questioned several times on what is the extent of your General knowledge she refused to elaborate on possessing any Knowledge.

(Para 593) Defendant Dudley Akama’s on numerous occasions under Oath in my Depositions upon Oral Examination and in Written Interrogatories testified that HE HAS NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF ANY LEGAL MATTERS DEALING WITH A BREACH OF CONFIDENTIALITY NOR DOES HE HAVE ANY PRIOR LEGAL EXPERIENCE DEALING WITH THIS TYPE OF SITUATION AS A DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL REPRESENTING THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.

(Para 594) Dudley was also asked if he ever had a case/situation like this before he states No Never did.
YET AFTER I COMPLETED MY DEPOSITION UPON ORAL EXAMINATION WITH DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, HIS LEGAL COUNSEL AND COLLEAGUE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MR. JOHN F. MOLAY PRESENTED EXHIBITS AND QUESTIONED DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA AT THAT ORAL DEPOSITION AS TO WHETHER MY

(Para 595) CIVIL SUIT THAT DEFENDANT NAOMI MORGAN HAS IN HER POSSESSION BREACHED CONFIDENTIALITY.
DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA BOLDLY STATED NO IT CONTAINED “NO HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL RECORDS”, BUT HOW COULD IT I WAS ADMITTED TO KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL HOW COULD I POSSIBLY HAVE HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL RECORDS OF PATIENT THEIR?

(Para 596) I ALSO ASKED THIS QUESTION TO DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA NUMEROUS TIMES IN ORAL DEPOSITIONS/WRITTEN INTERRROGATORIES WHO DENIED THIS SIMPLE LEGAL QUESTION. THEREFORE DEFENDANTS DUDLEY AKAMA KNEW HE HAD NO JURISDICTION PERIOD AS A DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN SEIZING MY LEGAL MAIL/DOCUMENTS FROM KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL THAT CONTAINED

(Para 597) NO HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL RECORDS AND DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA COULD NOT TAKE IT OFF PRIVATE PROPERTY FROM
A PRIVATE HOSPITAL AND NAOMI MORGAN HAD NO LEGAL GROUNDS AND JURISDICTION TO ALLOW DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DUDLEY AKAMA TO ILLEGALLY TAKE MY LEGAL DOCUMENTS FROM KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL PROPERTY AS WELL, AND IS STIPULATED IN MY SUMMARY JUDGMENT CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS PERIOD THAT
TRULY SUPERSEDES ALL THE MUMBLE-JUMBLE CRAP TAKING PLACE IN JUDGE BERT AYABE’S COURT.

(Para 598) WHERE EMPHASIS BY DEFENDANTS AND COUNSEL WAS
DELIBERATELY FOCUSED In Civil No. 06-1-2068-11 BIA, and Appeal No. 30065 Final Judgment for Defendants Naomi Morgan of Kahi Mohala Hospital.
The evidence before the Circuit Court was undisputed that the item of mail at the heart of this dispute was addressed to Appellee Ms. Morgan (and not addressed to Appellant).

(Para 599) Final Judgment for Defendant Dudley Akama was that it was perfectly legal to hold the Legal Documents (Civil Suit in Federal Court) Seized or Taken from Kahi Mohala Hospital to allow the Department of the Attorney General to investigate whether I was violating or attempting to violate HRS 605-14, and HRS 605-15 which

(Para 600) empowers the Department of the Attorney General to investigate and prosecute persons who practice law without a license. FURTHERMORE I’LL BE SHOWING THAT MY CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIMS WAS SMALL POTATOES, BUT WAS NECESSARY AS A PREREQUIST FOR MY PUNITIVE DAMAGE CLAIMS THAT THE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT HAVE ENGAGED IN PRIOR TO ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY, AND SHOULD HAVE ADMITTED FAULT TO THE SMALL POTATOE CLAIM IN MY ORIGINAL COMPLAINT.

(Para 601) ITS JUST A POWER TRIP BY THE STATE OF HAWAII’S MENTAL HEALTH HOSIPTAL, SUB-CONTRACTED PRIVATE MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL THROUGH THE STATE OF HAWAII AND THEIR
EMPLOYEES, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE THROUGH TAX PAYERS MONEY THAT REPRESENTS STATE EMPLOYYES WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND THEIR ATTORNEYS, AND THE COURTS WHO HAS TURNED A MOLE HILL INTO A MOUNTAIN OF INJUSTICE,

(Para 602) AND THAT’S THE TYPE OF LIMELIGHT THE STATE OF HAWAII WANTS- “AND THEY WENT FOR IT-HOOK-LINE-AND-SINKER”. AND THIS CARRIED OVER INTO CR No. 950990 AND IMAMOTO vs. HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL et al AT THE VERY SAME TIME. FOR THE RECORD I’VE ASKED NUMEROUS TIMES FOR MY LEGAL PAPER WORK BACK Cited in my Complaint: I called back Kahi Mohala Hospitals administrative office,

(Para 603) and told them and their postal division, that the United States District Court Clerk has mailed my bulk mail complaints to them 3-4 days before. So they transferred me to administrative supervisor Naomi Morgan, who I just explained my story to, then she told me yes, they’ve just received my bulk mail yesterday (Thursday, December 24, 2004).

(Para 604) So I explained to Naomi Morgan that I’ve been transferred from Kahi Mohala on December 14, 2004, to Hawaii State Hospital (which of coarse she knows). She then told me that Kahi Mohala will transport my package from Kahi Mohala, to Hawaii State Hospital, unit H, where I m at, and by van. From what she told me, I believed that the package would be delivered on New Years Eve, but it didn’t arrive.

(Para 605) So I had to wait 3 more days (Kahi Mohala now has my
package for 10 days, as of 12/24/04). Now I had to wait till Monday January 3, 2005, for I want to file my civil suits against them (Kahi
Mohala Hospital) as soon as possible.
I called Naomi Morgan, and told her when are you going to have my package delivered to me? Now this is the third time I had to request my legal papers/civil suit.

(Para 606) In Depositions Upon Oral Examination and Written Interrogatories with Defendants Naomi Morgan and Dudley Akama Under Oath and in Affidavit with Written Interrogatories I’ve asked them about three times each if they knew or recognized that this was my Civil Suit they had in their possession, and they Both said NO. Now when Mr. John F. Molay AGAIN REPRESENTING Dudley Akama presented Exhibits at My Deposition Upon Oral Examination,

(Para 607) and in questioning his Defendant Dudley Akama. Mr. John F. Molay presented as the Very First Exhibit Entered in my Deposition Upon Oral Examination that Both Defendants Dudley Akama (Deputy Attorney General) and Naomi Morgan (Kahi Mohala Hospitals Administrative Supervisor, Patient Rights Advisor and Social Worker) HAVING POSSESSION AND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE THAT THIS WAS A CIVIL ACTION THAT BOTH SEIZED,

(Para 608) because the First Exhibit is Marked and Identified as Exhibit 1 with Dudley Akama’s Name in the Exhibit Identification Box, and is the Civil Cover Sheet with my Name as Plaintiff and the Address where I was admitted or residing at that time which was Kahi Mohala Hospital and the Phone Number of the Hospital, and Defendants Names in the Appropriate Box in this Civil Suit and Kahi Mohala Hospital was a Defendant.

(Para 609) Both Defendants and Their Counsels Have Perjured themselves, and they Knew that they cannot seize, hold, and detain permanently a Civil Suit or Legal Paper Work and Preventing me from Entering this or causing delay.
THIS EXHIBIT IS IN CHAPTER 6. NOW BECAUSE BOTH DUDLEY AKAMA AND NAOMI MORGAN AND KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL

(Para 610) ILLEGALLY SEIZED MY LEGAL PAPERWORK/DOCUMENTS THEIR COVERING THEIR BUTTS by saying upon reviewing my paperwork AFTER TAKING IT OFF KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL PROPERTY (WHICH IS THE GRAVAMAN OF THIS INSTANT CIVIL SUIT) Dudley has discovered that I am soliciting legal services to people, and he tries to prosecute me through the Criminal Justice Division of the State Attorney Generals Office.

(Para 611) I Brought to the Attention of the Circuit Court and Intermediate Court of Appeals that Dudley Akama, Naomi Morgan and Mr. John F. Molay is so Full of Shit in trying to Cover Their Butts
For Illegally Seizing My Legal Paperwork/Documents. Cited in Johnson Vs. Avery, 393 US 483, 21 Led2d 718, 89 SCt 747 (1965) Inmate acting as “jailhouse lawyer” has fundamental right under First Amendment to provide legal assistance to other inmates.

(Para 612) Furthermore They All Know I am Incarcerate for a CR (conditional release) Probation Violation, and TO TOP IT OFF Deputy Attorney General Dudley Akama At The Very Same Time is the Very Same Deputy Attorney General Having Me Involuntarily Treated for being classified as being mentally ill, paranoid and delusional and suffering from chronic paranoid schizophrenia in THE ABOVE CASE.

(Para 613) Dudley Akama Represented the Department of Health for my Involuntary Treatment in CR No. 95-0990 who Concealed Dr. Julie Trihn, and Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutlers Perjured Testimony and is explained in my Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al In Civil No. 08-1-0823-04 KKS and In Appeal No 29859.

(Para 614) THEREFORE TWOFOLD DUDLEY, NAOMI MORGAN AND MR. MOLAY LEGALLY COULD NOT HAVE ME PROSECUTED AS A JAILHOUSE LAWYER (which I wasn’t) AND FROM BEING MENTALLY ILL, PARANOID, DELUSIONAL, AND SUFFERING FROM CHRONIC PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA ITS IMPOSSIBLE.

(Para 615) This is immoral, and unethical practice by Dudley Akama, trying to criminally prosecute me, while trying to involuntarily treat me for being mentally ill, paranoid, and delusional and suffering from chronic paranoid schizophrenia, as the Court found me, and had me involuntarily treated.

(Para 616) NOW LOOK AT Deputy Attorney General Mr. Molay for Defendant Dudley Akama states that my claim is of conversion. Conversion was never Entered as a Defense for Defendant Dudley Akama Until his Counter Motion for Summary Judgment.
I stated in my Reply to Defendants Counter Motion for Summary Judgment that I am not claiming conversion,

(Para 617) although Mr. Molay admits in his explanation of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of conversion, as to any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority by the Defendants.
Also in Mr. Molays assertion of conversion by a state actor is a simple intentional tort, and does not give rise to a the violation of federal civil rights guaranteed by the 14 amendment,

(Para 618) and Mr. Molay is correct with Dudley’s Intentional deceit in trying to cover-up the Facts and that Dudley HAD NO JURISDICTION PERIOD IN SEIZING MY LEGAL MAIL/DOCUMENTS FROM KAHI MOHALA HOSPITAL THAT CONTAINED NO HAWAII STATE HOSPITAL RECORDS AND COULD NOT TAKE IT OFF PRIVATE PROPERTY FROM A PRIVATE HOSPITAL that violated my First, Fourth Amendment claims and of Illegally Seizing Legal Mail,

(Para 619) and this Intentional Deceit warrants my biggest claim of Punitive damages in that what Both Naomi and th Dudley have done was wanton, reckless and malicious.
I am not claiming a 14 Amendment Violation and Mr. Molay is Whole Heartedly Misinterpreting my True Claims in which I am sticking to my Guns,

(Para 620) and HAS INFLUENCED and/or swayed the Judge in his Ruling as this being my Claim in which the Judge erroneously Ruled upon in favor of Defendant Dudley Akama.
Mr. Molay also states that the right to maintain an action for conversion may be defeated by unlawful or illegal acts of the Plaintiff, where the possession itself is made unlawful by statutes, so that the

(Para 621) court is being asked to further the unlawfulness by supporting the possession, the Plaintiff may not recover. Based on the contents of the document reviewed By Akama, it was perfectly legal to hold the documents to allow the Department of the Attorney General to investigate whether I was violating or attempting to violate HRS 605-14, and HRS 605-15 which empowers the Department of the Attorney General to investigate and prosecute persons who practice law without a license.

(Para 622) In MY 90 Pages of Depositions upon Oral Examination by a Certified Court Reporter Of Both Defendants and in Written Interrogatories I’ve Attacked the Creditability and Trustworthiness UNDER OATH/AFFIDAVITS of Both Defendants in Many Other Way’s That SUPPORTS MY STANCE TO AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTION DEPRIVATIONS ALTHOUGH HEAVELY ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES SHOWING EXTENSIVE PERJURY A CONSCIOUS, CALLOUS, DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE THAT’S WANTON, RECKLESS, MALICIOUS AND VERY VINDICTIVE.

(Para 623) One of Two Determinations in how I lost my Motion for Summary Judgment was Because The Judge Erroneously Ruled that My Civil Suit was Returned to Defendant Naomi Morgan at Kahi Mohala Hospital because the Federal Court Clerk Didn’t Know Who This Civil Suit Belonged Too. Documents 2-6 is a Sent Civil Suit to the Federal Court Clerk missing the First Page of My Complaint, Stamped by the Court Clerk, With a Civil Cover Sheet with My Name as Plaintiff, Complete Address, and Phone Number and the Very Same Defendants Names in the Appropriate Box,

(Para 624) and an Envelope Stamped without a Return Address on it AND IT WAS MAILED BACK TO ME FROM THE U.S. FEDERAL COURT CLERK TWO TIMES (Two Different Occasions Or Two Separate Civil Suits). I COULD HAVE DONE THIS A HUNDRED TIMES JUST TO PROVE ITS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE FEDERAL COURT CLERK DIDN’T KNOW WHO THIS CIVIL SUIT BELONGED TOO AND THAT IT WAS MAILED BACK TO NAOMI MORGAN- IMPOSSIBLE.

(Para 625) DEFENDANTS OBJECTED, THE FEDERAL COURT IS CALLING ME A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT BECAUSE OF THIS –EVEN THOUGH I EXPLAINED TO THEM WHY I DID THIS WAS BECAUSE I WANTED TO USE THIS AS EVIDENCE IN THE STATE COURT IN THIS CIVIL SUIT WHICH WAS ENTERED FIVE TIMES BECAUSE OF THIS INJUSTICE TO ME BY THE COURTS.

(Para 626) AGAIN Mr. John F. Molay, Dudley Akama, and Ms. April Luria is using this Against me in These Civil Suits by saying I m a Vexatious Litigant.
Dudley Akama Represented the Department of Health for my Involuntary Treatment in CR No. 95-0990 who Concealed Dr. Julie Trihn, and Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutlers Perjured Testimony and is explained in my Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al from Page 3 second paragraph to Page 8.

(Para 627) False testimony by clients Dudley Akama, Dr. Chiyomi Fukino-Cutler and Dr. Julie Trihn, but Also by Counsels Mr. John F. Molay (Deputy Attorney General for the Dept. of Health) IT HAS ALSO ENTERED AT THE VERY SAME TIME in Willard Max Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al.

(Para 628) A lawyer is not required to make a disinterested exposition of the Law, But Must Recognize the Existence of Pertinent Legal Authorities. The underlying concept is that legal argument is a discussion seeking to determine the legal premises properly applicable to the case,

(Para 629) and False Evidence when evidence that a lawyer knows to be false is provided by a person (other lawyers) who is not the client, the lawyer must refuse to offer it regardless of the clients wishes. False Evidence is offered by the clients. Upon ascertaining that Material Evidence is False, the lawyer should seek to persuade the client that the Evidence should not be offered or,

(Para 630) if it has been offered, that its false character should Immediately be Disclosed. If the persuasion is ineffective, the lawyer must take Remedial Measures to the Extent Reasonably Necessary to Rectify The Consequences, and If Perjured Testimony or False Evidence has been offered, the advocates proper coarse ordinarily is to remonstrate with the client confidentiality.

(Para 631) If that fails, the advocate should seek to withdrawal if that would remedy the situation.
An Unscrupulous Client might in this way attempt to produce a series of mistrials and thus escape prosecution.
However a second such encounter could be construed as a deliberate abuse of the right to counsel and as such a waiver of the right to

(Para 632) further representation as Dudley AKAMA HAS TWO TIMES Cited in Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital and Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al and was represent both times by Mr. John F. Molay.
Dudley Akama’s right to Further Counsel is a Deliberate abuse of right to counsel and To Any Type of Representation.

(Para 633) Constitutional Requirements the general rule that an advocate must disclose the Existence of Perjury with respect to the Material Fact, and the Lawyers Ethical Duty in such a situation may be qualified by constitutional provisions, and the Obligation of the advocate under these Rules is subordinate to such a constitutional requirement. Duration of Obligation WAS MADE KNOWN BY ME PLAINTIFF IN MY SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS AND THEREAFTER IN THE HIGHER COURTS.

(Para 634) Refusing to Offer Proof Believed to be False. Defense Counsel Mr. John F. Molay and Dudley Akama Has Also Violate Below Rules on Professional Conduct INTENTIONALLY AND WHOLEHEARTEDLY.

(Para 635) Rule 3.4 Fairness To Opposing Party And Counsel; a lawyer shall not (a) unlawfully obstruct another parties access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy or CONCEAL A Document(s) or other material having potential evidentiary value.

(Para 636) A Lawyer shall not Counsel or Assist another person to do any such act(s), and (b) falsify evidence or counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely. Rule 3.7 Lawyer as Witness (a) a lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness except where (2) the testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case.

(Para 637) Rule 3.8 Performing The Duty Of Public Prosecutor Or Other Government Lawyer; a public prosecutor or other government lawyer shall (a) not initiate or cause to be instituted criminal charges when the prosecutor or government lawyer knows or it is obvious that the charges are not supported by probable cause.

(Para 638) Rule 4.1 Truthfulness In Statements To Others; In the coarse of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly; (a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or (b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client. Rule 8.1 (a) and (b) Bar Admission And Disciplinary Matters;

(Para 639) Rule 8.3 Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) a Lawyer Having Knowledge that another Lawyer has Committed a Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that Raises a Substantial Question as to that Lawyers Honesty, Trustworthiness, or Fitness as a Lawyer in other respects;

(Para 640) Shall Inform the Appropriate Professional Authority AND ALL DEFENSE COUNSELS John F. Molay and DEFENDANT DUDLEY AKAMA (Deputy Attorney General with John F. Molay of the same Division representing the Dept. of Health) HAS NOT. This Automatically Supersedes and Exposes an Instant Violation of

(Para 641) Rule 8.1 (a) and (b) Failure to disclose necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen in the matter.
Rule 8.4 Misconduct; It Is Misconduct for a Lawyer(s) to; (a) Violate or Attempt to Violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, Knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the act of another,

(Para 642) and (f) KNOWINGLY ASSIST A JUDGE or judicial officer in CONDUCT that is a VIOLATION of applicable Rules of Judicial Conduct OR OTHER LAW(S) AS MR. MOLAY AND DUDLEY AKAMA WITH THEIR CONVERSION TACTICS AND OTHER PERJURED TACTICS HAS ASSISTED JUDGE AYABE in the CREATION of Rule 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contention;

(Para 643) a Lawyer shall not bring or Defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, MODIFICATION OR REVERSAL OF EXISTING LAW.
Guidelines of Professionalism Section 5 in Writings Submitted to the Court; written material submitted to the Court should always be
FACTUAL and CONCISE,

(Para 644) and should ACCURATELY State the Current Laws and Fairly represent the Parties Position without unfairly attacking the
opposing party or opposing counsel. Specifically, a Lawyer(s) who manifests professional courtesy and civility (a) DOES NOT USE FACTS THAT ARE NOT ENTERED PROPERLY INTRODUCED IN THE CASE and PART OF THE RECORD in the case written in briefs or memoranda of POINTS OF AUTHORITIES,

(Para 645) (b) DOES NOT DEGRADE THE INTELLIGENCE, ETHICS, MORALS, INTEGRITY, OR PERSONAL BEHAVIOR OF THE OPPOSING PARTY unless such matters are at issue in the proceeding, AND LET ME USE PROCEEDINGS (All Past Events by ALL DEFENDANTS CREATING MY HISTORY) especially in Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital KKS and in Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital BIA

(Para 646) Plaintiffs Hearing Motions for Summary Judgment THROUGH EXTENSIVE PURJURY HAS INSULTED MY INTELLIGENCE, INTEGRITY AND CAUSED ME A LIFE TIME STIGMA. Section 6; Communications with Clients and Adversaries: A lawyer should at all times be civil, courteous, and accurate in communication with clients and adversaries, whether in writing or orally.

(Para 647) Specifically, a Lawyer(s) who manifests professional courtesy and civility in (a) DOES NOT draft a letter assigning to an opposing party a position that party has not taken or TO CREATE A “RECORD” OF EVENTS THAT HAS NOT OCCURRED. Section 7 Discovery: In the Efficient and Cost Effective Resolution of a Dispute COSTING OUR TAX PAYERS MONEY THAT’S PAYING FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE TO REPRESENT THERE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERALS AND THE STATES EMPLOYEES SUPPORTING A VERY HUGE LEGAL CONSPIRACY.

(Para 648) AND IS INSULTING THE TAX PAYERS INTELLIGENCE THATS SUPPORTING A HUGE CONSPIRACY AND AGAIN COSTING THE TAX PAYERS NEEDLESS COURT COSTS AND NOT TO MENTION FUTURE RAMIFICATIONS. Section 8 (a)(8) does not direct a deponent to refuse to answer a question unless the question seeks privilege information or is calculated to harass,

(Para 649) and (a)(9) refrains from self-serving speeches during depositions, no matter which party he or she represents, and (a)(10) does not engage in any conduct during deposition that is likely to offend others necessarily present and that would violate prevalent standards of behavior in judicial proceedings, and (b)(1) Document requests limiting requests of documents reasonably believed to be needed for the prosecution or DEFENSE OF AN ACTION,

(Para 650) and (b)(2) does not draft document production and Presents Documents clearly is not relevant to the subject matter of the case, and (b)(4) Withholding Documents and (b)(6) does not Delay Producing Documents to prevent opposing Counsel from inspecting documents prior to depositions, interrogatories or MORE LIKE FOR OTHER TACTICAL REASONS CONSPIRING TO COVER UP PERJURY,

(Para 651) and (c)(2) Does not Read or Respond to Interrogatories in an artificial manner Designed to Assure that Answers Are Not Truly Responsive, and (c)(3) Does not object to Interrogatories except when a good faith exists in the merit of the objection for the purpose of withholding relevant information, and if an interrogatory is objectionable only in part,

(Para 652) answers the objectionable portion.
From Candor Toward the Tribunal to Misleading Legal Argument; Legal Argument Based On Knowingly False Representation Of Law Constitutes Dishonesty Towards The Tribunal, etc., BUT THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED THROUGH MULTIPLE OBVIOUS LEGAL FACTORS.

(Para 653) ### Section 10 EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE COURT(S); ESPECIALLY WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF A CONJURED DEFENSE WITH ISSUE PRECLUSION OR COLLATERAL ESTOPPLE SUPPORTED BY A HEARSAY DECLARATION AND NO EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF THIS DEFENSE WHICH EVERYONE KNOWS IS PURE PURJURY WHERE THE INTENTIONAL INCOMPETENCE OF ALL COURTS

(Para 654) HAS ALLOWED THE ILLEGAL APPLICATION OF LAWS OR RULES OR INCONSISTENT LAWS THAT AFFIRMLY SUPPORTS A COLLABORATIVE CONSPIRACY IN WHICH THEIR WAS AN ABUNDANCE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS GOING ON, AND FROM OTHER OUTSIDE SOURCES AS WELL, AND FROM OTHER OUTSIDE SOURCES AS WELL THAT HAS INFLUENCED THE HIGHER COURTS.

(Para 655) These civil suits has Created the present day age of “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” cite in violations of and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2331 are the violations against all Defendants – Definitions the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State with 75 Million other mental health consumers, and view below ABOUT MORE CREATED DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND CREATED INTERNATIONAL DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

###HERE IT IS THE FIRST PART OF THIS ILLEGAL RESEARCH called Psycho-Endo-Neuro-Immunology now referred to as P.E.N.I.) Intentionally Created DOMESTIC TERRORISM and International Domestic Terrorism has entered psychiatry, neurology, neuro-immunolgy, and immunology: as cited and attached in my Exhibits A, E, F, G, and H.

(Para 656) The First Incomplete Epidemiological Study: for the study of PENI was because of their instruments needed to conduct Chronic EMF exposure assessments, and they needed these instruments to conduct the Second part of this research. ###Epidemiological studies were and are impossible to achieve because nobody is that stupid read why!

(Para 657) Their Epidemiological study also goes into Teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages their also BABY KILLERS cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with CHAPTER 90A – PROTECTION OF UNBORN CHILDREN (§ 1841) and radioactive??????????????and this multiple elastic wave scattering is affecting so many other people who are in path of who ever their doing their illegal research on since the mid 1970’s till present.

(Para 658) Since the beginning of the E.P.R.I reports (electric power research institute) and their instruments of acoustics, electromagnetics, microwaves, elastic wave scattering, cyclotron resonance, and a computer and programming, all done on a multi-layered structuring.

(Para 659) Listed below are the reasons why this dual research is being conducted on the General Public, and that’s because of Two Incomplete Epidemiological studies, and Obviously it has been impossible to get these results from any other means, or sources.

(Para 660) One of the reasons why this dual research exists, is because further epidemiological studies is needed in chronic EMF/Microwave exposure assessments, and through the instruments mentioned above can now be achieved, and goes unnoticed and/or undetected.

(Para 661) These researchers and Specialist doctors in the fields of Cancer, Tumors, Tumor Growth, Heart Diseases and Autoimmune Diseases and in Teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages which coincides with FCC publications and the E.P.R.I. reports, and are outright BLOODY MURDERS for countless Decades with Children, Women, and the Elderly and with Men. .

(Para 662) Through there Intentional Eradication Extermination Process due to the Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intention failures to Inform or Warn establishes the requisite “Intent” in which I exposed back in 1994 and the True Cause’s, and the never ending Cause(s) to Cell and/or Genetic aberrations and/or alterations leading to Cancer(s) Tumors and Tumor Growth was established 50 years ago.

(Para 663) Russia ‘s Epidemiological Study’s indicated this is abstracts from research publication(s) a long time ago and is the foremost authority on this Subject and Attached as Exhibits F and G goes into 300+ different Major Health Care topics besides Cancers and Tumors, Heart Diseases and Autoimmune Diseases in which they Stated Chronic EMF Exposure is an absolute Carcinogen B,

(Para 664) Article 6 of the Rome Statutes in accordance with the ICC on the Crimes of Genocide are (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,

(Para 665) and this is happening throughout the United States of America, and the EPA, FCC, and with many of the European Countries that are Defendants, and Japan have established the Intentional Avoidance of Liability that created the Intentional failures to Inform or Warn,

(Para 666) and possessing this Critical requisite INTENT needed in meeting all three criteria’s of the Crimes of Genocide are (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,

(Para 667) and just like the other private Conduits such as the E.P.R.I. (electric power research institute) who originally Financed these study’s under knowingly false pretenses Profited, and have now turned such past devastation of Crimes into their present day business electric cars

(Para 668) and so has Defendant(s) and their Countries in this Criminal Case and their Complete Health System(s) as nothing has EVER been attributed to Chronic non-ionized radiation exposure dealing with Cancers, Tumors and Tumor growth, all Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in teratology with Birth Defects and Miscarriages which Pronouncedly implicates them, and attached as Exhibits E, F and G are the exhibits proving this “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”.

(Para 669) The EPA and FCC in which the United States Government is the Only Civilized Country in the world who has NOT established any guild lines or Prudent Cautionary Policy’s for EMF (non-ionized radiation) exposure. The EPA has some time ago stated that EMF exposure is dangerous, but shortly after (which was long ago) recanted their findings that has been Proven Decades ago to causing ALL Cancers (especially Breast)

(Para 670) Tumors/Tumor Growth ALL Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in Teratology with Birth Defects and Miscarriages and if you review the Epidemiological studies in the (E.P.R.I reports) published by FCC you will see it exactly as stated.

(Para 671) Additional references from the PEOPLE CALLING THEMSELVES TI victims Electronic Harassment Mkultra Mind Control Cyber Bullying in the European Sector’s database has a very disappointing 20 people from Hungary, Czech, France, Sweden, Latvia and India.

(Para 672) That’s why I am exposing Buffers such as these because of the OBVIOUS LACK OF THESE VICTIMS WITH SO MANY DIFFERENT LABELS and Sidetracking and Deceiving people with very Delusional Conspiracy Theories, BELOW IS A GREAT EXAMPLE of who I Blew away.

(Para 673) Hey Everybody! Dr. Robert Duncan is a co-conspirator in Intentional fraud of covering up Human Right Genocide violations and the fact that our Health system is the #1 cause of death without I having to go into Iatrogenesis (pharmaceuticals) which I also can and will.

(Para 674) Re: Dr. Robert Duncan A.B., S.M., M.B.A., Ph.D Government warfare and surveillance system architect, author of Project: Soul Catcher: Secrets of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed, The Matrix Deciphered, and How to Tame a Demon: A short practical guide to organized intimidation stalking, electronic torture, and mind control, and see the Different levels of government possess this personal knowledge.

(Para 675) First of all When Dr. Duncan states that he designed these instruments for the Governments warfare & surveillance system(s) these exact instruments has been around since the early 1950’s when Germany used them for spying because it could penetrate concrete walls THIS IS DR. DUNCAN’S CRIME CHARGES INTO PLAGAIRISM.

(Para 676) As far as his personal knowledge in misinforming these TI victims, Electronic harassment, Mkultra, Cybernetics, Cyber bullying, organized intimidation stalking and mind control is concerned Dr. Duncan is using this heinous tactics because of his knowledge of what I can expose and in OBTAING THE REAL EVIDENCE.

(Para 677) What I can expose is called P.N.I. (psycho-neuro-immunology) which started back in the mid 1970’s. This is the time when crack cocaine and people seeing bugs crawling all over there body and when a stimulant psychosis wasn’t possible because it wasn’t through Chronic usage as all abstracts from scientific publications purports and supply

(Para 678) couldn’t meet the demand for Chronic usage and crystal meth came on the market in the early 1980’s in which supply could not meet the Demand and speculation or hesitation was obviously there because people started getting chronic in the 1990’s and this is NARCOTERRORISM Again.

(Para 679) The study is now called P.E.N.I. (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology the study of emotions and in creating psycho-social stressors) also look at the list of psycho-social stressors that’s directly linked with this Derelict science.

(Para 680) Also Dr. Duncan did not explain how these instruments can be targeted at these various victims in order to do torture or mind control and why these NOBODYS?

(Para 681) Dr. Duncan has now implicating the USA government in that there is NO National Security threats because to many countries knows about these instruments and like instruments for communications as Proven in my Exhibit A.

(Para 682) Here’s why and where Dr. Duncan Intentionally deceived these victims, because It is impossible without tapping memory or thought and if you go to my blogs it will fully explain this TWO PART RESEARCH (go to parts 2, 4, & 5)

(Para 683) Part 2 Project P.E.N.I. Children with ADHD Autism &“Big Pharma’s New Market(s)” a 700 % increase in over-misdiagnosis the same as Soldiers now and PTSD http://redwhiteandbluesthebravesheep.com/?p=54 Part 4 Project P.E.N.I. (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology) &Chronic EMF Exposure Deceptions the 2nd part of this Research http://redwhiteandbluesthebravesheep.com/?p=43 Part 5 300 plus topics diversity to so many causations Re: EMF Deceptions #breast cancer http://redwhiteandbluesthebravesheep.com/?p=41

(Para 684) It will show you the diagrams of where these instruments can tap memory and in utilizing your basic sensors, and has the Images attached as Exhibit A, and view the Timpanic Membrane and the Broca’s Area these 2 area’s only and hell with the Wernicke’s area that associated with Visual and optic sensories that relay’s only 2% of language processes, CLOSE YOUR EYE NOW ITS USELESS IN PROVING WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT.

(Para 685) The Matrix deciphered is a bunch of crock shit. I can gather both physical Evidence proving its P.E.N.I. beyond a reasonable doubt and my prototype will be able to do the mind control aspects and in duplicating Schizophrenic Bipolar Dual Diagnosis Symptom logy’s and other Mental Health illnesses.

(Para 686) Also tell Dr. Robert Duncan I can design the same instruments (my prototype attached as Exhibit A) and mass produce it for $50.00 excluding the Textile Hallucinations which really is torture because it can produce pains heat, etc.

(Para 687) Dr. Robert Duncan is just like this… Who the F-wants to be a rocket scientist-GOING ANY WHERE? What he is doing by making you believe this crap is “diverting” the General Public with False information (this qualifies for plagiarism to his many books) these are RICO Act and Conspiracy violations with Duncan.

(Para 688) When everyone should be gathering the simple crucial evidence explained in my Blog(s) under the REAL NAME OF THIS RESEARCH P.E.N.I. Psycho-Endo-Neuro-Immunology and check this OUT I CAN GATHER EVIDENCE FROM 75 MILLION PEOPLE WORLDWIDE IN THE MENTAL HEALTH SYSTENM(S) that’s why these Buffers Were Conjured Up, and there are 40 to 50 million more people every year throughout the world with Traumatic Brain Injury (mild to severe).

(Para 689) HERE’S MY FINDINGS (of more Profitability and Intentional Deceptions) from my research data compiled cited in and attached as Exhibits E, ESPECIALLY Exhibit F, and then G. It seems that this so called Newest and most expensive Cancer Medications $178,000.00 the anti-cancer drug Blincyto or Blinotum-omab targets the altered genetic characterizations of a type of Cancers such as Leukemia.

(Para 690) Like I said Even with these New Cancer Medication for leukemia) that is $178,000.00 per standard treatment requiring 2 treatments is an atrocity to their Intentional Avoidance of Liability that is STILL creating the Intentional failures to Inform or Warn as to the True Cause(s)

(Para 691) of Cell and/or Genetic Aberrations that can CONTINUE TO PRODUCE THE ENTIRE SPECTRUM OF CANCERS and THIS GOES FOR THE ENTIRE SPECTRUMS) WITH HEART DISEASES and AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES AS WELL AS IN TERATOLOGY WITH BIRTH DEFECTS and MISCARRIAGES.

(Para 692) THIS IS A HUGE INTENTIONAL ERADICATION EXTERMINATION PROCESS that obviously exceeded the Holocaust (10X) or more since this Vast Knowledge was first Known and is ONGOING and NOW THEY WANT TO PROFIT GREATLY FROM WHAT IS NOT A GUARANTEED TREATMENT and CELL AND/OR GENETIC ABERRATIONS CAN and WILL HAPPEN AGAIN THROUGHOUT ONES LIFE.

(Para 693) It seems they can only treat a RARE Cancer I feel sorry for those who have the Common ones. As Far as Breast Cancer and another Expensive Treatment goes. The Treatment is in Locating the Breast Cancer Cell and/or Genetic Aberration which is time consuming in locating this 1 Cell and/or Genetic Aberration and then it is “Only Removed” and they then Claim you’ll Never Get Breast Cancer Again.

(Para 694) Another word’s that “Guarantee is not a Guarantee” and chances are it will Happen to Countless people and this is 1 of the Best and Stupidest Examples of this Intentional Eradication Extermination Process and profiting.

(Para 695) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2331 are the violations against all Defendants – Definitions
(5) the term “Intentionally Created “domestic terrorism” means activities that—
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(Para 696) (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 1841 – Cited in violations of Actions and Inaction and in accordance with are violations in the Protection of unborn children
(Para 697) § 1841. Protection of unborn children
(a) (1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.

(Para 698) (2) (A) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the punishment for that separate offense is the same as the punishment provided under Federal law for that conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn child’s mother.
(B) An offense under this section does not require proof that—
(i) the person engaging in the conduct had knowledge or should have had knowledge that the victim of the underlying offense was pregnant;

(Para 699) or (ii) the defendant intended to cause the death of, or bodily injury to, the unborn child.
(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.

(Para 700) (D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the death penalty shall not be imposed for an offense under this section.
(b) The provisions referred to in subsection (a) are the following:
(1) Sections 36, 37, 43, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 229, 242, 245, 247, 248, 351, 831, 844(d), (f), (h)(1), and (i), 924(j), 930, 1111, 1112, 1113,

(Para 701) 1114, 1116, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1153(a), 1201(a), 1203, 1365(a), 1501, 1503, 1505, 1512, 1513, 1751, 1864, 1951, 1952 (a)(1)(B), (a)(2)(B), and (a)(3)(B), 1958, 1959, 1992, 2113, 2114, 2116, 2118, 2119, 2191, 2231, 2241(a), 2245, 2261, 2261A, 2280, 2281, 2332, 2332a, 2332b, 2340A, and 2441 of this title.

(Para 702) (2) Section 408(e) of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 848(e).
(3) Section 202 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2283).
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the prosecution— (1) of any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or a person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law;

(Para 703) (2) of any person for any medical treatment of the pregnant woman or her unborn child; or (3) of any woman with respect to her unborn child.
(d) As used in this section, the term “unborn child” means a child in utero, and the term “child in utero” or “child, who is in utero” means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb, and remember non-ionized radiation is a carcinogen B causing Cancers, Tumors and tumor growth, all Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages.

18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide
(Para 704) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with § 1091. Genocide (a) Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such— (1) kills members of that group; (2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group; (3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;

(Para 705) (4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part; (5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or (6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(b)Punishment for Basic Offense.—The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—

(Para 706) (1) in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and (2) a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.

(Para 707) ( c ) Incitement Offense.— Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(d) Attempt and Conspiracy.— Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.

(Para 708) (e) Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if— (1) the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or
(2) regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is— (A) a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));

(Para 709) (B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)); (C) a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or
(D) present in the United States.

(Para 710) With the instruments that project P.E.N.I. uses are acoustics, electromagnetics, microwaves, elastic wave scattering cyclotron resonance, and a computer and programing all done on a multi-layered structuring (chronic EMF exposure) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1992 – Intentionally Created (domestic terrorists) Terrorist attacks and other violence against railroad carriers and against mass transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air.

(Para 711) This is also Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) due to the Intentionally Created Cancers, Tumors and tumor growth, and All Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in Teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages.
(d)Definitions.—In this section— (1) the term “biological agent” has the meaning given to that term in section 178(1);

(Para 712) (2) the term “dangerous weapon” means a weapon, device, instrument(s), material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, including a pocket knife with a blade of less than 2½ inches in length and a box cutter;
(3) the term “destructive device” has the meaning given to that term in section 921(a)(4);

(Para 713) (4) the term “destructive substance” means an explosive substance, flammable material, infernal machine, or other chemical (but non-ionized radiation and chronic exposure does change the chemical balances of the body starting from head to toe as Cited in Exhibit?????), mechanical, or radioactive device or material,

(Para 714) or matter of a combustible, contaminative, corrosive, or explosive nature, except that the term “radioactive device” does not include any radioactive device or material used solely for medical, industrial, research, or other peaceful purposes;

(Para 715) (13) the term “spent nuclear fuel” has the meaning given to that term in section 2(23) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101(23));
(14) the term “State” has the meaning given to that term in section 2266; (15) the term “toxin” has the meaning given to that term in section 178(2); and (16) the term “vehicle” means any carriage or other contrivance used, or

(Para 716) capable of being used, as a means of transportation on land, on water, or through the air and project P.E.N.I Instruments uses multiple elastic wave scattering is affecting so many other people who are in path of who ever their doing their illegal research on since the mid 1970’s till present.

(Para 717) Cited from paragraphs 1 to HERE??????????????? are
The Commerce Clause (here’s a little bit of a rattle snake to regulating commerce) by interfering this with the ECONOMICS (a False Claims Act of 300 Trillion and more as will be cited 7(Defendants) Illegal allocation of funds to the State (Defendants) and fraud-ing taxpayers,

(Para 718) and is explained through the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities on the STATES Budget Cuts, they have imposed cuts that hurt vulnerable residents and is REGULATING the ECONOMY based on unacceptable policy priorities

(Para 719) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2331 are the violations against all Defendants – Definitions the term INTENTIONALLY CREATED “domestic terrorism” and International domestic terrorism, 18 U.S. Code § 1841 – Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with are violations in the Protection of unborn children, and 18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide with the Crime of Aggression.

(Para 720) ###The second part of this Illegal research was originally called PNI (psych-neuro-immunology) now it’s called P.E.N.I. (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology the study of emotions and stress and how it affects the Immune system:

(Para 721) I have exposed Mind Control at its purist form that will make even Mind altering drugs look like baby aspirin (especially when you review project P.E.N.I.’s list of psycho-social stressors. Though Reform or Terminating Cliché’s and the psychology of Totalism and/or Brainwashing, Coercive Persuasion, Mind Abuse,

(Para 722) Thought Control and chosen techniques include dehumanizing of individuals (is to make somebody less human by taking away his or her interesting aspects of his or her personality, or his or her compassion and sensitivity towards others), keeping him or her in filth, sleep deprivation, partial sensory deprivation,

(Para 723) psychological harassment, inclination(s) of guilt and group social pressure, Cults (although no ones in a cult) but dealing with the shift of focus, mind control and religious conversion, and the loss of Dignity is a term used in moral, ethical, and political discussions to signify that a being has an innate right to respect and ethical treatment, and is a precondition of freedom that is lost in this Escalating Trend OF AN OVER-KILL and very serious Torture.

(Para 724) ALL THESE SUBJECTS COINCIDES WITH THE LIST OF PSYCHO-SOCIAL STRESSORS of the study of project P.E.N.I. and look it up under Mind Body Medicine.

(Para 725) These are ALL EXTREME violations of Article 6 of the Rome Statutes in accordance with the ICC on the Crimes of Genocide are (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,
(Para 726) This non CIA project now called project P.E.N.I. (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology) perspective in Research uses all types of drugs as inducements from hallucinogens, psychedelics, entactogens, stimulants, depressants, dissociative’s, and deliriants as a legitimate means of creating and/or establishing a history of drug and alchohol usage to substantiate a legal mental health consumer status to remain in the mental health and judicial systems to the plausible deniability of this Dual Research

(Para 727) to the obvious Human Rights and Genocide violations as described and cited in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H by and through their instruments as described in the E.P.R.I. reports that created the inducement of drug usage (NARCOTERRORISM), and

(Para 728) Major crimes of violence, (excellent example Brian Uyesugi Hawaii’s most famous killers (the Xerox killer) killing 7 people at his work at Xerox (affecting other innocent people’s lives who can now experience psycho-social stressors like bereavement, because of strange poking in his neck and black and white shadowy figures (the same experiences as many others who took my questionnaire, and

(Para 729) because my prototype will tap the memory of people associated with project P.E.N.I and this will be recorded proving this type of extreme violence is common place since the mid 1970’s as a Part of project P.E.N.I.’s studies, and how is that for Homicide violations and look at how many people will have Personal Knowledge of this because they are a part of Psycho (psychiatry)-Endo-Neuro(neurologists)-Immunology(immunologists and their Universities and Hospitals.

(Para 730) including domestic violence, divorce, etc and being indefinably caught in the mental health system and being on a polypharmacy regime for over 30 + years becomes truly and Over-Kill from this Derelict Science and Now you know why the RISE in Domestic Violence.

(Para 731) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2261 – Intentionally Created Interstate domestic violence (a) Offenses.— (1)Travel or conduct of offender.— A person who travels in interstate or foreign commerce or enters or leaves Indian country or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate a spouse, intimate partner,

(Para 732) or dating partner, and who, in the course of or as a result of such travel or presence, commits or attempts to commit a crime of violence against that spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

(Para 733) (2) Causing travel of victim.— A person who causes a spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner to travel in interstate or foreign commerce or to enter or leave Indian country by force, coercion, duress, or fraud, and who, in the course of, as a result of, or to facilitate such conduct or travel, commits or attempts to commit a crime of violence against that spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

(Para 734) (b)Penalties.—A person who violates this section or section 2261A shall be fined under this title, imprisoned— AND WITH PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE LOOK AT JUST THE SLAP ON THE WRIST CHARGES THEY’LL BE SERVING MULTIPLE LIFE SENTENCES… PANIC TIME.

(Para 735) (1) for life or any term of years, if death of the victim results; (2) for not more than 20 years if permanent disfigurement or life threatening bodily injury to the victim results; (3) for not more than 10 years, if serious bodily injury to the victim results or if the offender uses a dangerous weapon during the offense;

(Para 736) (6) Whoever commits the crime of stalking in violation of a temporary or permanent civil or criminal injunction, restraining order, no-contact order, or other order described in section 2266 of title 18, United States Code, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than 1 year.

(Para 737) The Second Incomplete Epidemiological Study: for the study of PENI the other half of this dual research and are the Obvious Incomplete Epidemiological aspects of this study and/or the front to the study of PNI. Which is no doubt the study of “Emotions” (as Referenced in websites under psycho-neuro-immunology) and created protracted stress on the immune system.

(Para 738) Much of the research of PENI has focused on standard behavioral or psychosocial stressors, and that studies have shown that due to stressors, that it can impair immune function, decreasing the ability of certain white blood cells, called lymphocytes, to grow and multiply.

(Para 739) These findings all suggest that the immune system becomes less effective under protracted stress. However it is not yet clear whether the changes seen in studies like these actually lead to physical illness or interfere with healing. Because numbers of immune system cells generally remain in the normal range, even under stress, the medical impact of these changes still needs to be investigated, BUT WHAT THEY FOUND OUT is that it creates SO MUCH OTHER TOXIC EFFECTS OTHER THAN YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM.

(Para 740) THE FRONT, to the study of PENI, is that there are so many factors that can affect a person’s response to stress, that it is difficult to determine the precise impact of such stressors. In addition to the social and psychological factors, a person’s age, race, sex, and genetic makeup as well as the nature and duration of the stress may all affect the ultimate health outcome,

(Para 741) and again past epidemiological studies could not meet the above stated requirements, to fulfill a complete epidemiological study, they need chronic study’s. To make it simpler, recent studies have focused on one type of physiological response to stress- changes in the immune system in a LIMITED number of specific situations.

(Para 742) Like I said, the front of PNI, goes into the limited number of specific situations, and the duration of the stressful situations, are not chronic, as to what I can expose, as far as unlimited situations, and duration. The study can also expand now into “Age, Race and Genetic Makeups” and is a continuum of unlimited situations and of duration MY WHAT GENOCIDE VIOLATIONS.
(Para 743) This is just the tip of the iceberg in what I can expose to what the PENI has already done to the general public. I’m going to show that INDUCED DRUG USAGE (NARCOTERRORISM) The term narcoterrorism has been around since the early 1980s, when it was used to refer to violence used by Latin American cocaine cartels to extract political concessions from their governments (although cocaine, pharmacologically speaking, is not a narcotic).

(Para 744) More recently, the term has been used to refer to groups who use terrorism on behalf of a political agenda (and are known as terrorist groups), who use drug trade to finance their political activities is a big factor in the study of PENI, because once they induce drug usage (the PENI make these people commit CRIMES 1st Murder such as Brian Uyesugi, 2nd Murder, Manslaughter, Assault, Domestic Violence, and Terroristic Threatening, and look at my questionnaire

(Para 745) Here’s a table of stressors that many other people who has answered my questionnaire are experiencing, accompanied with their affidavits. HEALTH, an injury or illness, being in the hospital, major dental work, change in eating habits, change in sleeping habits, change in recreational habits,
(Para 746) WORK: hours and conditions, troubles at work with your boss, coworkers, persons under your supervision, loss of job, fired from work.

(Para 747) HOME AND FAMILY: Changes in living conditions, change of residence, change in family get-togethers, major change in health or behavior of family members, pregnancy, miscarriage or abortion, changes in arguments with spouse, in law problems, divorce, remarriage, death of spouse or other family members,

(Para 748) PERSONAL AND SOCIAL: drug usage (because it now Intentionally “created a history” to how you got Schizophrenia, Bipolar, crimes, jail time, change in personal habits, change in political beliefs, change in religious beliefs, change in social activity, new friends, girlfriend or boyfriend problems, sexual difficulties, death of a close friend or Family, suicidal thoughts:

(Para 749) FINANCIAL: major changes in finances, loss or damage of personal property, major purchase, foreclosure on mortgage, loan.

(Para 750) Like I said WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND would want to be a part of a study that is this Destructive… NOBODY in their RIGHT MINDS!

(Para 751) I’ve conducted studies by gathering information from a questionnaire that I’ve comprised, that’s based on my Experiences with the PNI voices, and I Created their Voice Patterns, and of coarse it has Psycho-Social Stressor questions as well (172 questions), and the relevance of the impact between your drug induced sons/daughters mental illnesses (Drug Psychosis, and/or other mental illnesses), AND HOW THEY ARE RELAPSING AGAIN AND AGAIN,

(Para 752) and the fact that in my questionnaire they are ALL experiencing the very same voice(s), patterns of the voices in what they make you do and experience and pinpointing in Most of the People who took the questionnaire to be hearing the very same voices by the very same experiences that the voices made them do, and in so many of the very same characteristics of their voices

(Para 753) Distinguishing this from mere coincidence and OUR BIG DIFFERENCES in Demographics, Education Levels, and Poverty levels (Genocide) ETC., CLEARLY DOES SUGGEST WE ARE HEARING THE VERY SAME VOICES THROUGH THE VERY SAME CHARACTERISTICS OF OUR VOICES AND THIS IS AND THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE OF THE TWO UNDERLINED TOPICS which goes into such as songs they sing, a few famous actors/actresses (like Rosie O’Donnell) impersonations or

(Para 754) other different famous people who they tend to sound like, the voices having a sergeant of arms/bull named Big Guy (in Which 7 out 10 people have already named and this is just from 12 people who took my questionnaire), and just about everyone going through ESP experiences with Clairvoyance (and with the instruments mentioned is easy to prove why their experiencing this, and how it’s done), and that truly distinguishes them hearing the very same voices, and its truly uncanny/hairy,

(Para 755) and if you answered the first 80-90 questions the same (70 % is answering YES to these questions which is different from the psycho-social stressor questions of my questionnaire) you will know your being affected and you’re a part of this experiment, and the same psycho-social stressor patterns that your sons/daughters and even YOU (family members after all your experiencing many of the psycho-social stressors) and are experiencing,

(Para 756) the nation’s top four killers, cancers, heart diseases, Iatrogenesis (pharmaceuticals, antipsychotics, anti-depressants) and autoimmune diseases in their respective order, neurological disorders, miscarriages and birth defects, and the relevant impact that it’s having on everyone in your Family, that’s why these professionals taught you what they Created Tough Love which creates a family separation.

(Para 757) Plugging Both Ears to determine if the instruments of the PNI are being directed at you, and/or distinguishing whether you’re an experiment. Plug both ears with your index fingers you’ll hear the instruments which will sound like a loud pulsing sound/noise or like a factory kind of sound (rather noisy),

(Para 758) but the PNI can bring this sound down knowing what your attempting, but just go to a quiet place and then try plugging both ears again you’ll hear it. Now you’re NOT SUPPOSE TO HEAR ANY SOUND IN YOUR HEAD BY PLUGGING BOTH EARS PERIOD ITS UNEXPLAINABLE.
(Para 759) What you’re Hearing I believe is the Cyclotron Resonance of the instruments. In technology, a cyclotron is a type of particle accelerator. In physics , the cyclotron frequency or gyrofrequency is the frequency of a charged particle moving perpendicularly to the direction of a uniform magnetic field, i.e. a magnetic field of constant magnitude and direction. “”Since that motion is always CIRCULAR, the cyclotron frequency is well defined THIS IS WHAT YOU’RE HEARING”.

(Para 760) THE PROGRESSION paragraphs?????????are Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2331 are the violations against all Defendants – Definitions The term “domestic terrorism” 18 U.S. Code § 1841 – Cited in and in accordance with are violations in the Protection of unborn children (2) Section 408(e) of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 848(e)), § 1091, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States who is Fraud-ing its Taxpayers to Finance an Intentional Eradication Extermination process, and CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B).

THE ICC ARTICLES 1 thru 5 what qualified them and in having sole jurisdiction and/or venue.
Article 1: The Court
(Para 761) An International Criminal Court (“the Court”) is hereby established. It shall be a permanent institution and shall have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of international concern, as referred to in this Statute, and shall be complementary to national criminal jurisdictions.

(Para 762) The jurisdiction and functioning of the Court shall be governed by the provisions of this Statute. The ICC NOW HAS COMPLETE and/or ABSOLUTE JURISDICTION due to the United Nations, because Jurisdiction lay’s under all four criteria’s of the International Criminal Courts definitions (now referred to as the ICC) as described below.

Article 2: Relationship of the Court with the United Nations
(Para 763) The United Nations and Ban Ki Moon are in direct violation(s) of National Security Law, and International National Security Law that is well documented by me as a (Relator) on a Super Huge Intentional Eradication and Extermination process dealing with Human Right and Genocide violations are Defendants in this Honorable Court.

(Para 764) OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GENEVA SWITZERLAND SENT TO: Human Rights Council Branch-Complaint Procedure Unit OHCHR- Palais Wilson United Nations Office at Geneva CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11

(Para 765) E-mail: CP@chchr.Org, nicholson@un.org, rcolville@chchr.org, dpi_dis_unit@un.org, InfoDEsk@chchr.org, gmagazzeni@chchr.org, fotoverkoop@anp.nl, Myc.Jolanta@dpa.com, redactie@gpd.nl, claimevent@zapaday.com all refused to accept my Complaint except Zapaday who said they have to review my Complaint first, and I called several times at the long distance phone numbers at Geneva and leaving messages,

(Para 766) but they still refuse to take into receipt my Complaint, but was taken into receipt VIA POSTAL SERVICE CONFIRMATION (Attached as Exhibit B) on my own initiative, and the United Nations never contacted me or answered any of my phone calls thereafter.

(Para 767) Thereby rendering the United Nations Complimentary and Cooperative powers on the Grounds of Mootness, because they were Unwilling or Unable TO DO SO genuinely as this is Evident with the United States of America and its Counterpart Conduits as Cited the ICC Articles—————, and in and attached as Exhibit C and D “the Great ERA of Sedition creating a worldwide Democracy Delusion”.

(Para 768) Attached as Exhibit A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H are case citing’s of the Human Rights Genocide violations through numerous Criminal and Civil proceedings, cited in CR No 0990 State of Hawaii vs Willard Max Imamoto attached as Exhibit I and Willard Max Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al attached as Exhibit J.

(Para 769) Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Hawaii State Hospital et al, Writ of Certiorari Willard Max Imamoto vs. Kahi Mohala Hospital et al.

(Para 770) The ICC has a cooperation agreement with the United Nations which now has No Jurisdiction. Which now falls on the ICC’s Jurisdiction and its States Parties to apply police force or enforcement body within its own Body for support, particularly for making arrests, transferring arrested persons to the ICC detention center in The Hague, freezing suspects’ assets, and enforcing sentences.

(Para 771) The ICC cooperates with both States Parties and non-States Parties, and this needs to STOP as BIASNESS and the CANNONS of the ICC will be in question, and these are the State Parties that needs to recuse themselves as well starting with Great Britain (UK), #Netherlands, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Mexico, China, Japan, Columbia, Lebanon, Nigeria,

(Para 772) and these are the other STATES that must recuse themselves by and through biasness through this Complaint as National Security Law violations and International National Security law violations has affected their Countries they are Afghanistan, and Palestine due to the conflicts of engaged war and being labelled as terrorist organization(s) and/or opposition to Israel.

(Para 773) Venezuela, Argentina, Costa Rica, Peru, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Chile due to Columbia’s as being a Defendant, and that Argentina and Brazil are having economic hardships with the United States of America, and Luxembourg and Liechtenstein must recuse themselves for representing the European Union from past corroborations with the ICC as the European Union liaison as opposed to this instant criminal case dealing with many of the European Union Countries (as Defendants),

(Para 774) and Greece must recuse itself as a Country that believes in extreme socialism and relies on other European Countries to bail them out, and Australia and Canada must recuse themselves for they are the up-and-coming-newbies and are BIG consumers of antipsychotics and anti-depressants and are a Direct Contraindication to what this Complaint represents as being another Environmental Impact.

(Para 775) China, India, Pakistan and Turkey must also recuse themselves (as being Defendants) from any matters dealing with the United Nations State Parties. It must proceed within its remaining Body and/or its State Parties.

(Para 776) #Mr. Michel de Smedt Director of the Investigations Division MUST BE RECUSED he in a native of Belgium (a Defendant).

(Para 777) These are the Judges of the International Criminal Court that must recuse themselves from this Criminal Investigation and proceedings due to Biasness as established by the Countries that are Defendants in this Criminal proceeding Trial Judge Chile Eboe-Osui (Nigeria), Appeals Judge Howard Morrison (United Kingdom), Pre-Trial Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut (France), Trial Judge Bertram Schmitt (Germany), Pre-Trial Judge Cuno Tarfusser (Italy), Appeals Judge Christine van der Wyngaert (Belgium) and Trial Judge Kuniko Ozaki (Japan).

Article 3: Seat of the Court

Article 4: Legal status and powers of the Court
(Para 778)
1. The Court shall have international legal personality. It shall also have such legal capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfillment of its purposes.
2. The Court may exercise its functions and powers, as provided in this Statute, on the territory of any State Party and, by special agreement, on the territory of any other State.

PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW
Article 5: Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
(Para 779) The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes

(Para 780) HOW IS THIS FOR AFFECTING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE OR ECONOMY A 100 Trillion dollar Federal False Claims Act suit which equals Three times 100 Trillion dollars that these Defendants has sustained because of

(Para 781) Defendants’ actions, plus a civil penalty of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 for each violation of 31 U.S.C. §3729; (Now this alone is 75 Million times $5,500.00, and not more than $11,000.00) and bring in the 50-70 million more TBI consumers which would fetch this Court anywhere from Six Trillion to Twenty Two Trillion dollars on “just civil penalties” to this Honorable Court in which this Court will ASSESS the Maximum and take the 22 Trillion plus.

(This is reference material and is attached as Exhibit___, but needs to be viewed in this Criminal case)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF WASHINTON Department of Justice
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Willard Max Imamoto Civil Action No. ____________ Ex rel.
Relator
Vs.
Same Defendant’s in this Instant Criminal Case on Page 1.
(Para 782) FILED UNDER SEAL (NOT ANYMORE) FALSE CLAIMS ACT UNDER MEDICAID, SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME, SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY INSURANCE, MEDICARE, GENERAL ASSISTANCE, FOOD STAMPS, FEDERAL GRANT MONEY’S FOR GOVERNMENTAL AND NON GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JURY DEMAND
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT IS PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C §§ 3729-3732 OF THE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT.

(Para 783) The United States of America, by and through Qui Tam Relator Willard Max Imamoto is not a Lawyer nor does he possess a Lawyer in this Qui Tam Complaint, brings this action under 31 U.S.C §3729, et seq., as amended (False Claims Act) to recover all damages, penalties and other remedies established by the False Claims Act on behalf of the International Criminal Court.

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
(Para 784) This is an action to recover damages and civil penalties on behalf of the International Criminal Court, for violations of the False Claims Act arising from false or fraudulent records, statements, or claims, or any combination thereof, made, used or caused to be made, used, or presented, or any combination thereof, by the defendants, their agents,

(Para 785) employees, or co-conspirators, or any combination thereof, with respect to false claims for outpatient psychotropic medications prescribed to children and youth for which claims were made to the federal Medicaid Program, and to Identify and determine importance of National as well as International interests and Domestic Policy considerations (as cited in National Security laws and International National Security laws).

(Para 786) The False Claims Act was enacted during the Civil War. Congress amended the False Claims Act in 1986 to enhance the Government’s ability to recover losses sustained as a result of fraud against the United States after finding that fraud in federal programs was pervasive and that the False Claims Act, which Congress characterized as the primary tool for combating government fraud, was in need of modernization.

(Para 787) Congress intended that the amendments create incentives for individuals with knowledge of fraud against the government to disclose the information without fear of reprisals or Government inactions, and to encourage the private bar to commit legal resources to prosecuting fraud on the Government’s behalf.

(Para 788) The False Claims Act provides that any person who knowingly submits, or causes the submission of, a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. Government for payment or approval is liable for a civil penalty of up to $11,000 for each such claim, plus three times the amount of the damages sustained by the Government.

(Para 789) The Honorable International Criminal Court will enter judgment against Defendants in an amount equal to three times the amount of damages (now this is Three times 100 Trillion dollars+ that these Defendants has sustained because of Defendants’ actions and inactions, and the civil penalty of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 for each violation of 31 U.S.C. §3729 AND THIS IS 22 TRILION DOLLARS+ FOR THE ICC;

(Para 790) (Now this alone is 75 Million times $5,500.00, and not more than $11,000.00), and the 50-70 million TBI consumers which would fetch the International Criminal Court anywhere from Six Trillion to Twenty Two Trillion dollars on “just civil penalties” in which this Honorable Court will impose these Civil Penalties to the 22 Trillion maximum allowed, because they can, and I said to.

(Para 791) The Act allows any person having information about a false or fraudulent claim against the Government to bring an action for himself and the Government, and to share in any recovery. The Act requires that the complaint be filed under seal for a minimum of 60 days (without service on the defendant during that time) to allow the Government time to conduct its own investigation and to determine whether to join the suit, and the United States of America’s Department of Justice in Washington refused only because the Government is Fraud-ing its own taxpayers..

(Para 792) Under Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSI) U.S.C. Title 16 Medicaid, and Title 18 U.S.C. Social Security Disability Insurance benefits (SSDI), Medicare, General Assistance (GA) benefits (Money), Food Stamps benefits , Federal Grant Money for Governmental and Non-Governmental Agencies in the Mental Health Field(s), and All the States in the United States in the States Interests in Federal Funding.

(Para 793) a) psychiatrist’s, psychologists, psychiatric nurses, social workers, and in both inpatient treatment and outpatient treatment and other prescribers, (b) mental health agencies, and (c) pharmacies, all have specific responsibilities to prevent false claims from being presented and are liable under the False Claims Act for their role in the submission of false claims. This is an action for treble damages and penalties for each false claim and each false statement under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq, as amended.

II: PARTIES
(Para 794) Relator Willard Max Imamoto, and the 75 Million Mental Health consumers, and (this is just an added bonus) the 50-70 million TBI consumers (per year worldwide-which doesn’t constitute for Federal False Claims Act, but as an Intentional Extermination Eradication process) that has been prescribed and given antipsychotics/anti-depressants medications when a minor and/or adult which constitute false claims under the False Claims Act and constitutes Created Domestic Terrorism and NarcoTerrorism.

(Para 795) My Businesses will also be establishing with various Neurologists and Immunologists and Especially Personal Injury Lawyers on the Subject of Traumatic Brain Injury (now referred to as TBI), because this is already proven with these lawyers, and their expert witnesses, and the neurobiological deficits that can occur, and then Secondary Mechanisms of injury,

(Para 796) and Assessing TBI results in Variable Constellations of Neurobehavioral Disorders such as cognitive or intellectual deficits, behavioral and personality changes, and mood, etc. There are about 50-75 Million more people per year in the world who sustained some sort of TBI per year.

(Para 797) Which Defendants Research Publications is already indicating and I’ve Expounded Upon), and then going beyond TBI and secondary mechanisms of injury (and the neurobiological deficits) that also goes into the Central Nervous System and Endocrine System from a Neuroimmunology to Immunology standpoint that requires Careful attention, and detailed monitoring of ALL DEFICITS biological, biophysiological, Metabolic, Hormonal, Enzymes, Amino’s, etc

(Para 798) Effects from structural brain damage that can affect the total schematics from a psycho-endo-neuro-immunological standpoint that CAUSES Cancers, Heart Diseases, and Autoimmune Diseases, and Shortened Life expectancy’s by 25-30 years. Attached as Exhibit F is the list of 6 Billion Ways 2 Die.

(Para 799) THIS IS ATTRIBUTED AS BEING FATAL IATYROGENESIS. Iatrogenesis, or an iatrogenic artifact pronounced (I-AT-RO-GENESIS); “originating from a physician”) is an inadvertent adverse effect or complication resulting from medical treatment or advice, including that of psychologist, therapists, pharmacists, nurses, physicians and dentists.

(Para 800) Iatrogenesis is not restricted to conventional medicine: Some iatrogenic artifacts are clearly defined and easily recognized, such as a complication following a surgical procedure.

(Para 801) Some less obvious ones can require significant investigation to identify, such as complex drug interactions. Causes of iatrogenesis include chance, medical error, negligence, social control, unexamined instrument design, anxiety or annoyance related to medical procedures, and the adverse effects or interactions. I’VE ALREADY LINKED ANTI PSYCHOTIC USAGE TO CANCERS, BRAIN TUMORS, HEART DISEASE AND AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE.

(Para 802) THIS WILL VERY WELL LEAD TO criminal charges not related to a monetary thing (as pharmaceutical companies pay no disregard to in Product Liability, and as other conduits/Defendants who have not been subjected to YET), but NOW WE WILL BE ABLE TO PROSECUTE THEM and with a Higher Degree of “INTENT” to man-slaughter once the determination of any deadly/fatal outcomes occurs and through the causal connection of antipsychotic use and/or over-usage IN WHICH I LOCKED IN THESE PEOPLE AND ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO WEASEL OUT OF.
Defendants again are the same as Page 1.

(Para 803) 2) Attached as Exhibit B and its Exhibit A in Relators References Purports that the USA Government is spending $732 Billion in Off Label Usage Only (this data is incorrect) with Antipsychotics per year which Totals about 21 % of the Federal Budget per year (& these figures are back in 2009). But just go with the 21% and you’ll see the Big picture.

(Para 804) 3) This data is INCORRECT as far as Government Fraud is applied to Off Label Usage, and this data is just from the year 2006.

(Para 805) 4) Its goes into about 100 Trillion Dollars+ Since the year 2000 to 2015 and is ONGOING (which increases about 5 – 6 Trillion a year and as Sequestration goes into Multiplication it increases rapidly per year) when you attribute other Fraudulent Government Benefits as Explained Below, and will put the Antipsychotic Companies out of Business Permanently (also this 100 + Trillion is coming from the other Defendants Countries).

(Para 806) 5) So basically this Claim is not About Off Label Usage but through the ON-GOING Off Label Usage Constituting a Much Larger Scale of Government Fraud in WHICH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS FRAUD ING THE TAXPAYERS OF AMERICA and PUTTING EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD AT RISK FOR WORLDWIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, besides an Intentional Eradication Extermination process.

(Para 807) I Already Proved Immanent Worldwide Catastrophes are happening, and More very near Immanent Worldwide Catastrophes are on the gloomy horizon, and such costs has already severely prejudice, and has strictly imperiled the ability of the actor’s government(s) (Defendants) to safeguard and enhance the well-being of its populace, and abroad.
(Para 808) Examples: Prevent the regional proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) (BUT IN THIS INCIDENT MASS DESTRUCTION DOESN’T HAVE TO BE “WEAPONS”)

(Para 809) 6) Also Attached as Exhibit B and its Exhibit A Purports that the Overwhelming increase in Children being over misdiagnosed as having ADHD has increased 700% and will become Bipolar by the age of 8-10 years of age, and why Many of these Children Become Dual Diagnosis through Illegal Drug Usage caused by the Diagnosis of having ADHD and being

(Para 810) over medicated with such Drugs as Methylphenidate, Anti psychotics and Anti-depressants creating Major Depression and Suicidal Tendencies Creating the need for Stimulant dependency or other Drug(s) alcohol usage that is also Increasing the Statistics of Why the USA has 14 Million+ Dual Diagnosed People and Growing at a Phenomenal rate and this is NARCOTERRORISM.

(Para 811) 7) The Soldiers with PTSD are just like the Children and the over misdiagnosis and is a separate contributor to another 700% increase and will go through everything just like the Children and will also become Bipolar. They are the Newest Markets for these Pharmaceutical Companies (affecting Domestic Commerce and International Commerce.

(Para 812) 8) Attached as Exhibit B and its Exhibit B Purports that the USA Government spends $110 billion a year on Food Stamps (these facts & figures are from 2006).

(Para 813) 9) Attached as Exhibit B and its Exhibit C Purports that the USA Government based on The Center on Budget and Policy Priority states there are 10.5 million people in the USA collecting SSI benefits or Supplemental Security Income at $730.00 a Month Times Twelve Months, and there are about the same amount of People in the USA collecting SSDI benefits (figures from 2006)

(Para 814) or Social Security Disability Insurance at $890.00 to Over a $1000.00 per Month Times Twelve Months for a Three Plus Trillion Dollar Federal Deficit per year (now this figured is actually Double and/or slightly more.

(Para 815) 10) Attached as Exhibit B and its Exhibit D Purports the Increase of Mental Disorders in America: Mental disorders are common in the United States and Internationally. An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older or about one in four adults suffer from a diagnosis mental disorder in a given year. As applied to the 2004 (and this is a 2004 statistic) U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure Translates to 57.7 Million People.

(Para 816) Even though mental disorders are widespread in the population, the main burden of illness is concentrated in a much smaller proportion about 6 percent, or 1 in 17 who suffer from a serious mental illness. In addition, mental disorders are the leading cause of Disability in the USA and Canada for ages 15-44.
Many people suffer from more than one mental disorder at a given time.

(Para 817) Nearly half (45 percent) of those with any mental disorder meet criteria for two or more disorders, with severity strongly related to comorbidity, such as Mood Disorders, Suicide, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorders, Panic Disorders, Obsessive Compulsive Disorders, Post Traumatic Stress Disorders, Generalized Anxiety, Social Phobias, Eating Disorders, ADHD Disorders, Autism, and Alzheimer’s Disease.

(Para 818) 11) In the USA, mental disorders are diagnosed based on the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition the (DSMIV) Psychiatry’s Bible.

(Para 819) 12) Now because the USA Government is inducing Illegal Drug(s) Usage, and fighting the War on Drugs, this obviously is Creating a Lot of Violent Crimes through Illegal Drug Usage, that incorporates Jail, or Prison, Court Expenditures, Public Defenders, Sheriff Transportation to and from Court, Attorney General’s Office and its Deputy Attorney Generals, Inpatient Treatment at $700.00 Plus a Day, then theirs Outpatient Treatment Centers receiving State Moneys and Federal Grants,

(Para 820) Probation Officers or Parole Officers, Classes of All Sorts dealing with Mental Health Issues and Drug Relapse, Half Way Houses, or Housing from 24 Hour Supervised, 8 Hour to 16 Hour Supervised and the State and Federal Grants Moneys Supporting this, and then Independent Living and The Federal Grant Moneys Supporting this and other Expenditures totaling the 50+ Trillion Dollars Taxpayers Deficit that I am talking about.

(Para 821) 13) Attached as Exhibit B and its Exhibit E Purports that the Federal Debt will Soon Surpass our Economy and the Federal Spending by the Numbers the Current rate of Federal Spending is at 19 Trillion dollars and through Sequestration and its multiplication process by the Year 2037 it will be at 571 Trillion Dollars surpassing the United States of America’s economy, and that is why the USA Government is borrowing over three trillion dollars a year MAINLY CREATED BY THE STATES INTERESTS AND ITS CONDUITS and the MANY BUFFER ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE STATES INTERESTS in Federal funding.

(Para 822) 14) The Top Three Leading Causes of Death “WAS” Cancers, Heart Diseases, and Autoimmune Diseases now the number 3 cause of death is Iatrogenesis (pharmaceutics).

(Para 823) ###THAT’S WHY I’VE SUBMITTED ABSTRACT FROM SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS FROM THE DEFENDANTS IN THIS CRIMINAL CASE; Re: of MACAQUE MONKEY’S who didn’t have Schizophrenia or Bipolar diseases and given antipsychotics for 18-22 months and proving various areas of structural brain damage in the White and Gray matter by as much as 8-11 % in such a short amount of time.

(Para 824) Just gathering the simple physical evidence NECESSARY ONCE AND FOR ALL in entering Extensive structural brain damage caused by over antipsychotic(s) usage through various dimensional imaging tests such as MRI, functional fMRI, SPECT, or PET scans based on the children who are not diagnosed with having schizophrenia or bipolar Diseases, but only having ADD, ADHD and behaviors and who’s been on an antipsychotic regime (polypharmacy) for over 10 years or longer,

(Para 825) and Many of Hawaii’s Methamphetamine Users (dual diagnosis) who doesn’t possess these a Degenerative Brain Processes for Schizophrenics or enlarged ventricles, and those diagnosed with having Bipolar and possessing enlarged amygdala’s), but only a Drug Psychosis and been on a antipsychotic regime (polypharmacy) for 20-35 years will show

(Para 826) Extensive Structural Brain Damage with Shrinkage in the Gray and White matter, cause the Basal Ganglia, Caudate Nucleus or Thalamus to be Enlarged, also causes Death of Neurons, and affecting the Oligodendrocytes and Astrocytes the insulation to the firing of neurons.

(Para 827) Giving a DEFINITE DETERMINE that ANTIPSYCHOTICS is TO DANGEROUS FOR ANY USE IN WHICH “NONE” OF THE DEFENDANTS WHO ARE “RESEARCH NEUROLOGISTS AND PSYCHIATRISTS HAVE WHOLE HEARTEDLY INTENTIONALLY AVOIDED THIS LIABILITY” AND SO HAS THE FDA, and CREATED THE INTENTIONALLY FAILED TO INFORM AND/OR WARN AND COULD HAVE SAVED MILLIONS OF LIVES BY NOW instead of using Macaque Monkeys they could have done it with the Obvious Evidence I presented here, but didn’t!

(Para 828) 15) Attached as B and its Exhibit F Purports Now that the Top Three Leading Causes of Death is Cancers, Heart Diseases and Iatrogenesis (Dying through Pharmaceuticals from Adverse Drug Reactions and Interactions) and I’ll be Showing very soon that the Leading Cause of Death is From Iatrogenesis as Plaintiffs Exhibits I in his Opposition Motion for Summary Judge with Defendant NAMI’s Substantive Joinder Motion to Dismiss with Bazelon Center on Mental Health Law Purports.

(Para 829) 16) I was the One who Told James Gottstein past President and Treasurer of NARPA, President of PsychRights, NARPA and John Jones and others of the 2012 Conference like Bazelon and Ira Burnim in my Presentation with my Critical Economic Impact Strategies and/or Taxpayers Interests, and In Community Organizing or as Jim calls it Public Attitudes,

(Para 830) and Jim has Now Publically announced a Little about my Critical Economic Impact Strategies after I told him this about 3-4 months prior (which I am not pissed about in any way if it helps people in a positive way) but Jim was Half Ass and Didn’t Exploit or Expose this Critical Aspect to its Fullest Governmental Fraud Capabilities that would have an Enormous Impact in Federal Deficit or Taxpayers Interests, because All Defendants in this Instant Civil Action ARE FRAUDING THE GOVERNMENT THEMSELVES.

(Para 831) 17) The Intentional Fraudulent ACTIONS and Deceit by All Defendants has reached a Super Heightened Particularity with Fraud and through a Very DERILICT Science Called PENI (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology).

(Para 832) 18) Here’s NAMI’s The States Interest and all the Other Defendants through NAMI and the Senate Probe (Senator Charles Grassley) Finding NAMI GUILTY of receiving Illegal Funds from Big Pharma to the Tune of 56 Million in about three years more than three quarter of their Income through their Numerous Causes of Action through their ACTIONS and Why and What they Created! Also NARCOTERRORISM!!

(Para 833) 19) Science News: Science Daily (Aug. 17, 2010) you may reference this material) nearly 1 million children in the United States are potential misdiagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder per year, simply because they “Are The Youngest And Most Immature” in their Kindergarten Class according to new research by a Michigan State University economist.

(Para 834) The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention on the subject of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD states the Morbidity in number of children 3-17 years of age ever diagnosed with ADHA is 5.2 million, and in Health Care Use, Ambulatory Care the number of these visits (to physician offices, hospital outpatient and emergency departments) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as primary diagnosis is 7.3 million (average annual, 2006-2007).

(Para 835) What I am saying is that regardless if it’s a misdiagnosis this is what will logically happen to most of the children, and they will be very susceptible of being further caught in the system that they can’t get out of. There is lack of evidence of the effectiveness in the long term of beneficial effects of Methylphenidate (Ritalin, Adderall) with regard to learning and academic performance.

(Para 836) Therapy with Methylphenidate should not be indefinite, and weaning off periods to assess symptoms is recommended. Methylphenidate is derived from the illegal drug meth-amphetamine (ice), but is FDA approved. The 700% increase in psycho stimulant use that occurred in the 1990s justifies concern about potential over diagnosis and inappropriate treatment of child behavior problems.

(Para 837) A critical review of epidemiologic research suggests that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is not universally over Diagnosed (Regardless of this Fact Please Read Below it will Blow Your Mind); however, for some U.S. communities there is evidence of substantial ADHD over diagnosis, adverse educational outcomes among children treated for the disorder, and suboptimal management of childhood behavior problems.

(Para 838) Evidence of ADHD over diagnosis is obscured when findings are reported without respect to geographic location, race, gender, and age. More sophisticated epidemiologic tracking of ADHD treatment trends and examination of associated outcomes is needed to appreciate the scope of the problem on a national level. Meanwhile, a public health Approach to ADHD that includes the development and implementation of data-driven, community-based interventions is warranted and is underway in some communities.

(Para 839) Guidelines for promoting judicious use of psychotropic drugs are suggested. Children who are forced to take methylphenidate are more prone or have a higher affinity of becoming drug users (of all stimulants) due to the profound induced stimulant psychological effects that was forced upon them,

(Para 840) that will created even more drug psychosis people being classified as schizophrenic or bipolar in the years to come, and so on, and so on. There are many adverse effects to taking this stimulate drug (that I listed), and it can cause decreases in height and weight, deforming of bone structure (curvature).

(Para 841) As the well known Dr. Peter R. Breggin M.D. (psychiatrist and anti-antipsychotic expert) from the Center for the study of Psychiatry and Psychology in Maryland and NARPA and Bazelon’s Main Man quotes and has address the United States Congress that children become psychotic with long term therapy such as paranoia, schizophrenia, and behavioral sensitization,

(Para 842) and can include hearing voices, visual hallucinations, urges to harm oneself, severe anxiety, euphoria, grandiosity, paranoid delusions, confusion, increased aggression and irritability, and is unpredictable in whom it will occur.
(Para 843) Special Precaution is recommended in individuals with Epilepsy (as both children have) with additional caution to individuals with uncontrolled epilepsy due to the Potential for Methylphenidate to Lower the Seizure Threshold.

(Para 844) These drugs can drastically and permanently change brain chemistry, and short term doses produce brain cell death, and long-lasting and sometimes permanent changes in the biochemistry of the brain. These drugs also endanger the cardiovascular system and commonly produce mental effects, including depression.

(Para 845) Stimulants even more often become gateway drugs to additional psychiatric medications. Stimulant-induced over-stimulation, for example, is often treated with additive or dangerous sedatives (Risperidone, and

(Para 846) Depakote as both children are taking), while stimulant-induced depression is often treated with dangerous, unapproved antidepressants. As the child’s emotional control breaks down due to medication effects, mood stabilizers may be added.

(Para 847) Eventually, these children end up on four or five psychiatric drugs at once and a “DIAGNOSIS OF BIPOLAR DISORDER” by the age of eight or ten. This is an Atrocity that will become a Very Huge Human Rights,

(Para 848) Genocide (because of the demographics, race, ethnics, poverty level of these targeted people, through educators and the State System) that Has Already IMPACTED the 10 Million Children in the USA diagnosed as having ADD, ADHD, and behaviors,

(Para 849) who Has a Very Great Chance of becoming Bipolar by the Age of 9-10 through Off Label Usage, and the Very Great Possibility of these Children becoming future Drug Abusers THAT WILL BECOME LIKE THE 10 MILLION + Dual Diagnosed Due to Forced Stimulant Inducement through Methylphenidate

(Para 850) and the Major Tranquilizers Anti psychotics and are more prone or have a higher affinity of becoming drug users that will Create a HUGE TAXPAYER, PARENTS INTEREST, and ALREADY IS THE DOWNFALL OF OUR HEALTH SYSTEM.

(Para 851) ###ALSO MOST IMPORTANTLY (Second Crux) CREATING MORE OFF LABEL USAGE that is Again Creating MORE GOVERNMENT FRAUD Attached as Plaintiffs Exhibit E specifies ALL the Different Drug Psychosis’s and the ABSOLUTE TIME FRAME of DRUG PSYCHOSIS DISSIPATION

(Para 852) (especially methamphetamine) that Clearly Defines WE ARE NOT A TRUE SCHIZOPHRENICS and SHOULD NOT BE ON LONG TERM TREATMENT PLANS THAT LAY’S THE SOUND FOUNDATION FOR TWO SEPARATE CLASSIFICATIONS TO TREATMENT

(Para 853) ESPECIALLY LONG TERM TREATMENT IN OUTPATIENT CARE, AND IS A MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS THAT WILL MAKE ALL DEFENDANT COUNTRIES DEFICITS EXCEED THEIR TOTAL ECONOMIES AND IS A MAJOR MITIGATING FACTOR TO AN INTENTIONAL ERADICATION EXTERMINATION PROCESS THAT HAS ALREADY EXCEEDED THE HOLOCAUSTE 10 PLUS TIMES.

(Para 854) Plaintiffs drug psychosis (From Methamphetamine Usage a Stimulant Psychosis, and because what 90 plus percent of the people in Hawaii & abroad who has/had a Drug Psychosis from this usage (and Most of Hawaii’s Dual Diagnosed are affected by this epidemic for decades) is being PREVENTED BY THE FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS to the CLAIM OF ABSOLUTE TIME FRAME OF DRUG PSYCHOSIS DISSIPATION

(Para 855) from 7-10 days and up to several months, and chronic abuse may lead to symptoms which persist beyond the withdrawal period for months, and even up to a year Wikipedia’s from Medical Encyclopedia(s) and from the UCLA Semel Institute of Neurological and Behavioral Studies (which was a Defendant in 11-00781 DAE KSC), and TONS MORE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE HAS SUGGESTED Chronic Usage to Dissipate in Six Months.

(Para 856) From MEDICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA’S, extensive research by Leading Scientists in Japan with 50 years of Research on the Topic of every Amphetamine(s) dealing with stimulant and/or methamphetamine studies BOLDLY STATES THAT ALL CHRONIC USAGE WITH THE WOMEN IN JAPAN PRISONS DISSIPATES IN ABOUT SIX MONTHS (the Foremost Authority),

(Para 857) and that the Use of Any Anti Psychotics has exceeded the absolute time frame of their drug psychosis dissipation and for about 45-50 millions of others, and is an quantitative atrocity of a use/misuse and an extension to an unjustified psychiatric commitment in outpatient care, and that I or anyone one else can’t claim Civil Rights or Constitutional Violation Claims as well as Criminal “beyond a reasonable doubt” and it Created the Intentional Domestic Terrorism.

(Para 858) ###and I ALREADY PROVED this with just a Matson container with the entire inside covered with T-1000 or better grade aluminum sheets 4 by 8 feet, and just documenting via video camera me that persons family staying in the Matson container without

(Para 859) medications (their polypharmacy regime) proving these people DIDN’T experience Any Audio and/or Visual Hallucinations while in my shielded Matson container… versus what their current medical reports states (now this equates to about 30 to 40 million+ people worldwide).

(Para 860) is Ludicrous and subjects me and the other 70-75 million of others to long term treatment goals violating (Revised Statutes) HRS Section 334 to section 334-123 Outpatient Treatment, HRS Section 353 Involuntary Treatment, HRS 704-404, and (8) Fitness To Proceed, HRS 704-405 Fitness To Proceed, HRS 704 Sections 411/413 /414/ 415 Condition Release) in long term treatment in outpatient care

(Para 861) that becomes a Violation to an Extension to an Unjustified Psychiatric Commitment, this is also Assault and Battery, including a shorten life span by about 25-30 years due to antipsychotic(s) and anti-depressants over mis-usage .through the Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intentional Failures to Inform or Warn this INTENT now leads to Murder in the 1st and 2nd.

(Para 862) Knowing that claims for such medication would be submitted to Medicaid, and the Federal Government through the States Interest for reimbursement, and which constitute false claims under the False Claims Act.

(Para 863) Defendants same as Page 1, and (a) submitted or caused to be submitted claims to Medicaid for psychiatric medications prescribed and given to Relator and other minors, and (b) continues to submit or cause to be submitted claims to Medicaid for psychiatric medications prescribed and given to minors, which constitute false claims under the False Claims Act.

(Para 864) Cited in National Security Law and International National Security law violations and in accordance with THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM IN THE 21ST CENTURY WHO ARE THE ACTORS? HOW DOES THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FUNCTION? WHY DOES THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM BEHAVE THE WAY IT DOES? THESE COUNTRIES ARE EXTERMINATING ERADICATING 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS AND ANOTHER 50-70 MILLION TBI CONSUMERS, and this how many TBI consumers there are PER YEAR.

(Para 865) THAT COSTS THE TAXPAYERS WORLDWIDE OVER a 150 TRILION DOLLARS (since just the year 2000 to present) in WHICH THE HEALTH SYSTEM DOES’’T EVEN COME CLOSE TO A FRACTION IN GROSS PROFITS WHICH IS NOT STIMULATING OUR ECONOMY COMPARED TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS AND THIS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENTAL DEFICIT that includes our Health System(s) is the #1 cause of Death.

(Para 866) Defendant, _________________________________, transacts business in the District of ___________________________, and (a) submitted claims to Medicaid for psychiatric medications prescribed and given to Relator and other minors, and (b) continues to submit claims to Medicaid for psychiatric medications prescribed and given to minors, which constitute false claims under the False Claims Act.

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE:
(Para 867) 1) This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331, and 31 U.S.C. §3732, the latter of which specifically confers jurisdiction on this Court for actions brought pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §§3729 and 3730.
(Para 868) 2) There have been no public disclosures of the allegations or transactions contained herein that bar jurisdiction under 31 U.S.C. §3730 (e).

(Para 869) 3) This Court has personal jurisdiction over the defendants pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §3732(a) because that section authorizes nationwide service of process and because all the Defendants have at least minimum contacts with the United States, and can be found in, reside, or transact or have transacted, business in the District of All Fifty States.

(Para 870) 4) Venue exists in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1) because all of the Defendants have at least minimum contacts with the United States, and all the defendants can be found in, reside, or transact or have transacted business in the District of All Fifty States.

APPLICABLE LAW
Medicaid
(Para 871) Medicaid is a public assistance program providing for payment of medical expenses for low-income patients. Funding for Medicaid is shared between the federal government and state governments.
Federal reimbursement for prescription drugs under the Medicaid program is, as relevant, limited to “covered outpatient drugs.” 42 U.S.C. §1396b(i)(10), 1396r-8(k)(2), (3).

(Para 872) Outpatient drug prescriptions, as relevant, are covered under Medicaid, i.e., reimbursable only if the drug is prescribed for a medically accepted indication, defined as indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or supported by one or more of the following Compendia:

(Para 873) (i) American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information, (ii) United States Pharmacopeia-Drug Information (or its successor publications), or (iii) DRUGDEX Information System, (Covered Outpatient Drugs). Every Medicaid provider must agree to comply with all Medicaid requirements.

(Para 874) Paragraphs 1 -205 are violations of and cited in accordance with State and Federal violations of Civil Rights, Constitutional and Criminal, and cited in Paragraphs 206 to 417, and cited in Paragraphs 418 to 655, and cited in paragraphs 656 to 775.

False Claims Act
(Para 875) False Claims Act liability attaches to any person who knowingly presents or causes a false or fraudulent claim to be presented for payment, or to a false record or statement made to get a false or fraudulent claim paid by the government. 31 U.S.C. 729(a)(1)&(2).

(Para 876) Under the False Claims Act, “knowing” and “knowingly” mean that a person, with respect to information. (1) has actual knowledge of the information; (2) act’s in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or (3) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information, and no proof of specific intent to defraud is required, 31 U.S.C. §3729(b).

(Para 877) Again this is referenced and overly cited in paragraphs 1 -205 are violations of and cited in accordance with State and Federal violations of Civil Rights, Constitutional and Criminal, and cited in Paragraphs 206 to 417, and cited in Paragraphs 418 to 655, and cited in paragraphs 656 to 775.

(Para 878) The False Claims Act is violated not only by a person who makes a false statement or a false record to get the government to pay a claim, but also by one who engages in a course of conduct that causes the government to pay a false or fraudulent claim for money.

ALLEGATIONS
(Para 879) Psychiatrist prescribed the psychotropic drugs on Attachment A to Relator while a minor that were not for an indication approved by the FDA or supported by one or more of the Compendia. Pharmacy submitted claims to Medicaid for reimbursement for the psychotropic drugs prescribed to Relator set forth in Attachment A that were not for an indication approved by the FDA or supported by one or more of the Compendia:

CAUSES OF ACTION
(Para 880) Count1: Psychiatrist Liability for Uncovered Drugs
1) Psychiatrist prescribed the psychotropic drugs to Relator set forth in Attachment A, and to other minors, that are not for an indication approved by the FDA or supported by one or more of the Compendia, thereby causing claims for such prescriptions to be made to The ICC not Medicaid for reimbursement.

2) (Para 881) (1) with actual knowledge; . (2) in deliberate ignorance; or (3) in reckless disregard that such claims are false, and is liable under the False Claims Act therefor.

(Para 882) Upon information and belief, Psychiatrist continues to prescribe psychotropic drugs to minors that are not for an indication Approved by the FDA or supported by one or more of the Compendia, thereby causing claims for such prescriptions to be made to Medicaid for reimbursement. (1) with actual knowledge; .(2) in deliberate ignorance; or (3) in reckless disregard that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor.

(Para 883) Count 2: Provider Liability for Uncovered Drugs
Provider has submitted and/or caused the submission to Medicaid and continues to submit or cause to be for reimbursement of the psychotropic drugs prescribed to Relator set forth in Attachment A, and to other minors, that are not for an indication that is approved by the FDA or supported by one or more of the Compendia.

(Para 884) (1) with actual knowledge; . (2) in deliberate ignorance; or (3) in reckless disregard that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor, and in accordance with Product liability cited in paragraphs 1 -126??????????? and the RICO Act Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges.

(Para 885) Cited in paragraphs 206 to 417 are the Civil suits in Federal Court including the same as above and including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, a denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth) , and scientific misconduct, and includes murder in the 1st and murder in the 2nd, and about another 100 Criminal offenses.

(Para 886) Cited in paragraphs are the Federal Courts, and States Court(s) committing Criminal charges in their respective Courts and in aiding and abetting, and being illegally labeled a Vexatious litigant stopped me from filing Hearing Motions, Reply Memorandums, Objections or Appeals, that links Legislature, The Supreme Courts, Congress, and the Obama administration al the Influencers cited in National Security laws and International National Security law violations.

(Para 887) and includes the RICO act and Conspiracy charges and Murder in the 1st and 2nd and Defendants were all Mental Health law centers, National Advocates, NAMI the biggest mental health buffers working even with President Obama, and Senator Grassley’s investigation of fraud and experimental blinding’s linked to Obama and NAMI.

(Para 888) Count 3: Pharmacy Liability for Uncovered Drugs
Pharmacy submitted claims to Medicaid for reimbursement of outpatient pediatric prescriptions for psychotropic drugs to Relator and other minors that are not for an indication that is approved by the FDA or supported by one or more of the Compendia. (1) with actual knowledge; (2) in deliberate ignorance; or (3) in reckless disregard that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor.

VII. DEFENDANTS’ LIABILITY
(Para 889) By virtue of the acts described above, defendants knowingly (a) submitted, and continue to submit, and/or (b) caused and/or continue cause to be submitted, false or fraudulent claims to the United States Government for payment of psychiatric drugs prescribed to Relator and other minors that are not for an indication that is approved by the FDA or supported by one or more of the Compendia.
The Government paid and continues to pay such false claims.
By reason of the defendants’ acts, the United States has been damaged, and continues to be damaged, in substantial amount to be determined at trial.

VIII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
(Para 890) WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, the International Criminal Court, through Relator, requests the Court enter the following relief:
That defendants be ordered to cease and desist from violating 31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq, but must Honor current Mental Health consumers benefits, until other Criminal and Civil compensation(s) redressed.

(Para 891) That this Court enter judgment against Defendants in an amount equal to three times the amount of damages (now this is Three times 100 Trillion dollars that these Defendants has sustained because of Defendants’ actions, plus a civil penalty of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 for each violation

(Para 892) of 31 U.S.C. §3729; (Now this alone is 75 Million times $5,500.00, and not more than $11,000.00) and the 50-70 million TBI consumers which would fetch this Court anywhere from Six Trillion to Twenty Two Trillion dollars on “just civil penalties” to this Honorable Court.

(Para 893) That Relator be awarded the maximum amount allowed pursuant to §3730(d) of the False Claims Act. That Relator be awarded all costs of this action, including attorneys’ fees and expenses; and That Relator recover such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

(Para 894) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, All Defendants Britain UK, United States, China, India, Turkey and Pakistan are Creditors to these 12 Countries and I Germany, Belgium, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Columbia, Mexico, Lebanon, Ukraine, Nigeria, and Japan.

(Para 895) § 914. Creditors of the United States
Whoever falsely personates any true and lawful holder of any share or sum in the public stocks or debt of the United States, or any person entitled to any annuity, dividend, pension, wages, or other debt due from the United States, and, under color of such false personation,

(Para 896) transfers or endeavors to transfer such public stock or any part thereof, or receives or endeavors to receive the money of such true and lawful holder thereof, or the money of any person really entitled to receive such annuity, dividend, pension, wages, or other debt, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
DATED: Honolulu Hawaii August 7, 2013 (this was when I sent it to the Department of Justice (Defendant) in Washington D.C).
By:
Certificate of Service
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this Complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information Relator possesses has been served on the International Criminal Court as provided in FRCP 4.
Willard Max Imamoto willardimamoto@gmail.com

###CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)
(Para 897) A unique aspect of the American political system is its design feature creating two co-equal principals among the President and Congress. The Framers of the Constitution envisioned a national security process that would depend on a system of shared and separate powers across the democratic institutions that they created.

(Para 898) Embedded in these constitutional foundations are the formal sources of power of the presidency and Congress, the two key democratic institutions that work together to formulate and carry out national security policy AND HAVE FAILED for Several Decades as Cited in References. Some scholars argue that the Framers’ intent to give the Congress a leading role in government is evident in the fact that Article I of the Constitution grants many explicit powers to the

(Para 899) Congress in comparison to the ambiguity and vagueness of the President’s powers outlined in Article II. Indeed, a survey of the historical record reveals that, over time, Presidents have successfully exploited the ambiguity of their formal powers to increase the power of the Presidency vis-à-vis the Congress.

(Para 900) A brief review of the constitutional basis of each institution’s powers will be useful to strategists seeking to understand the evolution of these powers in the life of the American republic. Key National Security Powers as Enumerated in the Constitution. Authority to administer the federal bureaucracy, however, does not necessarily translate into its control.

(Para 901) All Presidents are faced with the challenge of making the bureaucracy responsive to their leadership. Two key tools to shape the executive branch’s outputs into a more coherent administration vision are the use of the appointment authority and the White House Staff.

(Para 902) Article Section 2 gives the President the power to appoint the department and agency heads within the federal government (THE OTHER F—EN CONDUITS) IS Legislature, CONGRESS and OUR SUPREME COURTS, and the Presidents administration as Influencers have Taken Away our Constitutional and Civil Rights,

(Para 903) and Created a Presidential Power to Implement & Influence our Supreme Court and in return into a Political Agenda that has violated the very Cannons of Judges and our Supreme Court has Entered Dangerous Waters rendering our Supreme Laws not to be the Supreme Laws of our land or anywhere else for that matter.

(Para 904) The Supreme Court’s Refusal to Honor the obligations imposed by the Constitution and by Federal Statutes that comport with the Constitutional design of the Supreme Laws of our Land that is supported In that The State(s) and Federal Government and Court(s) have INTENTIONALLY manipulated their immunity in a systematic fashion to discriminate against Federal Causes of Action or State Action cited in Alden, Supra, 527 US at 758.

(Para 905) Therefore a Pre-Deprivation Hearing and Post Deprivation Remedies under Civil Rights and Constitutional violations is Impossible, and the same goes for Tort claims BUT HAS CHOSEN To Conformed to FRE (Federal Rules of Evidence) Miscellaneous Rules Section 626-3 to Claims for Relief based on the (BASIC Civil and Constitutional Rights) AS NOW BEING OPPOSED TO THEIR

(Para 906) Legal Collaborative Conspiracy Creating the INTENTIONALLY LEGAL MALFEASANT with (INCONSISTENT LAWS) in that if any other provision of law, including any Rule promulgated by the Supreme Court, is inconsistent with this chapter, this chapter shall govern unless this chapter or such inconsistent provision of law specifically provides otherwise.

(Para 907) With this Current Trend now (from Supreme Court Citing’s) with our Supreme Court Judges influencing Legislature that enacts law and influences Congress is very real threat to the Supremacy of our Law(s).

Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations in accordance with #INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCIES, PRESIDENTIAL POWER AND PERSUASION, #CONGRESS: DOES AN EFFECTIVE CHECK REMAIN ON PRESIDENTIAL POWER? , and
#ENTER THE JUDICIARY: WILL IT ACT TO RESTORE THE BALANCE? , KEYS TO EFFECTIVE PRESIDENTIAL LEADERSHIP CONGRESSIONAL-PRESIDENTIAL COLLABORATION IN THE WAR IN IRAQ, and CONCLUSION.

(Para 908) The American republic’s very essence lies in its allocation of power across the political system. The Founders envisioned a struggle for power between actors enabled with competing powers to keep each other in check. That such struggles continue is a testament to the continued viability of the founding blueprint.

(Para 909) In the current political environment, the backdrop of national security seems to present an obstacle to the balanced interplay of the President, Congress, and the Courts. But the Founders’ institutional design was undertaken with a realistic expectation that national security matters could be at the heart of power plays among the government elite placed in each of three empowered branches.

(Para 910) Liberty could not be forfeited, the Founders assumed, unless key actors chose not to employ their countervailing power to preserve it. Security, meanwhile, would depend on the adoption of an effective strategy for victory. At the early stages of the “Long War,” balancing the quest for security with the preservation of liberty requires a collaborative employment of the national security powers that the President, Congress, and the Courts share.

(Para 911) Effective conduct of national security policy depends on understanding one’s power, its limits, and the recognition that other actors’ actions also shape the policy battlefield. Successful national security policy exploits the institutional competencies that the Framers designed into the American political system.

(Para 912) Coordinated efforts that link the President’s national security policy initiatives with the unique capacity of Congress to vet the policy, educate the public, and ultimately lend its support are more likely to lead to successful strategy. Such policy must also withstand the scrutiny of the Courts empowered to rein in the President or Congress when either entity oversteps its allocation of power.

(Para 913) Successful policy implementation, furthermore, is reliant on competent executive decision making, efficient bureaucratic processes and the keen oversight of lawmakers, the media, and the American people.

(Para 914) Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations Domestic and International Law, and when all Defendants Countries have Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism in their own right…then Domestic and International Law has become Incompetent and rendered mootness under legal Malfeasance.

(Para 915) The analytic process used to determine the policy should address those tenets of international law (rules, principles, customs, precedents, and agreements) that could have the force of law on all the relevant actors.

(Para 916) These same principles would apply to the respective domestic laws that could impact each actor. Previous and existing Regional and Global Policies and Strategies.

(Para 917) The policymaker assesses in detail previous and existing policies and strategies on the issue or related issues for each relevant actor. It is very important to identify the ends, ways, and means employed by these policies and strategies over the course of time.

(Para 918) It is critical to distinguish between policies oriented on near-term objectives and those oriented on longer-term goals. Attainment of the longer-term goals is often more important for the policy issue at hand. An important question is, “Did components of the policies and strategies change or remain the same and why in either case?”

(Para 919) The answer should show where the ways and means succeeded and where they failed (and this has continuously failed for several decades, and even before that say… starting in the mid 1950’s (the older conventional neuroleptics).

(Para 920) It could also provide sufficient information to determine (ONLY) weaknesses and opportunities created by previous policies and strategies that the current policymaking actor could take advantage of and change in the new or modified policy.

(Para 921) The wide spread of the Great Democracy Delusion has entered into the Great ERA of Sedition in which our Government(s) (Defendants) has created a Worldwide environmental impact that identifying the ends, ways, and means employed by these policies and strategies making long-term goals and short- or near-term objectives Oblivious to its Damn Nation.

(Para 922) The Institutional Competencies have proven be very incompetent, and the Presidential Power and Persuasion are of Sedition, and the RICO Act violations, Racketeering, and Conspiracy, Congress hasn’t done an Effective Check remain on Presidential Power.

(Para 923) Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations #ENTER THE JUDICIARY: WILL IT ACT TO RESTORE THE BALANCE?, KEYS TO EFFECTIVE PRESIDENTIAL LEADERSHIP CONGRESSIONAL-PRESIDENTIAL COLLABORATION has already PROVEN to be an Overwhelming widespread of SEDITION

(Para 924) through Legislature, Congress, Supreme Courts, and Senators Diane Feinstein, Patrick Leahy, Patty Murray, Jeb Hensarling, Harry Reid, Daniel Inouye, Colleen Hanabusa, Mazie Hirono, Ed Case, Charles Djou, Brian Schatz, EPA, FCC, the Attorney General’s Office in Washington D.C. Obama, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Cruz, Kasick, Bernie Sanders, FOX News, Barbara Walters, Megyn Kelly, Krauthammer, O’Reilly, Deepak Chopra, Anant ???, Ian Bremmer.

(Para 925) Differentiating between the ability of the prior policies and strategies to attain both long-term and short- or near-term objectives may permit the evaluator to understand what policy can be successfully implemented over the course of time. It is critical to distinguish between policies oriented on near-term objectives and those oriented on longer-term goals.

(Para 926) Attainment of the longer-term goals is often more important for the policy issue at hand. An important question is, “Did components of the policies and strategies change or remain the same and why in either case?”

(Para 927) The answer should show where the ways and means succeeded and where they failed (and this has continuously failed for several decades as Cited in References). It could also provide sufficient information to determine weaknesses and opportunities created by previous policies and strategies that the current policymaking actor could take advantage of and change in the new or modified policy.

(Para 928) ENTER THE GREAT ERA OF SEDITION also known as treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness, subversion, mutiny, rebellion, high treason, lèse-majesté, apostasy, and perfidy.. Our next President can be impeached right after being sworn into office as well as other incumbent Presidents and/or Prime Ministers in other Countries

(Para 929) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with National Security law violations and International National Security Law violations as applied with ###THINK TANKS

(Para 930) Of the many influences on U.S. foreign policy formulation, the role of think tanks is among the most important and least appreciated. A distinctively American phenomenon, the independent policy research institution has shaped U.S. global engagement for nearly 100 years. But because think tanks conduct much of their work outside the media spotlight, they garner less attention than other sources of U.S. policy—like the jostling of interest groups, the maneuvering between political parties, and the rivalry among branches of government.

###The Revolving Door
(Para 931) Using both the public media (whom I’ve shown to have Political Agenda’s and is a Major Influencer that has become Malice and are in Direct violations of National Security Law violations and International National Security Law violations) and their own publishing resources, as well as the Internet, think tanks attempt to engage and educate the public.

(Para 932) While some reflect the philosophical leanings of associated interest groups, others serve as independent judges of public policy and government performance. In fulfilling this role, they also build confidence in public policy and public officials. Even where government fails to deliver sufficient results, think tanks help shine light on policy failures and suggest corrective actions.

(Para 933) The appearance of independence from government is vital in this role (but isn’t) to additionally, these organizations serve as interpreters of current events for citizens, providing various viewpoints on the issue of the day. Researcher Diana Stone suggests, however, that think tanks’ engagement with the public is a one-way relationship. That is, there is little formal structure in most think tanks to receive and process public feedback.

(Para 934) She also notes that think tanks are focused heavily on policy elite and around governmental centers of power, effectively limiting their engagement mission (but has wholeheartedly engaged in this type of Malice for Decades as is obvious with the United States of America’s in this year’s election process).

(Para 935) Influencers which includes the Medias (Defendants) and their Political Agenda’s as Major influencers such as FOX news Megyn Kelly, Krauthammer, O’Reilly, etc who has included a Political Agenda to their Profession of Actual Malice in the Rico Act, Conspiracy, Sedition, etc.

(Para 936) Megyn Kelly cut her hair short because documented in Linkedin I called FOX News “FOX News isn’t sharp like a fox. Their just a Dumb Dog with long hair, and that’s why Megyn Kelly cut her hair.
Also Megyn Kelly is blaming Trump for calling her a Bimbo, but it was me. It just shows you that Donald Trump doesn’t have balls, and obviously Megyn Kelly will never be able to have balls (and this is Plagiarism).

(Para 937) other influencers with political agenda’s Deepak Chopra MD (official) Founder, Chopra Foundation Re: America’s Healthcare System Needs This from the Next President and Health insurance is not enough. Americans need the next president to also value this. Newton Holt liked Willard Max Imamoto’s comment on Deepak Chopra’s Re: posting from above “Deepak Chopra is a complete idiot…

(Para 938) Anant Agarwal CEO at edX, Professor at MIT Technology — Not Taxes — Can Solve America’s Higher Ed Crisis & Hey, future president. I’ve written you an easy-to-follow plan to deal with the world. Just start here.

(Para 939) Andy Hawkins liked Willard Max Imamoto’s comment on Anant Agarwal’s (MIT 4 nothing) Re: posting from above “Re: Technology not taxes” Gentlemen as far as technology is concerned were just in the “Age of Communications” nothing more.

(Para 940) Perhaps you’ve been watching to much NCIS in which if you ask them (the real NCIS) are you just like the TV’s multi different series they’ll tell we do not possess even one tenth of the technology in these TV shows. Read why Higher Education is the Worlds Downfall http://redwhiteandbluesthebravesheep.com/?p=131

(Para 941) Ian Bremmer President at Eurasia Group We need to figure out what America stands for in the 21st century — and have a foreign policy that reflects it Here’s my comment to Ian Bremmer President of Eurasia Group who’s a big part in what I can expose… in how the USA is causing a Worldwide economic collapse,

(Para 942) and these are the other countries (Defendants) following in the USA footsteps creating and truly the 1st of a kind in the history when a World creates a Multi-Continent economic collapse at just about the same time… in what I call “Creating a Dumb-ino (domino) Effect”

(Para 943) This has created Plagiarism to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own, and to use (another’s production) without crediting the source, and to commit literary theft. In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward or publically.

(Para 944) Copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit, failing to put a quotation in quotation marks, giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation

(Para 945) Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source is usually enough to prevent plagiarism.

(Para 946) Plagiarism carry’s a fine of $250, 000.00 or Ten years in jail and/or both when FOX News and their reporters make over $2500.00 from plagiarism per count, but these Influencers also face National Security law and International National Security law violations.

Under the RICO Act cited in this Complaint for Criminal Charges.

(Para 947) cited in violation of ACTIONS and Inactions and in accordance with the RICO Act Title 18 U.S.C. the progression of all Defendants into what is Federal Violations also goes into National Security and International National Security law violations and constitutes a Grand Scale Conspiracy with Defendants operation of management of the enterprise, and the pattern. Then the relatedness, and then continuity, and then multiple schemes and the pattern, and then racketeering activity, and then the issue of consent,

(Para 948) and then extortion under Color of Official Right, and then extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Governmental Power(s) that are Defendants ranging from the State Court9s) Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Psychiatric nurses, Social workers, Federal Court(s), Legislature, Senators, Presidential candidates, Private Companies,

(Para 949) and then other predicate acts related to extortion, and then extraterritorial acts (Defendants Countries speaks for itself) of racketeering, and then Civil Remedies under section 1964 from proximate cause to intervening factors to non-predicate acts to independent contributing factors to directly injured third-party victims to injury to business or property to equitable relief to securities fraud,

(Para 950) and then section 1962 (a) and (b) claims association–in-fact enterprise under section 1962(a) and (b), and then injury “ by reason of” a section 1962 (a) violation, and then injury “by reason of” section (b) violation, and then Conspiracies to violate RICO-section 1962(d), and the RICO statute of limitations, and then limitation period, and then accrual of a Civil RICO claim, and then early conflicting accrual Rules,

(Para 951) and the Supreme Courts (are Defendants with Criminal charges against them thereby eliminating their immunity) effort to resolve the conflict, and then tolling doctrines, and then new and independent injuries.

(Para 952) Although Government entities cannot be Defendants from civil claims they are liable under Criminal activity Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, Commerce.

(Para 953) The United States of America, Britain (UK), are the biggest producers of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and then comes China, India, Pakistan and Turkey. With just the United States of America, Britain and India the combined False Claims Act or Qui Tam Complaint would be well over 100 Trillion dollars from just the year 2000 till present, and is ongoing.

(Para 954) India would have its first ever Countries deficit (and hey that would only leave Australia as the only Country not experiencing a National deficit)..

(Para 955) As a Relator for these Countries I want at least 15% out of 25% which includes Germany, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, France and Spain on the European Union. Then you have Columbia, Mexico, Ukraine, Lebanon, Japan and Nigeria excluding China although they are consumers at 9.1% in Beijing only, and they are producers of antipsychotics and antidepressants. The only Country I would leave out would be China.

(Para 956) With this amount won in the ICC as preferred Jurisdiction just by setting up the United Nations and Ban Ki Moon in which I already have documented. Just imagine the interest accrued that will be able to sustain the European Union, and they could be just like China telling the USA, but now other Countries like Britain, India , Pakistan, and Turkey “we own you”.

(Para 957) The thing with the other European Countries as well as Columbia, Mexico, Ukraine, Lebanon, Japan and Nigeria is that they didn’t recognize the pattern set by Britain just before leaving the European Union.

(Para 958) Britain (foreseen my blogs back when Obama Care first started) and obviously STOPPED all benefits for its mental health consumers (socialism) before it got to (extreme socialism) in which the GREAT ERA of SEDITION has been going on for numerous Decades…creating the Worldwide spread of the Democracy Delusion.

(Para 959) Now these Countries affected by the Worldwide spread of the Democracy Delusion has secured a life lasting economy based on just the interest on the principle balance(s) owed by these respective Countries like Japan, Columbia, Germany, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Lebanon, Mexico, and Nigeria provided they did not manufacture antipsychotics and anti-depressant in their Countries.

(Para 960) ) Which now deters the wide spread of the Democracy Delusion that affects all Countries Economic Union’s. “It is set-up to allow many different angles” that will one day control the vast schematics that has created this International Environmental impact as my CITED in National Security violations and International National Security violations.

(Para 961) Making the shift/transition of economy for a stronger economy for these Countries a Guarantee, and a separation from the Democracy Delusion. You should view my websites and their analytics and the Counties viewing them China (Beijing), Russian (Moscow and Kiev), Germany (Nuremberg), France, Turkey, South America, Nigeria, and many Countries from South East Asia.

(Para 962) Our Sequestration deficit has taking us to damn nation(s) and this is caused by our health/mental health system and our Judicial system as well as the various Government Agencies. With these many countries going belly up will create a truly unbelievable worldwide catastrophic economic collapse (National Security and International National Security violations) that has created our Greatest Environmental Impact ever in history.

(Para 963) Trump and all other Presidential candidates whom I’ve contacted have only addressed this issue to the tune of 300 billion dollars in cut backs, and their out of their F—ken minds as well all the other Media’s (influencers with a political agenda) especially with FOX’s “bimbo” who cut her hair short Megyn Kelly who’s political agenda has influenced the General Public (especially with Democrats) about the “true” sequestration and sequestrations multiplication process, and they have been informed by me a long time ago as with Krauthammer, and Mick O’Reilly.

(Para 964) This is what I sent to the Department of Justice in Washington D.C (a Defendant) as cited and supports my stance to the furtherance of malfeasance in the form of Judicial Conspiracies and is attached as Exhibit C and has repeated materials of genuine facts, but is short content reading.

(Para 965) Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations IDENTIFY AND DETERMINE IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL INTERESTS AND DOMESTIC POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS..

(Para 966) Survival interests represent the single most important interests for any actor.. This is the very essence of the actor’s existence—the protection of its citizens and institutions from attack by enemies, both foreign and domestic.

###Vital. (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)
(Para 967) ###A vital interest exists when an issue is so important to an actor’s well-being that its leadership can only compromise to a certain point.

(Para 968) Beyond that point, compromise is not possible because the potential harm to the actor would be intolerable. If the interest is achieved, it would bring great benefit to the actor; if denied, it would carry costs that are severe but not catastrophic,

(Para 969) Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations of #Domestic Political Considerations.
(Para 970) Once the policymaker identifies the actors and their interests, he/she must analyze them to discover shared, complementary, and diverging interests to determine potential domestic support or opposition and the reasons behind those positions.

(Para 971) The policy must conform to both international law and domestic laws and IT HASN’T, but now these Defendants Countries who are not producers of Antipsychotics and anti-depressants can now say we own your Countries and let their 20-25 trillion each grow with interest.

(Para 972) ###A violation of either would automatically render the policy illegitimate, and the policy has been illegitimate for many decades. Beyond that, the policymaker is looking for the effect—actual or perceived—of the issue under consideration on the Group(s) (Defendants) in question, existing positions/policies, ideological stances, or other interests (for example, economics) that might be involved in even the slightest way with the issue.

(Para 973) (a) CITING Crimes against Genocide; attached as Exhibit A (my device/prototype called Hallelujah), attached as Exhibit B (my Five referenced Civil Suits), attached as Exhibit C (Federal False Claims Act and/or Qui Tam Complaint), attached as Exhibit D (National Security Law and International Security Law violations and the Great ERA of Sedition creating the widespread of the Democracy Delusion),

(Para 974) attached as Exhibit E (EMF exposure assessments Deceptions with the P.E.N.I.’s instruments), attached as Exhibit F (the perfect examples of 6 Billion Ways 2 Die through Chronic EMF exposure), attached as Exhibit G (300+ topics of causes of Actions to the EMF exposure deceptions), attached as Exhibit H (How to Totally Control the Health, Judicial systems and Government(s).

(Para 975) Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations CHAPTER 113B – here’s a bit of a rattle snake Intentionally Created TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) and BEING Intentionally Created INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM, obviously because of THE 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS Intentional Eradication Extermination process creating a Super huge False Claims Act 300+ Trillion.

(Para 976) engaging in conspiracies to kill THIS IS THE ULTIMATE FORM OF TERRORISM; The Crux: #COMPARE INTENTIONALLY THE CREATED DOMESTIC TERRORISM OF the 75 plus million Mental Health consumers I’ve presented in the Instant CRIMINAL Charges to Human Rights Genocide violations, and the other 50-70 million TBI consumers (per year worldwide)which is an Intentional Eradication Extermination process.

(Para 977) No prosecution for any offense described in this section shall be undertaken by the United States except on written certification of the Attorney General (is a Defendant in this criminal case) and to influence the policy of other government (s) similarly situated (defendants) and to affect the conduct of government(s) AND THESE ARE SOME OF THE VIOLATIONS IN ACCORDANCE BY FEDERAL CODES… by mass destruction.

(Para 978) I Already Proved Immanent Worldwide Catastrophes are happening, and More very near Immanent Worldwide Catastrophes are on the gloomy horizon, and such costs has already severely prejudice, and has strictly imperiled the ability of the actor’s government(s) (Defendants) to safeguard and enhance the well-being of its populace, and abroad.

(Para 979) Examples: Prevent the regional proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), BUT IN THIS INCIDENT MASS DESTRUCTION DOESN’T HAVE TO BE “WEAPONS”.

(Para 980) ANALYZE RISK FOR EACH OPTION (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)
Policy decisions affect a complex system of interdependent and interacting dynamics in the environment, by which term we mean the macro-context of the contemplated course of action.

(Para 981) In order to characterize a policy alternative’s likelihood of attaining desired outcomes, policymakers must understand how a particular course of action will affect the environment and international environment beyond the battlefield or beyond the narrowly military and take measures to reduce risks to effective implementation.

(Para 982) in this Case the Battlefield was created) and the impact of these intended consequences will carry a much heavier worldwide burden when risk analyze for each option LEAVES THE INTERNATIONAL FOREIGN POLICY OPTIONS NO OPTIONS (it’s like a cancer you must cut out the cancer with the remaining Defendants who have one twelfth of the 300+ Trillion dollars false claims act).

(Para 983) There are many ways to assess policy-relevant internal and external environmental factors, threats, and hazards and characterize the likelihood of their occurrence and/or concurrence is that has been and it continues to be ongoing and, is through a Conspiracy of multiple sedition’s.

(Para 984) This characterization does include qualitative and quantitative violations, and it has because of the Intent through the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL.

(Para 985) Ideally, policymakers should use all available techniques. An evaluation of all the potential risks inherent in each policy option provides a cost-benefit assessment to ensure the gain from attaining the end state objective will be greater than the negative consequences of implementing the policy, and the Negative worldwide Environmental factors has soundly laid a permanent NO Promise to the expanse of the widespread of the Democracy Delusion of Grandeur.

NATIONAL SECURITY POWERS: ARE THE CHECKS IN BALANCE? (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)

(Para 986) On the distinction between policy success in domestic and foreign policy, President John F. Kennedy once noted, “The big difference is that between a bill being defeated and the country [being] wiped out. It has already been established and our Countries our being “Wiped Out”.

(Para 987) Much is at stake in the formulation and implementation of national security policy. Not only is the achievement of national interests on the line, the preservation of the Framers’ constitutional allocation of power designed to keep liberty and security in balance is also at stake, and this has been “wiped out too”.
(Para 988) As the United States proceeds further in its “Long War” focused on fighting terrorism, its political elite is struggling to define the degree of collaboration that must remain between the different branches of government.

(Para 989) Does a state of national emergency or war justify the suspension of deliberation and consultation inherent in the American political system’s design?

(Para 990) IT NEVER HAS AND IS A BIG PART OF AMERICA’S DEMIZE (and other Defendants Countries) or the created widespread of the Democracy Delusion of Grandeur..

(Para 991) Does Congress retain meaningful powers to resist presidential assertions of power? BRING IN CITING OF CONGRESS WAY BELOW?????????????????? What role should the courts play in limiting or facilitating presidential overreach and congressional reassertion of its powers?

(Para 992) EVERYONE ALREADY ACKNOWLEGES THIS IN TODAY USA PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES in Congress role and the Supreme Courts role has entered a Political Agenda and a Direct violation of the Cannons of Judicial Conduct and has now forever superseded the

(Para 993) Supremacy of the United States of America’s Supreme Law of the land and has become Legal Malfeasance as will other Countries related to the widespread of the Democracy Delusion as has Ban Ki Moon and the United Nations (Defendants) and these Countries as State Parties of the U.N.

(Para 994) These are key questions of concern to all who participate in and seek to understand the U.S. national security policymaking process. This chapter will review the constitutional foundations of the American political system, explore the adaptation and evolution of this original distribution of power,

(Para 995) and assess the impact of the current state of “checks and balances” (on its trending demise) on prospects for strategic success and the preservation of American democracy, and mere preservation of the American democracy is a selfish outlook into the worldwide environmental impact caused by the widespread of the Democracy Delusion of Grandeur.

(Para 996) Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations) CHAPTER 9 INTERNATIONAL ORDER, DEFINING INTERNATIONAL ORDER, THE MAJOR IR THEORETICAL PARADIGMS, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism, and in

(Para 997) CHAPTER 10 THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM IN THE 21ST CENTURY WHO ARE THE ACTORS?, HOW DOES THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FUNCTION? WHY DOES THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM BEHAVE THE WAY IT DOES? THESE COUNTRIES ARE EXTERMINATING ERADICATING 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS AND ANOTHER 50-70 MILLION TBI CONSUMERS, and this is how many TBI consumers there are PER YEAR.

(Para 998) THAT COSTS THE TAXPAYERS WORLDWIDE OVER a 150 TRILION DOLLARS (since just the year 2000 to present) in WHICH THE HEALTH SYSTEM DOES’’T EVEN COME CLOSE TO A FRACTION IN GROSS PROFITS WHICH IS NOT STIMULATING OUR ECONOMY COMPARED TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS AND THIS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENTAL DEFICIT that includes our Health System(s) as the Major causes and is the #1 cause of Death

THE MAJOR IR THEORETICAL PARADIGMS, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism and to be an Idealist is (delusional)
CHAPTER 10 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)

(Para 999) THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM IN THE 21ST CENTURY WHO ARE THE ACTORS? HOW DOES THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FUNCTION? WHY DOES THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM BEHAVE THE WAY IT DOES? THESE COUNTRIES ARE EXTERMINATING ERADICATING 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS AND ANOTHER 50-70 MILLION TBI CONSUMERS, and this how many TBI consumers there are PER YEAR.

(Para 1000) CHAPTER 11 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations) INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY AND AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY REALISM AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS LIBERAL INSTITUTIONALIST RESPONSE CONSTRUCTIVISTS AND THE SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS
INTERNATIONAL ORDER DEFINING INTERNATIONAL ORDER
THE MAJOR IR THEORETICAL PARADIGMS, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism

(Para 1001) CONCLUSION: TOWARD A GRAND STRATEGY OF HEGEMONY and Hegemony is also a Delusion (as defined as leadership and/or dominance), and Obama’s newest suggested strategy of a One World Order. The widespread of the Democracy Delusion with Defendants who think they are Powerhouses such as the United States, Germany, France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Japan, China, Nigeria, and Columbia.

(Para 1002) Defendants have proven to be Derelict Murders as opposed to Hegemony and this is the widespread of the Democracy Delusion of Grandeur being exposed.

(Para 1003) Delivery systems; prevent the emergence of a regional hegemony in important regions; promote the well-being of allies and friends and protect them from external aggression (ONLY BECAUSE THIS IS INTERNAL AGGRESSION)

(Para 1004) that created the International External AGGRESSION and the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THATS TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL.

(Para 1005) Look at who the Defendant Countries are. Important interests are significant to the actor’s well-being. They could cause serious concern and harm to the actor’s overseas interests (in which it already has and that is why my Qui Tam Complaint or False Claims Act is a 300+ Trillion dollar False Claims Act violation(s),

(Para 1006) Time constraints may also limit the U.S. ability to drum up allies. Threats that are immediate and pose a serious threat to survival or vital interests may force the hand of the United States, (and let’s see how the forced hand reacts). The United States of America and its Allies are the “Defendants in this Criminal Case” dealing with National Security and International National Security law violations,

(Para 1007) and constitutes these Defendants as being Heinously Incompetent to having any further input into Foreign Policy as it has already created an International Environmental Impact that “can be compared to Thermo Nuclear War”.

(Para 1008) ###UNILATERALISM, MULTILATERALISM, ALONE OR WITH OTHERS? (Para 1008) (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations) “I SAY DEATH LIKES COMPANY MORE THAN MISSERY”. and everyone’s response to these Defendants how Ob-tuse annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand: “he wondered if the doctor was being deliberately obtuse” synonyms: stupid • slow-witted • slow • dull-witted • unintelligent •

(Para 1009) The rhetoric in the dispute between multi-literalist and unilateralist approaches obscures that there are few foreign policy decisions that are purely one or the other. THIS WILL SOLIDIFY FOREIGN POLICY ONCE AND FOR ALL as a Major Concern especially for the United States of America, Britain, China, Japan, South East Asia, South America, Nigeria, and now with Asian interests in Africa.

(Para 1010) These Countries Can’t be Influenced into what are Major Economical, and Environmental impact situations and must form different Alliances/Unions in addressing these two Universal topics of such importance that they must not go down with these sinking ships.

(Para 1011) Advocates for both positions agree that it is better to have allies in support of a cause than to go it alone. They disagree over what the United States should be willing to give up recruiting partners.

(Para 1012) Unilateralists favor staking out one’s position and moving forward with whomever is willing to go along. Multi-lateralists favor rallying other nations to our cause and are more willing to accept trade-offs in building coalitions.

(Para 1013) #Unilateralists and multi-lateralists agree that there is little room for compromise on such fundamental issues as survival interests, and COMPROMISE HAS REACHED A POINT OF NO RETURN WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES ON SURVIVAL INTERESTS.

(Para 1014) Finally, both unilateralists and multi-lateralists agree that the United States should seek to build an international order that will favor the expansion of American values (this has diminished forever in everyone’s hearts especially in the USA political arena, and when Americans and other Defendants “citizens” here about this Court case), “their hearts will be as one broken”.

(Para 1015) and help preserve America’s dominant position in the world. The United States has a unique opportunity to establish international rules and standards that protect American interests (THEY NEVER HAVE)

(Para 1016) and this is not protecting American interests or standards through dominance (dominance as cited in Hegemony) pronounced he•gem•o•ny, in “gem” these Defendants are only colored glass not even a semi-precious gem, and it represents the interests and standards that once was.

(Para 1017) and America’s dominance is distorted and Derelict just like its Health System, and with project P.E.N.I., and when your Health system is the #1 cause of death its then is Identical to the Morals and Values of what our Country Has Become as is the other Defendants Countries.

(Para 1018) CHECK THIS CRUD OUT: The paradox of American power at the end of this millennium is that it is too great to be challenged by any other state, yet not great enough to solve problems such as global terrorism and nuclear proliferation. America needs the help and respect of other nations.

(Para 1019) #AMERICA AND THE OTHER COUNTRIES IMPLICATED IN VIOLATION OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATION NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS IN THIS COMPLAINT WON”T GET HELP OR RESPECT FROM OTHER NATIONS. #NOT EVEN FROM ITS OWN PEOPLE(S) this is un-multilateralism and un-unilateralism Conspiracy of Democracy.

(Para 1020) They differ on how the United States should attempt to build that order. Unilateralists tend to favor more assertive, even coercive approaches. They fall more into the realist school of international relations theory and argue that ultimately power is what matters and reliance on agreements or treaties in lieu of real power is dangerous.

#(Para 1021) On the other hand, multi-lateralists favor moving ahead in a framework of international institutions and treaties that will bind all states, America included to rules and commitments.

#(Para 1022) They feel that restrictions on the United States will assuage concerns make (an unpleasant feeling) less intense: “the letter assuaged the fears of most members” “about a global order dominated by American power—power unprecedented, unrestrained, and unpredictable. And even within the constraints of a rules-based system, America will continue to enjoy a preponderance of power,

(Para 1023) but this should not happen, and that their Law cannot be the Supreme Laws even in Their Own Land(s), but must conform now to other tribunals and international treaties due to its malfeasant abandonment that was wanton, reckless and malicious to its own people(s) and abroad, and this applies to the other Defendants as well.

CONCLUSION: RECENT TRENDS IN U.S. FOREIGN POLICY (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)

(Para 1024) #There is a growing view that American foreign policy has tended to be more assertively unilateral in recent years. America’s refusal to join the international ban on antipersonnel land mines, its rejections of the Kyoto treaty on global warming and an inspection and verification protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention, and

(Para 1025) FOREIGN POLICY and/or new stronger Economic Unions WILL NOW BE RULED BY European Countries such as GERMANY, BELGIUM, FRANCE, SPAIN, ITALY, NETHERLANDS, South America could create its own Economic Union with MEXICO, and COLUMBIA or join the European Union, JAPAN, and NIGERIA as the Richest Country in Africa just get richer and could Diversify itself in the African Region, and

(Para 1026) LEBANON, and the UKRAINE WHO WILL HAVE A GREAT PART OF THE 300+ TRILION DOLLAR CLAIM and interest accrued, and interest to be accrued, because they now Own United States, Britain, China, India, Turkey, and Pakistan- which in turn creates an investment risk for Africa whom these debtors have interests in.

(Para 1027) #its withdrawal from the International Criminal Court and the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty are offered as evidence of a policy of avoiding international commitments that might constrain America’s freedom of action, and America as well as other Defendant Countries followers has Intentionally Endangered the remainder of the World, AND THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN they now have become everybody’s Nobody.

(Para 1028) #Critics argue that the United States pursues its own international agenda without regard for the interests, views, or concerns of the rest of the world. This is true, as well as Great Britain, China, and Russia.

(Para 1029) The response is that the United States is acting, as all states should and must, in its own self-interests, and THE OTHER DEFENDANTS Countries MUST ALSO BECAUSE Now THEY HAVE 300+ TRILLION owed to them where you can just brush off the USA, Britain, China, India, Turkey and Pakistan.

(Para 1030) #CHAPTER 13 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)
POLICIES ON DEMOCRACY THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING DEMOCRACY AND YES DEMOCRACY NOW HAS A VERY MAJOR PROBLEM IN DEFINING OR RE-DEFING DEMOCRACY…IT HAS BECOME THE WIDESPREAD OF THE DEMOCRACY DELUSION OF GRANDEUR same like what killing the United States and the other Defendant Countries.

(Para 1031) CHAPTER 14 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)
WORLD REGIONS AND ONE WORLD ORDER…is now Obama’s pleads to the World and a heads up as to how the new administration would be under Hillary Clinton, because the United States of America can’t get out of what they created

(Para 1032) in these instant Criminal Charges and with other Defendant Countries, and there is NO Regional Stability, creating a very huge Regional Conflict, and it has created and Embedded Terrorism and a direct violation of Jus in bello.

(Para 1033) CHAPTER 15 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)
“LAWYERS, GUNS, AND MONEY”: #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AND U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS DIRECT THREATS, and REMEMBER “TERRORISTS THESE ARE ALL INTENTIONALLY CREATED THREATS” to cover-up a Super Huge Intentional Eradication Extermination process with 75 Million Mental Health consumers, and about 300 million more as cited in this Criminal Investigation.

(Para 1034) #CHAPTER 8 SECURING AMERICA FROM ATTACK (and the “created terrorists” are here in the United States, Germany, Belgium and abroad and my prototype will resolve this intentionally created worldwide environmental impact and expose this truth behind this Criminal investigation “beyond a reasonable doubt”:

(Para 1035) THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT’S EVOLVING ROLE AFTER 9/11 and the Obama administration idiots and Hillary Clinton with Benghazi and lying to its own people and the World…where nobody would trust the United States or its next President.

(Para 1036) ###ALTHOUGH IN PRE 9/11 the USA and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES KNEW ABOUT THE TWIN TOWERS AS BEING TARGETS and LET IT HAPPEN…IT’S THE OTHER PEARL HARBOR and YES I CAN PROVE THIS and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES WHO ARE NAMED in this instant Criminal investigation and WITH THE PROOF my Prototype called HALLELUJAH.

Article 6: Genocide Crimes against Genocide and is Superimposed with the Crime of Aggression.
(Para 1037) (a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(Para 1038) This is what qualifies Criminal charges against all Defendants under Article 6 of the Crimes of Genocide (a), (b), and (c).

(Para 1039) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with Seditious conspiracy § 2384
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder,

(Para 1040) or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

RECAPPING: to the Charges of the Crime of Genocide are;
(Para 1041) Cited in paragraphs 1 – 205 are violations of and cited in accordance with in Product liability and tangible property rights, RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963. Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, and

(Para 1042) Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and

(Para 1043) 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518.

(Para 1044) Now cited in paragraphs 206 to 417 are violations of and cited in accordance with are the Civil suits in Federal Court(s) and State Court(s) AND LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF CRIMINAL CHARGES including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth) , scientific misconduct, and

(Para 1045) includes murder in the 1st and 2nd,,, RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963, Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), and

(Para 1046) Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, and

(Para 1047) 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518, AND NOW LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF THE RICO ACT, RACKETEERING, AND CONSPIRACY, and

(Para 1048) 18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government, 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, assault and battery, Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249), and

(Para 1049) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623), and

(Para 1050) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968), and

(Para 1051) And look at the Progression it taking again with CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391), and

(Para 1052) 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, and

(Para 1053) 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder.

(Para 1054) Cited in paragraphs 418 to 655 are violations of and cited in accordance with are States Court(s) committing Criminal charges in their respective Courts and in aiding and abetting a non-lawyer from a National advocacy center for Mental Health consumers, and illegally labeling me as a Vexatious litigant stopped me from filing Motions, Reply Memorandums, Objects or Appeals,

(Para 1055) and the Progression Continues with Defendants who are Governmental Organizations and NGO’s all Mental Health law centers, National Advocates, NAMI the biggest mental health buffers working even with President Obama, Senator Grassley’s investigation of fraud and experimental blinding’s, and including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth), scientific misconduct, and includes murder in the 1st and 2nd,,

(Para 1056) and includes two Civil suits in Judge Kenneth S Sakamoto and Bert I Ayabe’s Court are violations of and cited in accordance with RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963, Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, and

(Para 1057) Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and

(Para 1058) 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518, AND NOW LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF THE RICO ACT, RACKETEERING, AND CONSPIRACY, and

(Para 1059) 18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government, 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, assault and battery, Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233), and

(Para 1060) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122), and

(Para 1061) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968), and

(Para 1062) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391), 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, and

(Para 1063) 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, and

(Para 1064) 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder, and

(Para 1065) and now enters INTENTIONALLY CREATED Domestic Terrorism in violations of cited in accordance with CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM Domestic, National and International (§§ 2331 to 2339D).

(Para 1066) Cited in paragraphs 656 to 775 are the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL.

(Para 1067) HERE IT IS THE FIRST PART OF THIS ILLEGAL RESEARCH called Psycho-Endo-Neuro-Immunology now referred to as (P.E.N.I.) Intentionally Created DOMESTIC TERRORISM and International Domestic Terrorism Through there Intentional Eradication Extermination Process due to the Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intention failures to Inform or Warn,

(Para 1068) establishes the requisite “Intent” has entered psychiatry, neurology, neuro-immunolgy, and immunology and NARCOTERRORISM, and that is why the State Court(s), Federal Court(s), Legislature, Congress, the Media’s FDA, FCC, EPA and the President and his Administration are in violations of National Security Laws and International National Security Laws,

(Para 1069) and cited in violations of and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1841 – Cited in and in accordance with are violations in the Protection of unborn children, ) cited in violation of and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2261 – Interstate domestic violence, the illegal research of PENI implicating FCC, EPA, and the EPRI reports, Dr. Robert Duncan, Blincyto Non Ionized radiation exposure

(Para 1070) and the USA is the last civilized Country who has never established any Guidelines or Prudent Cautionary Policies killing Tens of millions per year. Since the beginning of the E.P.R.I reports (electric power research institute) and their instruments of acoustics, electromagnetics, microwaves, elastic wave scattering, cyclotron resonance, and a computer and programming, all done on a multi-layered structuring.

(Para 1071) Listed below are the reasons why this dual research is being conducted on the General Public, and that’s because of Two Incomplete Epidemiological studies, and Obviously it has been impossible to get these results from any other means, or sources.

(Para 1072) One of the reasons why this dual research exists, is because further epidemiological studies is needed in chronic EMF/Microwave exposure assessments, and through the instruments mentioned above can now be achieved, and goes unnoticed and/or undetected.

(Para 1073) These researchers and Specialist doctors in the fields of Cancer, Tumors, Tumor Growth, Heart Diseases and Autoimmune Diseases and in Teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages which coincides with FCC publications and the E.P.R.I. reports, and are outright BLOODY MURDERS for countless Decades with Children, Women, and the Elderly and with Men.

(Para 1074) ###Epidemiological studies were and are impossible to achieve because nobody is that stupid.
###The second part of this Illegal research was originally called PNI (psych-neuro-immunology) now it’s called P.E.N.I. (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology the study of emotions and stress and how it affects the Immune system:

(Para 1075) The First Incomplete Epidemiological Study: for the study of PENI was because of their instruments needed to conduct Chronic EMF exposure assessments, and they needed these instruments to conduct the Second part of this research.

(Para 1076) ###The second part of this Illegal research was originally called PNI (psych-neuro-immunology) now it’s called P.E.N.I. (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology:

(Para 1077) With the instruments that project P.E.N.I. uses are acoustics, electromagnetics, microwaves, elastic wave scattering cyclotron resonance, and a computer and programing all done on a multi-layered structuring (chronic EMF exposure)

(Para 1078) cited in and in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1992 – Intentionally Created (domestic terrorists) Terrorist attacks and other violence or through the air and project P.E.N.I Instruments uses multiple elastic wave scattering is affecting so many other people who are in path of who ever their doing their illegal research on since the mid 1970’s till present.

(Para 1079) In Project P.E.N.I. I’ve distinguishing the Newest Marketing trends with the Children with ADHD Autism and “Big Pharma’s Newest Market(s)” when a 700 % increase in over-misdiagnosis and the same is trending with our Soldiers now and with PTSD and is an Intentional as a eradication extermination process,

(Para 1080) and look at the “DEMOGRAPHICS” (demographics is applied to Genocide violations), because of the Poverty Levels of these children (and their minorities), and Educational levels, that’s associated with what they consider Minorities as being un-savory, and through Senator Grassley’s Senate panel investigation.

(Para 1081) When you review project P.E.N.I.’s list of psycho-social stressors. Though Reform or Terminating Cliché’s and the psychology of Totalism and/or Brainwashing, Coercive Persuasion, Mind Abuse, Thought Control and chosen techniques include dehumanizing of individuals

(Para 1082) (is to make somebody less human by taking away his or her interesting aspects of his or her personality, or his or her compassion and sensitivity towards others), keeping him or her in filth, sleep deprivation, partial sensory deprivation, psychological harassment, inclination(s) of guilt and group social pressure,

(Para 1083) Cults (although no ones in a cult) but dealing with the shift of focus, mind control and religious conversion, and the loss of Dignity is a term used in moral, ethical, and political discussions to signify that a being has an innate right to respect and ethical treatment,

(Para 1084) and is a precondition of freedom that is lost in this Escalating Trend OF AN OVER-KILL and very serious Torture of 75 Million mental health consumers worldwide.

(Para 1085) and/or the front to the study of PNI. ALL THESE SUBJECTS COINCIDES WITH THE LIST OF PSYCHO-SOCIAL STRESSORS of the study of project P.E.N.I. and look it up under Mind Body Medicine, and are the Obvious Incomplete Epidemiological aspects of this study Which is no doubt the study of “Emotions” (as Referenced in websites under psycho-neuro-immunology) and created protracted stress on the immune system.

(Para 1086) Here’s a table of stressors that many other people who has answered my questionnaire are experiencing, accompanied with their affidavits. HEALTH, an injury or illness, being in the hospital, major dental work, change in eating habits, change in sleeping habits, change in recreational habits, WORK: hours and conditions, troubles at work with your boss, coworkers, persons under your supervision, loss of job, fired from work.

(Para 1087) HOME AND FAMILY: Changes in living conditions, change of residence, change in family get-togethers, major change in health or behavior of family members, pregnancy, miscarriage or abortion, changes in arguments with spouse, in law problems, divorce, remarriage, death of spouse or other family members,

(Para 1088) PERSONAL AND SOCIAL: drug usage (because it now Intentionally “created a history” to how you got Schizophrenia, Bipolar, crimes, jail time, change in personal habits, change in political beliefs, change in religious beliefs, change in social activity, new friends, girlfriend or boyfriend problems, sexual difficulties, death of a close friend or Family, suicidal thoughts:

(Para 1089) FINANCIAL major changes in finances, loss or damage of personal property, major purchase, foreclosure on mortgage, loan. Like I said WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND would want to be a part of a study that is this Destructive… NOBODY in their RIGHT MINDS!

(Para 1090) The EPA has some time ago stated that EMF exposure is dangerous, but shortly after (which was long ago) recanted their findings that has been Proven Decades ago to causing ALL Cancers (especially Breast) Tumors/Tumor Growth ALL Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in Teratology with Birth Defects and Miscarriages, and if you view their Epidemiological studies in the (E.P.R.I reports) and you should view these reports ALL DEVASTATING results, and very short, and no name of Subject (who died) or Who did the Study(s) and IT WAS INCOMPLETE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDYS.

(Para 1091) These are the Instruments used with the study with the E.P.R.I. reports and the very same instruments used by Project P.E.N.I. acoustics, electromagnetics, microwaves, cyclotron resonance, Elastic Wave Scattering, and a computer and programing (there’s book on this topic called Zappp) that controls the out-going Non-Ionized radiation and all of this is done on a multi-layered structuring and these instruments can circumnavigate the globe because of elastic wave scattering, and is very comparable with various Communication instruments.

(Para 1092) This isn’t Military High grade technology Germany back in the 1950’s used these instruments for spying because it could penetrate through concrete walls of buildings. With my Prototype (just grab them and put on my device tap their memory and device will be able to record it) attached as Exhibit A (My headset will be able to do what their instruments can do at just $50.00) you’ll find guaranteed WHO was doing Project PENI to you just by tapping there memory anyone at

(Para 1093) Many Major Universities, and their Senate panel who regulates researches, and of coarse psychiatrists, psychologists, neurologists, neuro-immunologists and Immunologists as well as Cancer researchers, Heart and Autoimmune specialists. Now don’t think you’re the only ones being affected by this illegal research only because the PENI are using multiple elastic wave scattering and not a single elastic wave scattering.

(Para 1094) So those that are noticeably being affected the wave band width are in its maximum cylindrical cones, and the multiple wave scattering is engulfing covering a vast majority of towns and counties, etc, and these people are Chronically being Exposed to this Non-Ionized Radiation Cancers Tumors, tumor growth, All Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in Teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages killing babies.

(Para 1095) Yes certain locations especially those countries participating in the E.P.R.I reports (electric power research institute) which at that time was located in Pleasant Valley California and Japan had the biggest funding for this back in 1980 and early 1980’s (500 thousand vs. other Universities in the United States of America, and the University of Hawaii received 75 thousand, and then theirs parts of Europe,

(Para 1096) and if you review FCC’s publications on this subject but they couldn’t get proper results with their Epidemiological studies at that time and that is why it is still being conducted till this day and project PENI still needs these instruments to conduct their Studies and any other way is Impossible.
The over-kill to this is that PENI must be able to State that it creates EVERY KNOWN disease(s) and even the very rare diseases.

(Para 1097) ###and I already proved with just a Matson container with the entire inside covered with T-1000 or better grade aluminum sheets 4 by 8 feet, and I just documenting via video camera that person (dual diagnosis) and I, and that persons family staying in the Matson container without medications (their polypharmacy regime) and I proved these people didn’t experience any Audio and Visual Hallucinations, and yet their still on a polypharmacy regime (30-40 million dual diagnosis consumers worldwide).

(Para 1098) ###ALSO MOST IMPORTANTLY (Second Crux) CREATING MORE OFF LABEL USAGE that is Again Creating MORE GOVERNMENT FRAUD Attached as Plaintiffs Exhibit E specifies ALL the Different Drug Psychosis’s and the ABSOLUTE TIME FRAME of DRUG PSYCHOSIS DISSIPATIONS (especially methamphetamine) that Clearly Defines WE ARE NOT A TRUE SCHIZOPHRENICS or BIPOLAR,

(Para 1099) and SHOULD NOT BE ON LONG TERM TREATMENT PLANS THAT LAY’S THE SOUND FOUNDATION FOR TWO SEPARATE CLASSIFICATIONS TO TREATMENT, and ESPECIALLY LONG TERM TREATMENT IN OUTPATIENT CARE,

(Para 1100) AND IS A MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS THAT WILL MAKE ALL DEFENDANT COUNTRIES DEFICITS EXCEED THEIR TOTAL ECONOMIES AND IS A MAJOR MITIGATING FACTOR TO AN INTENTIONAL ERADICATION EXTERMINATION PROCESS THAT HAS ALREADY EXCEEDED THE HOLOCAUSTE 10 PLUS TIMES,

(Para 1101) and Plaintiffs drug psychosis (From Methamphetamine Usage a Stimulant Psychosis, and because what 90 plus percent of the people in Hawaii and abroad who has/had a Drug Psychosis from this usage (and Most of Hawaii’s Dual Diagnosed are affected by this epidemic for decades) is being PREVENTED BY THE FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS to the CLAIM OF ABSOLUTE TIME FRAME OF DRUG PSYCHOSIS DISSIPATION,

(Para 1102) and from 7-10 days and up to several months, and chronic abuse may lead to symptoms which persist beyond the withdrawal period for months, and even up to a year Wikipedia’s from Medical Encyclopedia(s) and from the UCLA Semel Institute of Neurological and Behavioral Studies (which was a Defendant in 11-00781 DAE KSC), and TONS MORE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE HAS SUGGESTED Chronic Usage to Dissipate in Six Months, and From MEDICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA’S,

(Para 1103) and extensive research by Leading Scientists in Japan with 50 years of Research on the Topic of every Amphetamine(s) dealing with stimulant and/or methamphetamine studies BOLDLY STATES THAT ALL CHRONIC USAGE WITH THE WOMEN IN JAPAN PRISONS DISSIPATES IN ABOUT SIX MONTHS (the Foremost Authority), and that the Use of Any Anti Psychotics has exceeded the absolute time frame of their drug psychosis dissipation and for about 45-50 millions of others,

(Para 1104) and is an quantitative atrocity of a use/misuse and an extension to an unjustified psychiatric commitment in outpatient care, and that I or anyone one else can’t claim Civil Rights or Constitutional Violation Claims, and is Ludicrous and subjects me and the other 70-75 million of others to long term treatment goals violating (Revised Statutes) HRS Section 334 to section 334-123 Outpatient Treatment, HRS Section 353 Involuntary Treatment, HRS 704-404, and (8) Fitness To Proceed, HRS 704-405 Fitness To Proceed,

(Para 1105) HRS 704 Sections 411/413 /414/ 415 Condition Release) in long term treatment in outpatient care that becomes a Violation to an Extension to an Unjustified Psychiatric Commitment, and Knowing that claims for such medication would be submitted to Medicaid, and the Federal Government through the States Interest for reimbursement, and which constitute false claims under the False Claims Act.

(Para 1106) ### Article 7 the Crimes against Humanity: The Crimes against Genocide are Identical as the Crimes against Humanity, but the Crimes against Humanity is being even more Superimposed with the Crimes of Aggression.

(Para 1107) THESE ARE VIOLATIONS of the Crimes of Humanity superimposed by the Crimes of Aggression and is cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with the ICC Statutes and these violations are already proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and in National Security violations and International National Security violations of Law, and in Federal Codes § 2381 – Treason § 2382 – Misprision of treason § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government, and

(Para 1108) § 2386 – Registration of certain organizations § 2387 – Activities affecting armed forces generally § 2388 – Activities affecting armed forces during war § 2389 – Recruiting for service against United States, § 2390 – Enlistment to serve against United States

(Para 1109) 1. (a) Murder; (b) Extermination; and this has becomes a major International Eradication Extermination process
(c) Enslavement; is defined in and (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
LOOK WHATS HAPPENING IN SYRIA AND OTHER COUNTRIES that is affecting so many Countries and their Borders, beaches with Syrian refuges

(Para 1110) (e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law; again cited in paragraphs 1 to 310 and cited in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I.

(Para 1111) (f) Torture;
(1) TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) “torture” means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control;

(Para 1112) (2) “severe mental pain or suffering” means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from— (A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;

(Para 1113) (e) “Torture” means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions;

(Para 1114) AGAIN cite in Paragraphs 1 to 760 in violations of Federal Codes 18 and 19 U.S.C., and in National Security law and International National Security law violations, but lawful sanctions has proven to be an Intentional eradication extermination process the paved the way to the CRIME OF AGGRESSION and like lawful sanctions it is unlawful sanctions they are “one in the same”

(Para 1115) (C) The threat of imminent death; or (D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality;

(Para 1116) (h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(Para 1117) but yet goes way beyond Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, or gender Based on the Aggression of our Derelict Health, and Judicial systems, Legislature, Congress, Supreme Courts, Media’s, and Presidential Administration(s) through their Political Agenda’s.

(Para 1118) (k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health. are the other Defendants (Countries) in this Criminal Case and its People(s) that are going through these other inhumane acts of a similar character (more than similarly situated) as reflected by project P.E.N.I. and in these Defendants Countries and it’s People(s).

(Para 1119) (b) “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population;

(Para 1120) (d) “Deportation or forcible transfer of population” means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law; Again cited in paragraphs 1 to 310 and with our Health and Judicial systems and with project P.E.N.I. the Demographics, Education Levels,

(Para 1121) and Poverty levels CLEARLY indicates 75 million Peoples are being Forcibly Deported and/or transferred and/or forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts in many ways qualifying this as a violation from Jail, Prison, State Hospitals, Supervised Group Homes, Homelessness, CPS and/or CWS and foster care to the Syrian refuges crisis

(Para 1122) Forced pregnancy means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;

(Para 1123) (g) “Persecution” means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity; again as cited in paragraphs 1 to 760 You’ll find this TREND WITH ALL DEFENDANTS COUNTRIES… it’s happening to their Minorities based on their Demographics, Education Levels, and Poverty levels

(Para 1124) through their Health and Judicial systems and with project P.E.N.I. and other influencers (conduits) Intentional Eradication Extermination process dealing with these 75 Million mental health consumers plus another 300 million or so.

(Para 1125) As cited in violations of Article 7 and the Crimes Against Humanity are superimposed with the Crimes of Aggression are paragraphs 1 -205 are violations of and cited in accordance with in Product liability and tangible property rights, RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963. Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, and

(Para 1126) or affect public trade or business, Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and

(Para 1127) 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518.

(Para 1128) Paragraphs 206 to 417 are violations of and cited in accordance with are the Civil suits in Federal Court including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth) , scientific misconduct, and includes murder in the 1st and 2nd,, RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963, Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, and

(Para 1129) Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, and

(Para 1130) 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, and

(Para 1131) 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518, AND NOW LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF THE RICO ACT, RACKETEERING, AND CONSPIRACY, and

(Para 1132) 18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government, 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, assault and battery, Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), and

(Para 1133) CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) and

(Para 1134) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D), and

(Para 1135) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391), 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, and

(Para 1136) 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, and

(Para 1137) 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder.

(Para 1138) Paragraphs 418 to 655 are violations of and cited in accordance with are States Court(s) committing Criminal charges in their respective Courts and in aiding and abetting a non-lawyer from a National advocacy center for Mental Health consumers, and illegally labeling me as a Vexatious litigant stopped me from filing Motions, Reply Memorandums, Objects or Appeals,

(Para 1139) and Defendants were all Mental Health law centers, National Advocates, NAMI the biggest mental health buffers working even with President Obama, Senator Grassley’s investigation of fraud and experimental blinding’s, and including including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth) , scientific misconduct, and

(Para 1140) and includes murder in the 1st and 2nd,, and includes two Civil suits in Judge Kenneth S Sakamoto and Bert I Ayabe’s Court are violations of and cited in accordance with RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963, Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, and

(Para 1141) destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and

(Para 1142) 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518, AND NOW LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF THE RICO ACT, RACKETEERING, AND CONSPIRACY, and

(Para 1143) 18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government, 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, assault and battery, Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249), and

(Para 1144) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521), and

(Para 1145) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) and

(Para 1146) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391), 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, and

(Para 1147) 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, and THE PROGRESSION INTO

(Para 1148) 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder, and now enters Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM Domestic, National and International Domestic Terrorism (§§ 2331 to 2339D).

# TERRORISM THE OTHER PEARL HARBOR:
(Para 1149) 911 and the Twin Tower Terrorist attacks were known before it happened. 911 is the Other Pearl Harbor in which our Government knew about, but uses this to Intentionally take away our Freedom and Rights in which the phrase “Freedom isn’t Free Anymore” (when freedom isn’t free anymore it becomes a too costly burden,

(Para 1150) and should never be said or spoken) was Created by our Government imposing this upon its own people Intentionally. So does England, Germany, Belgium, France, as well as other Countries also knew which is being used a lot more now in imposing their citizen’s rights as well.

(Para 1151) The Middle East and the Arab countries were lead into the wide spread of Terrorism in which I believe there will be a Major shift in economy of that Region with their Only natural resource (there only source of income OIL).

(Para 1152) The Arab countries were set up by USA Britain, and other countries that knew about 9/11 and let the beginning of terrorism happen, and I CAN PROVE IT attached as Exhibit A will PROVE THIS or even similar instruments like the ones project P.E.N.I. uses or in many uses of Communications instruments.

(Para 1153) I KNOW HOW TO STOP TERRORISTS EASILY and PERMANENTLY and all governments could have saved ALL the lives of Soldiers serving in Afghanistan and Iraq and throughout the World with Terrorist attacks and there PODS. I’ll Prove how Borders, Airports all transit systems and even in every County

(Para 1154) where Terrorists have entered or is staying at as PODs Could have been known, detained and prosecuted and even in Afghanistan and Iraq and there Country and all their County’s, and attached as Exhibit A will PROVE THIS AGAIN.

(Para 1155) The Terrorists could have been Known after the Occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, but wasn’t Intentionally and again I’ll Prove how. Everything happening in this World currently is an Intentionally created smoke screen, (example) have you noticed the Focus on Syria

(Para 1156) then the next week the focus is on Ebola Everything is a Smoke Screen to the Nations f—up out of control Leaders in just about every area of concern so what is happening in the World will remain as smoke screens or in creating different areas of concern like Zika.

(Para 1157) I AM GLAD I’VE AWAKEN THE SLEEPING GIANTS (this is the saying from Pearl Harbor where Admiral Yamamoto after attacking Pearl Harbor stated to his chief of staff and other Admirals).

(Para 1158) Examples: Prevent, deter, and reduce the threat of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons attacks on the interest-crafting actor (e.g., state) or its military forces abroad; Ensure the survival of allies and their active cooperation in shaping an international system in which the actor crafting the interest can thrive (and these actors are all Defendants in this instant action(s); Now how can these actors Prevent the emergence of hostile major powers or failed states on the borders of the actor crafting the interest.

(Para 1159) Our Enemies are our own Government(s) and it’s conduit’s that has CREATED the beginning OF TERRORISM and the INSURGENCE of a more widespread OF TERRORISM as a “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” ALTHOUGH IT TOO HAS CREATED AN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, and the OBVIOUS DECLINE of DEMOCRACY(s) Role on an INTERNATIONAL LEVEL.

(Para 1160) The Cruz: ####COMPARE TERRORISM (Domestic Terrorism) to the 75 plus million Mental Health consumers I’ve presented in the Instant Charge of Human Rights Genocide violations, and the other 50-70 million TBI consumers (per year worldwide).

(Para 1161) as cited in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, and the USA projected Federal Deficit through Sequestration and it’s multiplication process which will be a 571 Trillion Federal Deficit by the year 2037 surpassing our economy.

(Para 1162) THE CRIMES OF WAR ARE JUST LIKE THE PSYCHO-SOCIAL STRESSORS IN MANY WAYS and is Identical to Project P.E.N.I. that has engaged in conspiracies to kill THIS IS THE ULTIMATE FORM OF TERRORISM; The Crux: #COMPARE INTENTIONALLY THE CREATED DOMESTIC TERRORISM OF the 75 plus million Mental Health consumers and the Intentionally Created Narcoterrorism and the progression into the Crime of Aggression.

(Para 1163) I’ve presented in the Instant CRIMINAL Charges to Human Rights Genocide violations, and the other 50-70 million TBI consumers (per year worldwide) which is an Intentional Eradication Extermination process, and culminates the Crime of Aggression, and

(Para 1164) the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, against Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL.

(Para 1165) Look at the table of stressors HEALTH, an injury or illness, being in the hospital, major dental work, change in eating habits, change in sleeping habits, change in recreational habits, WORK: hours and conditions, troubles at work with your boss, coworkers, persons under your supervision, loss of job, fired from work, and

(Para 1166) HOME AND FAMILY: Changes in living conditions, change of residence, change in family get-togethers, major change in health or behavior of family members, pregnancy, miscarriage or abortion, changes in arguments with spouse, in law problems, divorce, remarriage, death of spouse or other family members, PERSONAL AND SOCIAL: drug usage (because it now Intentionally “created a history” to how you got Schizophrenia, Bipolar (narcoterrorism), and

(Para 1167) crimes, jail time, change in personal habits, change in political beliefs, change in religious beliefs, change in social activity, new friends, girlfriend or boyfriend problems, Domestic violence, sexual difficulties, death of a close friend or Family, suicide, FINANCIAL major changes in finances, loss or damage of personal property, major purchase, foreclosure on mortgage, loan,

(Para 1168) and Like I said WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND would want to be a part of a study that is this Destructive… NOBODY in their RIGHT MINDS!

(Para 1169) THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THE INTENTIONALLY CREATED TERRORISMS International Terrorism and Domestic Terrorism “are one in the same”

(Para 1170) PRESENT AT THE COUNTERREVOLUTION: AN ESSAY ON THE 2005 NATIONAL DEFENSE STRATEGY AND ITS IMPACT ON POLICY AND citing paragraphs 1 -205, and Paragraphs 206 to 417, and Paragraphs 418 to 760, and Paragraphs 761 to 781, and Paragraphs 782 to 896, and paragraphs 897 to 1036 foreign policy is obliterated.

(Para 1171) THE COUNTERREVOLUTION TO THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS BOTTOM LINE: REFRAMED Department of Defense STRATEGIC PRIORITIES.
Look at all these Defendants Countries and their Government’s towards THE COUNTERREVOLUTION TO THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS when their lives were Intentionally put in danger and through the Intentionally Created Terrorists and my Prototype DEVICE once completed will prove that Terrorism was Intentionally Created and 911 was the other Pearl Harbor,

(Para 1172) that Now Affects the Activities affecting armed forces there is NO Regional Stability, creating a very huge Regional Conflict, and it has created and Embedded the War on Terrorism a direct violation of Jus in bello. Cited below in Paragraphs 1149 to 1212 is Intentionally Created Terrorism.

(Para 1173) § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally IT WILL BE SOME OF THE ENTIRE ARMED FORCES VIOLATING THESE FEDERAL CODES THEN MORE THEN THE ENTIRE ARMED FORCES AS CITED BELOW because of the Great ERA of Sedition-will they be Prosecuted? Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:

(Para 1174) (a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or

(Para 1175) (1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or

(Para 1176) (2) distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States—

(Para 1177) Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

(Para 1178) (b) For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States, the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and,

(Para 1179) 18 U.S. Code § 2388 – Activities affecting armed forces during war; WILL THE ARMED FORCES NOW BE CONSCIENCIOUS OBJECTORS AND THIS IS NOT DEALING WITH RELIGION BELIEFS? HOW CAN THEY HAVE LOYALTY WHEN THEY WERE BETRAYED BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT(S) WITH THERE LIVES.

(Para 1180) From CHAPTER 19 RETOOLING U.S. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AS A STRATEGIC INSTRUMENT OF FOREIGN POLICY; PUBLIC DIPOMACY WHEN THIS CRIMINAL CASE GOES PUBLIC THERE IS NO PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.

(Para 1181) From CHAPTER 20 NAVIGATING THE LINKAGE BETWEEN CULTURE AND STRATEGY Three Dimensions: Identity, Political Culture, and Resilience. Relation of Strategy to Future States

(Para 1182) From CHAPTER 21 STRATEGIC THINKING AND CULTURE: Strategic Culture—The Succeeding Generations. TOWARD A FOURTH GENERATION? The Three Components of National Culture EMERGING CONCEPTS: BEYOND SOCIAL SCIENCE. MY DISSERTATION ON WORLD PEACE IS CALLED ARMAGEDDON DEALING WITH THE FUTURE OF CULTURE, AND CONCEPTS ON SOCIAL SCIENCE…THERE IS NO EVOLUTION AND THAT’S THE EMERGING CONCEPT.

(Para 1183) My Interpretation of ARMAGEDDON or better known as Revelations; Re: The Great ERA of Sedition created the widespread of the Democracy Delusion.

(Para 1184) The Anti-Christ is a Religious war (anti-Christ simply translates into “those that don’t believe in Christ”). The Demon in Armageddon and the seven headed serpent also translates into who are the Anti-Christ’s as one of the heads of the serpent.

(Para 1185) Like I said the Anti-Christ(s) will show themselves in the Middle East as prophesized throughout the Middle East and the most famous Valley that had the most Wars. What’s happening in the Middle East with the Projection of Russia and Iran and Syria, and other Arab Countries teaming up against Israel brings in the other the other heads of the serpent.

(Para 1186) The Bear and her cubs was often believed to have been Germany, but it seems here that the “Bear and her cubs is Russia and of coarse the others joining in Armageddon (and you’ll find out whomever engages in Armageddon will also be the Anti-Christ’s). Israel who has never believed that Jesus was the Messiah and this definitely translated as being Anti-Christ as well.

(Para 1187) The USA and Britain and all other Defendants and what I can prove with this Intentional Eradication Extermination process of Children ADHD and Soldiers PTSD the Newest Market(s) and with the ALL OTHER MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS (75 millions)

(Para 1188) once I gather my Evidence will Prove that the USA, Britain, and other Defendants has exceed the Holocaust (10X) and all World Wars and the War on Terrorism (starting from the early 1950’s of coarse and with the older conventional neuroleptics. If two or more persons conspire to violate this section,

(Para 1189) and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

(Para 1190) It seems that other Conduits would be Canada (as a consumer), and China & India Turkey and Pakistan because of their various pharmaceutical production of (antipsychotics) and look at the USA legalizing of Gay marriages.

(Para 1191) Lastly you got these two Best Selling Authors with a series of books (that sold over 60 million books) profited from everyone believing that Armageddon is coming and more people are believing this more so then ever then any time in history,

(Para 1192) but what I have presented about Armageddon will take place in the Middle East ONLY (and this is a brilliant strategy it eliminates the Middle East and its only resource oil) where Israel, Iran, and Syria has and will use its Nuclear weapons (the only others with this capability is India and Pakistan) within that Region,

(Para 1193) and of coarse the other Super Powers will use their capabilities there as well. The United States of America is Super Broke that’s why they can’t fight these punk queer wars (a no win situation for our servicemen and women)

(Para 1194) Re: in my blogs on Suicide and in Awareness is finding the cause and look what I’ve already proven is that the Health and Mental Health System along with the Courts (Soldiers and Federal Courts). A great example of being over misdiagnosed with having ADHD and children are the Soldiers with PTSD, and This proven over-misdiagnosis leads to also having ADD, ODD, PTSD,

(Para 1195) and then a new diagnosis of having bipolar (which is already proven and trending as the newest markets with all mental health Buffer organizations experimental blinding’s and having ties with pharmaceutical companies and the Courts. Also the problem with our government and war in this new Trend is that our servicemen are fighting punk-queer war(s) ever since Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq that makes them more than expendable in a CAN’T WIN SITUATION.

(Para 1196) Hey Desert Storm took what 2 day’s to take that country with what maybe a handful of casualties and after occupying Afghanistan and Iraq easily that when our servicemen are dying by the thousands. You’ll find out that all servicemen were heinously more than Expendable in Afghanistan and Iraq, and how I could have save all the lives through my (PROTOTYPE/headset) same as P.E.N.I. instruments and/or many Communications instruments

(Para 1197) and that’s why Russia stepped in Syria, because the United States of America can’t afford these punk queer wars that was Un-Winnable, and they couldn’t afford to fight more punk queer wars in the Middle East and Russia won’t Tolerate Muslim Extremisms…Trust me that where thermo nuclear war is acceptable it eliminates a small time future Nuclear threat and it the surrounding Middle Eastern oil supplies paving way’s for a New Sources.

(Para 1198) This is where a Major World Economic transition takes place, and Russia becomes the biggest worldwide supplier of oil and its other Natural Resources, and as I Stated in my blogs don’t worry about a BIGGER Picture of Armageddon (it’s just in the middle east) and I’ll being showing everyone that all Governments with long range thermo nuclear capabilities ARE “ALL PAPER TIGERS”.

(Para 1199) Chernobyl is an excellent example of being uninhabitable for over 1 million years what does that tell you THATS THE BOTTOM LINE. Besides with the Middle East Eliminated by & through Russia’s Nuclear Armament sales Russia now becomes the BIGGEST OIL SUPPLIER in the World.

(Para 1200) To those Authors making people believe that in Armageddon they will perish, but rise after Armageddon and ascend to Heaven is Ludacris. The Churches should have intervened because it States that one won’t be accepted at the very end for now repenting & believing in Jesus just prior to Armageddon.

(Para 1201) What I have presented to the many churches with my Blogs as well as to the masses of people and THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING and took No initiative to make any changes or to be a voice of GOD and Jesus in recognizing there Eradication Extermination process and/or there Armageddon… what a sorry bunch of so called believers in Jesus just so they think they can enter the Eternal Kingdom of GOD.

(Para 1202) Your newest Armageddon is presented in my Blogs with the USA and Britain with the ever growing (because of the created Newest Market(s) a 700% over misdiagnosis and growing) that caused the Intentional Eradication Extermination Process long ago and creating the True Story and Multiplication of what Sequestration is all about and it’s a 571 Trillion Federal deficit by 2037 surpassing our economy and causing WORLDWIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE,

(Para 1203) and this is where BILLIONS will perish throughout the World, and this is THE OTHER PART OF ARMAGEDDON and ITS FINAL PHASE the CONCLUSION of ARMAGEDDON and to my belief its known as REVELATIONS all due to the massive Intentional Eradication Extermination process already created, and you can’t turn back time on this Foreign Policy.
(Para 1204) Read my Economic Blogs we got just 1 More Donkey President serving two terms and if this isn’t stopped by then… Sequestration won’t ever be stopped.

(Para 1205) The United States of America vs. Mohamed 1. Even before the September 11th Attacks against the United States in 2001, the country and the world were well aware of the activities of Osama bin Laden and the terrorist network known as al Qaeda. In October 2000, 48-year-old Ali A. Mohamed pled guilty in federal court in New York to five counts of conspiracy, including conspiring to kill U.S. nationals; conspiring to murder, kidnap,

(Para 1206) and maim outside the United States; conspiring to murder in general; and conspiring to destroy U.S. buildings and property. 2. The charges stemmed from the August 7, 1998, Terrorism at U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. More than 200 people, including 12 American citizens, were killed in the attacks, and more than 5,000 were injured.

(Para 1207) 3. The case attracted national and international attention because Mohamed was a former U.S. Army officer and because he implicated bin Laden in the bombings. Mohamed, a native Egyptian, served briefly with the CIA in 1984, until the agency determined that Mohamed had revealed his assignment to Middle East terrorists.

(Para 1208) In 1985, Mohamed moved to the California, seeking to become a U.S. citizen. He enlisted in the U.S. Army and was assigned to the Special Operations Command at Fort Bragg, where the Army trains its Special Forces.

(Para 1209) Mohamed was trained as a paratrooper and achieved the rank of sergeant before being honorably discharged in 1989. Upon his discharge, he renewed his contacts with the Egyptian “Islamic Jihad,” a radical group he had secretly associated with since the early 1980s. In 1991 he was recruited by al Qaeda to serve several missions directly related to bin Laden’s terrorist activities.

(Para 1210) 4. In 1993, bin Laden asked Mohamed to scout possible sites in Kenya to target for terrorist attacks. Mohamed, then a naturalized U.S. citizen, took photographs and drew diagrams of the U.S. embassy in Nairobi.

(Para 1211) He personally delivered these to bin Laden, who planned the attack that occurred about five years later. Mohamed became a suspect when one of his aliases turned up at the Nairobi bombing site. After reaching a plea bargain agreement with federal prosecutors, Mohamed implicated bin Laden in the attacks.

(Para 1212) At the time, prosecutors said it was the first time that a close associate of bin Laden had implicated the reputed terrorist in open court. Mohamed faces a prison term for an unspecified number of years. Less than one year after he gave his testimony, the United States suffered terrorist attacks on its own soil, as al Qaeda operatives destroyed the World Trade Center in New York City and seriously damaged the Pentagon in Washington, D.C.

These are the 18 U.S. Codes as applied to Criminal Charges.
18 U.S. Codes CHAPTER 105—SABOTAGE §2151. Definitions
As used in this chapter:
(Para 1213) Are all articles, parts or ingredients, intended for, adapted to, or suitable for the use of the United States or any associate nation, in connection with the conduct of war or defense activities of the Armed Forces of the United States, or any associate nation (all the Defendants).
The words “associate nation” means any nation at war with any nation with which the United States is at war.

(Para 1214) 18 U.S. Codes CHAPTER 105—SABOTAGE §2151. COMPARED TO THE 75 MILLION MH CONSUMERS

(Para 1215) CHAPTER 113B – here’s a bit of a rattle snake Created TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) and BEING created INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM, obviously because of THE 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS Intentional Eradication Extermination process creating a Super huge False Claims Act 300+ Trillion, that Created the Great ERA of Sedition and the widespread of the Democracy delusion AND EXHIBIT A WILL PROVE THIS EASILY from Limitation on Prosecution.—

CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D)
§ 2331 – Definitions
(Para 1216) As used in this chapter—(1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that, AND THIS IS WHATS HAPPENING IN THE OTHER DEFENDANT’S) COUNTRIES AS WELL AND QUALIFIES AS BEING Intentionally CREATED INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM

(Para 1217) (A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State, AND THIS IS HAPPENING TO THE 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS THIS IS THE ULTIMATE TERRORISTS Act Imaginable;

(Para 1218) (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(Para 1219) No prosecution for any offense described in this section shall be undertaken by the United States except on written certification of the Attorney General (is a Defendant in this criminal case) to influence the policy of other government (s) similarly situated (defendants) and to affect the conduct of government(s) AND THESE ARE SOME OF THE VIOLATIONS IN ACCORDANCE BY FEDERAL CODES… by mass destruction,

(Para 1220) 2332h (relating to radiological dispersal devices), 2332i (relating to acts of nuclear terrorism), 2339 (relating to harboring terrorists), 2339A (relating to providing material support to terrorists), 2339B (relating to providing material support to terrorist organizations), 2339C (relating to financing of terrorism), (example) ISIS and looting and selling of oil from oil wells in the Middle East, also bring Project P.E.N.I. and even the E.P.R.I. reports FCC EPA???????????

(Para 1221) #THE OTHER PEARL HARBOR and Exhibit A., and (c) Penalties.— Whoever violates this section shall be punished as provided under section 2332a(a) of this title., and (d) Exemptions to Jurisdiction.—This section does not apply to— BUT IT DOES IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ, and in Defendant Countries such as the United States of America, Germany, France, Belgium, etc engaging in conspiracies to kill THIS IS THE ULTIMATE TERRORISM;

(Para 1222) 18 U.S. Codes § 2339 – Harboring or concealing terrorists LOOK AT THE DEFENDANT COUNTRIES WHOM TERRORISTS ARE COMMITTING THEIR HEINOUS CRIMES IN, AND THESE COUNTRIES ARE HARBORING AND CONCEALING TERRORISTS, and these are all Violations of

(Para 1223) (a) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under section 32 (relating to destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities), section 175 (relating to biological weapons),

(Para 1224) section 229 (relating to chemical weapons), section 831 (relating to nuclear materials), paragraph (2) or (3) of section 844(f) (relating to arson and bombing of government property risking or causing injury or death), section 1366(a) (relating to the destruction of an energy facility),

(Para 1225) section 2280 (relating to violence against maritime navigation), section 2332a (relating to weapons of mass destruction), or section 2332b (relating to acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries) of this title, section 236(a) (relating to sabotage of nuclear facilities or fuel) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284(a)),
18 U.S. Code Chapter 37 – ESPIONAGE AND CENSORSHIP

(Para 1226) 18 U.S. Code § 792 – Harboring or concealing persons
§ 792. Harboring or concealing persons Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under sections 793 or 794 of this title, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(Para 1227) The Crux: ####COMPARE TERRORISM to the 75 plus million Mental Health consumers I’ve presented in the Instant Charge of Human Rights Genocide violations, and the other 50-70 million TBI consumers (per year worldwide), as cited in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I,

(Para 1228) I Already Proved Immanent Worldwide Catastrophes are happening, and More very near Immanent Worldwide Catastrophes are on the gloomy horizon, and such costs has already severely prejudice, and has strictly imperiled the ability of the actor’s government(s) (Defendants) to safeguard and enhance the well-being of its populace, and abroad.

(Para 1229 ) Examples: Prevent the regional proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) (BUT IN THIS INCIDENT MASS DESTRUCTION DOESN’T HAVE TO BE “WEAPONS”).

(Para 1230) and delivery systems; prevent the emergence of a regional hegemon in important regions; promote the well-being of allies and friends and protect them from external aggression. Important interests are significant to the actor’s well-being. They could cause serious concern and harm to the actor’s overseas interests (in which it already has and that is why my Qui Tam Complaint or False Claims Act is a 300 Trillion dollar suit

(Para 1231) NATIONAL SECURITY POWERS: ARE THE CHECKS IN BALANCE?
###CHAPTER 8 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations) SECURING AMERICA FROM ATTACK: THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT’S EVOLVING ROLE AFTER 9/11 ALTHOUGH IN PRE 9/11 the USA and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES KNEW ABOUT THE TWIN TOWERS AS BEING TARGETS and LET IT HAPPEN…IT’S THE OTHER PEARL HARBOR,

(Para 1232) and YES I CAN PROVE THIS (Exhibit A) and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES SUCH AS GERMANY, BELGIUM, FRANCE as they too possess this personal knowledge and look at what’s happening in their Countries as well AGAIN attached as Exhibit A will prove this “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

(Para 1233) JUS IN BELLO dealing with the Geneva Convention articles 1-143 Does Apply, but JUS IN BELLO WERE INTENTIONAL CREATED DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM and the progression into the Crimes of Genocide, the Crime against Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” FROM ALL DEFENDANTS COUNTRIES/GOVERNMENTS AND THE UNITED NATIONS.
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1: and these are all Violations of

(Para 1234) (a) “Attack directed against any civilian population” means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(Para 1235) again cited in paragraphs 1 to 310???? are ATTACKS DIRECTED AGAINST ANY CIVILIAN POPULATION WHICH TRANSLATES TO EACH INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT COUNTRIES AND IT’S GOVERNMENTS INFLUENCERS AND/OR CONDUITS ARE DOING TO IT’S OWN PEOPLE(S) INTENTIONALLY, and THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION IN DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS OVER-KILL ON IT’S OWN PEOPLE(S).

(Para 1236) (b) “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population; THIS ON THIS OTHER HAND IS THE VERY OPPOSITE TO THIS CLAIMS BECAUSE IT IS OUR HEALTH SYSTEM JUDICIAL SYSTEM (Supreme Courts) Legislature, Congress, Governmental agencies, NGO’s and our Presidents administration INTENTIONALLY KILLING MILLIONS.

(Para 1237) AND CREATING AN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM THE DEMOCRATIC (democracy) DELUSION of these Defendant Countries with the Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism, and the Intentionally Created International Terrorism happening in these Defendants (there HEGEMONY).

(Para 1238) (d) “Deportation or forcible transfer of population” means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law; Again cited in paragraphs 1 to 310 and with our Health and Judicial systems and with project P.E.N.I. the Demographics, Education Levels,

(Para 1239) and Poverty levels CLEARLY indicates 75 million Peoples are being Forcibly Deported and/or transferred and/or forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts in many ways qualifying this as a violation from Jail, Prison, State Hospitals, Supervised Group Homes, Homelessness, CPS and/or CWS and foster care to the Syrian refuges crisis

(Para 1240) (e) “Torture” means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions;

(Para 1241) AGAIN cite in Paragraphs 1 to 310???? in violation of Federal Codes????????????, but lawful sanctions has proven to be an Intentional eradication extermination process the paved the way to the CRIME OF AGGRESSION and like lawful sanctions it is unlawful sanctions they are “one in the same”

(Para 1242) (f) “Forced pregnancy” means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;

(Para 1243) (g) “Persecution” means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity; again as cited in paragraphs 1 to 310 You’ll find this TREND WITH ALL DEFENDANTS COUNTRIES… it’s happening to their Minorities based on their Demographics, Education Levels,

(Para 1244) and Poverty levels through their Health and Judicial systems and with project P.E.N.I. and other influencers (conduits) Intentional Eradication Extermination process dealing with these 75 Million mental health consumers plus another 300 million or so.

#ANOTHER GREAT EXAMPLE As Cited in Chapter 9 and INTERNATIONAL ORDER (Para 1245) The last 25 years, there have been a number of significant political, military, and economic events profoundly impacting international relations and world politics. Significant “shocks” in world politics include the collapse of the Soviet Union; the explosive spread of democratic political institutions across states in CENTRAL and EASTERN EUROPE, LATIN AMERICA, and ASIA;

(Para 1246) terrorist attacks by Islamic jihadist movements in the United States, Europe, East Asia, the Middle East, and South Asia; and FINANCIAL and ECONOMIC crises in ASIA, EUROPE, SOUTH AMERICA and the United States.

(Para 1247) Over the years, various scholars and policymakers have attempted to come to grips with what these events mean for interstate relations. SIMPLY BECAUSE THESE ARE ALL THE “DEFENDANTS” IN VIOLATIONS OF NATIONAL SECURITY LAW and INTERNATIONAL NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS OF THE GREAT DEMOCRACY DELUSION OF GRANDEUR.

#(Para 1248) #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS INDIRECT THREATS #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS ENABLERS OF DIRECT THREATS and #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL with this Intentionally Created Terrorists Cover-up to the Super huge Intentional eradication extermination process.

(Para 1249) Transnational threats and their effects may also be viewed as strategic distractions; they appear as exaggerations that pose nowhere near the same level of danger as conventional threats. By focusing so much attention to them, some argue policymakers overstate the threat at the expense of focusing limited time, attention, and resources on more pressing issues like rising powers, rogue states, and the competition for oil,

(Para 1250) AND THIS INSTANT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION ALSO INCLUDES A 300+ TRILLION DOLLAR FALSE CLAIMS ACT, that has caused rising powers (who are all small potatoes in every sense) of rogue states who are stealing oil from nearby rogue states to fuel more pressing issues (to retain themselves as a SMOKESCREEN as “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS”.

(Para 1251) There is also the danger of a self-fulfilling prophecy—raising transnational threats like terror groups or criminals to high levels of importance legitimizes these actors on the global stage in ways that they may not have been able to do themselves with their own resources or actions.

(Para 1252) Even “threats without threateners” (THEIR CAN NEVER BE THREATS WITHOUT THREATENERS AND THEY ARE THE GOVERNMENTS IN THIS INSTANT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION THAT KILLING IT’S OWN PEOPLE(S) become problematic for national security professionals WHO HAVE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE AS WELL).

(Para 1253) Their Placing pandemics on the security agenda has meant a more active role for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) (OBAMA, HILLARY and BENGHAZI), a role that is added to an already crowded agenda for the U.S. military.

(Para 1254) ## To hold the view that transnational threats are distractions is not to argue that they are unimportant, but that they should not be seen as residing in the province of national security, BUT IS.

(Para 1255) They are not in the realm of “high politics.” They belong where they always have, be they in the arena of law enforcement (for terrorism, drug trafficking), private business (for money laundering), or the scientific community (in the cases of pandemics and climate change).

(Para 1256) ## This where Corruption (ALL DEFENDANTS) and crime (CREATED CRIMES AS WELL AGAIN AS BEING STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS) are so ingrained and widespread as to cripple U.S. vital functions and the other Defendant Countries as well as is evident and EQUALLY SHARED IN SUCH A HUGE CONSPIRACY MAKING THIS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION 10X (plus) more Heinous then the HOLOCAUST.

(Para 1257) This has significantly eroded public confidence in U.S. the economy itself and Abroad due to the other Defendant Countries. LIKE I SAID THESE WERE INTENTIONALLY CREATED THREATS IN WHICH #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” say’s it all with this Intentionally Created Terrorists just to Cover-up the Super huge Intentional eradication extermination process with the 75 Million mental health consumers and 300+ million more..

(Para 1258) RESPONSES TO TRANSNATIONAL THREATS PART III: STRATEGIC ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS CHAPTER 16 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations)

(Para 1259) ETHICAL ISSUES IN WAR: THE PURPOSES OF THE JUST WAR FRAMEWORK THE JUST WAR FRAMEWORK HAS VIOLATED EVERY ARTICLE OF THE GENEVA CONVENTION from article’s 1 to 143, and HAS INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED THE JUS IN BELLO Principles of what War is.

(Para 1260) Just cause is through Malfeasance rendering a Legitimate Authority Incompetent and grounds of mootness Incompetence; Just Intent is a collaborative Conspiracy; Forcing other Countries into a Last Resort that has caused this worldwide environmental impact.

(Para 1261) Reasonable Hope of Success is not rational; JUS IN BELLO; The law of war is a legal term of art that refers to the aspect of public international law concerning acceptable justifications to engage in war (jus ad bellum) and the limits to acceptable wartime conduct (jus in bello or International humanitarian law), and do you call this International Humanitariam Law?

(Para 1262) CHAPTER 17 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations) INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND WORLD ORDER ORGANIZING PRINCIPLES: THE RESURGENCE OF NATIONAL SELF-INTEREST THE ROAD AHEAD: DÉJÀ VU my Conclusion for déjà vu is its been happening for too long now there is no more tolerance for déjà vu.

(Para 1263) Cited in violations of and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2332 – Criminal penalties AS IT APPLIES TO THE CRIMES OF WAR Intentionally CREATED WAR.

(Para 1264) (a) Homicide.—Whoever kills a national of the United States, while such national is outside the United States, shall— (1) if the killing is murder (as defined in section 1111(a)), be fined under this title, punished by death or imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or both;

(Para 1265) (2) if the killing is a voluntary manslaughter as defined in section 1112(a) of this title, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and (3) if the killing is an involuntary manslaughter as defined in section 1112(a) of this title, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(Para 1266) (b) Attempt or Conspiracy With Respect to Homicide.—Whoever outside the United States attempts to kill, or engages in a conspiracy to kill, a national of the United States shall— (1) in the case of an attempt to commit a killing that is a murder as defined in this chapter, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

(Para 1267) (2) in the case of a conspiracy by two or more persons to commit a killing that is a murder as defined in section 1111(a) of this title, if one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both so fined and so imprisoned.

(Para 1268) (c) Other Conduct.—Whoever outside the United States engages in physical violence— (1) with intent to cause serious bodily injury to a national of the United States; or (2) with the result that serious bodily injury is caused to a national of the United States; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(Para 1269) (d) Limitation on Prosecution.— No prosecution for any offense described in this section shall be undertaken by the United States except on written certification of the Attorney General (is a Defendant in this criminal case)

(Para 1270) or the highest ranking subordinate of the Attorney General with responsibility for criminal prosecutions that, in the judgment of the certifying official, such offense was intended to coerce, intimidate, or retaliate against a government or a civilian population.

(Para 1271) 1992—Pub. L. 102–572 renumbered section 2331 of this title as this section, substituted “Criminal penalties” for “Terrorist acts abroad against United States national” in section catch line, redesignated subsec. (e) as (d), and struck out former subsec. (d) which read as follows: “Definition.—As used in this section the term ‘national of the United States’ has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)

(Para 1272) 18 U.S. Codes § 2332b – Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries
Prohibited Acts.— (1) Offenses.—Whoever, involving conduct transcending national boundaries and in a circumstance described in subsection (b)— (A) kills, kidnaps, maims, commits an assault resulting in serious bodily injury, or assaults with a dangerous weapon any person within the United States; or

(Para 1273) (B) creates a substantial risk of serious bodily injury to any other person by destroying or damaging any structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property within the United States or by attempting or conspiring to destroy or damage any structure, conveyance,

(Para 1274) or other real or personal property within the United States; in violation of the laws of any State, or the United States, shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c). (2) Treatment of threats, attempts and conspiracies.— Whoever threatens to commit an offense under paragraph (1), or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished under subsection (c).

(Para 1275) (b) Jurisdictional Bases.— (1) Circumstances.—The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are— (A) the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce is used in furtherance of the offense; (B) the offense obstructs, delays, or affects interstate or foreign commerce, or would have so obstructed, delayed, or affected interstate or foreign commerce if the offense had been consummated;

(Para 1276) (C) the victim, or intended victim, is the United States Government, a member of the uniformed services, or any official, officer, employee, or agent of the legislative, executive, or judicial branches, or of any department or agency, of the United States;

(Para 1277) (D) the structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property is, in whole or in part, owned, possessed, or leased to the United States, or any department or agency of the United States;
(Para 1278) (E) the offense is committed in the territorial sea (including the airspace above and the seabed and subsoil below, and artificial islands and fixed structures erected thereon) of the United States; or

(Para 1279) (F) the offense is committed within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
(2) Co-conspirators and accessories after the fact.— Jurisdiction shall exist over all principals and co-conspirators of an offense under this section,

(Para 1280) and accessories after the fact to any offense under this section, if at least one of the circumstances described in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of paragraph (1) is applicable to at least one offender.

(Para 1281) (c) Penalties.— (1) Penalties.—Whoever violates this section shall be punished— (A) for a killing, or if death results to any person from any other conduct prohibited by this section, by death, or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life;
(Para 1282) (B) for kidnapping, by imprisonment for any term of years or for life; (C) for maiming, by imprisonment for not more than 35 years; (D) for assault with a dangerous weapon or assault resulting in serious bodily injury, by imprisonment for not more than 30 years;

(Para 1283) (E) for destroying or damaging any structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property, by imprisonment for not more than 25 years; (F) for attempting or conspiring to commit an offense, for any term of years up to the maximum punishment that would have applied had the offense been completed; and (G) for threatening to commit an offense under this section, by imprisonment for not more than 10 years.

(Para 1284) (2 ) Consecutive sentence.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not place on probation any person convicted of a violation of this section; nor shall the term of imprisonment imposed under this section run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment.

(Para 1285) (d) Proof Requirements.—The following shall apply to prosecutions under this section: (1) Knowledge.— The prosecution is not required to prove knowledge by any defendant of a jurisdictional base alleged in the indictment, and knowledge is offered as proof as well as the Intentional Intent.

(Para 1286) (2) State law.— In a prosecution under this section that is based upon the adoption of State law, only the elements of the offense under State law, and not any provisions pertaining to criminal procedure or evidence, are adopted, and I say slap in State(s) and Federal laws as applied to maximize Defendants sentences.

(Para 1287) (e) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.—There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction— (1) over any offense under subsection (a), including any threat, attempt, or conspiracy to commit such offense; and (2) over conduct which, under section 3, renders any person an accessory after the fact to an offense under subsection (a).

(Para 1288) (f) Investigative Authority.— In addition to any other investigative authority with respect to violations of this title, the Attorney General shall have primary investigative responsibility for all Federal crimes of terrorism, and any violation of section 351(e), 844(e), 844(f)(1), 956(b), 1361, 1366(b), 1366(c), 1751(e), 2152, or 2156 of this title, and they are Defendants,

(Para 1289) and the Secretary of the Treasury shall assist the Attorney General at the request of the Attorney General. Nothing in this section shall be construed to interfere with the authority of the United States Secret Service under section 3056.

(Para 1290) (g) Definitions.—as used in this section— (1) the term “conduct transcending national boundaries” means conduct occurring outside of the United States in addition to the conduct occurring in the United States; such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Syria.

(Para 1291) (2) the term “facility of interstate or foreign commerce” has the meaning given that term in section 1958(b)(2); (3) the term “serious bodily injury” has the meaning given that term in section 1365(g)(3); [1]

(Para 1292) (4) the term “territorial sea of the United States” means all waters extending seaward to 12 nautical miles from the baselines of the United States, determined in accordance with international law; and (5) the term “Federal crime of terrorism” means an offense that—

(Para 1293) (A) is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and (B) is a violation of— (i) section 32 (relating to destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities), 37 (relating to violence at international airports),

(Para 1294) 81 (relating to arson within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction), 175 or 175b (relating to biological weapons), 175c (relating to variola virus), 229 (relating to chemical weapons), subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) of section 351 (relating to congressional, cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination and kidnaping),

(Para 1295) 831 (relating to nuclear materials), 832 (relating to participation in nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats to the United States) [2] 842(m) or (n) (relating to plastic explosives), 844(f)(2) or (3) (relating to arson and bombing of Government property risking or causing death), 844(i) (relating to arson and bombing of property used in interstate commerce),

(Para 1296) 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a Federal facility with a dangerous weapon), 956(a)(1) (relating to conspiracy to murder, kidnap, or maim persons abroad), 1030(a)(1) (relating to protection of computers), 1030(a)(5)(A) resulting in damage as defined in 1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(II) through (VI) (relating to protection of computers),

(Para 1297) 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the United States), 1116 (relating to murder or manslaughter of foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons), 1203 (relating to hostage taking), 1361 (relating to government property or contracts),

(Para 1298) Take a look at the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton and the United States Consulate and the people who died in Benghazi????????????

(Para 1299) 1362 (relating to destruction of communication lines, stations, or systems), 1363 (relating to injury to buildings or property within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States), 1366(a) (relating to destruction of an energy facility), 1751(a), (b), (c), or (d) (relating to Presidential and Presidential staff assassination and kidnaping),

(Para 1300) 1992 (relating to terrorist attacks and other acts of violence against railroad carriers and against mass transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air), 2155 (relating to destruction of national defense materials, premises, or utilities), 2156 (relating to national defense material, premises, or utilities),

(Para 1301) 2280 (relating to violence against maritime navigation), 2280a (relating to maritime safety), 2281 through 2281a (relating to violence against maritime fixed platforms), 2332 (relating to certain homicides and other violence against United States nationals occurring outside of the United States),

(Para 1302) 2332a (relating to use of weapons of mass destruction), 2332b (relating to acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries), 2332f (relating to bombing of public places and facilities), 2332g (relating to missile systems designed to destroy aircraft),

(Para 1303) 2332h (relating to radiological dispersal devices), 2332i (relating to acts of nuclear terrorism), 2339 (relating to harboring terrorists), 2339A (relating to providing material support to terrorists), 2339B (relating to providing material support to terrorist organizations),

(Para 1304) 2339C (relating to financing of terrorism), (example) ISIS and looting and selling of oil from oil wells in the Middle East, also bring Project P.E.N.I. and even the E.P.R.I. reports FCC EPA???????????

(Para 1305) 2339D (relating to military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization), or 2340A (relating to torture) of this title; (ii) sections 92 (relating to prohibitions governing atomic weapons) or 236 (relating to sabotage of nuclear facilities or fuel) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2122 or 2284);

(Para 1306) (iii) section 46502 (relating to aircraft piracy), the second sentence of section 46504 (relating to assault on a flight crew with a dangerous weapon), section 46505(b)(3) or (c) (relating to explosive or incendiary devices, or endangerment of human life by means of weapons, on aircraft), 911, Pentagon it already happened and is continuing ???????????????

(Para 1307) section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved (relating to application of certain criminal laws to acts on aircraft), or section 60123(b) (relating to destruction of interstate gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facility) of title 49; or

(Para 1308) § 2332c – Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title II, § 201(c)(1), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–871]
§ 2332d – Financial transactions § 2332e – Requests for military assistance to enforce prohibition in certain emergencies SYRIA.
(Para 1309) 18 U.S. Codes § 2332f – Bombings of places of public use, government facilities, public transportation systems and infrastructure facilities

(Para 1310) (a) Offenses.— (1) In general.—Whoever unlawfully delivers, places, discharges, or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into, or against a place of public use, a state or government facility, a public transportation system, or an infrastructure facility— (A) with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or

(Para 1311) (B) with the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility, or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in “major economic loss”, shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c).

(Para 1312) (2) Attempts and conspiracies.— Whoever attempts or conspires to commit an offense under paragraph (1) shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c). (b)Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the offenses in subsection (a) if— (1) the offense takes place in the United States and—

(Para 1313) (A) The offense is committed against another state or a government facility of such state, including its embassy or other diplomatic or consular premises of that state; BENGHAZI?????????????
(B) the offense is committed in an attempt to compel another state or the United States to do or abstain from doing any act;

(Para 1314) (C) at the time the offense is committed, it is committed— (i) on board a vessel flying the flag of another state; (ii) on board an aircraft which is registered under the laws of another state; or (iii) on board an aircraft which is operated by the government of another state;

(Para 1315) (D) a perpetrator is found outside the United States; (E) a perpetrator is a national of another state or a stateless person; or (F) a victim is a national of another state or a stateless person; (2) the offense takes place outside the United States and—

(Para 1316) (A) a perpetrator is a national of the United States or is a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; (B) a victim is a national of the United States; (C) a perpetrator is found in the United States; (D) the offense is committed in an attempt to compel the United States to do or abstain from doing any act;

(Para 1317) (E) the offense is committed against a state or government facility of the United States, including an embassy or other diplomatic or consular premises of the United States; (F) the offense is committed on board a vessel flying the flag of the United States or an aircraft which is registered under the laws of the United States at the time the offense is committed; or

(Para 1318) (G) the offense is committed on board an aircraft which is operated by the United States. (c) Penalties.— Whoever violates this section shall be punished as provided under section 2332a(a) of this title.

(Para 1319) (d) Exemptions to Jurisdiction.—This section does not apply to— BUT IT DOES IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ, and in Defendant Countries such as the United States of America, Germany, France, Belgium, etc (1) the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under the law of war, which are governed by that law, (2) activities undertaken by military forces of a state in the exercise of their official duties; or

(Para 1320) (3) offense’s committed within the United States, where the alleged offender and the victims are United States citizens and the alleged offender is found in the United States, or where jurisdiction is predicated solely on the nationality of the victims or the alleged offender and the offense has no substantial effect on interstate or foreign commerce.

(Para 1321) (e) Definitions.—As used in this section, the term— (1) “serious bodily injury” has the meaning given that term in section 1365(g)(3) of this title; [1] (2) “national of the United States” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22));

(Para 1322) (3) “state or government facility” includes any permanent or temporary facility or conveyance that is used or occupied by representatives of a state, members of Government, the legislature or the judiciary or by officials or employees of a state or any other public authority or entity or by employees or officials of an intergovernmental organization in connection with their official duties;

(Para 1323) (4) “intergovernmental organization” includes international organization (as defined in section 1116(b)(5) of this title); (5) “infrastructure facility” means any publicly or privately owned facility providing or distributing services for the benefit of the public, such as water, sewage, energy, fuel, or communications;

(Para 1324) (6) “place of public use” means those parts of any building, land, street, waterway, or other location that are accessible or open to members of the public, whether continuously, periodically, or occasionally, and encompasses any commercial, business, cultural, historical, educational, religious, governmental, entertainment, recreational, or similar place that is so accessible or open to the public;

(Para 1325) (7) “public transportation system” means all facilities, conveyances, and instrumentalities, whether publicly or privately owned, that are used in or for publicly available services for the transportation of persons or cargo;

(Para 1326) (8) “explosive” has the meaning given in section 844(j) of this title insofar that it is designed, or has the capability, to cause death, serious bodily injury, or substantial material damage;

(Para 1327) (9) “other lethal device” means any weapon or device that is designed or has the capability to cause death, serious bodily injury, or substantial damage to property through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic chemicals, biological agents, or toxins (as those terms are defined in section 178 of this title) or radiation or radioactive material;

(Para 1328) (Added Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, § 803 (a), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 376; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4005 (d)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1813.) § 2339A – Providing material support to terrorists § 2339B – Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations § 2339C – Prohibitions against the financing of terrorism § 2339D – Receiving military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization

(Para 1329) Cited in violation of Created Terrorists and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code Chapter 37 – ESPIONAGE AND CENSORSHIP 18 U.S. Code § 792 – Harboring or concealing persons Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under sections 793 or 794 of this title, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(Para 1330) Cited in violation of Created Terrorists and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 956 – Conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim, or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country § 956. Conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim, or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country

(Para 1331) (a) (1) Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, conspires with one or more other persons, regardless of where such other person or persons are located, to commit at any place outside the United States an act that would constitute the offense of murder, kidnapping, or maiming if committed in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States shall,

(Para 1332) if any of the conspirators commits an act within the jurisdiction of the United States to effect any object of the conspiracy, be punished as provided in subsection (a)(2).
(2) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a)(1) of this section is— (A) imprisonment for any term of years or for life if the offense is conspiracy to murder or kidnap; and

(Para 1333) (B) imprisonment for not more than 35 years if the offense is conspiracy to maim. Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, conspires with one or more persons, regardless of where such other person or persons are located, to damage or destroy specific property situated within a foreign country and belonging to a foreign government or to

(Para 1334) any political subdivision thereof with which the United States is at peace, or any railroad, canal, bridge, airport, airfield, or other public utility, public conveyance, or public structure, or any religious, educational, or cultural property so situated, shall, if any of the conspirators commits an act within the jurisdiction of the United States to effect any object of the conspiracy, be imprisoned not more than 25 years.

(Para 1335) Cited in violation of created terrorists and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1992 – Terrorist attacks and other violence against railroad carriers and against mass transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air (a)General Prohibitions.—Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c), knowingly and without lawful authority or permission—

(Para 1336) (1) wrecks, derails, sets fire to, or disables railroad on-track equipment or a mass transportation vehicle;
(2) places any biological agent or toxin, destructive substance, or destructive device in, upon, or near railroad on-track equipment or a mass transportation vehicle with intent to endanger the safety of any person, or with a reckless disregard for the safety of human life;

(Para 1337) (3) places or releases a hazardous material or a biological agent or toxin on or near any property described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (4), with intent to endanger the safety of any person, or with reckless disregard for the safety of human life;

(Para 1338) (4) sets fire to, undermines, makes unworkable, unusable, or hazardous to work on or use, or places any biological agent or toxin, destructive substance, or destructive device in, upon, or near any— (A) tunnel, bridge, viaduct, trestle, track, electromagnetic guideway, signal, station, depot, warehouse, terminal,

(Para 1339) or any other way, structure, property, or appurtenance used in the operation of, or in support of the operation of, a railroad carrier, and with intent to, or knowing or having reason to know, such activity would likely, derail, disable, or wreck railroad on-track equipment; or

(Para 1340) (B) garage, terminal, structure, track, electromagnetic guideway, supply, or facility used in the operation of, or in support of the operation of, a mass transportation vehicle, and with intent to, or knowing or having reason to know, 1 such activity would likely, derail, disable, or wreck a mass transportation vehicle used, operated, or employed by a mass transportation provider;

(Para 1341) (5) removes an appurtenance from, damages, or otherwise impairs the operation of a railroad signal system or mass transportation signal or dispatching system, including a train control system, centralized dispatching system, or highway-railroad grade crossing warning signal;

(Para 1342) (6) with intent to endanger the safety of any person, or with a reckless disregard for the safety of human life, interferes with, disables, or incapacitates any dispatcher, driver, captain, locomotive engineer, railroad conductor, or other person while the person is employed in dispatching, operating, controlling, or maintaining railroad on-track equipment or a mass transportation vehicle;

(Para 1343) (7) commits an act, including the use of a dangerous weapon, with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury to any person who is on property described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (4); (8) surveils, photographs, videotapes, diagrams, or otherwise collects information with the intent to plan or assist in planning any of the acts described in paragraphs (1) through (6);

(Para 1344) (9) conveys false information, knowing the information to be false, concerning an attempt or alleged attempt to engage in a violation of this subsection; or (10) attempts, threatens, or conspires to engage in any violation of any of paragraphs (1) through (9),
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both,

(Para 1345) and if the offense results in the death of any person, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or subject to death, except in the case of a violation of paragraph (8), (9), or (10).
(b)Aggravated Offense.—Whoever commits an offense under subsection (a) of this section in a circumstance in which—
(1) the railroad on-track equipment or mass transportation vehicle was carrying a passenger or employee at the time of the offense;

(Para 1346) (2) the railroad on-track equipment or mass transportation vehicle was carrying high-level radioactive waste or spent nuclear fuel at the time of the offense; or (3) the offense was committed with the intent to endanger the safety of any person, or with a reckless disregard for the safety of any person, and the railroad on-track equipment or mass transportation vehicle was carrying a hazardous material at the time of the offense that—

(Para 1347) (A) was required to be placarded under subpart F of part 172 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations; and (B) is identified as class number 3, 4, 5, 6.1, or 8 and packing group I or packing group II, or class number 1, 2, or 7 under the hazardous materials table of section 172.101 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both, and if the offense resulted in the death of any person, the person may be sentenced to death.

(Para 1348) (c) Circumstances Required for Offense.—A circumstance referred to in subsection (a) is any of the following:
(1) Any of the conduct required for the offense is, or, in the case of an attempt, threat, or conspiracy to engage in conduct, the conduct required for the completed offense would be, engaged in, on, against, or affecting a mass transportation provider, or a railroad carrier engaged in interstate or foreign commerce.

(Para 1349) (2) Any person travels or communicates across a State line in order to commit the offense, or transports materials across a State line in aid of the commission of the offense.
(d) Definitions.—In this section— (1) the term “biological agent” has the meaning given to that term in section 178(1);

(Para 1350) (2) the term “dangerous weapon” means a weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, including a pocket knife with a blade of less than 2½ inches in length and a box cutter;

(Para 1351) (3) the term “destructive device” has the meaning given to that term in section 921(a)(4); (4) the term “destructive substance” means an explosive substance, flammable material, infernal machine, or other chemical, mechanical, or radioactive device or material, or matter of a combustible, contaminative, corrosive, or explosive nature, except that the term “radioactive device” does not include any radioactive device or material used solely for medical, industrial, research, or other peaceful purposes;

(Para 1352) (5) the term “hazardous material” has the meaning given to that term in chapter 51 of title 49;
(6) the term “high-level radioactive waste” has the meaning given to that term in section 2(12) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101(12));

(Para 1353) (7) the term “mass transportation” has the meaning given to that term in section 5302(a)(7) [2] of title 49, except that the term includes intercity bus transportation [3] school bus, charter, and sightseeing transportation and passenger vessel as that term is defined in section 2101(22) of title 46, United States Code;

(Para 1354) (8) the term “on-track equipment” means a carriage or other contrivance that runs on rails or electromagnetic guideways;
(9) the term “railroad on-track equipment” means a train, locomotive, tender, motor unit, freight or passenger car, or other on-track equipment used, operated, or employed by a railroad carrier;

(Para 1355) (10) the term “railroad” has the meaning given to that term in chapter 201 of title 49;
(11) the term “railroad carrier” has the meaning given to that term in chapter 201 of title 49;
(12) the term “serious bodily injury” has the meaning given to that term in section 1365;

(Para 1356) (13) the term “spent nuclear fuel” has the meaning given to that term in section 2(23) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101(23));
(14) the term “State” has the meaning given to that term in section 2266; (15) the term “toxin” has the meaning given to that term in section 178(2); and

(Para 1357) (16) the term “vehicle” means any carriage or other contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on land, on water, or through the air.

(Para 1358) Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions of Intentionally Created Terrorists and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2441 – War crimes are paragraphs 1359 to 1380 and applies to the 75 million mental health consumers as.
§ 2441. War crimes (a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death. these offenses applies to Soldiers who performed their duties in Afghanistan and Iraq.

(Para 1359) (b) Circumstances.— The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).

(Para 1360) (c) Definition.—As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct— (1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;

(Para 1361) (2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907; (3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character; or

(Para 1362) (4) of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians in the United States, Germany, Belgium, and France.

(Para 1363) (d) Common Article 3 Violations.— (1 )Prohibited conduct.—In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows:

(Para 1364) (A) Torture.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind.

(Para 1365) (B) Cruel or inhuman treatment.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical abuse, upon another within his custody or control.

(Para 1366) (C) Performing biological experiments.—
The act of a person who subjects, or conspires or attempts to subject, one or more persons within his custody or physical control to biological experiments without a legitimate medical or dental purpose and in so doing endangers the body or health of such person or persons.

(Para 1367) (D) Murder.— The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill, or kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause.

(Para 1368) (E) Mutilation or maiming.—
The act of a person who intentionally injures, or conspires or attempts to injure, or injures whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities,

(Para 1369) including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, by disfiguring the person or persons by any mutilation thereof or by permanently disabling any member, limb, or organ of his body, without any legitimate medical or dental purpose.

(Para 1370) (F) Intentionally causing serious bodily injury.— The act of a person who intentionally causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the law of war.

(Para 1371) (G) Rape.— The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force wrongfully invades, or conspires or attempts to invade, the body of a person by penetrating, however slightly, the anal or genital opening of the victim with any part of the body of the accused, or with any foreign object.

(Para 1372) (H) Sexual assault or abuse.— The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force engages, or conspires or attempts to engage, in sexual contact with one or more persons, or causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, one or more persons to engage in sexual contact.

(Para 1373) (I) Taking hostages.— The act of a person who, having knowingly seized or detained one or more persons, threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such person or persons with the intent of compelling any nation, person other than the hostage, or group of persons to act or refrain from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the safety or release of such person or persons.

(Para 1374) (2) Definitions.—In the case of an offense under subsection (a) by reason of subsection (c)(3)— (A) the term “severe mental pain or suffering” shall be applied for purposes of paragraphs (1)(A) and (1)(B) in accordance with the meaning given that term in section 2340(2) of this title;

(Para 1375) (B) the term “serious bodily injury” shall be applied for purposes of paragraph (1)(F) in accordance with the meaning given that term in section 113(b)(2) of this title;

(Para 1353) (C) the term “sexual contact” shall be applied for purposes of paragraph (1)(G) in accordance with the meaning given that term in section 2246(3) of this title;
(D) the term “serious physical pain or suffering” shall be applied for purposes of paragraph (1)(B) as meaning bodily injury that involves—

(Para 1376) (i) a substantial risk of death;
(ii) extreme physical pain; (iii) a burn or physical disfigurement of a serious nature (other than cuts, abrasions, or bruises); or (iv) significant loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; and (E) the term “serious mental pain or suffering” shall be applied for purposes of paragraph (1)(B) in accordance with the meaning given the term “severe mental pain or suffering” (as defined in section 2340(2) of this title), except that—

(Para 1377) (i) the term “serious” shall replace the term “severe” where it appears; and (ii) as to conduct occurring after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the term “serious and non-transitory mental harm (which need not be prolonged)” shall replace the term “prolonged mental harm” where it appears.

(Para 1378) (3) Inapplicability of certain provisions with respect to collateral damage or incident of lawful attack.—The intent specified for the conduct stated in subparagraphs (D), (E), and (F) or paragraph (1) precludes the applicability of those subparagraphs to an offense under subsection (a) by reasons of subsection (c)(3) with respect to—
(A) collateral damage; or

(Para 1379) (B) death, damage, or injury incident to a lawful attack.
(4)Inapplicability of taking hostages to prisoner exchange.—
Paragraph (1)(I) does not apply to an offense under subsection (a) by reason of subsection (c)(3) in the case of a prisoner exchange during wartime.

(Para 1380) (5) Definition of grave breaches.—
The definitions in this subsection are intended only to define the grave breaches of common Article 3 and not the full scope of United States obligations under that Article.

(Para 1381) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions through Intentionally created terrorists and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § are paragraphs 1382 to 1419. 842 – Unlawful acts § 842. Unlawful acts (a) It shall be unlawful for any person— (1) to engage in the business of importing, manufacturing, or dealing in explosive materials without a license issued under this chapter;

(Para 1382) (2) knowingly to withhold information or to make any false or fictitious oral or written statement or to furnish or exhibit any false, fictitious, or misrepresented identification, intended or likely to deceive for the purpose of obtaining explosive materials, or a license, permit, exemption, or relief from disability under the provisions of this chapter; these offenses applies to Soldiers who performed their duties in Afghanistan and Iraq.

(Para 1383) (3) other than a licensee or permittee knowingly—
(A) to transport, ship, cause to be transported, or receive any explosive materials; or (B) to distribute explosive materials to any person other than a licensee or permittee; or (4) who is a holder of a limited permit— (A) to transport, ship, cause to be transported, or receive in interstate or foreign commerce any explosive materials; or these offenses applies to Soldiers who performed their duties in Afghanistan and Iraq.

(Para 1384) (B) to receive explosive materials from a licensee or permittee, whose premises are located outside the State of residence of the limited permit holder, or on more than 6 separate occasions, during the period of the permit, to receive explosive materials from 1 or more licensees or permittees whose premises are located within the State of residence of the limited permit holder.

(Para 1385) (b) It shall be unlawful for any licensee or permittee to knowingly distribute any explosive materials to any person other than— (1) a licensee; (2) a holder of a user permit; or (3) a holder of a limited permit who is a resident of the State where distribution is made and in which the premises of the transferor are located.

(Para 1386) (c) It shall be unlawful for any licensee to distribute explosive materials to any person who the licensee has reason to believe intends to transport such explosive materials into a State where the purchase, possession, or use of explosive materials is prohibited or which does not permit its residents to transport or ship

(Para 1387) explosive materials into it or to receive explosive materials in it.
(d) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to distribute explosive materials to any individual who: (1) is under twenty-one years of age;
(2) has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

(Para 1388) (3) is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(4) is a fugitive from justice; (5) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)); (6) has been adjudicated a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution;

(Para 1389) (7) is an alien, other than an alien who—
(A) is lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act); (B) is in lawful nonimmigrant status, is a refugee admitted under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157), or is in asylum status under section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158), and—

(Para 1390) (i) is a foreign law enforcement officer of a friendly foreign government, as determined by the Secretary in consultation with the Secretary of State, entering the United States on official law enforcement business, and the shipping, transporting, possession, or receipt of explosive materials is in furtherance of this official law enforcement business; or

(Para 1391) (ii) is a person having the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a corporation, partnership, or association licensed pursuant to section 843(a), and the shipping, transporting, possession, or receipt of explosive materials is in furtherance of such power;

(Para 1392) (C) is a member of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or other friendly foreign military force, as determined by the Attorney General in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, who is present in the United States under military orders for training or other military purpose authorized by the United States and the shipping, transporting, possession, or receipt of explosive materials is in furtherance of the authorized military purpose; or

(Para 1393) (D) is lawfully present in the United States in cooperation with the Director of Central Intelligence, and the shipment, transportation, receipt, or possession of the explosive materials is in furtherance of such cooperation;
(8) has been discharged from the armed forces under dishonorable conditions;

(Para 1394) (9) having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced the citizenship of that person.
(e) It shall be unlawful for any licensee knowingly to distribute any explosive materials to any person in any State where the purchase, possession, or use by such person of such explosive materials would be in violation of any State law or any published ordinance applicable at the place of distribution. these offenses applies to Soldiers who performed their duties in Afghanistan and Iraq.

(Para 1395) (f) It shall be unlawful for any licensee or permittee willfully to manufacture, import, purchase, distribute, or receive explosive materials without making such records as the Attorney General may by regulation require, including, but not limited to, a statement of intended use, the name, date, place of birth, social security number or taxpayer identification number,

(Para 1396) and place of residence of any natural person to whom explosive materials are distributed. If explosive materials are distributed to a corporation or other business entity, such records shall include the identity and principal and local places of business and the name, date, place of birth, and place of residence of the natural person acting as agent of the corporation or other business entity in arranging the distribution.

(Para 1397) (g) It shall be unlawful for any licensee or permittee knowingly to make any false entry in any record which he is required to keep pursuant to this section or regulations promulgated under section 847 of this title.
(Para 1398) (h) It shall be unlawful for any person to receive, possess, transport, ship, conceal, store, barter, sell, dispose of, or pledge or accept as security for a loan, any stolen explosive materials which are moving as, which are part of, which constitute, or which have been shipped or transported in, interstate or foreign commerce,

(Para 1399) either before or after such materials were stolen, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the explosive materials were stolen.
(i) It shall be unlawful for any person— (1) who is under indictment for, or who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(2) who is a fugitive from justice;

(Para 1400) (3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)); (4) who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution;
(5) who is an alien, other than an alien who—

(Para 1401) (A) is lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act); (B) is in lawful nonimmigrant status, is a refugee admitted under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157), or is in asylum status under section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158), and—

(Para 1402) (i) is a foreign law enforcement officer of a friendly foreign government, as determined by the Secretary
1 in consultation with the Secretary of State, entering the United States on official law enforcement business, and the shipping, transporting, possession, or receipt of explosive materials is in furtherance of this official law enforcement business; or

(Para 1403) (ii) is a person having the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a corporation, partnership, or association licensed pursuant to section 843(a), and the shipping, transporting, possession, or receipt of explosive materials is in furtherance of such power;

(Para 1404) (C) is a member of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or other friendly foreign military force, as determined by the Attorney General in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, who is present in the United States under military orders for training or other military purpose authorized by the United States and the shipping, transporting, possession, or receipt of explosive materials is in furtherance of the authorized military purpose; or

(Para 1405) (D) is lawfully present in the United States in cooperation with the Director of Central Intelligence, and the shipment, transportation, receipt, or possession of the explosive materials is in furtherance of such cooperation;
(6) who has been discharged from the armed forces under dishonorable conditions;

(Para 1406) 2 (7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced the citizenship of that person
to ship or transport any explosive in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or to receive or possess any explosive which has been shipped or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce.

(Para 1407) (j) It shall be unlawful for any person to store any explosive material in a manner not in conformity with regulations promulgated by the Attorney General. In promulgating such regulations, the Attorney General shall take into consideration the class, type, and quantity of explosive materials to be stored, as well as the standards of safety and security recognized in the explosives industry.

(Para 1408) (k) It shall be unlawful for any person who has knowledge of the theft or loss of any explosive materials from his stock, to fail to report such theft or loss within twenty-four hours of discovery thereof, to the Attorney General and to appropriate local authorities. (l) It shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture any plastic explosive that does not contain a detection agent.

(Para 1409) (m) (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States, or export from the United States, any plastic explosive that does not contain a detection agent.

(Para 1410) (2) This subsection does not apply to the importation or bringing into the United States, or the exportation from the United States, of any plastic explosive that was imported or brought into, or manufactured in the United States prior to the date of enactment of this subsection by or on behalf of any agency of the United States

(Para 1411) performing military or police functions (including any military reserve component) or by or on behalf of the National Guard of any State, not later than 15 years after the date of entry into force of the Convention on the Marking of Plastic Explosives, with respect to the United States. (n) (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to ship, transport, transfer, receive, or possess any plastic explosive that does not contain a detection agent.

(Para 1412) (2) This subsection does not apply to— (A) the shipment, transportation, transfer, receipt, or possession of any plastic explosive that was imported or brought into, or manufactured in the United States prior to the date of enactment of this subsection by any person during the period beginning on that date and ending 3 years after that date of enactment; or

(Para 1413) (B) the shipment, transportation, transfer, receipt, or possession of any plastic explosive that was imported or brought into, or manufactured in the United States prior to the date of enactment of this subsection by or on behalf of any agency of the United States performing a military or police function (including any military reserve

(Para 1414) component) or by or on behalf of the National Guard of any State, not later than 15 years after the date of entry into force of the Convention on the Marking of Plastic Explosives, with respect to the United States.

(Para 1415) (o) It shall be unlawful for any person, other than an agency of the United States (including any military reserve component) or the National Guard of any State, possessing any plastic explosive on the date of enactment of this subsection, to fail to report to the Attorney General within 120 days after such date of enactment

(Para 1416) the quantity of such explosives possessed, the manufacturer or importer, any marks of identification on such explosives, and such other information as the Attorney General may prescribe by regulation. (p) Distribution of Information Relating to Explosives, Destructive Devices, and Weapons of Mass Destruction.—
(1)Definitions.—In this subsection—

(Para 1417) (A) the term “destructive device” has the same meaning as in section 921(a)(4); (B) the term “explosive” has the same meaning as in section 844(j); and (C) the term “weapon of mass destruction” has the same meaning as in section 2332a(c)(2).
(2) Prohibition.—It shall be unlawful for any person—

(Para 1418) (A) to teach or demonstrate the making or use of an explosive, a destructive device, or a weapon of mass destruction, or to distribute by any means information pertaining to, in whole or in part, the manufacture or use of an explosive, destructive device, or weapon of mass destruction, with the intent that the teaching, demonstration, or information be used for, or in furtherance of, an activity that constitutes a Federal crime of violence; or

(Para 1419) (B) to teach or demonstrate to any person the making or use of an explosive, a destructive device, or a weapon of mass destruction, or to distribute to any person, by any means, information pertaining to, in whole or in part, the manufacture or use of an explosive, destructive device, or weapon of mass destruction, knowing that such person intends to use the teaching, demonstration, or information for, or in furtherance of, an activity that constitutes a Federal crime of violence.

(Para 1420) Cited in violation of created terrorists and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 216 – Penalties and injunctions § 216. Penalties and injunctions (a) The punishment for an offense under section 203, 204, 205, 207, 208, or 209 of this title is the following: (1) Whoever engages in the conduct constituting the offense shall be imprisoned for not more than one year or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both.

(Para 1421) (2) Whoever willfully engages in the conduct constituting the offense shall be imprisoned for not more than five years or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both. The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against any person who engages in conduct constituting an offense under section 203, 204, 205, 207, 208, or 209

(Para 1422) of this title and, upon proof of such conduct by a preponderance of the evidence, such person shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $50,000 for each violation or the amount of compensation which the person received or offered for the prohibited conduct, whichever amount is greater. The imposition of a civil penalty under this subsection does not preclude any other criminal or civil statutory, common law, or administrative remedy, which is available by law to the United States or any other person.

(Para 1423) (c) If the Attorney General has reason to believe that a person is engaging in conduct constituting an offense under section 203, 204, 205, 207, 208, or 209 of this title, the Attorney General may petition an appropriate United States district court for an order prohibiting that person from engaging in such conduct.

(Para 1424) The court may issue an order prohibiting that person from engaging in such conduct if the court finds that the conduct constitutes such an offense. The filing of a petition under this section does not preclude any other remedy which is available by law to the United States or any other person.

(Para 1425) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 231 – Civil disorders § 231. Civil disorders (a) (1) Whoever teaches or demonstrates to any other person the use, application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary device, or technique capable of causing injury or death to persons,

(Para 1426) knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder which may in any way or degree obstruct, delay, or adversely affect commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce or the conduct or performance of any federally protected function; or

(Para 1427) (2) Whoever transports or manufactures for transportation in commerce any firearm, or explosive or incendiary device, knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be used unlawfully in furtherance of a civil disorder; or

(Para 1428) (3) Whoever commits or attempts to commit any act to obstruct, impede, or interfere with any fireman or law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his official duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder which in any way or degree obstructs, delays,

(Para 1429) or adversely affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce or the conduct or performance of any federally protected function—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Para 1430) (b) Nothing contained in this section shall make unlawful any act of any law enforcement officer which is performed in the lawful performance of his official duties.

(Para 1431) Cited in violation of Action and Inaction and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 844 – Penalties are from paragraphs 1432 to 1464. § 844. Penalties (a) Any person who— (1) violates any of subsections (a) through (i) or (l) through (o) of section 842 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both; and (2) violates subsection (p)(2) of section 842, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(Para 1432) (b) Any person who violates any other provision of section 842 of this chapter shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Para 1433) (c) (1) Any explosive materials involved or used or intended to be used in any violation of the provisions of this chapter or any other rule or regulation promulgated thereunder or any violation of any criminal law of the United States shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture, and all provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to the seizure, forfeiture, and disposition of firearms, as defined in section 5845(a) of that Code, shall, so far as applicable, extend to seizures and forfeitures under the provisions of this chapter.

(Para 1434) (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), in the case of the seizure of any explosive materials for any offense for which the materials would be subject to forfeiture in which it would be impracticable or unsafe to remove the materials to a place of storage or would be unsafe to store them, the seizing officer may destroy the explosive materials forthwith.

(Para 1435) Any destruction under this paragraph shall be in the presence of at least 1 credible witness. The seizing officer shall make a report of the seizure and take samples as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.
(3) Within 60 days after any destruction made pursuant to paragraph

(Para 1436) (2), the owner of (including any person having an interest in) the property so destroyed may make application to the Attorney General for reimbursement of the value of the property. If the claimant establishes to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that—
(A) the property has not been used or involved in a violation of law; or

(Para 1436) (B) any unlawful involvement or use of the property was without the claimant’s knowledge, consent, or willful blindness,
the Attorney General shall make an allowance to the claimant not exceeding the value of the property destroyed.

(Para 1437) (d) Whoever transports or receives, or attempts to transport or receive, in interstate or foreign commerce any explosive with the knowledge or intent that it will be used to kill, injure, or intimidate any individual or unlawfully to damage or destroy any building, vehicle, or other real or personal property, shall be imprisoned for not more than ten years, or fined under this title,

(Para 1438) or both; and if personal injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years or fined under this title, or both;

(Para 1439) and if death results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years, or to the death penalty or to life imprisonment.

(Para 1440) (e) Whoever, through the use of the mail, telephone, telegraph, or other instrument of interstate or foreign commerce, or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, willfully makes any threat, or maliciously conveys false information knowing the same to be false,

(Para 1441) concerning an attempt or alleged attempt being made, or to be made, to kill, injure, or intimidate any individual or unlawfully to damage or destroy any building, vehicle, or other real or personal property by means of fire or an explosive shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years or fined under this title, or both these offenses applies to Soldiers who performed their duties in Afghanistan and Iraq.

(Para 1442) (f) (1) Whoever maliciously damages or destroys, or attempts to damage or destroy, by means of fire or an explosive, any building, vehicle, or other personal or real property in whole or in part owned or possessed by, or leased to, the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or any institution or organization receiving Federal financial assistance, shall be imprisoned for not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years, fined under this title, or both.

(Para 1443) (2) Whoever engages in conduct prohibited by this subsection, and as a result of such conduct, directly or proximately causes personal injury or creates a substantial risk of injury to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties, shall be imprisoned for not less than 7 years and not more than 40 years, fined under this title, or both these offenses applies to Soldiers who performed their duties in Afghanistan and Iraq.

(Para 1444) (3) Whoever engages in conduct prohibited by this subsection, and as a result of such conduct directly or proximately causes the death of any person, including any public safety officer performing duties, shall be subject to the death penalty, or imprisoned for not less than 20 years or for life, fined under this title, or both these offenses applies to Soldiers who performed their duties in Afghanistan and Iraq.

(Para 1445) (g) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), whoever possesses an explosive in an airport that is subject to the regulatory authority of the Federal Aviation Administration, or in any building in whole or in part owned, possessed, or used by,

(Para 1446) or leased to, the United States or any department or agency thereof, except with the written consent of the agency, department, or other person responsible for the management of such building or airport, shall be imprisoned for not more than five years, or fined under this title, or both.

(Para 1447) (2) The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable to— (A) the possession of ammunition (as that term is defined in regulations issued pursuant to this chapter) in an airport that is subject to the regulatory authority of the Federal Aviation Administration if such ammunition is either in checked baggage or in a closed container; or

(Para 1448) (B) the possession of an explosive in an airport if the packaging and transportation of such explosive is exempt from, or subject to and in accordance with, regulations of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration for the handling of hazardous materials pursuant to chapter 51 of title 49.

(Para 1449) (h) Whoever— (1) uses fire or an explosive to commit any felony which may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, or
(2) carries an explosive during the commission of any felony which may be prosecuted in a court of the United States,

(Para 1450) including a felony which provides for an enhanced punishment if committed by the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or device shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years the illegally research of P.E.N.I.

(Para 1451) In the case of a second or subsequent conviction under this subsection, such person shall be sentenced to imprisonment for 20 years. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not place on probation or suspend the sentence of any person convicted of a violation of this subsection,

(Para 1452) nor shall the term of imprisonment imposed under this subsection run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment including that imposed for the felony in which the explosive was used or carried.

(Para 1453) (i) Whoever maliciously damages or destroys, or attempts to damage or destroy, by means of fire or an explosive, any building, vehicle, or other real or personal property used in interstate or foreign commerce or in any activity affecting interstate or foreign commerce shall be imprisoned for not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years, fined under this title, or both;

(Para 1454) and if personal injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be imprisoned for not less than 7 years and not more than 40 years, fined under this title, or both; and if death results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall also be subject to imprisonment for any term of years, or to the death penalty or to life imprisonment.

(Para 1455) (j) For the purposes of subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) of this section and section 842(p), the term “explosive” means gun powders, powders used for blasting, all forms of high explosives, blasting materials, fuse’s (other than electric circuit breakers), detonators, and other detonating agents, smokeless powders, other explosive or incendiary devices within the meaning of paragraph (5)

(Para 1456) of section 232 of this title, and any chemical compounds, mechanical mixture, or device that contains any oxidizing and combustible units, or other ingredients, in such proportions, quantities, or packing that ignition by fire, by friction, by concussion, by percussion, or by detonation of the compound, mixture, or device or any part thereof may cause an explosion.

(Para 1457) (k) A person who steals any explosives materials which are moving as, or are a part of, or which have moved in, interstate or foreign commerce shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years, fined under this title, or both.

(Para 1458) (l) A person who steals any explosive material from a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer, or from any permittee shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(Para 1459) (m) A person who conspires to commit an offense under subsection (h) shall be imprisoned for any term of years not exceeding 20, fined under this title, or both.

(Para 1460) (n) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person who conspires to commit any offense defined in this chapter shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

(Para 1461) (o) Whoever knowingly transfers any explosive materials, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such explosive materials will be used to commit a crime of violence (as defined in section 924(c)(3)) or drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 924(c)(2)) shall be subject to the same penalties as may be imposed under subsection (h) for a first conviction for the use or carrying of an explosive material.

(Para 1462) (p) Theft Reporting Requirement.— (1)In general.—
A holder of a license or permit who knows that explosive materials have been stolen from that licensee or permittee, shall report the theft to the Secretary  not later than 24 hours after the discovery of the theft.

(Para 1463) (2)Penalty.— A holder of a license or permit who does not report a theft in accordance with paragraph (1), shall be fined not more than $10,000, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(Para 1464) and look at the other countries following the very same Democracy values of Intentional Extreme Socialism which is an Intentional Eradication Extermination process and this has INTENTIONALLY ENDANGERED THE INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT…thus INTENTIONALLY CREATED WIDESPREAD OF TERRORISM CATASTROPHICALLY AFFECTING OUR ECONOMY AND COMMERCE AND KILLING PEOPLE IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES.

(Para 1465) HERE’S ARE ALL FEDERAL CODES VIOLATIONS AS WELL AS THE RICO Act and Conspiracy violations under cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 373 – (a) Solicitation to commit a crime of violence § 373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence.

(Para 1466) Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States,

(Para 1467) and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment

(Para 1468) or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years.

(Para 1469) (b) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal intent, the defendant prevented the commission of the crime solicited.

(Para 1470) A renunciation is not “voluntary and complete” if it is motivated in whole or in part by a decision to postpone the commission of the crime until another time or to substitute another victim or another but similar objective. If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.

(Para 1471) Cited in VIOLATIONS OF AND IN ACCORDANCE BY FEDERAL CODES are Defendants Actions and Inactions… by mass destruction, 2332h (relating to radiological dispersal devices relating to project P.E.N.I., and the E.P.R.I reports as in conjunctions with the FCC and EPA and cited in no guidelines and no prudent cautionary policies on chronic EMF exposure), and

(Para 1472) 2332i (relating to acts of nuclear terrorism), 2339 (relating to harboring terrorists, 2339A (relating to providing material support to terrorists), 2339B (relating to providing material support to terrorist organizations), 2339C (relating to financing of terrorism), and Intentionally created Domestic terrorism75 MILLION and Terrorists ??????????

(Para 1473) ### The Crimes against Genocide is Superimposed with the Crime of Aggression, and are Identical as the Crimes against Humanity and is Superimposed with the Crime of Aggression, and is Identical as War Crimes and is Superimposed with the Crime of Aggression.

(Para 1474) Article 9: Elements of Crimes and the progression of the Crime of Aggression:
Elements of Crimes shall assist the Court in the interpretation and application of articles 6, 7 and 8. They shall be adopted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Assembly of States Parties, and Ladies and Gentlemen of this Honorable Court is cited in violations of and in accordance with the Crime of War are

(Para 1475) Paragraphs 1 -205 are violations of Actions and Inactions and cited in accordance with in Product liability and tangible property rights, RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963. Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, and

(Para 1476) Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and

(Para 1477) 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518.

(Para 1478) Paragraphs 206 to 417 are violations of Actions and Inactions and cited in accordance with are the Civil suits in Federal Court including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth) , scientific misconduct, and includes murder in the 1st and 2nd,, RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963, Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, and

(Para 1479) Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371, and

(Para 1480) Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518, and

(Para 1481) AND NOW LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF THE RICO ACT, RACKETEERING, AND CONSPIRACY money wise,
18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government, 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, assault and battery, Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233), and

(Para 1482) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521), and

(Para 1483) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B), and

(Para 1484) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391), 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, and

(Para 1485) 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder.

(Para 1486) Paragraphs 418 to 760 are violations of Action and Inactions and cited in accordance with are States Court(s) committing Criminal charges in their respective Courts and in aiding and abetting a non-lawyer from a National advocacy center for Mental Health consumers, and illegally labeling me as a Vexatious litigant stopped me from filing Motions, Reply Memorandums, Objects or Appeals, and Defendants were all Mental Health law Centers, National Advocates, and

(Para 1487) NAMI the biggest mental health buffers working even with President Obama, Senator Grassley’s investigation of fraud and experimental blinding’s, and including including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth) , scientific misconduct, and includes murder in the 1st and 2nd,, and includes two Civil suits in Judge Kenneth S Sakamoto and Bert I Ayabe’s Court,

(Para 1488) and in the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to why the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL,

(Para 1489) and HERE IS WHY WITH THE FIRST PART OF THIS ILLEGAL RESEARCH called Psycho-Endo-Neuro-Immunology now referred to as (P.E.N.I.) Intentionally Created DOMESTIC TERRORISM and International Domestic Terrorism Through there Intentional Eradication Extermination Process due to the Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intention failures to Inform or Warn establishes the requisite “Intent”
(Para 1490) has entered psychiatry, neurology, neuro-immunolgy, and immunology and NARCOTERRORISM, and that is why the State Court(s), Federal Court(s), Legislature, Congress, the Media’s FDA, FCC, EPA and the President and his Administration are in violations of National Security Laws and International National Security Laws,

(Para 1492) are violations of and cited in accordance with RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, § 1963, Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business,

(Para 1493) Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees,

(Para 1494) 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518, AND NOW LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF THE RICO ACT, RACKETEERING, AND CONSPIRACY, and

(Para 1495) 18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government, 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, assault and battery, Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249), and

(Para 1496) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821), and

(Para 1497) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968) CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391), and

(Para 1498) HERE IS THE PROGRESSION OF THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, and

(Para 1499) 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder,

(Para 1500) and now enters the Crime of Aggression and its progression with Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism, CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM Domestic, and Intentionally Created International Domestic Terrorism (§§ 2331 to 2339D), 18 U.S. Code § 1841 – Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with and in violations of the Protection of unborn children, (killing babies), and cited in violation of and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2261 – Interstate domestic violence, and

(Para 1501) Paragraphs 761 to 781 are violations of Actions and Inactions and cited in accordance with THE ICC ARTICLES 1 thru 5 and what qualifies the ICC to have SOLE JURISDICTION and/or VENUE. HOW IS THIS FOR AFFECTING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE OR ECONOMY A 100+ Trillion dollar Federal False Claims Act suit which equals Three times 100 Trillion dollars that

(Para 1502) these Defendants has sustained because of Defendants’ actions, plus a civil penalty of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 for each violation of 31 U.S.C. §3729; (Now this alone is 75 Million times $5,500.00, and not more than $11,000.00) and bring in the 50-70 million more TBI consumers which would fetch this Court anywhere from Six Trillion to Twenty Two Trillion dollars on “just civil penalties” and

(Para 1503) to this Honorable Court in which this Court will ASSESS the Maximum and take the 22 Trillion plus, and the Criminal Charges against all Defendant are astronomical with just the Slap on the Wrist offenses they will already be sentenced for two life terms easily, the Progression of the Crime of Aggression

(Para 1504) and are violations of Actions and Inactions and cited in accordance with are States Court(s) committing Criminal charges in their respective Courts and in aiding and abetting a non-lawyer from a National advocacy center for Mental Health consumers, and illegally labeling me as a Vexatious litigant stopped me from filing Motions, Reply Memorandums, Objects or Appeals,

(Para 1505) and Defendants were all Mental Health law centers, National Advocates, NAMI the biggest mental health buffers working even with President Obama, Senator Grassley’s investigation of fraud and experimental blinding’s, and including Assault and battery Plagiarism, Libel and slander, denial of evidentiary matters (explained in depth) , scientific misconduct, and includes murder in the 1st and 2nd,,

(Para 1506) and includes two Civil suits in Judge Kenneth S Sakamoto and Bert I Ayabe’s Court, and in the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL,

(Para 1507) and HERE IS WHY WITH THE FIRST PART OF THIS ILLEGAL RESEARCH called Psycho-Endo-Neuro-Immunology now referred to as (P.E.N.I.) Intentionally Created DOMESTIC TERRORISM and International Domestic Terrorism (75 MILION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS)Through there Intentional Eradication Extermination Process due to the

(Para 1508) Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intention failures to Inform or Warn establishes the requisite “Intent” has entered psychiatry, neurology, neuro-immunolgy, and immunology and NARCOTERRORISM,

(Para 1508) and that is why the State Court(s), Federal Court(s), Legislature, Congress, the Media’s FDA, FCC, EPA and the President and his Administration are in violations of Actions and Inactions of National Security Laws and International National Security Laws, are violations of and cited in accordance with RICO Criminal Charges and Conspiracy Charges, and

(Para 1509) § 1963, Criminal penalties, § 1964. Civil remedies, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business, Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I – CRIMES (§§ 1 – 2725), Chapter 19 – CONSPIRACY (§§ 371 – 373), Section 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States,

(Para 1510) 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) §371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, Section 373 – Solicitation to commit a crime of violence, 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States, 18 U.S. Code § 1035 – False statements relating to health care matters, 18 U.S. Code § 1518 – Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses § 1518, AND NOW LOOK AT THE PROGRESSION OF THE RICO ACT, RACKETEERING, AND CONSPIRACY,

(Para 1511) 18 U.S. Code § 954 – False statements influencing foreign government, 18 U.S. Code § 914 – Creditors of the United States, assault and battery, Cited in U.S.C. CHAPTER 7 – ASSAULT (§§ 111 to 119) CHAPTER 11 – BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (§§ 201 to 227), and

(Para 1512) CHAPTER 12 – CIVIL DISORDERS (§§ 231 to 233) CHAPTER 13 – CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241 to 249) CHAPTER 15 – CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT (§§ 281 to 293), CHAPTER 23 – CONTRACTS (§§ 431 to 443) CHAPTER 43 – FALSE PERSONATION (§§ 911 to 917), CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS (§§ 1001 to 1040) CHAPTER 50A – GENOCIDE (§§ 1091 to 1093) CHAPTER 51 – HOMICIDE (§§ 1111 to 1122), and

(Para 1513) CHAPTER 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (§§ 1501 to 1521) CHAPTER 79 – PERJURY (§§ 1621 to 1623) CHAPTER 89 – PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS (§ 1821) CHAPTER 93 – PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (§§ 1901 to 1924) CHAPTER 95 – RACKETEERING (§§ 1951 to 1960), CHAPTER 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (§§ 1961 to 1968), and

(Para 1514) THE Progression of the Crime of Aggression as cited in CHAPTER 105 – SABOTAGE (§§ 2151 to 2157) CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM (§§ 2331 to 2339D) CHAPTER 113C – TORTURE (§§ 2340 to 2340B) CHAPTER 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (§§ 2381 to 2391), 18 U.S. Code § 1621 – Perjury generally, 18 U.S. Code § 1622 – Subornation of perjury, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, and

(Para 1515) 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, 18 U.S. Code § 1506 – Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail, 18 U.S. Code § 1509 – Obstruction of court orders, 18 U.S. Code § 1510 – Obstruction of criminal investigations, 18 U.S. Code § 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court, and

(Para 1516) 18 U.S. Code § 1018 – Official certificates or writings, 18 U.S. Code § 1111 – Murder, 18 U.S. Code § 1113 – Attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, and 18 U.S. Code § 1117 – Conspiracy to murder, and now enters Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM Domestic, and International Domestic Terrorism (§§ 2331 to 2339D), 18 U.S. Code § 1841 – Cited in and in accordance with are violations in the Protection of unborn children, (killing babies), and cited in violation of and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2261 – Interstate domestic violence.

(Para 1517) Paragraphs 782 to 896 are violations of and cited in accordance with the great Era of Sedition influencers and now including all charges from aboves paragraphs, but now including National Security violations and International National Security violations, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, and

(Para 1518) destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business and INTRODUCING SEQUESTRATION and Sequestration Multiplication process when our Federal Deficit which will be 571 Trillion dollars by the year 2037 surpassing our economy, and are violations of and cited in accordance with goes into everything cited above but now including the monetary intent aspects of all defendants, and

(Para 1519) that is perverse by the dumb fucks when sequestrations multiplication process has gotten all Defendants into a 100+ trillion dollar False Claims Act fraud-ing its own taxpayers, which in the ICC will get 3 X this settlement of 300+ trillion, and has created Crimes of Genocide, Crimes on Humanity, Crimes of war And for the First Crimes of Aggression, and international national security violation creating this environmental impact that has become so catastrophic, also making our health systems and the Presidents, legislature Congress Supreme Courts, FDA, FCC, and EPA the number 1 cause of death,

(Para 1520) CITED in paragraphs 897 to 1036 cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with National Security laws and International National Security Laws #CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS, #INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCIES, PRESIDENTIAL POWER AND PERSUASION, #CONGRESS: DOES AN EFFECTIVE CHECK REMAIN ON PRESIDENTIAL POWER? , and

(Para 1521) and #ENTER THE JUDICIARY: WILL IT ACT TO RESTORE THE BALANCE?, KEYS TO EFFECTIVE PRESIDENTIAL LEADERSHIP CONGRESSIONAL-PRESIDENTIAL COLLABORATION has already PROVEN to be an Overwhelming widespread of SEDITION and CONCLUSION, Domestic and International Law, and when all Defendants Countries have Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism in their own right…and

(Para 1522) then Domestic and International Law has become Incompetent and rendered mootness under legal Malfeasance. ENTER THE GREAT ERA OF SEDITION also known as treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness, subversion, mutiny, rebellion, high treason, lèse-majesté, apostasy, and perfidy..

(Para1523) Our next President can be impeached right after being sworn into office as well as other incumbent Presidents and/or Prime Ministers in other Countries. #THINK TANKS, #The Revolving Door using both the public media (whom I’ve shown to have Political Agenda’s and is a Major Influencer that has become Malice and are in Direct violations of National Security Law violations and International National Security Law violations)

(Para 1524) and their own publishing resources, as well as the Internet, think tanks attempt to engage and educate the public. and these are the other countries (Defendants) following in the USA footsteps creating and truly the 1st of a kind in the history when a World creates a Multi-Continent economic collapse at just about the same time… and

(Para 1525) in what I call “Creating a Dumb-ino (domino) Effect”, and the progression of all Defendants constitutes a Grand Scale Conspiracy with Defendants operation of management of the enterprise, and the pattern. Then the relatedness, and then continuity, and then multiple schemes and the pattern, and then racketeering activity, and then the issue of consent, and then extortion under Color of Official Right,

(Para 1526) and then extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Governmental Power(s) that are Defendants ranging from the State Court(s), Federal Court(s), Legislature, Senators, Presidential candidates, Private Companies, and then other predicate acts related to extortion, and then extraterritorial acts (Defendants Countries speaks for itself), and

(Para 1527) IDENTIFY AND DETERMINE IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL INTERESTS AND DOMESTIC POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS, Survival interests represent the single most important interests for any actor OBLITERATED. This is the very essence of the actor’s existence—the protection of its citizens and institutions from attack by enemies, both foreign and domestic.

(Para 1528) Prevent the regional proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), BUT IN THIS INCIDENT MASS DESTRUCTION DOESN’T HAVE TO BE “WEAPONS THESE COUNTRIES ARE EXTERMINATING ERADICATING 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS AND ANOTHER 50-70 MILLION TBI CONSUMERS, and this how many TBI consumers there are PER YEAR.

(Para 1529) This characterization does include qualitative and quantitative violations, and it has because of the Intent through the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL.

(Para 1530) ANALYZE RISK FOR EACH OPTION (Policy decisions affect a complex system of interdependent and interacting dynamics in the environment in this Case the Battlefield was created) and the impact of these intended consequences will carry a much heavier worldwide burden when risk analyze for each option LEAVES THE INTERNATIONAL FOREIGN POLICY OPTIONS NO OPTIONS

(Para 1531) it’s like a cancer you must cut out the cancer with the remaining Defendants who have one twelfth of the 300+ Trillion dollars false claims act. There are many ways to assess policy-relevant internal and external environmental factors, threats,

(Para 1532) and hazards and characterize the likelihood of their occurrence and/or concurrence is that has been and it continues to be ongoing and, is through a Conspiracy of multiple sedition’s (the Great ERA of Sedition). NATIONAL SECURITY POWERS: ARE THE CHECKS IN BALANCE? CHAPTER 9 INTERNATIONAL ORDER, DEFINING INTERNATIONAL ORDER,

(Para 1533) THE MAJOR IR THEORETICAL PARADIGMS, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism. THAT COSTS THE TAXPAYERS WORLDWIDE OVER a 150 TRILION DOLLARS (since just the year 2000 to present) in WHICH THE HEALTH SYSTEM DOESN’’T EVEN COME CLOSE TO A FRACTION IN GROSS PROFITS WHICH IS NOT STIMULATING OUR ECONOMY PERIOD

(Para 1534) COMPARED TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS AND THIS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENTAL DEFICIT that includes our Health System(s) as the Major causes and is the #1 cause of Death. THE MAJOR IR THEORETICAL PARADIGMS, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism and to be an Idealist was always discouraged (delusional)-TO BAD IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN DISCOURAGED.

(Para 1535) CHAPTER 11 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations) INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY AND AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY REALISM AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS LIBERAL INSTITUTIONALIST RESPONSE, CONSTRUCTIVISTS AND THE SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, and

(Para 1536) CONCLUSION: TOWARD A GRAND STRATEGY OF HEGEMONY and Hegemony is also a Delusion (as defined as leadership and/or dominance), and Obama’s newest suggested strategy of a One World Order.

(Para 1537) The widespread of the Democracy Delusion with Defendants who think they are Powerhouses such as the United States, Germany, France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Japan, China, Nigeria, and Columbia. Defendants have proven to be Derelict Murders as opposed to Hegemony and this is the widespread of the Democracy Delusion of Grandeur being exposed.

(Para 1538) Delivery systems; prevent the emergence of a regional hegemony in important regions; promote the well-being of allies and friends and protect them from external aggression (ONLY BECAUSE THIS IS INTERNAL AGGRESSION) that created the International External AGGRESSION and the furtherance of progression and constitutes these Defendants as being Heinously Incompetent to

(Para 1539) having any further input into Foreign Policy as it has already created an International Environmental Impact that “can be compared to Thermo Nuclear War”. #UNILATERALISM, MULTILATERALISM, ALONE OR WITH OTHERS? The rhetoric in the dispute between multi-literalist and unilateralist approaches obscures that there are few foreign policy decisions that are purely one or the other.

(Para 1540) THIS WILL SOLIDIFY FOREIGN POLICY ONCE AND FOR ALL as a Major Concern especially for the United States of America, Britain, China, Japan, South East Asia, South America, Nigeria, and now with Asian interests in Africa.

(Para 1541) These Countries Can’t be Influenced into what are Major Economical, and Environmental impact situations and must form different Alliances/Unions in addressing these two Universal topics of such importance that they must not go down with these sinking ships.

(Para 1542) Unilateralists and multi-lateralists agree that there is little room for compromise on such fundamental issues as survival interests, and COMPROMISE HAS REACHED A POINT OF NO RETURN WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES ON SURVIVAL INTERESTS.

(Para 1543) Finally, both unilateralists and multi-lateralists agree that the United States should seek to build an international order that will favor the expansion of American values (this has diminished forever in everyone’s hearts especially in the USA political arena, and when Americans and other Defendants “citizens” here about this Court case), “their hearts will be as one broken”.

(Para 1544) To help preserve America’s dominant position in the world. The United States has a unique opportunity to establish international rules and standards that protect American interests (THEY NEVER HAVE), and this is not protecting American interests or standards through dominance (dominance as cited in Hegemony)

(Para 1545) pronounced he•gem•o•ny, in “gem” these Defendants are only colored glass not even a semi-precious gem, and it represents the interests and standards that once was. America’s dominance is distorted and Derelict just like its Health System, and with project P.E.N.I., and when your Health system is the #1 cause of death its then is Identical to the Morals and Values of what our Country Has Become as is the other Defendants Countries.

(Para 1546) CONCLUSION: RECENT TRENDS IN U.S. FOREIGN POLICY #CHAPTER 13 POLICIES ON DEMOCRACY, THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING DEMOCRACY AND YES DEMOCRACY NOW HAS A VERY MAJOR PROBLEM IN DEFINING OR RE-DEFING DEMOCRACY…IT HAS BECOME THE WIDESPREAD OF THE DEMOCRACY DELUSION OF GRANDEUR same like what killing the United States and the other Defendant Countries.

(Para 1547) CHAPTER 14 WORLD REGIONS AND ONE WORLD ORDER…is now Obama’s pleads to the World and a heads up as to how the new administration would be under Hillary Clinton, because the United States of America can’t get out of what they created in these instant Criminal Charges and with other Defendant Countries, and there is NO Regional Stability,

(Para 1548) creating a very huge Regional Conflict, and it has created and Embedded Terrorism and a direct violation of Jus in bello. CHAPTER 15 “LAWYERS, GUNS, AND MONEY”: #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AND U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS DIRECT THREATS, and REMEMBER “TERRORISTS THESE ARE ALL INTENTIONALLY CREATED THREATS”

(Para 1549) to cover-up a Super Huge Intentional Eradication Extermination process with 75 Million Mental Health consumers, and about 300 million more as cited in this Criminal Investigation. #CHAPTER 8 SECURING AMERICA FROM ATTACK (and the “created terrorists” are here in the United States, Germany, Belgium and abroad and my prototype will resolve this intentionally created worldwide environmental impact and expose this truth behind this Criminal investigation “beyond a reasonable doubt”:

(Para 1550) #ALTHOUGH IN PRE 9/11 the USA and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES KNEW ABOUT THE TWIN TOWERS AS BEING TARGETS and LET IT HAPPEN…IT’S THE OTHER PEARL HARBOR and YES I CAN PROVE THIS and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES WHO ARE NAMED in this instant Criminal investigation and WITH THE PROOF my Prototype called HALLELUJAH.

(Para 1551) Paragraphs 1037 to 1105 Article 6: Genocide Crimes against Genocide and is Superimposed with the Crime of Aggression.
(a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
This is what qualifies Criminal charges against all Defendants under Article 6 of the Crimes of Genocide (a), (b), and (c).

(Para 1552) Cited from paragraphs 1037 to 1105 ### Article 7 the Crimes against Humanity: The Crimes against Genocide are Identical as the Crimes against Humanity, but the Crimes against Humanity is being even more Superimposed with the Crimes of Aggression.

(Para 1553) 2. Amendments to the Elements of Crimes may be proposed by:
(a) Any State Party; Excluding Defendants United States of America, Britain (UK), Ukraine, France, Columbia, Lebanon, Netherlands, Mexico, Spain, Germany, Belgium, China, Japan, Italy, Nigeria, Turkey, Pakistan and India (Defendants), and cited below with other Governmental and Non-Governmental Organizations.

(Para 1554) Such amendments shall be adopted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Assembly of States Parties.
3. The Elements of Crimes and amendments thereto shall be consistent with this Statute.

(Para 1555) Article 8: War crimes cited BELOW are ALL VIOLATIONS in accordance with the U.N. Articles/Geneva Convention as well as the ICC Articles as well as was cited Federal Codes and in violations of National Security law and International National Security law and it applies to the 75 Million mental health consumers as well.
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.
2. For the purpose of this Statute, “war crimes” means:

(Para 1556) (a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention: (i) Willful killing; (ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; (iii) Willfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health; AND THIS IS HAPPENING in the USA, GERMANY, BELGIUM, FRANCE through the intentional creation of International Terrorism.

(Para 1557) (iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly; (v) Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power; (vi) Willfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial; (vii) Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; (viii) Taking of hostages.

(Para 1558) (b) Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: (i) Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;

(Para 1559) (ii) Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives; (iii) Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict;

(Para 1560) (iv) Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;

(Para 1561) (v) Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives; (vi) Killing or wounding a combatant who, having laid down his arms or having no longer means of defense, has surrendered at discretion; (vii) Making improper use of a flag of truce, of the flag or of the military insignia and uniform of the enemy or of the United Nations, as well as of the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions, resulting in death or serious personal injury; AS APPLIED TO CREATED TERRORISM???????????????????????????????

(Para 1562) (viii) The transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or outside this territory; (ix) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;

(Para 1563) (x) Subjecting persons who are in the power of an adverse party to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest, and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health of such person or persons;

(Para 1564) (xi) Killing or wounding treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army; (xii) Declaring that no quarter will be given; (xiii) Destroying or seizing the enemy’s property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war; (xiv) Declaring abolished, suspended or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party;

(Para 1565) (xv) Compelling the nationals of the hostile party to take part in the operations of war directed against their own country, even if they were in the belligerent’s service before the commencement of the war; (xvi) Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault;

(Para 1566) (xvii) Employing poison or poisoned weapons; (xviii) Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices; (xix) Employing bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core or is pierced with incisions;

(Para 1567) (xx) Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123;

(Para 1568) (xxi) Committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; (xxii) Committing rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, as defined in article 7, paragraph 2 (f), enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence also constituting a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions; (xxiii) Utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military operations;

(Para 1569) (xxiv) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; (xxv) Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including willfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; (xxvi) Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities.

(Para 1570) (c) In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause:

(Para 1571) (i) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; (ii) Committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; (iii) Taking of hostages;

(Para 1572) (iv) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which are generally recognized as indispensable.

(Para 1573) (d) Paragraph 2 (c) applies to armed conflicts not of an international character and thus does not apply to situations of internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence or other acts of a similar nature.

(Para 1574) (e) Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in armed conflicts not of an international character, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: (i) Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;

(Para 1575) (ii) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law;

(Para 1576) (iii) Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict;

(Para 1577) (iv) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives; (v) Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; (vi) Committing rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, as defined in article 7, paragraph 2 (f), enforced sterilization, and any other form of sexual violence also constituting a serious violation of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions;

(Para 1578) (vii) Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into armed forces or groups or using them to participate actively in hostilities; (viii) Ordering the displacement of the civilian population for reasons related to the conflict, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand; (ix) Killing or wounding treacherously a combatant adversary; (x) Declaring that no quarter will be given;

(Para 1579) (xi) Subjecting persons who are in the power of another party to the conflict to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest, and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health of such person or persons;

(Para 1580) (xii) Destroying or seizing the property of an adversary unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of the conflict; (f) Paragraph 2 (e) applies to armed conflicts not of an international character and thus does not apply to situations of internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots,

(Para 1581) Isolated and sporadic acts of violence or other acts of a similar nature. It applies to armed conflicts that take place in the territory of a State when there is protracted armed conflict between governmental authorities and organized armed groups or between such groups.
(Para 1582) 3. Nothing in paragraph 2 (c) and (e) shall affect the responsibility of a Government to maintain or re-establish law and order in the State or to defend the unity and territorial integrity of the State, by all legitimate means.

The Crime of Aggression
(Para 1583) The Crimes against Genocide, and the Crimes against Humanity and the Crimes of War Crimes are Identical with each other Crimes although there is a progression into and is Super Imposed with the Crimes of Aggression as cited by the Rome Statutes of the ICC including prima facie evidence and beyond a reasonable doubt;

(Para 1584) 2. The Court shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a provision is adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and setting out the conditions under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to this crime by 2017. Such a provision shall be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations. As the United States of America’s Federal Codes,

(Para 1585) including Article 2, Article 3, Article 5, Article 6, Article 7, Article 8, Article 12, Article 18, Article 19, Article 25 (1) (2), Article 27 (2), Article 28, and. Article 29 (1) (2 (3).

(Para 1586) Definition of the crime of aggression: Article 8 bis adopted in Kampala defines the individual crimes of aggression as the planning, preparation, initiation or execution by a person in a leadership position of an act of aggression. Importantly, it contains the threshold requirement that the act of aggression must constitute a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

(Para 1587) An act of aggression is defined as the use of armed force by one State against another State without the justification of self-defense or authorization by the Security Council. The definition of the act of aggression, as well as the actions qualifying as acts of aggression contained in the amendments (for example invasion by armed forces, bombardment and blockade), are influenced by the UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974.

(Para 1588) Where a ‘situation’ is referred to the Prosecutor by the UN Security Council, article 15 ter of the Statute provides that the Court’s jurisdiction is triggered in the same manner as with the other crimes in the Statute, meaning the Prosecutor may proceed with an investigation into the crime of aggression. In contrast to Security Council referrals, under article 15 bis, the Prosecutor may only proceed with an own motion (proprio motu) investigation or an investigation based on a State referral of a situation into the crime of aggression:.

(Para 1589) Non-State Parties have been explicitly excluded from the Court’s jurisdiction into a crime of aggression under this article when committed by that State’s nationals or on its territory.
Both articles 15 bis and 15 ter note that any determination by an organ outside of the Court (such as the Security Council) will be without prejudice to the Court’s own finding of an act of aggression.

(Para 1590) Adoption and entry into force: The amendments were adopted by consensus in accordance with article 5(2) of the Statute and will enter into force under article 121(5). However, the provisions of both article 15 bis

(Para 1591) and article 15 ter provide that the Court will not be able to exercise its jurisdiction over the crime of aggression until: at least 30 States Parties have ratified or accepted the amendments; and a decision is taken by two–thirds of States Parties to activate the jurisdiction at any time after 1 January 2017.

(Para 1592) ICC position on the crime of aggression: The Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC) represents over 2500 organizations (AND ALL Governmental and Non-Governmental Organizations MUST RECUSE THEMSELVES they are Defendants) that strongly support the Rome Statute system from all over the world with differing mandates and expertise.

HERE ARE THE DEFENDANTS:
(Para 1593) Amnesty International, Article 19, Breakthrough (human rights), Carter Center, Center for Economic and Social Rights, Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian law, Coalition for the International Criminal Court, Committee of Concerned Scientists, Committee to Protect Journalists, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, Cultural Survival, and

(Para 1594) Disabled Peoples’ International, Enough Project, Equality Now, Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, Every Human Has Rights, Freedom from Torture, Freedom House, Front Line Defenders, Society for Threatened Peoples, GIRCA, Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, Global Rights, Habitat International Coalition, Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, and

(Para 1595) Helsinki Watch, Hindu American Foundation, Hindu Human Rights, Human Life International, Human Rights Internet, Human Rights First, Human Rights Foundation, Human Rights Internet, Human Rights Watch, Human Rights Without Frontiers, Institute for War and Peace Reporting, International Alliance of Women, International Center for Transitional Justice, International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, and

(Para 1596) International Centre for Human Rights Research, International Disability Alliance, International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, International Committee of the Red Cross (private, sovereign organization), International Federation for Human Rights, International Foundation for Human Rights and Tolerance, and

(Para 1597) International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (federation of 15 other human rights organizations not included in this list; now bankrupt due to fraud), International Humanist and Ethical Union, International Human Rights Commission-IHRC, http://www.ihrchq.org, International Institute of Human Rights, International League for Human Rights, International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR), and

(Para 1598) International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims, International Service for Human Rights, International Society for Human Rights, Islamic Human Rights Commission, JUSTICE, Mind Freedom International, Minority Rights Group International, National Labor Committee in Support of Human and Worker Rights, International Organization of Human Rights IOHR (OIDO), No Peace Without Justice, and

(Para 1599) Peace Brigades International, Physicians for Human Rights, Point of Peace Foundation, Peace University, Protection International, Reporters Without Borders, Redress Trust, Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, Society for Threatened Peoples, Survival International, Tahirih Justice Center, The Advocacy Project, and

(Para 1600) The Sentinel Project for Genocide Prevention, Transparency International, UN Watch, World Council of Churches, World Organization Against Torture, Witness (human rights group), Womankind Worldwide, Women’s Learning Partnership for Rights, Development, and Peace, World Future Council, World Organization Against Torture, and

(Para 1601) Youth for Human Rights International, Regional non-governmental organizations, Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (Arab world), Arab Commission for Human Rights (Arab world), Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (Asia), Asian Human Rights Commission (Asia), Asian Centre for Human Rights (Asia), and

(Para 1602) Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (Commonwealth nations), Ecumenical Center for Human Rights (Americas), Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (Euro-Mediterranean region), European Roma Rights Centre (Europe), Federal Union of European Nationalities (Europe), Helsinki Citizens Assembly (Europe), Human Rights Foundation (Americas), and

(Para 1603) Human Rights Trust of Southern Africa (Southern Africa), International Association of Independent Journalists Inc. (Canada, England & elsewhere), Journalists for Human Rights (Africa), Kurdish Human Rights Project (Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Iran & elsewhere), UNESCO): World Health Organization (WHO), SAMSHA, Active Minds, Amen Clinics, and

(Para 1604) American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, American Association for the Abolition of Involuntary Mental Hospitalization, American Association of Community Psychiatrists, American Board of Professional Psychology, and

(Para 1605) American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, American College Counseling Association, American College of Psychiatrists, American Counseling Association, American Group Psychotherapy Association, American Mental Health Foundation, American Osteopathic Board of Neurology and Psychiatry, American Psychiatric Association, and

(Para 1606) Association of LGBTQ Psychiatrists, Association of Medical Superintendents of American Institutions for the Insane, Aurora Mental Health Center, Berkeley Free Clinic, Biofeedback Certification International Alliance, Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, Center for the Prevention of Suicide, Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis, Cole Resource Center, Compeer, CONREP, Consumer Action Network, and

(Para 1607) Copeland Center for Wellness and Recovery, CrisisLink, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (Greater Houston), Fountain House (self-help program), Freedom Center (mental health organization), Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, Independence Center (St. Louis), International OCD Foundation, International Society for Bipolar Disorders, and

(Para 1608) International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, Jennifer Mudd Houghtaling Postpartum Depression Foundation, Justice Resource Institute, Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Mental Health Association of Portland, Mental Health Association of San Francisco, Mental Research Institute, and

(Para 1609) Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, National Alliance on Mental Illness and the Stanley Foundation, National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, National Child Traumatic Stress Network, National Empowerment Center, National Institute of Mental Health, National Mental Health Anti-Stigma Campaign, National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, and

(Para 1610) Naval Center for Combat and Operational Stress Control, New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, New Jersey Association for Infant Mental Health, North American Society of Adlerian Psychology, Palladia (social services organization), Recovery International, Samaritan Institute, Sensory Processing Disorder Foundation, Service Program for Older People, Suicide Prevention Action Network USA, Aristides Hatzis who is the

(Para 1611) Associate Professor of Law & Economics and Legal Theory at the University of Athens, Genocide scholars, educators, and activists such as Aleksandar Veljic, Claudia Moscovici, Summer Programmes Office University of Amsterdam Graduate School of Social Sciences, Beverley Chalmers, Anthonie Holslag Teacher at University of Amsterdam, Goran Basic Postdoctoral Researcher in Sociology, and

(Para 1612) Department of Sociology, Lund University, and the other 679 members and Doctors, Re: Newly Unlocked UN Archive Confirms Horrors First Exposed in “Genocide Revealed” genocide revealed.com• A UN archive sealed for 70 years confirms Holocaust atrocities first exposed in detail in Aleksandar Veljic’s “Genocide Re: from Willard Max Imamoto What’s with the Holocaust in this age in time?

(Para 1613) The Holocaust is History and I have presented to you a “new form” of Genocide that has already exceeded the Holocaust (10X) and all World Wars, and the War on Terrorism. Ladies and Gentlemen I have received No input or response in your discussion topics from such Notable as yourselves. Only the Great Genocide Scholar Gregory Stanton had some balls as to approach Genocide in a slightly different way.

(Para 1614) It seems Genocide Scholars are stuck with the same routine with Genocide and war and/or Malfeasant Dictators and if you review my blogs (which you already did) you will see that 99.9% of what your basing your narrow minded affixation(s) upon are now known as Smoke Screens to the Bigger picture of what is happening here in the

(Para 1615) United States of America and abroad where there is a huge Intentional Eradication Extermination process by our Health and Mental Health system and the Court(s) both State and Federal and has reached both Supreme Courts that’s being Shrouded, Cloaked, and Avoided by the USA, and the United Nations (in which I already set up Ban Ki Moon & Zapaday about 3-4 years ago and documented), and now by Genocide Scholars as your dumb ass selves.

(Para 1616) Hey anyway you’ve just been set up, because this now goes ballistic publically, and this just a small sample as to the Governmental Agencies and NGO’s that I contact dealing in economy, cultural and social, activists that could have about 5 more pages of Defendants…

(Para 1617) so when I say to the ICC when the 2500 Governmental and/or NGO’s have NO SAY in this Instant Criminal Case they have NO SAY which is excellent as they are Influencers from abroad and active in the United Nations as well.

IN CONCLUSION:
1) Ladies and Gentlemen of this Honorable Court from the beginning of this Criminal investigation we started with product liability and Under Product Liability Law of products in the form of “Tangible Personal Property” and when referencing this subject it refers to “Body” specifically as “Ownership of Body”,

2) and is further supported by HRS (Hawaii Revised Statutes, and/or Revised Statutes with every other State), and that the validity of property does depend on Whether the “property right” requires enforcement by the state, and that Different forms of “property” require different amounts of enforcement, and the Pharmaceutical Companies “purported Product”

3) and the Only Product enforced in HRS) due to the insistence of its purported product by its conduits and ultimately in State Court citing’s that influenced State Legislators into enacting a stringent amount of enforcement that has enable a “Special Relationship” that was Created or Assumed by the State

4) and the Antipsychotic Pharmaceutical Companies who never Objected to this “Special Relationship” of Tangible Personal Property Rights of our Body and/or Ownership or Co-Ownership of our Body.

5) Product liability is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause.

6) This IS THREEFOLD and shared by the State and Pharmaceutical Company (example Defendants Janssen Pharmaceutical s Inc., now of Johnson and Johnson, and Johnson and Johnson) and the Federal Government in their mutual responsibility in ownership of our body, that went into the RICO Act for Criminal Charges is where this collaborative effort(s) begins.

7) Under the RICO Act Title 18 U.S.C. the progression of all Defendants constitutes a Grand Scale Conspiracy with Defendants operation of management of the enterprise, and the pattern. Then the relatedness, and then continuity, and then multiple schemes and the pattern, and then racketeering activity, and then the issue of consent, and then extortion under Color of Official Right,

8) and then extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Governmental Power(s) that are Defendants ranging from the State Court(s), Federal Supreme Court(s), Legislature, Senators, Presidential administration(s) and candidates, Private Companies, and then other predicate acts related to extortion, and then extraterritorial acts of racketeering cited in Criminal penalties and civil remedies, Solicitation to commit a crime of violence.

9) Then it went into Conspiracy Charges Therefore, the very act of an agreement with criminal intent (along with an overt act, where required) is considered sufficiently dangerous to warrant charging conspiracy as an offense separate from the intended crime. Once an agreement with criminal intent is made, the conspiracy is complete, unless the applicable statute requires the additional element of an overt act. The agreement need not be written or formal, and it may be proved by Circumstantial Evidence.

10) Intent Criminal intent is also necessary to create a conspiracy. These Defendants have join forces with, join together with, joint effort, joint planning, maneuvering, plan, plot, plot together, proposal, scheme, scheme together, take part in a crime together, take part with another in crime, treasonable alliance, underplot, unlawful combination, unlawful contrivance, unlawful plan, unlawful scheme.

11) That violated the Commerce Clause (here’s a little bit of a rattle snake to regulating commerce) by interfering this with the ECONOMICS (a False Claims Act of 300 Trillion and more between the Federal Government (Defendants) Illegal allocation of funds to the State (Defendants) and fraud-ing taxpayers.

12) The other Court cases cited in this Criminal investigation progressed into the Intentionally Created “domestic terrorism” and “international domestic terrorism” cite in violations of Actions and Inactions, and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2331 are the violations against all Defendants – Definitions the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State with 75 Million other mental health consumers;

13) (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

14) (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. That has influence other Governments into an Intentional Eradication Extermination process dealing with 75 Million mental health consumers and has Obliterated the Supremacy of the Law(s) of the United States and other Defendants Countries.

15) ##THAT’S WHY I’VE SUBMITTED ABSTRACT FROM SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS FROM THE DEFENDANTS IN THIS CRIMINAL CASE; Re: of MACAQUE MONKEY’S who didn’t have Schizophrenia or Bipolar diseases and given antipsychotics for 18-22 months and proving various areas of structural brain damage in the White and Gray matter by as much as 8-11 % in such a short amount of time.

16) Just gathering the simple physical evidence NECESSARY ONCE AND FOR ALL in entering Extensive structural brain damage caused by over antipsychotic(s) usage through various dimensional imaging tests such as MRI, functional fMRI, SPECT, or PET scans based on the children who are not diagnosed with having schizophrenia or bipolar Diseases,

17) but only having ADD, ADHD and behaviors and who’s been on an antipsychotic regime (polypharmacy) for over 10 years or longer, and Many of Hawaii’s Methamphetamine Users (dual diagnosis) who doesn’t possess these a Degenerative Brain Processes for Schizophrenics or enlarged ventricles, and those diagnosed with having Bipolar and possessing enlarged amygdala’s),

18) but only a Drug Psychosis and been on a antipsychotic regime (polypharmacy) for 20-35 years will show Extensive Structural Brain Damage with Shrinkage in the Gray and White matter, cause the Basal Ganglia, Caudate Nucleus or Thalamus to be Enlarged, also causes Death of Neurons, and affecting the Oligodendrocytes and Astrocytes the insulation to the firing of neurons.

19) Giving a DEFINITE DETERMINE that ANTIPSYCHOTICS is TO DANGEROUS FOR ANY USE IN WHICH “NONE” OF THE DEFENDANTS WHO ARE “RESEARCH NEUROLOGISTS AND PSYCHIATRISTS HAVE WHOLE HEARTEDLY INTENTIONALLY AVOIDED THIS LIABILITY” AND SO HAS THE FDA, and CREATED THE INTENTIONALLY FAILED TO INFORM AND/OR WARN AND COULD HAVE SAVED MILLIONS OF LIVES BY NOW instead of using Macaque Monkeys they could have done it with the Obvious Evidence I presented here, but didn’t!

20) Then in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2332b – Acts of terrorism transcending … The term narcoterrorism More recently, the term has been used to refer to groups who use terrorism on behalf of a political agenda (and are known as terrorist groups), who use drug trade to finance their political agenda’s and consortiums.

21) Here are Great examples NAMI’s (national alliance for mental illness) who at this time with the NAMI Institute and Stanley Foundation in conjunctions with President Obama’s Administration and the FDA and these numerous Causes of Action through their ACTIONS and Why and What they Created.

22) Senator Grassley’s Senate Panel Investigation of NAMI found them guilty of receiving illegal funds from Big Pharmaceutical Companies. Over three quarters of NAMI’s income 56 million dollars was received illegally in less than two and a half years, and NAMI Institute and the Stanley Foundation in conjunction with the Obama Administration,

23) and the FDA are using this illegal funding to create Experimental blindings, and are educating and encouraging parents from these experimental blindings to have your children medicated for ADHD, because of them theirs a 700 % increase in over misdiagnosis, and the same is happening with the Soldiers and PTSD another over misdiagnosis.

24) Big Pharmaceutical companies newest markets. These drugs the Children are taking such as Methylphenidate or Ritalin or Adderall also endanger the cardiovascular system and commonly produce mental effects, including depression. Stimulants even more often become gateway drugs to additional psychiatric medications.

25) Stimulant-induced over-stimulation, for example, is often treated with additive or dangerous sedatives (Risperidone, etc., while stimulant-induced depression is often treated with dangerous unapproved antidepressants.

26) As the child’s emotional control breaks down due to medication effects, mood stabilizers may be added. Eventually, these children end up on four or five psychiatric drugs at once and a “DIAGNOSIS OF BIPOLAR DISORDER” by the age of eight or ten.

27) Children who are forced to take Methylphenidate or Ritalin or Adderall are more prone or have a higher affinity of becoming drug users CREATING INDUCED DRUG USERS AGAIN NARCOTERRORISM (of all stimulants) due to the profound induced stimulant psychological effects that was forced upon them, that will created even more drug psychosis people being classified as Dual Diagnosis and with having schizophrenic or bipolar,

28) and our Government has CREATED THESE CHILDREN… FUTURE DRUG USERS (NARCOTERRORISM) THAT WILL BECOME LIKE THE 20-30 MILLION Dual Diagnosed. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT OUR STATE SYSTEM IS CREATING YOUR CHILDREN TO BE PERMANENTLY CLASSIFIED A BIPOLAR.

29) A SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS BY THE MEDICATIONS THEY’VE BEEN PRESCRIBED, AND IS HAPPENING TO TENS OF MILLIONS OF CHILDREN IN THE USA ALONE AND THEIR CREATED DRUG USERS THROUGH NARCOTERRORISM.

30) Cited in National Security and International National Security law violations Domestic and International Law, and when all Defendants Countries have Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism in their own right…then Domestic and International Law has become Incompetent and rendered mootness under legal Malfeasance.

31) ##HERE IT IS THE FIRST PART OF THIS ILLEGAL RESEARCH called Psycho-Endo-Neuro-Immunology now referred to as P.E.N.I.) Intentionally Created DOMESTIC TERRORISM and International Domestic Terrorism has entered psychiatry, neurology, neuro-immunolgy, and immunology:

32) The First Incomplete Epidemiological Study: For the study of PENI was because of their instruments needed to conduct Chronic EMF exposure assessments, and they needed these instruments to conduct the Second part of this research.

33) Their Epidemiological study also goes into Cancers, Tumors, tumor growth, all Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in Teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages their also BABY KILLERS cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with CHAPTER 90A – PROTECTION OF UNBORN CHILDREN (§ 1841)

34) and cited in Criminal violations18 U.S. Code § 1992 terrorist attacks under Nuclear and/or radioactive weapons non-ionized radiation is used through their instruments and through the air qualifies this as a violation, and this multiple elastic wave scattering is affecting so many other people who are in path of who ever their doing their illegal research on since the mid 1970’s till present.

35) Since the beginning of the E.P.R.I reports (electric power research institute) and their instruments of acoustics, electromagnetics, microwaves, elastic wave scattering, cyclotron resonance, and a computer and programming, all done on a multi-layered structuring,
36) and can you imagine how many Millions and Millions of people this has been Chronically Affected through the elastic wave scattering and its pathways since the mid 1970’s till present, and remember non-ionized radiation is a carcinogen B causing Cancers, Tumors and tumor growth, all Heart and Autoimmune diseases and in teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages all part(s) of their Epidemiological studies.

37) These researchers and Specialist doctors in the fields of Cancer, Tumors, Tumor Growth, Heart Diseases and Autoimmune Diseases and in Teratology Birth Defects and Miscarriages which coincides with FCC publications and the E.P.R.I. reports, and are outright BLOODY MURDERS for countless Decades with Children, Women, and the Elderly and with Men.

38) Intentional Eradication Extermination Process is because of the Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intention failures to Inform or Warn establishes the requisite “Intent”. The EPA and FCC in which the United States Government is the Only Civilized Country in the world who has NOT established any guild lines or Prudent Cautionary Policy’s for EMF (non-ionized radiation) exposure.

39) ##The second part of this Illegal research was originally called PNI (psych-neuro-immunology) now it’s called P.E.N.I. (psycho-endo-neuro-immunology the study of emotions and stress and how it affects the Immune system:

40) I have exposed Mind Control at its purist form that will make even Mind altering drugs look like baby aspirin (especially when you review project P.E.N.I.’s list of psycho-social stressors. Though Reform or Terminating Cliché’s and the psychology of Totalism and/or Brainwashing, Coercive Persuasion, Mind Abuse,

41) Thought Control and chosen techniques include dehumanizing of individuals (is to make somebody less human by taking away his or her interesting aspects of his or her personality, or his or her compassion and sensitivity towards others), keeping him or her in filth, sleep deprivation, partial sensory deprivation, psychological harassment,

42) inclination(s) of guilt and group social pressure, Cults (although no ones in a cult) but dealing with the shift of focus, mind control and religious conversion, and the loss of Dignity is a term used in moral, ethical, and political discussions to signify that a being has an innate right to respect and ethical treatment, and is a precondition of freedom that is lost in this Escalating Trend OF AN OVER-KILL and very serious Torture.

43) ALL THESE SUBJECTS COINCIDES WITH THE LIST OF PSYCHO-SOCIAL STRESSORS of the study of project P.E.N.I. and look it up under Mind Body Medicine.

44) These are ALL EXTREME violations of Article 6 of the Rome Statutes in accordance with the ICC on the Crimes of Genocide are (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,

45) Intentionally Created induced drug usage (again NARCOTERRORISM) from hallucinogens, psychedelics, entactogens, stimulants, depressants, dissociative’s, and deliriants as a legitimate means of creating and/or establishing a history of drug and alchohol usage to substantiate a legal mental health consumer status to remain in the mental health and judicial systems

46) Major crimes of violence, (excellent example Brian Uyesugi Hawaii’s most famous killers (the Xerox killer) killing 7 people at his work at Xerox (affecting other innocent people’s lives who can now experience psycho-social stressors like bereavement, because of strange poking in his neck and black and white shadowy figures (the same experiences as many others who took my questionnaire,

47) and because my prototype will tap the memory of people associated with project P.E.N.I and this will be recorded proving this type of extreme violence is common place since the mid 1970’s as a Part of project P.E.N.I.’s studies, and how is that for Homicide violations and look at how many people will have Personal Knowledge of this because they are a part of

48) Psycho (psychiatry)-Endo-Neuro(neurologists)-Immunology(immunologists and their Universities and Hospitals. Including domestic violence, divorce, etc and is truly and Over-Kill from this Derelict Science and Now you know why the RISE in Domestic Violence.

49) THE PROGRESSION that are Cited in violation of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 & 19 U.S. Code are derived through the Intentional Avoidance of Liability creating the Intentional Failures to Inform or Warn this INTENT now leads to Murder in the 1st and 2nd.

50) Cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 2331 are the violations against all Defendants – Definitions the term is a now Manifestation of the growing Intentionally Created “domestic terrorism” and ”international domestic terrorism”.

51) Cited in violation of ACTIONS and Inactions and in accordance with the RICO Act Title 18 U.S.C. the progression of all Defendants constitutes a Grand Scale Conspiracy with Defendants operation of management of the enterprise, and the pattern.

52) Then the relatedness, and then continuity, and then multiple schemes and the pattern, and then racketeering activity, and then the issue of consent, AND THIS IS HAPPENING TO THE 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS THIS IS THE ULTIMATE TERRORISTS Act Imaginable;

53) Then going into citing’s violations of and cited in accordance with the great Era of Sedition influencers and now including all charges from aboves paragraphs, but now including National Security violations and International National Security violations, Conspiracies under U.S.C. 18 against the public, or such as endanger the public health, violate public morals, insult public justice, destroy the public peace, or affect public trade or business.

54) Re: the False Claims Act, and INTRODUCING SEQUESTRATION and Sequestration Multiplication process when our Federal Deficit which will be 571 Trillion dollars by the year 2037 surpassing our economy, and are violations of and cited in accordance with goes into everything cited above but now including the monetary intent aspects of all defendants

55) that is perverse by the dumb fucks when sequestrations multiplication process has gotten all Defendants into a 100 trillion dollar False Claims Act fraud-ing its own taxpayers, which in the ICC will get 3 X this settlement of 300+ trillion, and has created Crimes of Genocide, Crimes on Humanity, Crimes of war and for the First Crimes of Aggression,

56) and international national security violations creating this environmental impact that has become so catastrophic, also making our health systems, Legislature, Congress, Supreme Courts, FDA, FCC, EPA, and the Presidents and his administration the number 1 cause of death.

57) Then extortion under Color of Official Right, and then extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Governmental Power(s) Then you have the False Claims Act and HOW IS THIS FOR AFFECTING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE OR ECONOMY A 100 Trillion dollar Federal False Claims Act suit which equals Three times 100 Trillion dollars

58) that these Defendants has sustained because of Defendants’ actions, plus a civil penalty of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 for each violation of 31 U.S.C. §3729; (Now this alone is 75 Million times $5,500.00, and not more than $11,000.00)

59) and bring in the 50-70 million more TBI consumers which would fetch this Court anywhere from Six Trillion to Twenty Two Trillion dollars on “just civil penalties” to this Honorable Court in which this Court will ASSESS the Maximum and take the 22 Trillion plus.

60) THIS IS THE MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS (example the United States federal deficit by the year 2037 will 571 trillion dollars surpassing it economy) THAT WILL MAKE ALL DEFENDANT COUNTRIES DEFICITS EXCEED THEIR TOTAL ECONOMIES AND IS A MAJOR MITIGATING FACTOR TO AN INTENTIONAL ERADICATION EXTERMINATION PROCESS THAT HAS ALREADY EXCEEDED THE HOLOCAUSTE 10 PLUS TIMES.

61) THAT COSTS THE TAXPAYERS WORLDWIDE OVER a 150 TRILION DOLLARS (since just the year 2000 to present) in WHICH THE HEALTH SYSTEM DOES’’T EVEN COME CLOSE TO A FRACTION IN GROSS PROFITS WHICH IS NOT STIMULATING OUR ECONOMY ITS KILLING NATIONS COMPARED TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS AND THIS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENTAL DEFICIT that includes our Health System(s) as the Major causes and is the #1 cause of Death.

62) Our Enemies are our own Government(s) and it’s conduit’s that has CREATED the beginning OF TERRORISM and the INSURGENCE of a more widespread OF TERRORISM as a “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” ALTHOUGH IT TOO HAS CREATED AN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, and the OBVIOUS DECLINE of DEMOCRACY(s) Role on an INTERNATIONAL LEVEL.

63) The Cruz: ##COMPARE TERRORISM to the 75 plus million Mental Health consumers the Intentionally Created “Domestic Terrorism” and “International Domestic Terrorism” I’ve presented in the Instant Charge of Human Rights Genocide violations, and the other 50-70 million TBI consumers (per year worldwide).

64) Then cited are violations of National Security laws and International National Security Laws in accordance with ###CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS, #INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCIES, PRESIDENTIAL POWER AND PERSUASION, #CONGRESS: DOES AN EFFECTIVE CHECK REMAIN ON PRESIDENTIAL POWER? , and #ENTER THE JUDICIARY: WILL IT ACT TO RESTORE THE BALANCE?, KEYS TO EFFECTIVE PRESIDENTIAL LEADERSHIP CONGRESSIONAL-PRESIDENTIAL COLLABORATION

65) has already PROVEN to be an Overwhelming widespread of SEDITION and CONCLUSION, Domestic and International Law, and when all Defendants Countries have Intentionally Created Domestic Terrorism in their own right…then Domestic and International Law has become Incompetent and rendered mootness under legal Malfeasance.

66) ENTER THE GREAT ERA OF SEDITION also known as treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness, subversion, mutiny, rebellion, high treason, lèse-majesté, apostasy, and perfidy. Our next President can be impeached right after being sworn into office as well as other incumbent Presidents and/or Prime Ministers in other Countries.

67) #THINK TANKS, #The Revolving Door Using both the public media (whom I’ve shown to have Political Agenda’s and is a Major Influencer that has become Malice and are in Direct violations of National Security Law violations and International National Security Law violations) and their own publishing resources, as well as the Internet, think tanks attempt to engage and educate the public.

68) and these are the other countries (Defendants) following in the USA footsteps creating and truly the 1st of a kind in the history when a World creates a Multi-Continent economic collapse at just about the same time… in what I call “Creating a Dumb-ino (domino) Effect”, and the progression of all Defendants constitutes a Grand Scale Conspiracy with Defendants operation of management of the enterprise, and the pattern.

69) Then the relatedness, and then continuity, and then multiple schemes and the pattern, and then racketeering activity, and then the issue of consent, and then extortion under Color of Official Right, and then extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Governmental Power(s) that are Defendants ranging from the State Court(s), Federal Court(s), Legislature, Senators, Presidential candidates, Private Companies,

70) and then other predicate acts related to extortion, and then extraterritorial acts (Defendants Countries speaks for itself), IDENTIFY AND DETERMINE IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL INTERESTS AND DOMESTIC POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS, Survival interests represent the single most important interests for any actor OBLITERATED.

71) This is the very essence of the actor’s existence—the protection of its citizens and institutions from attack by enemies, both foreign and domestic. Prevent the regional proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), BUT IN THIS INCIDENT MASS DESTRUCTION DOESN’T HAVE TO BE “WEAPONS THESE COUNTRIES ARE EXTERMINATING ERADICATING 75 MILLION MENTAL HEALTH CONSUMERS AND ANOTHER 50-70 MILLION TBI CONSUMERS, and this how many TBI consumers there are PER YEAR.

72) This characterization does include qualitative and quantitative violations, and it has because of the Intent through the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, Humanity, and War Crimes and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” THIS SAYS IT ALL.

73) ANALYZE RISK FOR EACH OPTION (Policy decisions affect a complex system of interdependent and interacting dynamics in the environment in this Case the Battlefield was created) and the impact of these intended consequences will carry a much heavier worldwide burden when risk analyze for each option LEAVES THE INTERNATIONAL FOREIGN POLICY OPTIONS NO OPTIONS (it’s like a cancer you must cut out the cancer with the remaining Defendants who have one twelfth of the 300+ Trillion dollars false claims act).

74) There are many ways to assess policy-relevant internal and external environmental factors, threats, and hazards and characterize the likelihood of their occurrence and/or concurrence is that has been and it continues to be ongoing and, is through a Conspiracy of multiple sedition’s (the Great ERA of Sedition).

75) NATIONAL SECURITY POWERS: ARE THE CHECKS IN BALANCE? CHAPTER 9 INTERNATIONAL ORDER, DEFINING INTERNATIONAL ORDER, THE MAJOR IR THEORETICAL PARADIGMS, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism.

76) THAT COSTS THE TAXPAYERS WORLDWIDE OVER a 150 TRILION DOLLARS (since just the year 2000 to present) in WHICH THE HEALTH SYSTEM DOES’’T EVEN COME CLOSE TO A FRACTION IN GROSS PROFITS WHICH IS NOT STIMULATING OUR ECONOMY COMPARED TO SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS AND THIS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENTAL DEFICIT that includes our Health System(s) as the

77) Major causes and is the #1 cause of Death. THE MAJOR IR THEORETICAL PARADIGMS, Realism, Liberalism, Institutionalism, Constructivism, and to be an Idealist is (delusional). CHAPTER 11 (as cited in National Security and International National Security law violations) INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY AND AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY

78) REALISM AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS LIBERAL INSTITUTIONALIST RESPONSE, CONSTRUCTIVISTS AND THE SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS. CONLUSION: TOWARD A GRAND STRATEGY OF HEGEMONY and Hegemony is also a Delusion (as defined as leadership and/or dominance), and Obama’s newest suggested strategy of a One World Order.

79) The widespread of the Democracy Delusion with Defendants who think they are Powerhouses such as the United States, Germany, France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Japan, China, Nigeria, and Columbia.

80) Defendants have proven to be Derelict Murders as opposed to Hegemony and this is the widespread of the Democracy Delusion of Grandeur being exposed. Delivery systems; prevent the emergence of a regional hegemony in important regions;

81) promote the well-being of allies and friends and protect them from external aggression (ONLY BECAUSE THIS IS INTERNAL AGGRESSION) that created the International External AGGRESSION and the furtherance of progression and constitutes these Defendants as being Heinously Incompetent to having any further input into Foreign Policy as it has already created an

82) International Environmental Impact that “can be compared to Thermo Nuclear War”. #UNILATERALISM, MULTILATERALISM, ALONE OR WITH OTHERS? The Rhetoric in the dispute between multi-literalist and unilateralist approaches obscures that there are few foreign policy decisions that are purely one or the other.

83) THIS WILL SOLIDIFY FOREIGN POLICY ONCE AND FOR ALL as a Major Concern especially for the United States of America, Britain, China, Japan, South East Asia, South America, Nigeria, and now with Asian interests in Africa.

84) These Countries Can’t be Influenced into what are Major Economical, and Environmental impact situations and must form different Alliances/Unions in addressing these two Universal topics of such importance that they must not go down with these sinking ships.

85) Unilateralists and multi-lateralists agree that there is little room for compromise on such fundamental issues as survival interests, and COMPROMISE HAS REACHED A POINT OF NO RETURN WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES ON SURVIVAL INTERESTS.

86) Finally, both unilateralists and multi-lateralists agree that the United States should seek to build an international order that will favor the expansion of American values (this has diminished forever in everyone’s hearts especially in the USA political arena, and when Americans and other Defendants “citizens” here about this Court case), “their hearts will be as one broken”.

87) To help preserve America’s dominant position in the world. The United States has a unique opportunity to establish international rules and standards that protect American interests (THEY NEVER HAVE), and this is not protecting American interests or standards through dominance (dominance as cited in Hegemony) pronounced he•gem•o•ny, in “gem” these Defendants are only colored glass not even a semi-precious gem, and it represents the interests and standards that once was.

88) America’s dominance is distorted and Derelict just like its Health System, and with project P.E.N.I., and when your Health system is the #1 cause of death its then is Identical to the Morals and Values of what our Country Has Become as is the other Defendants Countries.

89) CONCLUSION: RECENT TRENDS IN U.S. FOREIGN POLICY #CHAPTER 13 POLICIES ON DEMOCRACY THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING DEMOCRACY AND YES DEMOCRACY NOW HAS A VERY MAJOR PROBLEM IN DEFINING OR RE-DEFING DEMOCRACY…IT HAS BECOME THE WIDESPREAD OF THE DEMOCRACY DELUSION OF GRANDEUR same like what killing the United States and the other Defendant Countries.

90) CHAPTER 14 WORLD REGIONS AND ONE WORLD ORDER…is now Obama’s pleads to the World and a heads up as to how the new administration would be under Hillary Clinton, because the United States of America can’t get out of what they created in these instant Criminal Charges and with other Defendant Countries, and there is NO Regional Stability, creating a very huge Regional Conflict,

91) and it has created and Embedded Terrorism and a direct violation of Jus in bello. CHAPTER 15 “LAWYERS, GUNS, AND MONEY”: #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AND U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY #TRANSNATIONAL THREATS AS DIRECT THREATS, and REMEMBER “TERRORISTS THESE ARE ALL INTENTIONALLY CREATED THREATS” to cover-up a Super Huge Intentional Eradication Extermination process with 75 Million Mental Health consumers, and about 300 million more as cited in this Criminal Investigation.

92) #CHAPTER 8 SECURING AMERICA FROM ATTACK (and the “created terrorists” are here in the United States, Germany, Belgium and abroad and my prototype will resolve this intentionally created worldwide environmental impact and expose this truth behind this Criminal investigation “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

93) #ALTHOUGH IN PRE 9/11 the USA and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES KNEW ABOUT THE TWIN TOWERS AS BEING TARGETS and LET IT HAPPEN…IT’S THE OTHER PEARL HARBOR and YES I CAN PROVE THIS and MANY OTHER COUNTRIES WHO ARE NAMED in this instant Criminal investigation and WITH THE PROOF my Prototype called HALLELUJAH.

Paragraphs 1037 to 1105 Article 6: Genocide Crimes against Genocide and is Superimposed with the Crime of Aggression.
94) (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; This is what qualifies Criminal charges against all Defendants under Article 6 of the Crimes of Genocide (a), (b), and (c).

95) Cited from paragraphs 1106 to 1148 ### Article 7 the Crimes against Humanity: The Crimes against Genocide are Identical as the Crimes against Humanity, but the Crimes against Humanity is being even more Superimposed with the Crimes of Aggression.

96) Cited from paragraphs 1149 to 1582 ### Article 8 the Crimes of War: and Charges of the Crimes of War. The Crimes against Genocide are Identical as the Crimes against Humanity, and the Crimes of War is Identical as the Crimes against Genocide, and the Crimes against Humanity, but the Crimes War is being even more Superimposed with the Crimes of Aggression. THE CRIMES OF WAR ARE JUST LIKE THE PSYCHO-SOCIAL STRESSORS IN MANY WAYS and is Identical to Project P.E.N.I. that has engaged in Seditious conspiracies to kill. THIS IS THE ULTIMATE FORM OF TERRORISM; The Crux: #COMPARE INTENTIONALLY CREATED DOMESTIC TERRORISM and International Domestic Terrorism of the 75 plus million Mental Health consumers and the Intentionally Created Narcoterrorism and the progression into the Crime of Aggression which is an Intentional Eradication Extermination process in the Instant CRIMINAL Charges to Human Rights Genocide violations and culminates the Crime of Aggression, and the furtherance of progression into the Crimes of Genocide, against Humanity, and War Crimes were Intentionally created “they knew and let it happen, and the TRUE INSIGHT as to what the Crime of War and the Crime of Aggression is all about and THAT TRANSNATIONAL THREATS ARE “STRATEGIC DISTRACTIONS” to an overly ridicules over-kill. This Criminal investigation proved beyond a reasonable doubt that this False Claims Act violations has cost the taxpayers worldwide over 150 trillion dollars (just since 2000 to present, I could have stated this back in 1980 or even before that the mid 1950’s) in which the Health System doesn’t even come close to a fraction in gross profits (vs. 150 trillion) which is not Stimulating our Economy compared to SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS AND THIS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENTAL DEFICIT now a 300+ trillion False Claims Act that implicated our Health System(s) as the #1 cause of Death without even going into Iatrogenesis (pharmaceuticals) what a F—ken dumb math.
97) Article 9 the Crimes of Aggression are Superimposed as cited and applied to paragraphs 1 to 1617 who still are Heinous Conspirators doing acts of Intentionally killing (10X the holocaust) that involves the RICO Act for what every Defendant believed was prosperous for them, but equated to a 300+ trillion False Claims Act.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF:
Your Honors a Defendant who violates the Crimes cited in this Complaint and the concurrent Charges with just THE SLAP ON THE WRIST CHARGES THEY’LL BE SERVING MULTIPLE LIFE SENTENCES… IT’S THEIR PANIC TIME.
The Intentionally created avoidance of liabilities with all Defendants created the Intentional failures to Inform or Warn, and their Heinous conscious, callous, deliberate indifferences that were wanton, reckless and very malicious. The multitude and magnitude of this ongoing Malfeasance are acts that truly are unthinkable unspeakable, and unforgettable. To see the extent of such horrible suffering(s) from unborn babies to children to young adults to women and man and to grandmothers and grandfathers that has violated every Criminal Charge in this Criminal investigation from a Derelict Science that affected everything thing from your head to your toe, and the Duration of such suffering(s) began from children to young adults to women and man and to grandmothers and grandfathers this progression just so that they could get the epidemiological results from chronic EMF exposure assessments, and from Chronic situations dealing with emotional and physical suffering(s) and protracted stress and the obvious end results were YES IT WILL KILL YOU EVERYWAY IN ALL ILLNESSES, and has exceeded the Holocaust 10X, and all World Wars, and the War on Terrorism combined.
This has equated as being the worse form of Terrorism Ever even worse than a thermos nuclear weapon hitting any State.
These Defendants deserve the Death penalty to having concurrent life sentences in prison and many could exceed this depending on their caseloads. Regardless this is obviously the realistic approach and because of the Magnitude of such Heinous violations against the Human race its makes your jobs easier in passing sentence(s) to its fullest (many will commit suicide guaranteed).
Your Honors will be able to Motion for Assets Forfeiture and/or Forfeiture cited in violations of Actions and Inactions and in accordance with 18 U.S. Code § 1031 – Major fraud against the United States and from Criminal Charges.
The maximum fine imposed upon a defendant for a prosecution including a prosecution with multiple counts under this section shall not exceed $10,000,000, and other citing’s imposes smaller fines to $5,000,000.00 to $1,000,000.00 to a $1,000.00 depending on the scope of concurrent Criminal Charges, and the other aspect in how it applies to Civil Remedies.
I am publishing my eBook by the beginning of next year 2017 and my eBooks guarantees these people $5,000,000.00 who have been affected by over antipsychotic/anti-depressant usage and who have Extensive Structural brain damage caused by Defendants who have taken MRI, fMRI, SPECT and PET scan proving this to be awarded this through this Competent Court so please seize all assets and/or assets forfeiture for these people(s) they are the unsuspected injured and deserve some sort of restitution, and in this process it will re stimulate economy they never had this much money and are great spenders, and who’s families can make trust funds for them only and even for a house of their own.
I also intent to guarantee this in these Countries incompetent Courts as well to create below if necessary to safeguard the people(s). With this process of re stimulating economy through them…Governments now can abruptly stop this type of extreme socialism and put perspectives in order instead of just stopping these overly unnecessary benefits like what Britain did, but most of all to stop a Super Revolution if done in the wrong way.
Governments like the United States of America’s and other Defendant Countries Greatest fears are in having Simultaneous Super Revolutions where the people(s) have a Revolution against their Government or in this case against their Governments (Super Revolution) creating the utmost chaos and economic damage.
Another of these Governments Greatest fears are the States of these Countries breaking off and going into Independent States, and creating their own Government and creating their own survival interests.
THIS MIGHT HAPPEN ANYWAY.
This Criminal investigation proved beyond a reasonable doubt that this False Claims Act violations has cost the taxpayers worldwide over 150 trillion dollars (just since 2000 to present, I could have stated this back in 1980 or even before that the mid 1950’s) in which the Health System doesn’t even come close to a fraction in gross profits (vs. 150 trillion) which is not Stimulating our Economy compared to SEQUESTRATIONS MULTIPLICATION PROCESS AND THIS WORLDWIDE GOVERNMENTAL DEFICIT now a 300+ trillion False Claims Act that implicated our Health System(s) as the #1 cause of Death without even going into Iatrogenesis (pharmaceuticals) what a F—ken dumb math.
Also the United Nations is a Universal Court that has lost all of its Integrity from the Geneva Convention, its Articles dealing with Human Rights violations and Genocide. There are and Incompetent and Moot Court that implicates them as being Malfeasant (evil doing). When they try to sanction or impose its force against other Countries they could be held liable for Criminal Charges as well as Civil penalties in future events that’s manifested from this greatest of heinous Criminal investigation and case in the history of the World.
Relator Wilard Max Imamoto humbly asks to be awarded the maximum amount allowed pursuant to §3730(d) of the False Claims Act (about 15-17% of the 25% maximum allowed equals 45+ trillion). That Relator be awarded all costs of this action, including attorneys’ fees and expenses; and that Relator recover such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.

FROM HERE ON LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THIS HONORABLE COURT YOU KNOW YOUR JOBS AS BELOW APPLIES:
Article 10
Nothing in this Part shall be interpreted as limiting or prejudicing in any way existing or developing rules of international law for purposes other than this Statute.

Article 11: Jurisdiction ratione temporis
1. The Court has jurisdiction only with respect to crimes committed after the entry into force of this Statute.
2. If a State becomes a Party to this Statute after its entry into force, the Court may exercise its jurisdiction only with respect to crimes committed after the entry into force of this Statute for that State, unless that State has made a declaration under article 12, paragraph 3.

Article 12: Preconditions to the exercise of jurisdiction
1. A State which becomes a Party to this Statute thereby accepts the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the crimes referred to in article 5.
2. In the case of article 13, paragraph (a) or (c), the Court may exercise its jurisdiction if one or more of the following States are Parties to this Statute or have accepted the jurisdiction of the Court in accordance with paragraph 3:
(a) The State on the territory of which the conduct in question occurred or, if the crime was committed on board a vessel or aircraft, the State of registration of that vessel or aircraft;
(b) The State of which the person accused of the crime is a national.
3. If the acceptance of a State which is not a Party to this Statute is required under paragraph 2, that State may, by declaration lodged with the Registrar, accept the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court with respect to the crime in question. The accepting State shall cooperate with the Court without any delay or exception in accordance with Part 9.

Article 13: Exercise of jurisdiction
The Court may exercise its jurisdiction with respect to a crime referred to in article 5 in accordance with the provisions of this Statute if:
(a) A situation in which one or more of such crimes appears to have been committed is referred to the Prosecutor by a State Party in accordance with article 14;
(b) A situation in which one or more of such crimes appears to have been committed is referred to the Prosecutor by the Security Council acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations; or
(c) The Prosecutor has initiated an investigation in respect of such a crime in accordance with article 15.

####3Article 14: Referral of a situation by a State Party
1. A State Party may refer to the Prosecutor a situation in which one or more crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court appear to have been committed requesting the Prosecutor to investigate the situation for the purpose of determining whether one or more specific persons should be charged with the commission of such crimes.
2. As far as possible, a referral shall specify the relevant circumstances and be accompanied by such supporting documentation as is available to the State referring the situation.

#####Article 15: Prosecutor
1. The Prosecutor may initiate investigations proprio motu on the basis of information on crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.
2. The Prosecutor shall analyze the seriousness of the information received. For this purpose, he or she may seek additional information from States, organs of the United Nations, intergovernmental or non-governmental organizations, or other reliable sources that he or she deems appropriate, and may receive written or oral testimony at the seat of the Court.
3. If the Prosecutor concludes that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, he or she shall submit to the Pre-Trial Chamber a request for authorization of an investigation, together with any supporting material collected. Victims may make representations to the Pre-Trial Chamber, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
4. If the Pre-Trial Chamber, upon examination of the request and the supporting material, considers that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, and that the case appears to fall within the jurisdiction of the Court, it shall authorize the commencement of the investigation, without prejudice to subsequent determinations by the Court with regard to the jurisdiction and admissibility of a case.
5. The refusal of the Pre-Trial Chamber to authorize the investigation shall not preclude the presentation of a subsequent request by the Prosecutor based on new facts or evidence regarding the same situation.
6. If, after the preliminary examination referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Prosecutor concludes that the information provided does not constitute a reasonable basis for an investigation, he or she shall inform those who provided the information. This shall not preclude the Prosecutor from considering further information submitted to him or her regarding the same situation in the light of new facts or evidence.

Article 16: Deferral of investigation or prosecution
No investigation or prosecution may be commenced or proceeded with under this Statute for a period of 12 months after the Security Council, in a resolution adopted under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, has requested the Court to that effect; that request may be renewed by the Council under the same conditions.

Article 17: Issues of admissibility
1. Having regard to paragraph 10 of the Preamble and article 1, the Court shall determine that a case is inadmissible where:
(a) The case is being investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution; In which I’ve already proven///////////////////////////////////
(b) The case has been investigated by a State which has jurisdiction over it and the State has decided not to prosecute the person concerned, unless the decision resulted from the unwillingness or inability of the State genuinely to prosecute;
(c) The person concerned has already been tried for conduct which is the subject of the complaint, and a trial by the Court is not permitted under article 20, paragraph 3;
(d) The case is not of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.
2. In order to determine unwillingness in a particular case, the Court shall consider, having regard to the principles of due process recognized by international law, whether one or more of the following exist, as applicable:
(a) The proceedings were or are being undertaken or the national decision was made for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court referred to in article 5;
(b) There has been an unjustified delay in the proceedings which in the circumstances is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice;
(c) The proceedings were not or are not being conducted independently or impartially, and they were or are being conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.
3. In order to determine inability in a particular case, the Court shall consider whether, due to a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of its national judicial system, the State is unable to obtain the accused or the necessary evidence and testimony or otherwise unable to carry out its proceedings.

Article 18: Preliminary rulings regarding admissibility
1. When a situation has been referred to the Court pursuant to article 13 (a) and the Prosecutor has determined that there would be a reasonable basis to commence an investigation, or the Prosecutor initiates an investigation pursuant to articles 13 (c) and 15, the Prosecutor shall notify all States Parties and those States which, taking into account the information available, would normally exercise jurisdiction over the crimes concerned. The Prosecutor may notify such States on a confidential basis and, where the Prosecutor believes it necessary to protect persons, prevent destruction of evidence or prevent the absconding of persons, may limit the scope of the information provided to States.
2. Within one month of receipt of that notification, a State may inform the Court that it is investigating or has investigated its nationals or others within its jurisdiction with respect to criminal acts which may constitute crimes referred to in article 5 and which relate to the information provided in the notification to States. At the request of that State, the Prosecutor shall defer to the State’s investigation of those persons unless the Pre-Trial Chamber, on the application of the Prosecutor, decides to authorize the investigation.
3. The Prosecutor’s deferral to a State’s investigation shall be open to review by the Prosecutor six months after the date of deferral or at any time when there has been a significant change of circumstances based on the State’s unwillingness or inability genuinely to carry out the investigation which has already happened.
4. The State concerned or the Prosecutor may appeal to the Appeals Chamber against a ruling of the Pre-Trial Chamber, in accordance with article 82. The appeal may be heard on an expedited basis.
5. When the Prosecutor has deferred an investigation in accordance with paragraph 2, the Prosecutor may request that the State concerned periodically inform the Prosecutor of the progress of its investigations and any subsequent prosecutions. States Parties shall respond to such requests without undue delay.
6. Pending a ruling by the Pre-Trial Chamber, or at any time when the Prosecutor has deferred an investigation under this article, the Prosecutor may, on an exceptional basis, seek authority from the Pre-Trial Chamber to pursue necessary investigative steps for the purpose of preserving evidence where there is a unique opportunity to obtain important evidence or there is a significant risk that such evidence may not be subsequently available.
7. A State which has challenged a ruling of the Pre-Trial Chamber under this article may challenge the admissibility of a case under article 19 on the grounds of additional significant facts or significant change of circumstances.

Article 19: Challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court or the admissibility of a case
1. The Court shall satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction in any case brought before it. The Court may, on its own motion, determine the admissibility of a case in accordance with article 17.
2. Challenges to the admissibility of a case on the grounds referred to in article 17 or challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court may be made by:
(a) An accused or a person for whom a warrant of arrest or a summons to appear has been issued under article 58;
(b) A State which has jurisdiction over a case, on the ground that it is investigating or prosecuting the case or has investigated or prosecuted; or
(c) A State from which acceptance of jurisdiction is required under article 12.
3. The Prosecutor may seek a ruling from the Court regarding a question of jurisdiction or admissibility. In proceedings with respect to jurisdiction or admissibility, those who have referred the situation under article 13, as well as victims, may also submit observations to the Court.
4. The admissibility of a case or the jurisdiction of the Court may be challenged only once by any person or State referred to in paragraph 2. The challenge shall take place prior to or at the commencement of the trial. In exceptional circumstances, the Court may grant leave for a challenge to be brought more than once or at a time later than the commencement of the trial. Challenges to the admissibility of a case, at the commencement of a trial, or subsequently with the leave of the Court, may be based only on article 17, paragraph 1 (c).
5. A State referred to in paragraph 2 (b) and (c) shall make a challenge at the earliest opportunity.
6. Prior to the confirmation of the charges, challenges to the admissibility of a case or challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court shall be referred to the Pre-Trial Chamber. After confirmation of the charges, they shall be referred to the Trial Chamber. Decisions with respect to jurisdiction or admissibility may be appealed to the Appeals Chamber in accordance with article 82.
7. If a challenge is made by a State referred to in paragraph 2 (b) or (c), the Prosecutor shall suspend the investigation until such time as the Court makes a determination in accordance with article 17.
8. Pending a ruling by the Court, the Prosecutor may seek authority from the Court:
(a) To pursue necessary investigative steps of the kind referred to in article 18, paragraph 6;
(b) To take a statement or testimony from a witness or complete the collection and examination of evidence which had begun prior to the making of the challenge; and
(c) In cooperation with the relevant States, to prevent the absconding of persons in respect of whom the Prosecutor has already requested a warrant of arrest under article 58.
9. The making of a challenge shall not affect the validity of any act performed by the Prosecutor or any order or warrant issued by the Court prior to the making of the challenge.
10. If the Court has decided that a case is inadmissible under article 17, the Prosecutor may submit a request for a review of the decision when he or she is fully satisfied that new facts have arisen which negate the basis on which the case had previously been found inadmissible under article 17.
11. If the Prosecutor, having regard to the matters referred to in article 17, defers an investigation, the Prosecutor may request that the relevant State make available to the Prosecutor information on the proceedings. That information shall, at the request of the State concerned, be confidential. If the Prosecutor thereafter decides to proceed with an investigation, he or she shall notify the State to which deferral of the proceedings has taken place.

Article 20: Ne bis in idem
1. Except as provided in this Statute, no person shall be tried before the Court with respect to conduct which formed the basis of crimes for which the person has been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
2. No person shall be tried by another court for a crime referred to in article 5 for which that person has already been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
3. No person who has been tried by another court for conduct also proscribed under article 6, 7 or 8 shall be tried by the Court with respect to the same conduct unless the proceedings in the other court:
(a) Were for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
(b) Otherwise were not conducted independently or impartially in accordance with the norms of due process recognized by international law and were conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, was inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.

Article 21: Applicable law
1. The Court shall apply:
(a) In the first place, this Statute, Elements of Crimes and its Rules of Procedure and Evidence;
(b) In the second place, where appropriate, applicable treaties and the principles and rules of international law, including the established principles of the international law of armed conflict;
(c) Failing that, general principles of law derived by the Court from national laws of legal systems of the world including, as appropriate, the national laws of States that would normally exercise jurisdiction over the crime, provided that those principles are not inconsistent with this Statute and with international law and internationally recognized norms and standards.
2. The Court may apply principles and rules of law as interpreted in its previous decisions.
3. The application and interpretation of law pursuant to this article must be consistent with internationally recognized human rights, and be without any adverse distinction founded on grounds such as gender as defined in article 7, paragraph 3, age, race, colour, language, religion or belief, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth, birth or other status.

PART 3. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW

Article 22: Nullum crimen sine lege
1. A person shall not be criminally responsible under this Statute unless the conduct in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court.
2. The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favor of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted.
3. This article shall not affect the characterization of any conduct as criminal under international law independently of this Statute.

Article 23: Nulla poena sine lege
A person convicted by the Court may be punished only in accordance with this Statute.

Article 24: Non-retroactivity ratione personae
1. No person shall be criminally responsible under this Statute for conduct prior to the entry into force of the Statute.
2. In the event of a change in the law applicable to a given case prior to a final judgment, the law more favorable to the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted shall apply.

Article 25: Individual criminal responsibility
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction over natural persons pursuant to this Statute.
2. A person who commits a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court shall be individually responsible and liable for punishment in accordance with this Statute.
3. In accordance with this Statute, a person shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court if that person:
(a) Commits such a crime, whether as an individual, jointly with another or through another person, regardless of whether that other person is criminally responsible;
(b) Orders, solicits or induces the commission of such a crime which in fact occurs or is attempted;
(c) For the purpose of facilitating the commission of such a crime, aids, abets or otherwise assists in its commission or its attempted commission, including providing the means for its commission;
(d) In any other way contributes to the commission or attempted commission of such a crime by a group of persons acting with a common purpose. Such contribution shall be intentional and shall either:
(i) Be made with the aim of furthering the criminal activity or criminal purpose of the group, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
(ii) Be made in the knowledge of the intention of the group to commit the crime;
(e) In respect of the crime of genocide, directly and publicly incites others to commit genocide;
(f) Attempts to commit such a crime by taking action that commences its execution by means of a substantial step, but the crime does not occur because of circumstances independent of the person’s intentions. However, a person who abandons the effort to commit the crime or otherwise prevents the completion of the crime shall not be liable for punishment under this Statute for the attempt to commit that crime if that person completely and voluntarily gave up the criminal purpose.
4. No provision in this Statute relating to individual criminal responsibility shall affect the responsibility of States under international law.

Article 26: Exclusion of jurisdiction over persons under eighteen
The Court shall have no jurisdiction over any person who was under the age of 18 at the time of the alleged commission of a crime.

Article 27: Irrelevance of official capacity
1. This Statute shall apply equally to all persons without any distinction based on official capacity. In particular, official capacity as a Head of State or Government, a member of a Government or parliament, an elected representative or a government official shall in no case exempt a person from criminal responsibility under this Statute, nor shall it, in and of itself, constitute a ground for reduction of sentence.
2. Immunities or special procedural rules which may attach to the official capacity of a person, whether under national or international law, shall not bar the Court from exercising its jurisdiction over such a person Especially not Criminal Charges.

Article 28: Responsibility of commanders and other superiors
In addition to other grounds of criminal responsibility under this Statute for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court:
(a) A military commander or person effectively acting as a military commander shall be criminally responsible for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court committed by forces under his or her effective command and control, or effective authority and control as the case may be, as a result of his or her failure to exercise control properly over such forces, where:
(i) That military commander or person either knew or, owing to the circumstances at the time, should have known that the forces were committing or about to commit such crimes; and
(ii) That military commander or person failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress their commission or to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.
(b) With respect to superior and subordinate relationships not described in paragraph (a), a superior shall be criminally responsible for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court committed by subordinates under his or her effective authority and control, as a result of his or her failure to exercise control properly over such subordinates, where:
(i) The superior either knew, or consciously disregarded information which clearly indicated, that the subordinates were committing or about to commit such crimes;
(ii) The crimes concerned activities that were within the effective responsibility and control of the superior; and
(iii) The superior failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress their commission or to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.

Article 29: Non-applicability of statute of limitations
The crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court shall not be subject to any statute of limitations.

Article 30: Mental element
1. Unless otherwise provided, a person shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court only if the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge.
2. For the purposes of this article, a person has intent where:
(a) In relation to conduct, that person means to engage in the conduct;
(b) In relation to a consequence, that person means to cause that consequence or is aware that it will occur in the ordinary course of events.
3. For the purposes of this article, “knowledge” means awareness that a circumstance exists or a consequence will occur in the ordinary course of events. “Know” and “knowingly” shall be construed accordingly.

Article 31: Grounds for excluding criminal responsibility
1. In addition to other grounds for excluding criminal responsibility provided for in this Statute, a person shall not be criminally responsible if, at the time of that person’s conduct:
(a) The person suffers from a mental disease or defect that destroys that person’s capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct to conform to the requirements of law;
(b) The person is in a state of intoxication that destroys that person’s capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct to conform to the requirements of law, unless the person has become voluntarily intoxicated under such circumstances that the person knew, or disregarded the risk, that, as a result of the intoxication, he or she was likely to engage in conduct constituting a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(c) The person acts reasonably to defend himself or herself or another person or, in the case of war crimes, property which is essential for the survival of the person or another person or property which is essential for accomplishing a military mission, against an imminent and unlawful use of force in a manner proportionate to the degree of danger to the person or the other person or property protected. The fact that the person was involved in a defensive operation conducted by forces shall not in itself constitute a ground for excluding criminal responsibility under this subparagraph;
(d) The conduct which is alleged to constitute a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been caused by duress resulting from a threat of imminent death or of continuing or imminent serious bodily harm against that person or another person, and the person acts necessarily and reasonably to avoid this threat, provided that the person does not intend to cause a greater harm than the one sought to be avoided. Such a threat may either be:
(i) Made by other persons; or
(ii) Constituted by other circumstances beyond that person’s control.
2. The Court shall determine the applicability of the grounds for excluding criminal responsibility provided for in this Statute to the case before it.
3. At trial, the Court may consider a ground for excluding criminal responsibility other than those referred to in paragraph 1 where such a ground is derived from applicable law as set forth in article 21. The procedures relating to the consideration of such a ground shall be provided for in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.

Article 32: Mistake of fact or mistake of law
1. A mistake of fact shall be a ground for excluding criminal responsibility only if it negates the mental element required by the crime.
2. A mistake of law as to whether a particular type of conduct is a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court shall not be a ground for excluding criminal responsibility. A mistake of law may, however, be a ground for excluding criminal responsibility if it negates the mental element required by such a crime, or as provided for in article 33.
Article 33: Superior orders and prescription of law
1. The fact that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed by a person pursuant to an order of a Government or of a superior, whether military or civilian, shall not relieve that person of criminal responsibility unless:
(a) The person was under a legal obligation to obey orders of the Government or the superior in question;
(b) The person did not know that the order was unlawful; and
(c) The order was not manifestly unlawful.
2. For the purposes of this article, orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s